Social Determinants of Health Impacting the Experience of Young Adults With Cancer at a Single Community Urban Hospital: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer patients receive palliative medicine consultation at a late stage and face diagnostic delays. Failure to address social determinants of health (SDOH) and AYA-specific needs can adversely impact patient experience. This retrospective observational cohort study used data from chart review to assess the frequency of SDOH impacting AYA patients and setting of initial diagnosis at a US urban safety-net hospital. The association of SDOH variables with delays in treatment, loss of follow-up, and no-shows was tested using Chi-square and t-tests. One hundred seventy five patient charts were reviewed. Sixty-two percent were diagnosed in acute care settings. Substance use disorders, financial, employment, and insurance issues were associated with delayed treatment, with weak to moderate effect sizes. Mental health diagnoses, substance use disorder, homelessness, and financial burdens were associated with patient no-shows, with moderate to large effect sizes. Twenty-five percent of patients received palliative medicine consultation; 70% of these occurred at end of life. This study demonstrates the impact of SDOH on AYA cancer care and the need for policy allowing for intervention on SDOH.

Questioning methadone split-dosing for analgesia among hospitalized patients with opioid use disorder.

Methadone is hypothesized to provide greater analgesic coverage when split into two or more divided doses. However, empirical data are lacking, and our anecdotal experience at a safety-net hospital among patients with opioid use disorder suggests that it may not be straightforward. Guidelines and clinicians should exercise appropriate caution when recommending this strategy.

Colorado Palliative Care and Hospice Crisis Standards: Moving Beyond Critical Care Planning.

Palliative care (PC) and hospice services have experienced shortages before 2020, and during the initial phases of the current pandemic, more critical gaps are expected with future surges, much as scarcity in intensive care unit services may recur during the COVID-19 pandemic. Although ethical allocation of ventilators and intensive care unit care is the subject of important discussions during this pandemic, caring for those at the end of life and those not desiring or qualifying for critical interventions must not be neglected, as critical care and comfort-focused care are intertwined. We review state and regional gaps already recognized in planning for scarcity in PC and hospice services during this pandemic and describe the planning initiatives Colorado has developed to address potential scarcities for this vulnerable and diverse group of people. We hope to encourage other state and regional groups to anticipate needs in the coming surges of this pandemic or in public health crises to come. Such planning is key to avoid the degradation of care that may result if it is necessary to invoke crisis standards of care and ration these essential services to our communities.

Palliative Volume Resuscitation in a Patient with Cancer and Hypercalcemia: Why Bother?

Hypercalcemia of malignancy affects 2%-2.8% of cancer patients and is associated with an increased risk of mortality and other symptom-related complications. Standard treatment consists of fluid resuscitation, intravenous bisphosphonates, and calcitonin. Little is known, however, about the benefits of treatment of malignant hypercalcemia in patients with late-stage terminal cancer. We present a case of a hospice patient with squamous cell lung cancer brought to our hospital with newly altered mental status who was found to have hypercalcemia of malignancy. Our discussion centers on the diagnostic dilemma of deciding which patients seeking comfort-focused care may benefit from fluid resuscitation for symptoms of hypercalcemia of malignancy while maintaining the unambiguous goal of comfort care.

Chief of Residents for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety: A Recipe for a New Role in Graduate Medical Education.

INTRODUCTION: The San Antonio Uniformed Services Health Education Consortium (SAUSHEC) is the largest group of residency programs in the Department of Defense. In an effort to provide improved Quality Improvement and Patient Safety (QI/PS) training for its residents, SAUSHEC created the position of Chief of QI/PS for Residents in the academic year 2014-2015. The Chief of QI/PS for Residents was based in the Internal Medicine residency program but also assisted with SAUSHEC-wide QI/PS projects. This is the first such job in the Department of Defense. METHODS: Here, we detail the accomplishments during this first academic year, including the alignment of the job with the stated QI/PS-related goals of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Clinical Learning Environment Review. Efforts focused within the Internal Medicine residency program included QI/PS curriculum development, improvement upon monthly morbidity and mortality (M&M) conferences, and facilitating resident participation in QI projects. The 2014-2015 academic year Internal Medicine residency QI/PS project focused on increasing comfort and discussions with patients regarding advance directives; this also served to emphasize the humanistic side of potential QI/PS projects. The Chief of QI/PS for Residents also spearheaded hospital-wide initiatives, including the creation of a quarterly hospital-wide M&M conference, coordinating resident involvement in QI/PS-related committees, and facilitating feedback of patient safety report responses to trainees. RESULTS: We focus on the portion of the QI/PS curriculum involving the presentation of a mock Root Cause Analysis (RCA) and provide the results of a pre- and postpresentation survey of resident knowledge of RCAs. In order to quantify the efforts over the entire academic year, we also report the results of a resident self-assessment of QI/PS aptitude and competencies, including changes in these measures over the academic year. Finally, we discuss challenges faced and outline future goals for the position. CONCLUSION: The SAUSHEC Chief of QI/PS for Residents is the first such designated position in the Department of Defense. As QI/PS continues to increase as a focus area for physician training, we anticipate that other programs will create similar positions. We provide ideas for how a Chief of QI/PS for Residents can be involved at a program and hospital-wide level and quantify the success of different efforts.