Phantom sensation in genital gender-affirming surgery: a narrative review.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review findings related to phantom genital sensation, emphasizing phantom sensation in the transgender and gender diverse (TGD) population. We discuss prevalence, presentation and potential implications for sensory outcomes in genital gender-affirming surgery. RECENT FINDINGS: There is a high prevalence of phantom genital sensations in the TGD population. The prevalence varies by body part, approaching 50% in the most frequently reported transgender phantom - the phantom penis. Unlike genital phantoms that occur after trauma or surgery which are often painful, transgender phantoms are typically neutral and often erogenous in experience. Phantom sensation in the TGD population can be an affirming experience and important part of sexual well being and embodiment. SUMMARY: Recent studies have begun to characterize the prevalence and presentations of phantom genital sensations in TGD people, informing our evolving understanding of the sensory experiences of the transgender and gender diverse population. Targeting integration of these centrally-mediated phantom genital sensations with the peripherally generated sensation from genital stimulation may represent one potential avenue to improve sensation and embodiment following genital gender-affirming surgical procedures. Additionally, emerging techniques in modern peripheral nerve surgery targeting phantom pain may offer potential treatment options for painful phantom sensation seen after cases of genital surgery or trauma.

Factors Affecting the Choice to Forgo Nipple Grafts in Gender-Affirming Chest Surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Some patients pursuing gender-affirming mastectomy prefer to forgo autologous nipple and areolar reconstruction, instead choosing a "no nipple" option. The objective of this study is to evaluate the motives and influences contributing to this decision. METHODS: A retrospective survey-based study of patients undergoing gender-affirming mastectomy over a 4.6-year period was conducted. All patients were offered nipple and areolar reconstruction. A survey was distributed to those who elected to forgo nipple and areolar reconstruction exploring the factors influencing that choice and postoperative satisfaction. RESULTS: Five hundred thirty-six patients underwent gender-affirming mastectomy and 13% chose to forgo nipple and areolar reconstruction. The survey response rate was 72%. Most respondents identified as nonbinary (48%) or transmasculine (42%). Body image, defined in the context of this study as an improvement in body image satisfaction due to achievement of a more gender-congruent appearance, was the most highly cited and most heavily weighted decision-making factor. Concerns about nipple graft outcomes were frequently cited as important but carried less weight. There were no differences between transmasculine and nonbinary patients in terms of motivations for choosing this surgical option. Fifty-eight percent of respondents pursued or planned to pursue chest tattoos, whereas 42% preferred no further chest modifications. Patient satisfaction was high postoperatively (98%), and 82% of respondents would choose to forgo nipple and areolar reconstruction again even if surgical outcomes of free nipple grafts were improved. CONCLUSIONS: Gender-affirming mastectomy without nipple and areolar reconstruction was requested by 13% of patients presenting for gender-affirming chest surgery over the study period and had high postoperative satisfaction among patients who chose this option. This modification of gender-affirming mastectomy is a variation that surgical teams should be aware of. Many reasons to forgo nipple preservation were cited, most of which related to body image. Secondary factors were easier recovery and/or concern about outcomes of free nipple grafts. Many patients wished information about this surgical option was more widely available.

Tissue Options for Construction of the Neovaginal Canal in Gender-Affirming Vaginoplasty.

