Detection of cancer-associated cachexia in lung cancer patients using whole-body [18F]FDG-PET/CT imaging: A multi-centre study.

BACKGROUND: Cancer-associated cachexia (CAC) is a metabolic syndrome contributing to therapy resistance and mortality in lung cancer patients (LCP). CAC is typically defined using clinical non-imaging criteria. Given the metabolic underpinnings of CAC and the ability of [18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET)/computer tomography (CT) to provide quantitative information on glucose turnover, we evaluate the usefulness of whole-body (WB) PET/CT imaging, as part of the standard diagnostic workup of LCP, to provide additional information on the onset or presence of CAC. METHODS: This multi-centre study included 345 LCP who underwent WB [18F]FDG-PET/CT imaging for initial clinical staging. A weight loss grading system (WLGS) adjusted to body mass index was used to classify LCP into 'No CAC' (WLGS-0/1 at baseline prior treatment and at first follow-up: N = 158, 51F/107M), 'Dev CAC' (WLGS-0/1 at baseline and WLGS-3/4 at follow-up: N = 90, 34F/56M), and 'CAC' (WLGS-3/4 at baseline: N = 97, 31F/66M). For each CAC category, mean standardized uptake values (SUV) normalized to aorta uptake () and CT-defined volumes were extracted for abdominal and visceral organs, muscles, and adipose-tissue using automated image segmentation of baseline [18F]FDG-PET/CT images. Imaging and non-imaging parameters from laboratory tests were compared statistically. A machine-learning (ML) model was then trained to classify LCP as 'No CAC', 'Dev CAC', and 'CAC' based on their imaging parameters. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis was employed to identify the key factors contributing to CAC development for each patient. RESULTS: The three CAC categories displayed multi-organ differences in . In all target organs, was higher in the 'CAC' cohort compared with 'No CAC' (P < 0.01), except for liver and kidneys, where in 'CAC' was reduced by 5%. The 'Dev CAC' cohort displayed a small but significant increase in of pancreas (+4%), skeletal-muscle (+7%), subcutaneous adipose-tissue (+11%), and visceral adipose-tissue (+15%). In 'CAC' patients, a strong negative Spearman correlation (ρ = -0.8) was identified between and volumes of adipose-tissue. The machine-learning model identified 'CAC' at baseline with 81% of accuracy, highlighting of spleen, pancreas, liver, and adipose-tissue as most relevant features. The model performance was suboptimal (54%) when classifying 'Dev CAC' versus 'No CAC'. CONCLUSIONS: WB [18F]FDG-PET/CT imaging reveals groupwise differences in the multi-organ metabolism of LCP with and without CAC, thus highlighting systemic metabolic aberrations symptomatic of cachectic patients. Based on a retrospective cohort, our ML model identified patients with CAC with good accuracy. However, its performance in patients developing CAC was suboptimal. A prospective, multi-centre study has been initiated to address the limitations of the present retrospective analysis.

Direct Patlak Reconstruction of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA PET for the Evaluation of Primary Prostate Cancer Prior Total Prostatectomy: Results of a Pilot Study.

To investigate the use of kinetic parameters derived from direct Patlak reconstructions of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) to predict the histological grade of malignancy of the primary tumor of patients with prostate cancer (PCa). Thirteen patients (mean age 66 ± 10 years) with a primary, therapy-naïve PCa (median PSA 9.3 [range: 6.3-130 µg/L]) prior radical prostatectomy, were recruited in this exploratory prospective study. A dynamic whole-body [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT scan was performed for all patients. Measured quantification parameters included Patlak slope (Ki: absolute rate of tracer consumption) and Patlak intercept (Vb: degree of tracer perfusion in the tumor). Additionally, the mean and maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmean and SUVmax) of the tumor were determined from a static PET 60 min post tracer injection. In every patient, initial PSA (iPSA) values that were also the PSA level at the time of the examination and final histology results with Gleason score (GS) grading were correlated with the quantitative readouts. Collectively, 20 individual malignant prostate lesions were ascertained and histologically graded for GS with ISUP classification. Six lesions were classified as ISUP 5, two as ISUP 4, eight as ISUP 3, and four as ISUP 2. In both static and dynamic PET/CT imaging, the prostate lesions could be visually distinguished from the background. The average values of the SUVmean, slope, and intercept of the background were 2.4 (±0.4), 0.015 1/min (±0.006), and 52% (±12), respectively. These were significantly lower than the corresponding parameters extracted from the prostate lesions (all p < 0.01). No significant differences were found between these values and the various GS and ISUP (all p > 0.05). Spearman correlation coefficient analysis demonstrated a strong correlation between static and dynamic PET/CT parameters (all r ≥ 0.70, p < 0.01). Both GS and ISUP grading revealed only weak correlations with the mean and maximum SUV and tumor-to-background ratio derived from static images and dynamic Patlak slope. The iPSA demonstrated no significant correlation with GS and ISUP grading or with dynamic and static PET parameter values. In this cohort of mainly high-risk PCa, no significant correlation between [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 perfusion and consumption and the aggressiveness of the primary tumor was observed. This suggests that the association between SUV values and GS may be more distinctive when distinguishing clinically relevant from clinically non-relevant PCa.

Fully Automated, Fast Motion Correction of Dynamic Whole-Body and Total-Body PET/CT Imaging Studies.

We introduce the Fast Algorithm for Motion Correction (FALCON) software, which allows correction of both rigid and nonlinear motion artifacts in dynamic whole-body (WB) images, irrespective of the PET/CT system or the tracer. Methods: Motion was corrected using affine alignment followed by a diffeomorphic approach to account for nonrigid deformations. In both steps, images were registered using multiscale image alignment. Moreover, the frames suited to successful motion correction were automatically estimated by calculating the initial normalized cross-correlation metric between the reference frame and the other moving frames. To evaluate motion correction performance, WB dynamic image sequences from 3 different PET/CT systems (Biograph mCT, Biograph Vision 600, and uEXPLORER) using 6 different tracers (18F-FDG, 18F-fluciclovine, 68Ga-PSMA, 68Ga-DOTATATE, 11C-Pittsburgh compound B, and 82Rb) were considered. Motion correction accuracy was assessed using 4 different measures: change in volume mismatch between individual WB image volumes to assess gross body motion, change in displacement of a large organ (liver dome) within the torso due to respiration, change in intensity in small tumor nodules due to motion blur, and constancy of activity concentration levels. Results: Motion correction decreased gross body motion artifacts and reduced volume mismatch across dynamic frames by about 50%. Moreover, large-organ motion correction was assessed on the basis of correction of liver dome motion, which was removed entirely in about 70% of all cases. Motion correction also improved tumor intensity, resulting in an average increase in tumor SUVs by 15%. Large deformations seen in gated cardiac 82Rb images were managed without leading to anomalous distortions or substantial intensity changes in the resulting images. Finally, the constancy of activity concentration levels was reasonably preserved (<2% change) in large organs before and after motion correction. Conclusion: FALCON allows fast and accurate correction of rigid and nonrigid WB motion artifacts while being insensitive to scanner hardware or tracer distribution, making it applicable to a wide range of PET imaging scenarios.