EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF USTEKINUMAB FOR CHRONIC POUCHITIS: A PROSPECTIVE OPEN-LABEL MULTICENTER STUDY.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Seventeen percent of patients with ulcerative colitis that undergo proctocolectomy with pouch surgery will develop chronic pouchitis. We evaluated the efficacy of ustekinumab for these patients. METHODS: We performed a prospective study of chronic pouchitis patients receiving ustekinumab intravenously at baseline (∼6mg/kg) and 90mg ustekinumab subcutaneously every 8 weeks thereafter. The modified pouchitis disease activity index (mPDAI) was assessed at baseline, week 16 and 48. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving steroid-free remission (mPDAI <5 and reduction by ≥2 points) at week 16. Secondary endpoints included the proportion of patients achieving remission at week 48, the proportion of patients achieving response (reduction of mPDAI by ≥2 points) at week 16 and 48, and change in mPDAI. RESULTS: We enrolled 22 patients (59% male, median age 42.2 years). Remission was achieved in 27.3% at week 16 and 36.4% at week 48. Response was achieved in 54.5% both at week 16 and 48. The median (IQR) mPDAI decreased from 8 (7-10) to 7 (4-9) at week 16 (p=0.007) and 4 (1.75-7.25) at week 48 (p<0.001). The clinical mPDAI subscore decreased from 3.5 (2-4) to 2 (1-3) at week 16 (p=0.009) and 1 (0-2.25) at week 48 (p=0.001). The endoscopic mPDAI subscore decreased from 5.5 (4-6) to 4 (3-6) at week 16 (p=0.032) and 3 (1.75-4.25) at week 48 (p=0.001). CONCLUSION: Ustekinumab was efficacious in half of the patients suffering from chronic pouchitis. Ustekinumab should therefore be positioned in the treatment algorithm of chronic pouchitis. (ClinicalTrials.gov Number NCT04089345).

Fibrostricturing Crohn's disease is marked by an increase in active eosinophils in the deeper layers.

INTRODUCTION: Approximately 50% of Crohn's disease (CD) patients develop intestinal strictures necessitating surgery. The immune cell distribution in these strictures remains uncharacterized. We aimed to identify the immune cells in intestinal strictures of CD patients. METHODS: During ileocolonic resections, transmural sections of terminal ileum were sampled from 25 CD patients and 10 non-inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) controls. Macroscopically, unaffected, fibrostenotic and inflamed ileum was collected and analysed for immune cell distribution (flow cytometry) and protein expression. Collagen deposition was assessed via a Masson's Trichrome staining. Eosinophil and fibroblast co-localization was assessed through immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: The Masson's Trichrome staining confirmed augmented collagen deposition in both the fibrotic as the inflamed region, though with a significant increased collagen deposition in fibrotic compared to inflamed tissue. Distinct Th1, Th2, regulatory T cells, dendritic cells and monocytes were identified in fibrotic and inflamed CD ileum compared to unaffected ileum of CD patients as non-IBD controls. Only minor differences were observed between fibrotic and inflamed tissue, with more active eosinophils in fibrotic deeper layers and increased Eosinophil Cationic Protein (ECP) protein expression in inflamed deeper layers. Lastly, no differences in eosinophil and fibroblast co-localization was observed between the different regions. CONCLUSION: This study characterized immune cell distribution and protein expression in fibrotic and inflamed ileal tissue of CD patients. Immunologic, proteomic and histological data suggest inflammation and fibrosis are intertwined, with large overlap between both tissue types. However strikingly, we did identify an increased presence of active eosinophils only in the fibrotic deeper layers, suggesting their potential role in fibrosis development.

Long-term risk of delayed postoperative Crohn's disease recurrence in patients with no or mild endoscopic recurrence at first assessment.

BACKGROUND: Early endoscopic evaluation is recommended for assessment of postoperative recurrence (POR) of Crohn's disease (CD) but no further monitoring recommendations are available. AIM: To evaluate the long-term outcome of patients without endoscopic POR at first endoscopic assessment. METHODS: Retrospective four-centre study including consecutive CD patients with ileocolonic resection (ICR) without endoscopic POR (Rutgeerts score i0-i1) at first endoscopic assessment performed within 18 months from ICR. All patients had a clinical follow-up ≥24 months and at least one further endoscopic assessment. Main outcomes were endoscopic, clinical and surgical POR, need for rescue therapy and "delayed POR" (any need for rescue therapy or clinical or surgical POR) during follow-up. RESULTS: Overall, 183 patients were included (79% with risk factors for POR, 44% without postoperative prophylaxis). Endoscopic POR was observed in 42% of patients. Clinical POR-free survival was 89.4% and 81.5% at 3 and 5 years, and delayed POR-free survival was 76.9% and 63.4% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. In multivariate analysis, postoperative prophylaxis (HR .55; 95% CI .325-.942) and active smoking (HR 1.72; 95%CI 1.003-2.962) were independent risk factors for clinical POR, whereas presence of mild endoscopic lesions at index ileocolonoscopy (i1) was the only risk factor for delayed POR (HR 1.824; 95% CI 1.108-3.002). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term risk of POR among patients with no or mild endoscopic lesions at first ileocolonoscopy after surgery is steadily low, being higher among smokers, in the absence of postoperative prophylaxis and when mild endoscopic lesions are observed in the first endoscopic assessment.

Comparative efficacy and safety of subcutaneous infliximab and vedolizumab in patients with Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis included in randomised controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: While indirect comparison of infliximab (IFX) and vedolizumab (VDZ) in adults with Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) shows that IFX has better effectiveness during induction, and comparable efficacy during maintenance treatment, comparative data specific to subcutaneous (SC) IFX (i.e., CT-P13 SC) versus VDZ are limited. AIM: Pooled analysis of randomised studies to compare efficacy and safety with IFX SC and VDZ in moderate-to-severe inflammatory bowel disease. METHODS: Parallel-group, randomised studies evaluating IFX SC and VDZ in patients with moderate-to-severe CD or UC were identified. Eligible studies reported ≥ 1 prespecified outcome of interest at Week 6 (reflecting treatment during the induction phase) and/or at 1 year (Weeks 50-54; reflecting treatment during the maintenance phase). Prespecified efficacy and safety outcomes considered in this pooled analysis included the proportions of patients achieving disease-specific clinical responses, clinical remission, or discontinuing due to lack of efficacy, and the proportions of patients experiencing adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, infections, serious infections, or discontinuing due to AEs. Data from multiple studies or study arms were extracted and pooled using a random-effect model; comparative analyses were performed separately for patients with CD and UC. RESULTS: We identified three eligible CD trials and four eligible UC trials that assigned over 1200 participants per disease cohort to either IFX SC or VDZ. In patients with CD, intravenous induction therapy with IFX demonstrated better efficacy (non-overlapping 95% confidence intervals [CIs]) compared with VDZ; during the maintenance phase, IFX SC showed numerically better efficacy (overlapping 95% CIs) than VDZ. A lower proportion of IFX SC-treated patients discontinued therapy due to lack of efficacy over 1 year. In patients with UC, efficacy profiles were similar with IFX SC and VDZ during the induction and maintenance phases, and a lower proportion of IFX SC-treated patients discontinued therapy due to lack of efficacy over 1 year. In both cohorts, safety profiles for IFX SC and VDZ were generally comparable during 1 year. CONCLUSION: IFX SC demonstrated better efficacy than VDZ in patients with CD, and similar efficacy to VDZ in patients with UC; 1-year safety was comparable with IFX SC and VDZ.

Disease acceptance, but not perceived control, is uniquely associated with inflammatory bowel disease-related disability.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Disability, an important aspect of disease burden in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), has been suggested as a valuable clinical endpoint. We aimed to investigate how disease acceptance and perceived control, two psychological predictors of subjective health, are associated with IBD-related disability. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, adult IBD patients from the University Hospitals Leuven received a survey with questions about clinical and demographic characteristics, disease acceptance and perceived control (Subjective Health Experience model questionnaire), and IBD-related disability (IBD Disk). Multiple linear regressions assessed predictors of IBD-related disability in the total sample and in the subgroups of patients in clinical remission or with active disease. RESULTS: In the total sample (N = 1250, 54.2% female, median [IQR] age 51 [39-61] years, 61.3% Crohn's disease, 34.9% active disease), adding the psychological predictors to the model resulted in an increased explained variance in IBD-related disability of 19% compared to a model with only demographic and clinical characteristics (R2adj 38% vs. 19%, p<.001). The increase in explained variance was higher for patients in clinical remission (ΔR2adj 20%, p<.001) compared to patients with active disease (ΔR2adj 10%, p<.001). Of these predictors, disease acceptance was most strongly associated with disability in the total sample (ß=-0.44, p<.001), as well as in both subgroups (ß=-0.47, p<.001 and ß=-0.31, p<.001 respectively). Perceived control was not significantly associated with disability when accounting for all other predictors. CONCLUSIONS: Disease acceptance is strongly associated with IBD-related disability, supporting further research into disease acceptance as a treatment target.

Real-world Effectiveness and Safety of Risankizumab in Patients with Moderate to Severe Multirefractory Crohn's Disease: A Belgian Multicentric Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: As real-world data on risankizumab in patients with moderate to severe Crohn's disease (CD) are scarce, we evaluated its effectiveness and safety in multirefractory Belgian patients. METHODS: Data from consecutive adult CD patients who started risankizumab before April 2023 were retrospectively collected at 6 Belgian centers. Clinical remission and response were defined using the 2-component patient-reported outcome. Endoscopic response was defined as a decrease in baseline Simple Endoscopic Score with ≥50%. Both effectiveness end points were evaluated at week 24 and/or 52, while surgery-free survival and safety were assessed throughout follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 69 patients (56.5% female, median age 37.2 years, 85.5% exposed to ≥4 different advanced therapies and 98.6% to ustekinumab, 14 with an ostomy) were included. At week 24, 61.8% (34 of 55) and 18.2% (10 of 55) of patients without an ostomy achieved steroid-free clinical response and remission, respectively. At week 52, these numbers were 58.2% (32 of 55) and 27.3% (15 of 55), respectively. Endoscopic data were available in 32 patients, of whom 50.0% (16 of 32) reached endoscopic response within the first 52 weeks. Results in patients with an ostomy were similar (steroid-free clinical response and remission, 42.9% and 14.3%, respectively). During a median follow-up of 68.3 weeks, 18.8% (13 of 69) of patients discontinued risankizumab, and 20.3% (14 of 69) of patients underwent CD-related intestinal resections. The estimated surgery-free survival at week 52 was 75.2%. No new safety issues were observed. CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world cohort of multirefractory CD patients, risankizumab was effective in inducing both clinical remission and endoscopic response. Risankizumab was well tolerated with no safety issues.

In this real-world study of multirefractory Crohn's disease patients, risankizumab was effective, with 58.2% and 27.3% achieving steroid-free clinical response and remission, respectively, at week 52. Surgery-free survival at week 52 was 75.2%, and no new safety concerns arose.

