RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Disseminating new safe practices has proved challenging. In a statewide initiative we developed a framework for (1) selecting two safe practices, (2) developing operational details of implementation, (3) enlisting hospitals to participate, and (4) facilitating implementation. METHODS: Potential topics were selected by a multistep process to identify candidate practices, review the evidence for efficacy and feasibility, and then select them on the basis of importance, efficacy, feasibility, and impact. A multi-stakeholder advisory group representing all constituencies selected two practices: reconciling medications (RM) and communicating critical test results (CTR). Operational details and strategies for implementation were then developed for each practice using a consensus process of discipline stakeholders led by content experts. Hospital CEOs were solicited to participate by the Massachusetts Hospital Association which made the project a "flagship" initiative. A collaborative model was used to facilitate implementation, following the IHI Model for Improvement. In addition to providing exposure to content and method experts, we gave teams a "toolkit" containing recommendations, a change package, and implementation strategies. Each collaborative met four times over an 18 month period. Results were assessed using the IHI team assessment scale and surveys of teams and hospital leaders. RESULTS: Hospital participation rate was high with 88% of hospitals participating in one or both collaboratives. Partial implementation of the practices was achieved by 50% of RM teams and 65% of CTR teams. Full implementation was achieved by 20% of teams for each. CONCLUSIONS: Major factors leading to hospital participation included the intrinsic appeal of the practices, access to experts, and the availability of implementation strategies. Team success was correlated with active engagement of a senior administrator, engagement of physicians, increased use of PDSA cycles, and attendance at collaborative meetings. The prior development of subpractices, recommendations and implementation strategies was essential for the hospital teams. These should be well worked out before hospitals are required to implement any guideline.
Assuntos
Comportamento Cooperativo , Difusão de Inovações , Medicina Baseada em Evidências/normas , Coalizão em Cuidados de Saúde , Erros Médicos/prevenção & controle , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto/normas , Desenvolvimento de Programas/métodos , Gestão da Segurança/organização & administração , Comunicação , Consenso , Hospitais/normas , Humanos , Equipes de Administração Institucional , Liderança , Participação nas Decisões , MassachusettsRESUMO
The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations requires accredited organizations to use a performance measurement system that meets its inclusion requirements to satisfy performance outcome and measurement expectations. The system, known as the ORYX initiative, is used for both internal performance control and external performance comparisons. This article outlines a three-step approach to using a performance measurement system based on the philosophy of continuous improvement and the methods of statistical process control (SPC). SPC, the methodology recommended by the Joint Commission, can be applied to the analysis of many quality measures and can be implemented with Microsoft Excel software.