High rate of de novo esophagitis 5 years after sleeve gastrectomy: a prospective multicenter study in Spain.

BACKGROUND: Major concerns years after the sleeve gastrectomy (SG) include weight regain, development of hiatal hernia (HH) and gastroesophageal reflux disease, with esophagitis and Barrett's esophagus (BE). Both problems could be related, and the incidence of asymptomatic patients is troubling. OBJECTIVE: To study the incidence of reflux symptoms, esophagitis, BE, HH, and asymptomatic pathology and their relationship with weight regain in patients 5 years after undergoing SG at different bariatric centers in Spain. SETTING: Public and private hospitals with bariatric surgery units. METHODS: Prospective, multicenter, nonrandomized study involving 13 Spanish hospitals with a cumulative experience of 4,500 patients having undergone the SG procedure and patients who had been subjected to the procedure at least 5 years previously along with preoperative gastroscopy. The clinical history, preoperative gastroscopy, and technical details of the SG were recorded. A specific clinical questionnaire was given that recorded the intake volume, perception of satiety, and gastroesophageal reflux (GER) symptoms. Gastroscopy, pH-metry, and manometry studies were carried out, and the data were analyzed statistically. The study has been authorized by the official Spanish ethics committee CEI/CEIm Hospital Universitario Gran Canaria Dr Negrín (code 2019-216-1). RESULTS: One hundred and five patients who underwent SG and who had with at least 5 years of follow-up were included. All procedures were performed laparoscopically. The mean age of patients was 51.1 years, and 70.5% were women. The mean characteristics of the SG procedure were a 37.2F probe, at 4.6 cm from the pylorus, and a crura closure was performed in 5 cases. There were no major complications (Clavien-Dindo grade >3) or deaths. The average preoperative body mass index was 46.3 kg/m2, the minimum reached was 20.6 kg/m2, whereas the average after 5 years was of 34.5 kg/m2. GER, HH, and esophagitis symptoms went from 17.1%, 28.6%, and 5.7%, respectively, before the SG to 76%, 30.5%, and 31.4%, respectively, 5 years after the procedure. Symptoms persisted over the years in 37.1% of cases and presented de novo in 52.8% of cases. Fifty-three percent of manometries (n = 27, total 51) and 64% of pH-metries (n = 32, total 53; DeMeester average score was 65) were pathologic 5 years after the procedure. Concerning gastroscopies, 5 years after the procedure, HH was found in 33 patients (30.5% of total) and esophagitis in 32 patients (31.4% of total). Eighty patients (76%) had GER symptoms, and 25 patients (24%) were asymptomatic. Only 1 patient (.9%) developed BE. CONCLUSIONS: Our study has confirmed a high rate of both persistent and de novo esophagitis and hiatal hernia, many of which were asymptomatic, 5 years after SG had been performed. Weight regain and a striking increase in gastric capacity are risk factors indicative of esophagitis, even when patients are asymptomatic. We consider a control gastroscopy and the preventive use of proton pump inhibitors necessary in these cases regardless of symptoms. We recommend that a control gastroscopy should be performed in all cases regardless of symptoms 5 years after SG. Further studies are needed to validate these recommendations.

Bariatric surgery in patients with previous COVID-19 infection.

