Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 25(7): 981-3, 2012 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21740319

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the immediate maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with sequential instrumental delivery (vacuum plus forceps) compared with the use of one instrument only (forceps or vacuum). STUDY DESIGN: A longitudinal observational study was carried out, including all instrumental deliveries performed in term singleton pregnancies, in vertex presentation, at station level 0 or +1. According to the type of the instruments, the deliveries were divided in three groups: the vacuum group, the forceps group and the sequential group. Immediate maternal and neonatal outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 275 instrumental deliveries were performed: 126 (45.5%) vacuum assisted deliveries, 62 (22.6%) forceps assisted deliveries and 87 (31.6%) sequential deliveries. Regarding maternal morbidity, there was a significant difference between the three groups (p < 0.001), with a higher rate of complications in the sequential group. The type of instrument was the only factor associated with significant maternal morbidity. The rate of immediate neonatal morbidity was 4.4% and there was no significant association with the instrument type or with other identifiable factors. CONCLUSION: Sequential delivery is associated with a higher maternal morbidity and it seems not to increase neonatal morbidity.


Assuntos
Traumatismos do Nascimento/etiologia , Vácuo-Extração/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Estudos Longitudinais , Gravidez , Vácuo-Extração/estatística & dados numéricos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA