Neuroprotective effect of magnesium sulfate in premature infants. Analysis after establishing an antenatal administration protocol in a tertiary care hospital.

INTRODUCTION: In 2016, a protocol was developed in our hospital for the antenatal administration of magnesium sulfate in pregnant women at risk of imminent preterm birth as a method to reduce the risk of cerebral palsy (CP). MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study in a level IIIC hospital with the primary objective of comparing the incidence of CP before and after the implementation of this protocol. Among the secondary outcomes, we ought to highlight the incidence of cognitive deficits and necrotizing enterocolitis and the mortality in both groups. The sample consisted of preterm newborns delivered before 32 weeks of gestation in 2011-2012 (prior to the implementation of the protocol) and in 2016-2018 (after the implementation of the protocol, whose mothers had received magnesium sulfate for neuroprotection). The clinical and epidemiological characteristics of both groups were comparable. RESULTS: We collected data for a total of 523 patients, 263 and 260 in each group. As regards the primary outcome, we did not find statistically significant differences between groups. We observed a statistically significant reduction in mortality and the risk of severe necrotizing enterocolitis in the group of patients born in the 2016-2018 period and between 26+0 and 27+6 weeks of gestation, whose mothers had received magnesium sulfate. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, the administration of magnesium sulfate to mothers at risk of preterm birth did not decrease the risk of developing CP.

How Much Do Parents Know About Pain in Their Children?

OBJECTIVES: Adequate pain control is essential to the comprehensive management of pediatric patients within the emergency department.The aim of this study is to evaluate parents' knowledge about pain in the pediatric population patient and secondarily describe erroneous concepts that can affect a correct children's pain management. METHODS: A single-center descriptive study of cross-sectional surveys was performed between October and December 2018, with a previously validated ad hoc and anonymous questionnaire consisting of 9 items. All parents/guardians participating in the study had a child aged 0 to 18 years who had been admitted to the emergency department. RESULTS: Sixty-nine percent (n = 315) were women, 49.9% (n = 226) had university degrees and only 11% (n = 50) had professions related to the healthcare system. A linear association was observed between the number of correct answers and the level of education (ß = 1.04; 95% confidence interval, 0.76-1.32; P < 0.001), as well as between parents with professions related to the healthcare system compared with other professions (61.4% vs 51.2% with P = 0.005). The responses of Spanish parents offered better results than answers obtained from parents from the American continent (56.4% vs 41.4% with P < 0.001). No differences were observed between parents of children with chronic diseases. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, we observed that a considerable percentage of parents hold misconceptions about how children express pain, and therefore, it would be necessary to encourage formation programs for parents to help identify, evaluate, and correctly treat pain in their children.