BACKGROUND: The process of reintroducing bariatric surgery to our communities in a COVID-19 environment was particular to each country. Furthermore, no clear recommendation was made for patients with a previous COVID-19 infection and a favorable outcome who were seeking bariatric surgery. OBJECTIVES: To analyze the risks of specific complications for patients with previous COVID-19 infection who were admitted for bariatric surgery. SETTING: Eight high-volume private centers from 5 countries. METHODS: All patients with morbid obesity and previous COVID-19 infection admitted for bariatric surgery were included in the current study. Patients were enrolled from 8 centers and 5 countries, and their electronic health data were reviewed retrospectively. The primary outcome was to identify early (<30 d) specific complications related to COVID-19 infection following bariatric surgery, and the secondary outcome was to analyze additional factors from work-ups that could prevent complications. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients with a mean age of 40 years (range, 21-68 yr) and a mean body mass index of 44.3 kg/m2 (±7.4 kg/m2) with previous COVID-19 infection underwent different bariatric procedures: 23 cases of sleeve (65.7 %), 7 cases of bypass, and 5 other cases. The symptomatology of the previous COVID-19 infection varied: 15 patients had no symptoms, 12 had fever and respiratory signs, 5 had only fever, 2 had digestive symptoms, and 1 had isolated respiratory signs. Only 5 patients (14.2 %) were hospitalized for COVID-19 infection, for a mean period of 8.8 days (range, 6-15 d). One patient was admitted to an intensive care unit and needed invasive mechanical ventilation. The mean interval time from COVID-19 infection to bariatric surgery was 11.3 weeks (3-34 wk). The mean hospital stay was 1.7 days (±1 d), and all patients were clinically evaluated 1 month following the bariatric procedure. There were 2 readmissions and 1 case of complication: that case was of a gastric leak treated with laparoscopic drainage and a repeated pigtail drain, with a favorable outcome. No cases of other specific complications or mortality were recorded. CONCLUSION: Minor and moderate COVID-19 infections, especially the forms not complicated with invasive mechanical ventilation, should not preclude the indication for bariatric surgery. In our experience, a prior COVID-19 infection does not induce additional specific complications following bariatric surgery.

Prognostic factors of weight loss after sleeve gastrectomy: Multi centre study in Spain and Portugal. / Factores predictivos de pérdida ponderal tras la gastrectomía vertical. Estudio multicéntrico hispano-portugués.

INTRODUCTION: Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) has become a technique in its own right although a selective or global indication remains controversial. The weight loss data at 5 years are heterogeneous. The aim of the study is to identify possible prognostic factors of insufficient weight loss after SG. METHODS: A SG retrospective multicenter study of more than one year follow-up was performed. Failure is considered if EWL>50%. Univariate and multivariate study of Cox regression were performed to identify prognostic factors of failure of weight loss at 1, 2 and 3 years of follow up. RESULTS: A total of 1,565 patients treated in 29 hospitals are included. PSP per year: 70.58±24.7; 3 years 69.39±29.2; 5 years 68.46±23.1. Patients with EWL<50 (considered failure): 17.1% in the first year, 20.1% at 3 years, 20.8% at 5 years. Variables with influence on the weight loss failure in univariate analysis were: BMI>50kg/m2, age>50years, DM2, hypertension, OSA, heart disease, multiple comorbidities, distance to pylorus> 4cm, bougie>40F, treatment with antiplatelet agents. The reinforcement of the suture improved results. In multivariate study DM2 and BMI are independent factors of failure. CONCLUSION: The SG associates a satisfactory weight loss in 79% of patients in the first 5 years; however, some variables such as BMI>50, age>50, the presence of several comorbidities, more than 5cm section of the pylorus or bougie>40F can increase the risk of weight loss failure.

Psychological changes in morbidly obese patients after sleeve gastrectomy.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to observe the psychological changes at one year postop in a group of patients undergoing laparoscopic vertical sleeve gastrectomy (GVL) and multidisciplinary follow- up. METHODS: A total of 46 patients with a BMI-35 or higher, who were selected for GVL, completed psychological testing. After GVL surgery, patients received psychological, nutritional, and medical attention during 12 months, and they retook the same tests. RESULTS: Psychological tests showed an improvement on almost all scales tested, except perfectionism. The most significant change was in the benchmark for Eating Disorders with an improvement of 89% for bulimia (P<.01), and 55% for body dissatisfaction (P<.01) and ineffectiveness (P<.01). In quality of life there was an improvement of 57% in the change in health status (P<.01). CONCLUSION: During our study, a protocol involving GVL and multidisciplinary follow-ups seems proved to be an effective intervention for improving bulimic symptoms and quality of living. The results of these psychological changes are similar to Roux-en-Y Gastric bypass but different to vertical banded gastroplasty or adjustable gastric band, according to previous studies. However, long-term studies are necessary to confirm this trend.