Outcome of Biological Therapies and Small Molecules in Ulcerative Proctitis: A Belgian Multicenter Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Several advanced therapies (biologic therapies and small molecules) have been approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis. The registration trials for these agents typically excluded patients with isolated proctitis, leaving an evidence gap. We evaluated efficacy and safety of advanced therapies in patients with ulcerative proctitis (UP). METHODS: This multicenter retrospective cohort study included consecutive patients with active UP (Mayo endoscopy subscore of ≥2, rectal inflammation up to 15 cm) initiating advanced therapy, after failing conventional therapy. The primary end point was short-term steroid-free clinical remission (total Mayo score ≤2 with no individual subscore >1). In addition, drug persistence and relapse-free and colectomy-free survival were assessed. Both binary logistic and Cox regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: In total, 167 consecutive patients (52.0% female; median age 41.0 years; 82.0% bionaive) underwent 223 courses of therapy for UP (38 adalimumab, 14 golimumab, 54 infliximab, 9 ustekinumab, 99 vedolizumab, 9 tofacitinib). The primary end point was achieved with 36.3% of the treatment courses, and based on multivariate analysis, more commonly attained in bionaive patients (P = .001), patients treated with vedolizumab (P = .001), patients with moderate endoscopic disease activity (P = .002), and a body mass index <25 kg/m2 (P = .018). Drug persistence was significantly higher in patients treated with vedolizumab (P < .001) and patients with a shorter disease duration (P = .006). No new safety signals were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Advanced therapies are also efficacious and safe in patients with ulcerative colitis limited to the rectum. Therefore, the inclusion of patients with UP in future randomized-controlled trials should be considered.

Defining Comprehensive Disease Control for Use as a Treatment Target for Ulcerative Colitis in Clinical Practice: International Delphi Consensus Recommendations.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Treatment of ulcerative colitis [UC] requires a patient-centric definition of comprehensive disease control that considers improvements in aspects not typically captured by classical landmark trial endpoints. In an international initiative, we reviewed aspects of UC that affect patients and/or indicate mucosal inflammation, to achieve consensus on which aspects to combine in a definition of comprehensive disease control, using a modified Delphi process. METHODS: The Delphi panel comprised 12 gastroenterologists and one patient advocate. Two gastroenterologists were elected as chairs and did not vote. To inform statements, we asked 18 patients and the panel members about their experiences of remission and reviewed published literature. Panel members voted on statements anonymously in three rounds, with a live discussion before Round 3. Consensus was met if ≥67% of the panel agreed. Statements without consensus in Rounds 1 and 2 were revised or discarded after Round 3. RESULTS: The panel agreed to measure individual patient benefit using a definition of comprehensive disease control that combines aspects currently measured in trials [rectal bleeding, stool frequency, disease-related quality of life, endoscopy, histological inflammatory activity, inflammatory biomarkers, and corticosteroid use] with additional patient-reported symptoms [bowel urgency, abdominal pain, extraintestinal manifestations, fatigue, and sleep disturbance]. The panel agreed on scoring systems and thresholds for many aspects. CONCLUSIONS: Using a robust methodology, we defined comprehensive disease control in UC. Next, we will combine the measurement and scoring of these aspects into a multicomponent tool and will adopt comprehensive disease control as a treatment target in clinical practice and trials.

Maintenance Risankizumab Sustains Induction Response in Patients with Crohn's Disease in a Randomized Phase 3 Trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Durable clinical remission, endoscopic healing, and biomarker normalization are key treatment goals for Crohn's disease. The selective anti-interleukin-23 p19 inhibitor risankizumab has demonstrated efficacy and safety in moderately to severely active Crohn's disease. This post-hoc analysis of data from the pivotal risankizumab maintenance study assessed whether risankizumab maintenance therapy sustained the clinical and endoscopic outcomes achieved with risankizumab induction therapy. METHODS: We evaluated 462 patients who achieved a clinical response to risankizumab intravenous induction treatment and were re-randomized to receive subcutaneous risankizumab 360 mg, subcutaneous risankizumab 180 mg, or placebo [withdrawal] every 8 weeks for 52 weeks in the randomized, controlled FORTIFY maintenance study. Maintenance of clinical, endoscopic, and biomarker endpoints at week 52 among patients who achieved these endpoints after 12 weeks of induction treatment was evaluated. RESULTS: A significantly higher proportion of patients receiving maintenance treatment with risankizumab 360 or 180 mg compared with placebo [withdrawal] maintained Crohn's Disease Activity Index remission [68.6%, 70.8%, vs 56.3%; p < 0.05], stool frequency/abdominal pain remission [69.2%, 64.1%, vs 50.5%; p < 0.01], endoscopic response [70.2%, 68.2%, vs 38.4%; p < 0.001], endoscopic remission [74.4%, 45.5%, vs 23.9%; p < 0.05], and Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease of 0-2 [65.5%, 36.7%, vs 21.9%]. Most patients [56.8-83.3%] who achieved normalized faecal calprotectin or C-reactive protein during induction sustained them with maintenance risankizumab. CONCLUSIONS: Subcutaneous risankizumab maintenance therapy results in durable improvement in clinical and endoscopic outcomes over 1 year in patients with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03105102.

