The mini-temporalis turnover flap for midface reanimation: Photogrammetric and patient-rated outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Mini-temporalis transposition (MTT) flaps, modified from Gillies' technique, have become less popular than temporalis tendon transfers for midface reanimation. MTT involves raising the middle third of the temporalis, transposition over the zygomatic arch and lengthening with deep temporalis fascia which is sutured to the orbicularis oris. AIM: This retrospective study assessed subjective and objective outcomes following MTTs by a single surgeon from 2009 to 2019. METHODS: Operative and surgical details were recorded. Four blinded consultants rated pre- and postoperative videos according to Terzis' scale. Pre- and postoperative resting, Mona Lisa and canine smile photographs were analysed using Emotrics, the software that automatically computes differences in inter-landmark distances. Patients also completed the Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI) patient-rated outcome measure. RESULTS: Forty-one patients (mean age 65.8 ±â€¯15.5) underwent MTT, median 3 (0.4-57) years post-paralysis and were followed up for median of 2.2 (0.4-8.8) years. Higher mean postoperative Terzis score demonstrates symmetric and aesthetic improvements (3 ±â€¯1.3 vs. 2 ±â€¯1; p<0.05). Emotrics analysis showed postoperative improvements in resting and dynamic symmetry of all indices, with the majority statistically significant (p<0.003). The mean GBI was 35.19 with 17 (94.4%) patients reporting improvement, whereas one (5.6%) patient reported detriment after surgery. Two (5.4%) patients suffered complications: one haematoma and one infection. Four patients (9.8%) required revisional flap tightening. No patients requested revisional surgery for temporal hollowing or zygomatic fullness. CONCLUSIONS: MTT effectively improves both subjective and objective resting and dynamic midface symmetry in a single stage. These results suggest this technique is a good alternative to temporalis tendon transfer techniques.

Closure of midline contaminated and recurrent incisional hernias with components separation technique reinforced with plication of the rectus muscles.

PURPOSE: Midline incisional hernia reconstruction by defect closure and reinforcement with either prosthetic or biologic materials has shown to significantly decrease recurrence rates even for complex cases. The purpose of this study is to evaluate outcomes regarding large incisional hernia reconstruction with components separation technique using rectus muscle plication as a reinforcement method. METHODS: Thirteen patients having large midline incisional hernias and either history of abdominal wall contamination or recurrence in the presence of mesh were treated between January 2007 and December 2011 with closure using components separation technique reinforced by rectus muscle plication. RESULTS: Average hernia square was 222 cm(2), and mean follow-up was 24 months. Complications occurred in 6 patients with a mean time to resolution of 59 days. One recurrence was present. CONCLUSIONS: When use of mesh or biologic materials is not desired, rectus muscle plication is a feasible tool as a reinforcement method after large hernia closure with components separation.