Development and external validation of a multivariable [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET-based prediction model for lymph node involvement in men with intermediate or high-risk prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: To develop and evaluate a lymph node invasion (LNI) prediction model for men staged with [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET. METHODS: A consecutive sample of intermediate to high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) patients undergoing [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET, extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND), and radical prostatectomy (RP) at two tertiary referral centers were retrospectively identified. The training cohort comprised 173 patients (treated between 2013 and 2017), the validation cohort 90 patients (treated between 2016 and 2019). Three models for LNI prediction were developed and evaluated using cross-validation. Optimal risk-threshold was determined during model development. The best performing model was evaluated and compared to available conventional and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)-based prediction models using area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC), calibration plots, and decision curve analysis (DCA). RESULTS: A combined model including prostate-specific antigen, biopsy Gleason grade group, [68Ga]Ga Ga-PSMA-11 positive volume of the primary tumor, and the assessment of the [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 report N-status yielded an AUC of 0.923 (95% CI 0.863-0.984) in the external validation. Using a cutoff of ≥ 17%, 44 (50%) ePLNDs would be spared and LNI missed in one patient (4.8%). Compared to conventional and MRI-based models, the proposed model showed similar calibration, higher AUC (0.923 (95% CI 0.863-0.984) vs. 0.700 (95% CI 0.548-0.852)-0.824 (95% CI 0.710-0.938)) and higher net benefit at DCA. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that information from [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 may improve LNI prediction in intermediate to high-risk PCa patients undergoing primary staging especially when combined with clinical parameters. For better LNI prediction, future research should investigate the combination of information from both PSMA PET and mpMRI for LNI prediction in PCa patients before RP.

Can Dynamic Whole-Body FDG PET Imaging Differentiate between Malignant and Inflammatory Lesions?

Background: Investigation of the clinical feasibility of dynamic whole-body (WB) [18F]FDG PET, including standardized uptake value (SUV), rate of irreversible uptake (Ki), and apparent distribution volume (Vd) in physiologic tissues, and comparison between inflammatory/infectious and cancer lesions. Methods: Twenty-four patients were prospectively included to undergo dynamic WB [18F]FDG PET/CT for clinically indicated re-/staging of oncological diseases. Parametric maps of Ki and Vd were generated using Patlak analysis alongside SUV images. Maximum parameter values (SUVmax, Kimax, and Vdmax) were measured in liver parenchyma and in malignant or inflammatory/infectious lesions. Lesion-to-background ratios (LBRs) were calculated by dividing the measurements by their respective mean in the liver tissue. Results: Seventy-seven clinical target lesions were identified, 60 malignant and 17 inflammatory/infectious. Kimax was significantly higher in cancer than in inflammatory/infections lesions (3.0 vs. 2.0, p = 0.002) while LBRs of SUVmax, Kimax, and Vdmax did not differ significantly between the etiologies: LBR (SUVmax) 3.3 vs. 2.9, p = 0.06; LBR (Kimax) 5.0 vs. 4.4, p = 0.05, LBR (Vdmax) 1.1 vs. 1.0, p = 0.18). LBR of inflammatory/infectious and cancer lesions was higher in Kimax than in SUVmax (4.5 vs. 3.2, p < 0.001). LBRs of Kimax and SUVmax showed a strong correlation (Spearman's rho = 0.83, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Dynamic WB [18F]FDG PET/CT is feasible in a clinical setting. LBRs of Kimax were higher than SUVmax. Kimax was higher in malignant than in inflammatory/infectious lesions but demonstrated a large overlap between the etiologies.

68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI versus multiparametric MRI in men referred for prostate biopsy: primary tumour localization and interreader agreement.

