Understanding Training Needs in Pediatric Feeding for Allied Health Professionals: An Australian Perspective.

PURPOSE: Clinician experience and confidence can negatively impact pediatric feeding service availability, but limited research has investigated what training allied health professionals (AHPs) need to increase these factors. This study developed and distributed a survey investigating Australian AHPs' self-reported confidence and anxiousness, training needs, factors impacting training access, and training preferences. METHOD: This study was conducted over two phases. Phase 1 involved development and refinement of the survey, and Phase 2 involved distribution to Australian AHPs. Questions pertained to general demographics, feeding experience, feeding confidence and skills perception, and training needs. The questions were composed of multiple-choice, Likert scale, and short-response options. RESULTS: Overall, 198 complete responses were received. Participants reported significantly lower confidence and higher anxiousness working with infants compared to older children (p < .01). Increased frequency of service provision predicted higher self-reported confidence and lower anxiousness (p < .01). Practical training opportunities including case discussion, videos, and clinical feedback were preferred. Access facilitators were online, on-demand training; however, respondents reported preferring hands-on training opportunities. Common barriers included cost, time, competing professional development priorities, and distance/travel. CONCLUSIONS: Findings have highlighted that recency and frequency of practice impact self-reported confidence and anxiousness, and that AHPs self-report lowest confidence and highest anxiety working with infants compared to older age groups. Overall, the findings highlight the need for flexible, practical, and remotely accessible training opportunities, as well as the need for access to regular clinical supervision and a pediatric feeding caseload.

Testing and Development of Slightly Thick Infant Formula Recipes for Dysphagia Management: An Australian Perspective.

Thickened feeds may be useful in supporting improved suck-swallow-breath coordination and airway protection in infants with dysphagia. Unfortunately, the stability of thickened feeds for infant formulas is unpredictable, which makes use of this strategy challenging. This study aimed to propose a set of Level 1 (slightly thick) recipes for Australian infant formulas/thickeners. A secondary aim was to test whether formula could be batch prepared. A set of powdered, ready-to-feed, and specialized formulas were mixed with two thickening products (Aptamil Feed Thickener® and Supercol®) and tested at 5-, 10-, 15-, 20-, 25-, 30-, and 45-min intervals using the International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative (IDDSI) Flow Test. Formula/thickener samples were mixed following manufacturer instructions, but recipes were adapted to determine an ideal recipe for Level 1 (slightly thick) consistency that would be maintained over a feed. Samples were refrigerated, reheated after 12 h, and retested. Each combination was tested six times. Overall, 1,353 IDDSI Flow Tests were conducted using 14 formula/thickener combinations. In all combinations, recipe alterations were made using metric spoon measurements as opposed to the manufacturer-provided scoop. All samples were most variable at the 5-min timepoint. Formulas thickened with Supercol® generally reached a more stable consistency by 10 min, whereas formulas thickened with Aptamil Feed Thickener® were more stable by 15 min. Samples tested after 12 h were more variable with Aptamil Feed Thickener®. This study provides practical recommendations for clinicians working with infants requiring thickened feeds for dysphagia management. Further study under controlled laboratory conditions is required.