IDH1-mutated Crohn's disease-associated small bowel adenocarcinomas: Distinctive pathological features and association with MGMT methylation and serrated-type dysplasia.

AIMS: Patients with Crohn's disease (CrD) have an elevated risk for the development of small bowel adenocarcinomas (SBAs). Actionable isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) mutations have been reported to be more frequent in CrD-SBAs than in sporadic SBAs. The present study aimed to investigate the clinicopathological and immunophenotypical features, as well as methylation profiles, of IDH1-mutated CrD-SBAs. METHODS AND RESULTS: An international multicentre series of surgically resected CrD-SBAs was tested for IDH1 mutation. Clinicopathological features, immunophenotypical marker expression and O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) and long interspersed nuclear element-1 (LINE-1) methylation were compared between IDH1-mutated and IDH1 wild-type CrD-SBAs. Ten (20%) of the 49 CrD-SBAs examined harboured an IDH1 mutation and all the mutated cancers harboured the R132C variant. Compared to IDH1 wild-type cases, IDH1-mutated CrD-SBAs showed significantly lower rates of cytokeratin 7 expression (P = 0.005) and higher rates of p53 overexpression (P = 0.012) and MGMT methylation (P = 0.012). All three dysplastic growths associated with IDH1-mutated SBAs harboured the same IDH1 variant (R132C) of the corresponding invasive cancer, and all were of non-conventional subtype (two serrated dysplastic lesions and one goblet cell-deficient dysplasia). In particular, non-conventional serrated dysplasia was significantly associated with IDH1-mutated CrD-SBAs (P = 0.029). No significant cancer-specific survival difference between IDH1-mutated CrD-SBA patients and IDH1 wild-type CrD-SBA patients was found (hazard ratio = 0.55, 95% confidence interval = 0.16-1.89; P = 0.313). CONCLUSIONS: IDH1-mutated CrD-SBAs, which represent approximately one-fifth of total cases, are characterised by distinctive immunophenotypical features and methylation profiles, with potential therapeutic implications. Moreover, IDH1-mutated non-conventional, serrated dysplasia is likely to represent a precursor lesion to such CrD-SBAs.

Dysbiosis and Associated Stool Features Improve Prediction of Response to Biological Therapy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Dysbiosis of the gut microbiota is considered a key contributor to inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) etiology. Here, we investigated potential associations between microbiota composition and the outcomes to biological therapies. METHODS: The study prospectively recruited 296 patients with active IBD (203 with Crohn's disease, 93 with ulcerative colitis) initiating biological therapy. Quantitative microbiome profiles of pretreatment and posttreatment fecal samples were obtained combining flow cytometry with 16S amplicon sequencing. Therapeutic response was assessed by endoscopy, patient-reported outcomes, and changes in fecal calprotectin. The effect of therapy on microbiome variation was evaluated using constrained ordination methods. Prediction of therapy outcome was performed using logistic regression with 5-fold cross-validation. RESULTS: At baseline, 65.9% of patients carried the dysbiotic Bacteroides2 (Bact2) enterotype, with a significantly higher prevalence among patients with ileal involvement (76.8%). Microbiome variation was associated with the choice of biological therapy rather than with therapeutic outcome. Only anti-tumor necrosis factor-α treatment resulted in a microbiome shift away from Bact2, concomitant with an increase in microbial load and butyrogen abundances and a decrease in potentially opportunistic Veillonella. Remission rates for patients hosting Bact2 at baseline were significantly higher with anti-tumor necrosis factor-α than with vedolizumab (65.1% vs 35.2%). A prediction model, based on anthropometrics and clinical data, stool features (microbial load, moisture, and calprotectin), and Bact2 detection predicted treatment outcome with 73.9% accuracy for specific biological therapies. CONCLUSION: Fecal characterization based on microbial load, moisture content, calprotectin concentration, and enterotyping may aid in the therapeutic choice of biological therapy in IBD.