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is recommended by the European Urology Association guidelines as the standard modality for imaging-guided biopsy. Recently positron emission tomography with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA PET) has shown promising results as a tool for this purpose. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of positron emission tomography with prostate-specific membrane antigen/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) using the gallium-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (68Ga-PSMA-11) and multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) for pre-biopsy tumour localization and interreader agreement for visual and semiquantitative analysis. Semiquantitative parameters included apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and maximum lesion diameter for mpMRI and standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and PSMA-positive volume (PSMAvol) for PSMA PET/MRI. RESULTS: Sensitivity and specificity were 61.4% and 92.9% for mpMRI and 66.7% and 92.9% for PSMA PET/MRI for reader one, respectively. RPE was available in 23 patients and 41 of 47 quadrants with discrepant findings. Based on RPE results, the specificity for both imaging modalities increased to 98% and 99%, and the sensitivity improved to 63.9% and 72.1% for mpMRI and PSMA PET/MRI, respectively. Both modalities yielded a substantial interreader agreement for primary tumour localization (mpMRI kappa = 0.65 (0.52-0.79), PSMA PET/MRI kappa = 0.73 (0.61-0.84)). ICC for SUVmax, PSMAvol and lesion diameter were almost perfect (≥ 0.90) while for ADC it was only moderate (ICC = 0.54 (0.04-0.78)). ADC and lesion diameter did not correlate significantly with Gleason score (ρ = 0.26 and ρ = 0.16) while SUVmax and PSMAvol did (ρ = - 0.474 and ρ = - 0.468). CONCLUSIONS: PSMA PET/MRI has similar accuracy and reliability to mpMRI regarding primary prostate cancer (PCa) localization. In our cohort, semiquantitative parameters from PSMA PET/MRI correlated with tumour grade and were more reliable than the ones from mpMRI.

Infiltrative growth pattern of prostate cancer is associated with lower uptake on PSMA PET and reduced diffusion restriction on mpMRI.

PURPOSE: Recently, a significant association was shown between novel growth patterns on histopathology of prostate cancer (PCa) and prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) uptake on [68Ga]PSMA-PET. It is the aim of this study to evaluate the association between these growth patterns and ADC (mm2/1000 s) values in comparison to [68Ga]PSMA uptake on PET/MRI. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated patients who underwent [68Ga]PSMA PET/MRI for staging or biopsy guidance, followed by radical prostatectomy at our institution between 07/2016 and 01/2020. The dominant lesion per patient was selected based on histopathology and correlated to PET/MRI in a multidisciplinary meeting, and quantified using SUVmax for PSMA uptake and ADCmean for diffusion restriction. PCa growth pattern was classified as expansive (EXP) or infiltrative (INF) according to its properties of forming a tumoral mass or infiltrating diffusely between benign glands by two independent pathologists. Furthermore, the corresponding WHO2016 ISUP tumor grade was evaluated. The t test was used to compare means, Pearson's test for categorical correlation, Cohen's kappa test for interrater agreement, and ROC curve to determine the best cutoff. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients were included (mean PSA 11.7 ± 12.5). The interrater agreement between both pathologists was almost perfect with κ = 0.81. While 25 lesions had an EXP-growth with an ADCmean of 0.777 ± 0.109, 37 showed an INF-growth with a significantly higher ADCmean of 1.079 ± 0.262 (p < 0.001). We also observed a significant difference regarding PSMA SUVmax for the EXP-growth (19.2 ± 10.9) versus the INF-growth (9.4 ± 6.2, p < 0.001). Within the lesions encompassing the EXP- or the INF-growth, no significant correlation between the ISUP groups and ADCmean could be observed (p = 0.982 and p = 0.861, respectively). CONCLUSION: PCa with INF-growth showed significantly lower SUVmax and higher ADCmean values compared to PCa with EXP-growth. Within the growth groups, ADCmean values were independent from ISUP grading.

Quantitative imaging parameters to predict the local staging of prostate cancer in intermediate- to high-risk patients.

OBJECTIVES: PSMA PET/MRI showed the potential to increase the sensitivity for extraprostatic disease (EPD) assessment over mpMRI; however, the interreader variability for EPD is still high. Therefore, we aimed to assess whether quantitative PSMA and mpMRI imaging parameters could yield a more robust EPD prediction. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated PCa patients who underwent staging mpMRI and [68Ga]PSMA-PET, followed by radical prostatectomy at our institution between 01.02.2016 and 31.07.2019. Fifty-eight cases with PET/MRI and 15 cases with PET/CT were identified. EPD was determined on histopathology and correlated with quantitative PSMA and mpMRI parameters assessed by two readers: ADC (mm2/1000 s), longest capsular contact (LCC, mm), tumor volume (cm3), PSMA-SUVmax and volume-based parameters using a fixed threshold at SUV > 4 to delineate PSMAtotal (g/ml) and PSMAvol (cm3). The t test was used to compare means, Pearson's test for categorical correlation, and ROC curve to determine the best cutoff. Interclass correlation (ICC) was performed for interreader agreement (95% CI). RESULTS: Seventy-three patients were included (64.5 ± 6.0 years; PSA 14.4 ± 17.1 ng/ml), and 31 had EPD (42.5%). From mpMRI, only LCC reached significance (p = 0.005), while both volume-based PET parameters PSMAtotal and PSMAvol were significantly associated with EPD (p = 0.008 and p = 0.004, respectively). On ROC analysis, LCC, PSMAtotal, and PSMAvol reached an AUC of 0.712 (p = 0.002), 0.709 (p = 0.002), and 0.718 (p = 0.002), respectively. ICC was moderate-good for LCC 0.727 (0.565-0.828) and excellent for PSMAtotal and PSMAvol with 0.944 (0.990-0.996) and 0.985 (0.976-0.991), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative PSMA parameters have a similar potential as mpMRI LCC to predict EPD of PCa, with a significantly higher interreader agreement.

Hot needles can confirm accurate lesion sampling intraoperatively using [18F]PSMA-1007 PET/CT-guided biopsy in patients with suspected prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted PET is increasingly used for staging prostate cancer (PCa) with high accuracy to detect significant PCa (sigPCa). [68 Ga]PSMA-11 PET/MRI-guided biopsy showed promising results but also persisting limitation of sampling error, due to impaired image fusion. We aimed to assess the possibility of intraoperative quantification of [18F]PSMA-1007 PET/CT uptake in core biopsies as an instant confirmation for accurate lesion sampling. METHODS: In this IRB-approved, prospective, proof-of-concept study, we included five consecutive patients with suspected PCa. All underwent [18F]PSMA-1007 PET/CT scans followed by immediate PET/CT-guided and saturation template biopsy (3.1 ± 0.3 h after PET). The activity in biopsy cores was measured as counts per minute (cpm) in a gamma spectrometer. Pearson's test was used to correlate counts with histopathology (WHO/ISUP), tumor length, and membranous PSMA expression on immunohistochemistry (IHC). RESULTS: In 43 of 113 needles, PCa was present. The mean cpm was overall significantly higher in needles with PCa (263 ± 396 cpm) compared to needles without PCa (73 ± 44 cpm, p < 0.001). In one patient with moderate PSMA uptake (SUVmax 8.7), 13 out of 24 needles had increased counts (100-200 cpm) but only signs of inflammation and PSMA expression in benign glands on IHC. Excluding this case, ROC analysis resulted in an AUC of 0.81, with an optimal cut-off to confirm PCa at 75 cpm (sens/spec of 65.1%/87%). In all 4 patients with PCa, the first or second PSMA PET-guided needle was positive for sigPCa with high counts (156-2079 cpm). CONCLUSIONS: [18F]PSMA-1007 uptake in PCa can be used to confirm accurate lesion sampling of the dominant tumor intraoperatively. This technique could improve confidence in imaging-based biopsy guidance and reduce the need for saturation biopsy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03187990, 15/06/2017.

When SUV Matters: FDG PET/CT at Baseline Correlates with Survival in Soft Tissue and Ewing Sarcoma.

INTRODUCTION: The role of positron-emission tomography/computed-tomography (PET/CT) in the management of sarcomas and as a prognostic tool has been studied. However, it remains unclear which metric is the most useful. We aimed to investigate if volume-based PET metrics (Tumor volume (TV) and total lesions glycolysis (TLG)) are superior to maximal standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and other metrics in predicting survival of patients with soft tissue and bone sarcomas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we screened over 52'000 PET/CT scans to identify patients diagnosed with either soft tissue, bone or Ewing sarcoma and had a staging scan at our institution before initial therapy. We used a Wilcoxon signed-rank to assess which PET/CT metric was associated with survival in different patient subgroups. Receiver-Operating-Characteristic curve analysis was used to calculate cutoff values. RESULTS: We identified a total of 88 patients with soft tissue (51), bone (26) or Ewing (11) sarcoma. Median age at presentation was 40 years (Range: 9-86 years). High SUVmax was most significantly associated with short survival (defined as <24 months) in soft tissue sarcoma (with a median and range of SUVmax 12.5 (8.8-16.0) in short (n = 18) and 5.5 (3.3-7.2) in long survival (≥24 months) (n = 31), with (p = 0.001). Similar results were seen in Ewing sarcoma (with a median and range of SUVmax 12.1 (7.6-14.7) in short (n = 6) and 3.7 (3.5-5.5) in long survival (n = 5), with (p = 0.017). However, no PET-specific metric but tumor-volume was significantly associated (p = 0.035) with survival in primary bone sarcomas (with a median and range of 217 cm3 (186-349) in short survival (n = 4) and 60 cm3 (22-104) in long survival (n = 19), with (p = 0.035). TLG was significantly inversely associated with long survival only in Ewing sarcoma (p = 0.03). DISCUSSION: Our analysis shows that the outcome of soft tissue, bone and Ewing sarcomas is associated with different PET/CT metrics. We could not confirm the previously suggested superiority of volume-based metrics in soft tissue sarcomas, for which we found SUVmax to remain the best prognostic factor. However, bone sarcomas should probably be evaluated with tumor volume rather than FDG PET activity.

What's behind 68Ga-PSMA-11 uptake in primary prostate cancer PET? Investigation of histopathological parameters and immunohistochemical PSMA expression patterns.

PURPOSE: Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA-) PET has become a promising tool in staging and restaging of prostate carcinoma (PCa). However, specific primary tumour features might impact accuracy of PSMA-PET for PCa detection. We investigated histopathological parameters and immunohistochemical PSMA expression patterns on radical prostatectomy (RPE) specimens and correlated them to the corresponding 68Ga-PSMA-11-PET examinations. METHODS: RPE specimens of 62 patients with preoperative 68Ga-PSMA-11-PET between 2016 and 2018 were analysed. WHO/ISUP grade groups, growth pattern (expansive vs. infiltrative), tumour area and diameter as well as immunohistochemical PSMA heterogeneity, intensity and negative tumour area (PSMA%neg) were correlated with spatially corresponding SUVmax on 68Ga-PSMA-11-PET in a multidisciplinary analysis. RESULTS: All tumours showed medium to strong membranous (2-3 +) and weak to strong cytoplasmic (1-3 +) PSMA expression. Heterogeneously expressed PSMA was found in 38 cases (61%). Twenty-five cases (40%) showed at least 5% and up to 80% PSMA%neg. PSMA%neg, infiltrative growth pattern, smaller tumour area and diameter and WHO/ISUP grade group 2 significantly correlated with lower SUVmax values. A ROC curve analysis revealed 20% PSMA%neg as an optimal cutoff with the highest sensitivity and specificity (89% and 86%, AUC 0.923) for a negative PSMA-PET scan. A multiple logistic regression model revealed tumoural PSMA%neg (p < 0.01, OR = 9.629) and growth pattern (p = 0.0497, OR = 306.537) as significant predictors for a negative PSMA-PET scan. CONCLUSIONS: We describe PSMA%neg, infiltrative growth pattern, smaller tumour size and WHO/ISUP grade group 2 as parameters associated with a lower 68Ga-PSMA-11 uptake in prostate cancer. These findings can serve as fundament for future biopsy-based biomarker development to enable an individualized, tumour-adapted imaging approach.

68Ga-PSMA-11 PET imaging in patients with ongoing androgen deprivation therapy for advanced prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) targeted positron emission tomography (PET) imaging significantly improved the detection of recurrent prostate cancer (PCa). However, the value of PSMA PET imaging in patients with advanced hormone-sensitive or hormone-resistant PCa is still largely unknown. The aim of this study was to analyze the detection rate and distribution of lesions using PSMA PET imaging in patients with advanced PCa and ongoing androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). METHODS: A total of 84 patients diagnosed with hormone-sensitive or hormone-resistant PCa who underwent 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computer tomography (CT) under ongoing ADT were retrospectively analyzed. We assessed the detection of PSMA-positive lesions overall and for three PSA subgroups (0 to < 1 ng/mL, 1 to < 20 ng/mL and > 20 ng/mL). In addition, PSMA-positive findings were stratified by localization (prostatic fossa, pelvic, para-aortic, mediastinal/supraclavicular and axillary lymph nodes, bone lesions and visceral lesions) and hormone status (hormone-sensitive vs. hormone-resistant). Furthermore, we assessed how many patients would be classified as having oligometastatic disease (≤ 3 lesions) and theoretically qualify for metastasis-directed radiotherapy (MDRT) in a personalized patient management. RESULTS: We detected PSMA-positive lesions in 94.0% (79 of 84) of all patients. In the three PSA subgroups detection rates of 85.2% (0 to < 1 ng/mL, n = 27), 97.3% (1 to < 20 ng/mL, n = 37) and 100% (> 20 ng/mL, n = 20) were observed, respectively. PSMA-positive visceral metastases were observed only in patients with a PSA > 1 ng/mL. Detection of PSMA-positive lesions did not significantly differ between patients with hormone-sensitive and hormone-resistant PCa. Oligometastatic PCa was detected in 19 of 84 patients (22.6%). Almost all patients, 94.7% (n = 18) would have been eligible for MDRT. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we observed an overall very high detection rate of 94% using PSMA PET imaging in patients with advanced PCa and ongoing ADT. Even in a majority of patients with very low PSA values < 1 ng/ml PSMA-positive lesions were found.

Diagnostic performance of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI-guided biopsy in patients with suspected prostate cancer: a prospective single-center study.

