RESUMO
The aims of our study were to evaluate the maternal and fetal outcomes of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP). In this observational, retrospective case-control study, we included all pregnant women who gave birth with a diagnosis of ICP between January 2010 and December 2020 at the Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Messina. The data were compared with those from a control group of pregnant women who did not have ICP. One hundred twenty-nine and eighty-five patients were included, respectively, in the study and in the control group. There was a significant difference between the two groups in the incidence of hypothyroidism, thrombophilia, gestational diabetes, gestational hypertension, postpartum hemorrhage, and preterm delivery, which were more frequent in the ICP patients. No neonatal adverse events were recorded, although a significant difference in the meconium-stained amniotic fluid condition was noted. After a 24-month follow-up, 48/129 patients with ICP accepted to be reassessed by liver ultrasound, elastographic examination, and liver function blood tests. No patient showed signs of chronic liver disease. This study confirmed a higher probability of adverse short-term maternal outcomes in ICP pregnant patients, but a lower probability of adverse short-term fetal outcomes and the absence of a long-term maternal risk of chronic liver disease.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To ascertain the most effective approach in pregnancies complicated by mild intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (mICP) by evaluating rates of adverse perinatal outcomes (APOs) and pathological placental findings. METHODS: A total of 89 pregnancies complicated by mICP (defined as total serum bile acids (TSBAs) levels <40 µmol/L) were included. One-drug (ursodeoxycholic acid [UDCA]) (n = 49, 55.1%) and combined (UDCA plus S-adenosyl methionine (SAMe)) (n = 40, 44.9%) therapies were compared. RESULTS: No differences were found in demographic, obstetric, and placental characteristics. In UDCA plus SAMe group, premature delivery was a common clinical decision (14.3 versus 25%, p-value = .201), with increased rates of instrumental vaginal delivery (VD; 28.6 versus 40%, p-value = .522), but similar cesarean section (CS) rates (26.5 versus 25%, p-value = .498). Mean placental weight was comparable (UDCA, mean 595.7 g, SD 213.1 g versus UDCA plus SAMe, mean 586.4 g, SD 102.9 g, p-value = .875). A total of 110 lesions were identified, 64 in 25 placentas of patients assigned to the UDCA and 46 in 15 placentas of patients managed by UDCA plus SAMe. Placental findings attributable to maternal malperfusion were found in 41/25 and 32/15 cases treated by UCDA and UDCA plus SAMe (165 versus 213%, p-value = .774), pathological fetal vascular supply in 17/25 and 8/15 placentas (68 versus 53%, p-value = .777), and inflammatory lesions in 6/25 and 6/15 cases (24 versus 40%, p-value = .757). CONCLUSIONS: Pregnancies complicated by mICP and managed by UDCA alone present similar APO rates and placental histopathology if compared with those treated by UDCA plus SAMe, failing to recognize advantages in the combined therapy. Further prospective studies and data sharing from ongoing RTCs could drive changes in therapeutic plan.