The assessment of segmental healing by the Modified Mayo Endoscopic Score (MMES) complements the prediction of long-term clinical outcomes in patients with ulcerative colitis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Current endoscopic scoring systems for ulcerative colitis (UC) do not consider the extent of mucosal inflammation. The modified Mayo endoscopic score (MMES) was developed to detect segmental endoscopic improvement. We evaluated the ability of the MMES to predict long-term clinical outcomes and compared it to the widely used Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES). METHODS: Consecutive patients with moderate to severe UC starting biological therapy were enrolled between January 2014 and September 2017 in this prospective observational study. A clinical and endoscopic evaluation was performed at baseline and at week 8/14. A modified Mayo score was used to grade clinical activity, MES and MMES were used to evaluate endoscopic activity. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to the evolution of endoscopic activity, namely endoscopic improvement (MES ≤ 1), segmental endoscopic response only (MES > 1, but decrease in MMES ≥ 30%) or no endoscopic response (all others). Over the follow-up period clinical relapse-, discontinuation- and colectomy-free survival were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 150 patients were included (48% female, median age 42 years, median disease duration 7 years) with a median follow-up of 61 months. We identified 69 patients with endoscopic improvement, 27 with segmental endoscopic response and 54 without endoscopic response. Patients with segmental endoscopic response showed intermediate long-term clinical outcomes as compared to the other two groups (log rank p = 0.003 for clinical relapse-, and p < 0.001 for both discontinuation- and colectomy-free survival). CONCLUSIONS: The MMES exhibited a benefit in predicting long-term outcome in UC even though endoscopic improvement remains the strongest predictor.

SCFAs switch stem cell fate through HDAC inhibition to improve barrier integrity in 3D intestinal organoids from patients with obesity.

Stem cells are a keystone of intestinal homeostasis, but their function could be shifted during energy imbalance or by crosstalk with microbial metabolites in the stem cell niche. This study reports the effect of obesity and microbiota-derived short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) on intestinal stem cell (ISC) fate in human crypt-derived intestinal organoids (enteroids). ISC fate decision was impaired in obesity, resulting in smaller enteroids with less outward protruding crypts. Our key finding is that SCFAs switch ISC commitment to the absorptive enterocytes, resulting in reduced intestinal permeability in obese enteroids. Mechanistically, SCFAs act as HDAC inhibitors in stem cells to enhance Notch signaling, resulting in transcriptional activation of the Notch target gene HES1 to promote enterocyte differentiation. In summary, targeted reprogramming of ISC fate, using HDAC inhibitors, may represent a potential, robust therapeutic strategy to improve gut integrity in obesity.

A Core Outcome Set for inflammatory bowel diseases: development and recommendations for implementation in clinical practice through an international multi-stakeholder consensus process.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Standardising health outcome measurements supports delivery of care, enables data-driven learning systems, and secondary data use for research. As part of the Health Outcomes Observatory initiative and building on existing knowledge, a core outcome set (COS) for inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) was defined through an international modified Delphi method. METHODS: Stakeholders rated 90 variables on a 9-point importance scale twice, allowing score modification based on feedback displayed per stakeholder group. Two consecutive consensus meetings were held to discuss results and formulate recommendations for measurement in clinical practice. Variables scoring 7 or higher by ≥80% of the participants, or based on consensus meeting agreement, were included in the final set. RESULTS: In total, 136 stakeholders (45 IBD patients (advocates), 74 healthcare professionals/researchers, 13 industry representatives and 4 regulators), from 20 different countries participated. The final set includes 18 case-mix variables, 3 biomarkers (haemoglobin to detect anaemia, C-reactive protein and faecal calprotectin to detect inflammation) for completeness and 28 outcomes (including 16 patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and 1 patient-reported experience). The PRO-2 and IBD-Control questionnaires were recommended to collect disease-specific PROs at every contact with an IBD practitioner, and the Subjective Health Experience model questionnaire, PROMIS Global Health and Self-Efficacy short form to collect generic PROs annually. CONCLUSIONS: A COS for IBD, including a recommendation for use in clinical practice, was defined. Implementation of this set will start in Vienna, Berlin, Barcelona, Leuven and Rotterdam, empowering patients to better manage their care. Additional centres will follow worldwide.

Effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab induction with or without budesonide in patients with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease in Europe: a retrospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Vedolizumab (VDZ), a gut-selective anti-lymphocyte trafficking integrin antibody, is effective in treating patients with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease (CD). In this study, we examined the real-world effectiveness and safety of induction therapy using VDZ alone or in combination with budesonide (VDZ + BUD) among patients with CD in Belgium, Israel, and Switzerland. METHODS: This retrospective chart review analysis included adult patients with moderately to severely active CD who started induction treatment with VDZ or VDZ + BUD (January 2015 through January 2019). The primary objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness in terms of clinical remission of VDZ alone or VDZ + BUD using patient-reported outcomes (PRO) of abdominal pain (AP) and/or loose stool frequency (LSF) (PRO-2) at weeks 0, 2, 6, 10, and 14. Regression models were used to assess differences and associations between the treatment groups. RESULTS: Overall, 123 patients were included (VDZ, n = 73; VDZ + BUD, n = 50). Clinical remission rates at week 14 were 71.4% (50/70) and 68.0% (34/50) with VDZ and VDZ + BUD, respectively. Mean percentage change in AP and LSF from baseline to week 14 was comparable between the groups. Median (95% confidence interval [CI]) time to clinical remission was 91 [70.0-98.0] and 95 [70.0-98.0] days, respectively. One patient in each group discontinued VDZ and 68.0% of patients in the VDZ + BUD group discontinued BUD before week 14. The rates of overall adverse events were similar between the groups (VDZ, 23.3%; VDZ + BUD, 26.0%). CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective study, VDZ alone and VDZ + BUD showed similar high remission rates in patients with moderately to severely active CD. Prospective randomized studies are needed to conclude on the role of combining VDZ with BUD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not applicable.

Early versus Late Use of Vedolizumab in Ulcerative Colitis: Clinical, Endoscopic, and Histological Outcomes.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: We explored the potential for differential efficacy of vedolizumab between "early" and "late" ulcerative colitis (UC) with evaluation of clinical, endoscopic, and histological endpoints. METHODS: This was a multicentre, multinational open-label study in patients with moderately-to-severely active UC, defining "early" UC by a disease duration <4 years and bio-naïve and "late" UC by a disease duration >4 years and additional exposure to tumour necrosis factor antagonists. Patients received standard treatment with intravenous vedolizumab for 52 weeks (300 mg weeks 0-2-6, every 8 weeks thereafter without escalation). The primary endpoint was corticosteroid-free clinical remission with endoscopic improvement (total Mayo score ≤2 with no subscore >1) at both week 26 and 52. RESULTS: A total of 121 patients were included: in the "early" group 25/59 (42.4%) achieved the primary endpoint versus 19/62 (30.6%) in the "late" group (P = 0.18). There were no significant differences between the two groups in endoscopic improvement (week 26: "early" 32/59 [54.2%] vs. "late" 29/62 [46.8%]; P = 0.412; week 52: 27/59 [45.8%] vs. 25/62 [40.3%]; P = 0.546) or histological remission (Robarts Histopathology Index <3 without neutrophils in the epithelium and lamina propria) (week 26: 24/59 [40.7%] vs. 21/62 [33.9%]; P = 0.439; week 52: 22/59 [37.3%] vs. 22/62 [35.5%]; P = 0.837). CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences in clinical, endoscopic, and histological outcomes were observed between "early" and "late" disease.