PURPOSE: Ultrasound-guided biopsy (US biopsy) with 10-12 cores has a suboptimal sensitivity for clinically significant prostate cancer (sigPCa). If US biopsy is negative, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided biopsy is recommended, despite a low specificity for lesions with score 3-5 on Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PIRADS). Screening and biopsy guidance using an imaging modality with high accuracy could reduce the number of unnecessary biopsies, reducing side effects. The aim of this study was to assess the performance of positron emission tomography/MRI with 68Ga-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA-PET/MRI) to detect and localize primary sigPCa (ISUP grade group 3 and/or cancer core length ≥ 6 mm) and guide biopsy. METHODS: Prospective, open-label, single-center, non-randomized, diagnostic accuracy study including patients with suspected PCa by elevation of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level and a suspicious lesion (PIRADS ≥3) on multiparametric MRI (mpMRI). Forty-two patients underwent PSMA-PET/MRI followed by both PSMA-PET/MRI-guided and section-based saturation template biopsy between May 2017 and February 2019. Primary outcome was the accuracy of PSMA-PET/MRI for biopsy guidance using section-based saturation template biopsy as the reference standard. RESULTS: SigPCa was found in 62% of the patients. Patient-based sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive value, and accuracy for sigPCa were 96%, 81%, 93%, 89%, and 90%, respectively. One patient had PSMA-negative sigPCa. Eight of nine false-positive lesions corresponded to cancer on prostatectomy and one in six false-negative lesions was negative on prostatectomy. CONCLUSION: PSMA-PET/MRI has a high accuracy for detecting sigPCa and is a promising tool to select patients with suspicion of PCa for biopsy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was retrospectively registered under the name "Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging (PET/MRI) Guided Biopsy in Men with Elevated PSA" (NCT03187990) on 06/15/2017 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03187990 ).

A pilot study on lung cancer detection based on regional metabolic activity distribution in digital low-dose 18F-FDG PET.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the potential of automatic lung cancer detection on submillisievert dose 18F-fludeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) scans using different positron emission tomography (PET) parameters, as a primary step towards a potential new indication for 18F-FDG PET in lung cancer screening. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort analysis with 83 patients referred for 18F-FDG PET/CT, including of 34 patients with histology-proven lung cancer and 49 patients without lung disease. Aside clinical standard PET images (PET100%) two additional low-dose PET reconstructions were generated, using only 15 s and 5 s of the 150 s list mode raw data of the full-dose PET, corresponding to 10% and 3.3% of the original 18F-FDG activity. The lungs were subdivided into three segments on each side, and each segment was classified as normal or containing cancer. The following standardized uptake values (SUVs) were extracted from PET per lung segment: SUVmean, SUVhot5, SUVmedian, SUVstd and SUVtotal. A multivariate linear regression model was used and cross-validated. The accuracy for lung cancer detection was tested with receiver operating characteristics analysis and T-statistics was used to calculate the weight of each parameter. RESULTS: The T-statistics showed that SUVstd was the most important discriminative factor for lung cancer detection. The multivariate model achieved an area under the curve of 0.97 for full-dose PET, 0.85 for PET10% with PET3.3% reconstructions resulting in a still high sensitivity the PET10% reconstruction of 80%. CONCLUSION: This pilot study indicates that segment-based, quantitative PET parameters of low-dose PET reconstructions could be used to automatically detect lung cancer with high sensitivity. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Automated assessment of PET parameters in low-dose PET may aid for an early detection of lung cancer.

Improved oncological outcome after radical prostatectomy in patients staged with 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET: a single-center retrospective cohort comparison.

BACKGROUND: Positron emission tomography (PET) targeting the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) has superior sensitivity over conventional imaging (CI) to stage prostate cancer (PCa) and therefore is increasingly used in staging to stratify patients before radical therapy. Whether this improved diagnostic accuracy translates into improved outcome after radical prostatectomy (RPE) has not yet been shown. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the oncological outcome after RPE between patients that underwent preoperative staging with CI or PSMA-PET for intermediate and high-risk PCa. METHODS: We retrospectively selected all patients that underwent RPE for intermediate- or high-risk PCa at our institution before PSMA-PET introduction (between March 2014 and September 2016) and compared the oncologic outcome of patients staged with PSMA-PET (between October 2016 and October 2018). Oncological pre-surgical risk parameters (age, PSA, D'Amico score, biopsy-ISUP, and cT stage) were compared between the groups. Oncological outcome was determined as PSA persistence, nerve-sparing rate, and surgical margin status. Wilcoxon rank-sum, Fisher's, and chi-square tests where used for statistical testing. RESULTS: One hundred five patients were included, 53 in the CI group and 52 in the PSMA-group. Patients in the PSMA group had higher ISUP grade (p < 0.001) and D'Amico score (p < 0.05). The rate of free surgical margins and PSA persistence after RPE was 64% and 17% for the CI and 77% and 6% for the PSMA group (p = 0.15 and 0.13, respectively). Subgroup analysis with high-risk patients revealed PSA persistence in 7% (3/44) in the PSMA group and 25% (7/28) in the CI group (p = 0.04). Limitations include the retrospective design and choline-PET for some patients in the CI group. CONCLUSION: Immediate outcome after RPE was not worse in the PSMA group compared with the CI group, despite a higher-risk cohort. In a comparison of only high-risk patients, PSMA-PET staging was associated with a significantly lower rate of postsurgical PSA persistence.

Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen PET: Therapy Response Assessment in Metastatic Prostate Cancer.

Therapy response assessment is a critical step in cancer management, leading clinicians to optimize the use of therapeutic options during the course of the disease. Imaging is a pivotal biomarker for therapy response evaluation in oncology and has gained wider use through the development of reproducible data-based guidelines, of which the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors is the most successful example. Disease-specific criteria have also been proposed, and the Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 criteria are the mainstay for prostate cancer (PC). However, conventional imaging evaluation in metastatic PC has several limitations, including (a) the inability to detect small-volume disease, (b) the high prevalence of bone (nonmeasurable) lesions at imaging, and (c) the established role of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels as the biomarker of choice for response assessment and disease progression. In addition, there are an increasing number of newer treatment options with various effects on imaging features. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET has improved patient selection for newer treatments, such as metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) or radionuclide therapy. The role of PSMA PET in response assessment for many metastatic PC therapeutic options (MDT, androgen deprivation therapy, chemotherapy, radionuclide therapy, and immunotherapy) is an evolving issue, with emerging data showing good correlation with PSA levels and clinical outcome. However, there are specific implications of each therapy (especially androgen deprivation therapy and immunotherapy) on PSMA expression by PC cells, leading to potential pitfalls and inaccuracies that must be known by radiologists. Despite some limitations, PSMA PET is addressing gaps left by conventional imaging methods (eg, CT and bone scanning) and nonimaging biomarkers (PSA levels) in metastatic PC therapy response assessment, a role that can be improved with advances like refinement of interpretation criteria and whole-body tumor burden quantification.© RSNA, 2020See discussion on this article by Barwick and Castellucci.

Immunohistochemical PSMA expression patterns of primary prostate cancer tissue are associated with the detection rate of biochemical recurrence with 68Ga-PSMA-11-PET.

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) targeted PET has a high detection rate for biochemical recurrence (BCR) of prostate cancer (PCa). Nevertheless, even at high prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels (> 3 ng/ml), a relevant number of PSMA-PET scans are negative, mainly due to PSMA-negative PCa. Our objective was to investigate whether PSMA-expression patterns of the primary tumour on immunohistochemistry (IHC) are associated with PSMA-PET detection rate of recurrent PCa. Methods: Retrospective institutional review board approved single-centre analysis of patients who had undergone 68Ga-PSMA-11-PET for BCR after radical prostatectomy (RPE) between 04/2016 and 07/2019, with tumour specimens available for PSMA-IHC. Clinical information (age, PSA-level, ongoing androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), Gleason score) and PSMA-IHC of the primary tumour were collected and their relationship to results from PSMA-PET (positive/negative) was investigated using a multiple logistic regression analysis. Results: 120 PSMA-PET scans in 74 patients were available for this analysis. Overall detection rate was 62% (74/120 scans), with a mean PSA value at scan time of 0.99 ng/ml (IQR 0.32-4.27). Of the clinical factors, only PSA-level and ADT were associated with PSMA-PET positivity. The percentage of PSMA-negative tumour area on IHC (PSMA%neg) had a significant association to PSMA-PET negativity (OR = 2.88, p < 0.001), while membranous PSMA-expression showed no association (p = 0.73). The positive predictive value of PSMA%neg ≥ 50% for a negative PSMA-PET was 85% (13/11) and for a PSMA%neg of 80% or more, 100% (9/9). Conclusions: PSMA-negative tumour area on IHC exhibited the strongest association with negative PSMA-PET scans, beside PSA-level and ADT. Even at very high PSA levels, PSMA-PET scans were negative in most of the patients with PSMA%neg ≥ 50%.