Baseline TREM-1 Whole Blood Gene Expression Does Not Predict Response to Adalimumab Treatment in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis or Crohn's Disease in the SERENE Studies.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: This study assessed whether baseline triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells [TREM-1] whole blood gene expression predicts response to anti-TNF therapy in patients with UC or CD. METHODS: TREM-1 whole blood gene expression was analysed by RNA sequencing [RNA-seq] in patients with moderately to severely active UC or CD treated with adalimumab in the Phase 3 SERENE-UC and SERENE-CD clinical trials. The predictive value of baseline TREM-1 expression was evaluated and compared according to endoscopic and clinical response vs non-response, and remission vs non-remission, at Weeks 8 and 52 [SERENE-UC], and Weeks 12 and 56 [SERENE-CD]. RESULTS: TREM-1 expression was analysed in 95 and 106 patients with UC and CD, respectively, receiving standard-dose adalimumab induction treatment. In SERENE-UC, baseline TREM-1 expression was not predictive of endoscopic response [p=0.48], endoscopic remission [p=0.53], clinical response [p=0.58] or clinical remission [p=0.79] at Week 8, or clinical response [p=0.60] at Week 52. However, an association was observed with endoscopic response [p=0.01], endoscopic remission [p=0.048], and clinical remission [p=0.04997] at Week 52. For SERENE-CD, baseline TREM-1 expression was not predictive of endoscopic response [p=0.56], endoscopic remission [p=0.33], clinical response [p=0.07], clinical remission [p=0.65] at Week 12, or endoscopic response [p=0.61], endoscopic remission [p=0.51], clinical response [p=0.62] or clinical remission [p=0.97] at Week 56. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline TREM-1 gene expression did not uniformly predict adalimumab response in SERENE clinical trials. Further research is needed to identify potential blood-based biomarkers predictive of response to anti-TNF therapy in patients with IBD.

Appearance of the Bowel and Mesentery During Surgery Is Not Predictive of Postoperative Recurrence After Ileocecal Resection for Crohn's Disease: A Prospective Monocentric Study.

BACKGROUND: Very few risk factors for postoperative recurrence (POR) of Crohn's Disease (CD) after ileocecal resection have been identified. The aim of the present study was to verify the association between an a priori defined list of intraoperative macroscopic findings and POR. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study including patients undergoing primary ileocecal resection for CD. Four intraoperative factors were independently evaluated by 2 surgeons: length of resected ileum, mesentery thickness, presence of areas of serosal fat infiltration, or abnormal serosal vasodilation on normal bowel proximal to the resected bowel. The primary end point was early endoscopic POR at month 6 and defined as modified Rutgeerts score ≥i2b. Secondary end points were clinical and surgical recurrence. RESULTS: Between September 2020 and November 2022, 83 consecutive patients were included. Early endoscopic recurrence occurred in 45 of 76 patients (59.2%). Clinical and biochemical recurrence occurred in 17.3% (95% confidence interval, [CI], 10.4%-28.0%) and 14.6% of the patients after 12 months. The risk of developing endoscopic and clinical recurrence was 1.127 (95% CI, 0.448;2.834, P = .799) and 0.896 (95% CI, 0.324-2.478, P = .832) when serosal fat infiltration was observed, and 1.388 (95% CI, 0.554-3.476, P = .484), and 1.153 (95% CI, 0.417;3.187, P = .783) when abnormal serosal vasodilation was observed. Similarly, length of the resected bowel and mesentery thickness showed no association with POR. A subgroup analysis on patients who received no postoperative medical prophylaxis did not identify any risk factor for endoscopic POR. CONCLUSIONS: The macroscopic appearance of the bowel and associated mesentery during surgery does not seem to be predictive of POR after ileocecal resection for CD.

Prospective studies investigating risk factors for Crohn's disease recurrence after surgery are scarce. In a prospective cohort of 83 patients undergoing primary ileocecal resection, no association between few intraoperative macroscopic findings and postoperative endoscopic/clinical recurrence was observed.