68Ga-PSMA-11 dose reduction for dedicated pelvic imaging with simultaneous PET/MR using TOF BSREM reconstructions.

OBJECTIVES: When increasing the PET acquisition time to match the longer MRI protocol in simultaneous PET/MR, the injected PET tracer dose can possibly be lowered to reduce radiation exposure. Moreover, applying new commercially available time-of-flight (TOF) block sequential regularized expectation maximization (BSREM)-based reconstruction algorithms could allow for further dose reductions. The purpose of this study was to find the minimal dose of the tracer targeting the prostate specific membrane antigen (68Ga-PSMA-11) for a dedicated 15-min pelvic PET/MR scan that still matches the image quality of a reference 3-min scan at 100% (150 MBq) dose. METHODS: In this retrospective analysis, 25 patients were included. PET emission datasets were edited to simulate stepwise reductions of injected tracer dose. Reference TOF ordered subset expectation maximum (OSEM) and new TOF BSREM reconstructions were performed and differences in the resulting PET images were visually and quantitatively assessed. RESULTS: Visually, TOF BSREM reconstructions with relatively high regularization parameter (ß) values are preferred. Quantitatively, however, high ß-values result in lower lesion maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) compared to the reference. A ß-value of 550 was considered the optimal compromise for the lowest possible 10% dose reconstructions, resulting in comparable visual assessment and lesion SUVmax. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that the injected 68Ga-PSMA-11 tracer dose for a standard 3-min PET scan can be reduced to approximately 10% (15 MBq) when the PET acquisition time is matched to the 15-min pelvic MRI protocol, and when reconstructed with TOF BSREM using ß = 550. This decreases the effective dose from 3.54 to 0.35 mSv. KEY POINTS: • Low-dose dedicated pelvic68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MR reduces radiation exposure for patients. • Retrospective study investigating the minimal dose needed for adequate image quality for 15-min PET frames over the pelvis showed using quantitative and qualitative analysis that a substantial dose reduction is possible without significant loss of image quality when using the TOF BSREM reconstruction algorithm. • With the introduction of low-dose pelvic68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MR, new potential applications of68Ga-PSMA-11 PET for local staging or investigation of equivocal MRI findings could become applicable, even for patients without confirmed prostate cancer.

Prostate Cancer: Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron-emission Tomography/Computed Tomography or Positron-emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Staging.

Positron-emission tomography (PET) with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) has been increasingly used to image prostate cancer in the last decade. In the staging setting several studies have already been published suggesting PSMA PET can be a valuable tool. They, however, did not translate into recommendations by guidelines. Both PSMA PET/computed tomography (CT) and PET/magnetic resonance imaging have been investigated in the staging setting, showing higher detection rate of prostate cancer lesions over the conventional imaging work-up and some studies already showed an impact on disease management. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the existing published data regarding PSMA PET for staging prostate cancer, with emphasis on PET/magnetic resonance imaging. Despite the fact that PSMA is a relatively new tool and not officially recommended for staging yet, there are >50 original studies in the literature assessing PSMA PET performance in the staging setting of prostate cancer, and some meta-analyses.

Metal artifact reduction in 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI for prostate cancer patients with hip joint replacement using multiacquisition variable-resonance image combination.

BACKGROUND: PET/MRI has a high potential in oncology imaging, especially for tumor indications where high soft tissue contrast is crucial such as genitourinary tumors. One of the challenges for PET/MRI acquisition is handling of metal implants. In addition to conventional methods, more innovative techniques have been developed to reduce artifacts caused by those implants such as the selective multiacquisition variable-image combination (MAVRIC-SL). The aim of this study is to perform a quantitative and qualitative assessment of metal artifact reduction in 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI for prostate cancer patients with hip joint replacement using a selective MAVRIC-SL sequence for the whole pelvis. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data of 20 men with 37 metal hip implants diagnosed with PCA, staged or restaged by 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI from June 2016 to December 2017. Each signal cancellation per side or metal implant was analyzed on the reference sequence LAVA-FLEX, as well as T1-weighted fast spin echo (T1w-FSE) sequence and MAVRIC-SL. Two independent reviewers reported on a four-point scale whether abnormal pelvic 68Ga-PSMA-11 uptake could be assigned to an anatomical structure in the tested sequences. RESULTS: The smallest averaged signal void was observed on MAVRIC-SL sequences with a mean artifact size of 26.17 cm2 (range 12.63 to 42.93 cm2, p < 0.001). The best image quality regarding anatomical assignment of pathological PSMA uptakes in the pelvis by two independent readers was noted for MAVRIC-SL sequences, followed by T1w-FSE with excellent interreader agreement. CONCLUSIONS: MAVRIC-SL sequence allows better image quality in the surrounding of hip implants by reducing MR signal voids and increasing so the accuracy of anatomical assignment of pathological 68Ga-PSMA-11 uptake in the pelvis over LAVA-FLEX and T1w-FSE sequences.

68Ga-PSMA-11 PET has the potential to improve patient selection for extended pelvic lymph node dissection in intermediate to high-risk prostate cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Radical prostatectomy with extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) is a curative treatment option for patients with clinically significant localised prostate cancer. The decision to perform an ePLND can be challenging because the overall incidence of lymph node metastasis is relatively low and ePLND is not free of complications. Using current clinical nomograms to identify patients with nodal involvement, approximately 75-85% of ePLNDs performed are negative. The aim of this study was to assess the added value of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET in predicting lymph node metastasis in men with intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer. METHODS: 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET scans of 60 patients undergoing radical prostatectomy with ePLND were reviewed for qualitative (visual) assessment of suspicious nodes and assessment of quantitative parameters of the primary tumour in the prostate (SUVmax, total activity (PSMAtotal) and PSMA positive volume (PSMAvol)). Ability of quantitative PET parameters to predict nodal metastasis was assessed with receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis. A multivariable logistic regression model combining PSA, Gleason score, visual nodal status on PET and primary tumour PSMAtotal was built. Net benefit at each risk threshold was compared with five nomograms: MSKCC nomogram, Yale formula, Roach formula, Winter nomogram and Partin tables (2016). RESULTS: Overall, pathology of ePLND specimens revealed 31 pelvic metastatic lymph nodes in 12 patients. 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET visual analysis correctly detected suspicious nodes in 7 patients, yielding a sensitivity of 58% and a specificity of 98%. The area under the ROC curve for primary tumour SUVmax was 0.70, for PSMAtotal 0.76 and for PSMAvol 0.75. The optimal cut-off for nodal involvement was PSMAtotal > 49.1. The PET model including PSA, Gleason score and quantitative PET parameters had a persistently higher net benefit compared with all clinical nomograms. CONCLUSION: Our model combining PSA, Gleason score and visual lymph node analysis on 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET with PSMAtotal of the primary tumour showed a tendency to improve patient selection for ePLND over the currently used clinical nomograms. Although this result has to be validated, 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET showed the potential to reduce unnecessary surgical procedures in patients with intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer.

Artificial intelligence for detecting small FDG-positive lung nodules in digital PET/CT: impact of image reconstructions on diagnostic performance.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of a deep learning algorithm for automated detection of small 18F-FDG-avid pulmonary nodules in PET scans, and to assess whether novel block sequential regularized expectation maximization (BSREM) reconstruction affects detection accuracy as compared to ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM) reconstruction. METHODS: Fifty-seven patients with 92 18F-FDG-avid pulmonary nodules (all ≤ 2 cm) undergoing PET/CT for oncological (re-)staging were retrospectively included and a total of 8824 PET images of the lungs were extracted using OSEM and BSREM reconstruction. Per-slice and per-nodule sensitivity of a deep learning algorithm was assessed, with an expert readout by a radiologist/nuclear medicine physician serving as standard of reference. Receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curve of OSEM and BSREM were assessed and the areas under the ROC curve (AUC) were compared. A maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax)-based sensitivity analysis and a size-based sensitivity analysis with subgroups defined by nodule size was performed. RESULTS: The AUC of the deep learning algorithm for nodule detection using OSEM reconstruction was 0.796 (CI 95%; 0.772-0.869), and 0.848 (CI 95%; 0.828-0.869) using BSREM reconstruction. The AUC was significantly higher for BSREM compared to OSEM (p = 0.001). On a per-slice analysis, sensitivity and specificity were 66.7% and 79.0% for OSEM, and 69.2% and 84.5% for BSREM. On a per-nodule analysis, the overall sensitivity of OSEM was 81.5% compared to 87.0% for BSREM. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that machine learning algorithms may aid detection of small 18F-FDG-avid pulmonary nodules in clinical PET/CT. AI performed significantly better on images with BSREM than OSEM. KEY POINTS: • The diagnostic value of deep learning for detecting small lung nodules (≤ 2 cm) in PET images using BSREM and OSEM reconstruction was assessed. • BSREM yields higher SUVmaxof small pulmonary nodules as compared to OSEM reconstruction. • The use of BSREM translates into a higher detectability of small pulmonary nodules in PET images as assessed with artificial intelligence.