Gender-affirming vaginoplasty (GAV) comprises the construction of a vulva and a neovaginal canal. Although technical nuances of vulvar construction vary between surgeons, vulvar construction is always performed using the homologous penile and scrotal tissues to construct the corresponding vulvar structures. Therefore, the main differentiating factor across gender-affirming vaginoplasty techniques is the tissue that is utilized to construct the neovaginal canal. These tissue types vary markedly in their availability, histology, and ease of harvest and have different advantages and disadvantages to their use as neovaginal lining. In this narrative review, the authors provide a comprehensive overview of the tissue types and associated operative approaches used for construction of the neovagina in GAV. Tissue choice is guided by several factors, such as histological similarity to natal vaginal mucosa, tissue availability, lubrication potential, additional donor site morbidity, and the specific goals of each patient. Skin is used to construct the neovagina in most cases with a combination of pedicled penile skin flaps and scrotal and extra-genital skin grafts. However, skin alternatives such as peritoneum and intestine are increasing in use. Peritoneum and intestine are emerging as options for primary vaginoplasty in cases of limited genital skin or revision vaginoplasty procedures. The increasing number of gender-affirming vaginoplasty procedures performed and the changing patient demographics from factors such as pubertal suppression have resulted in rapidly evolving indications for the use of these differing vaginoplasty techniques. This review sheds light on the use of less frequently utilized tissue types described for construction of the neovaginal canal, including mucosal tissues such as urethral and buccal mucosa, the tunica vaginalis, and dermal matrix allografts and xenografts. Although the body of evidence for each vaginoplasty technique is growing, there is a need for large prospective comparison studies of outcomes between these techniques and the tissue types used to line the neovaginal canal to better define indications and limitations.

Complications and management of excessive phallic turgor following gender-affirming phalloplasty.

Gender-affirming phalloplasty involves flap tubularization, placing unique stresses on the vascularity of the flap. Tubularization renders the flap susceptible to postoperative edema that can lead to excessive turgor that, if left untreated, can compromise perfusion and threaten the viability of the phallic reconstruction. This phenomenon has not been formally described in our literature. We aim to define this entity, described here as "Excessive Phallic Turgor" (EPT), and to outline its incidence, frequency of its underlying etiologies, and sequelae. We conducted a single-center, retrospective review of all phalloplasty operations involving flap transfer performed from December 2016 to May 2023. All patients requiring emergent intervention (bedside suture release, reoperation, or both) due to excessive phallic swelling and impending flap compromise were considered to have EPT. Variables compared between groups included underlying etiology (categorized as congestion, hematoma or swelling), patient demographics, flap type and size, management, length of stay, and postoperative outcomes. Over the study period, 147 phalloplasty operations involving flap transfer for shaft creation were performed. Of those, 15% developed EPT. Age, BMI, flap length, flap circumference, flap surface area, single vs multistage operation, flap tubularization (shaft-only vs tube-within-tube), and flap donor site were not significantly different between the cohort that developed EPT and that which did not. Development of EPT was associated with higher rates of phallic hematoma, surgical site infection, shaft fistula requiring repair, and longer inpatient stays. When EPT develops, prompt diagnosis and alleviation of intraphallic pressure are paramount for mitigating short- and long-term morbidity.

Use of Supinator Motor Branches in Targeted Muscle Reinnervation of the Superficial Radial Nerve.

Symptomatic neuromas of the superficial radial nerve (SRN) can cause debilitating pain. Traditional surgical management options have demonstrated inconsistent outcomes prompting a search for alternatives. Recent reports have emerged on the use of targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) for neuromas of the SRN using donors that are well established in hand surgery, such as the brachioradialis (BR) or extensor capri radialis longus or brevis. Use of the brachioradialis or extensor capri radialis longus motor targets can require surgery at or above the level of the antecubital fossa, and denervation of these muscle groups may be undesirable in cases of complex upper extremity injury where these donors may be needed for tendon or nerve transfer. The supinator is an expendable and often overlooked donor nerve that has not been assessed as a target for TMR of the SRN. In this case series, three patients with SRN neuromas whose conservative management failed and who did not have an SRN lesion amenable to reconstruction were managed with TMR to the nerves to supinator. At latest follow-up (9-22 months), no patients had deficits in supination or evident donor site morbidity. Two patients reported complete resolution of their SRN neuroma pain, and one patient reported partial improvement. This case series reports early results of TMR of the SRN using nerves to supinator in cases of SRN neuromas not amenable to reconstruction, demonstrating technical feasibility, improvements in neuroma pain, and no discernible donor morbidity.

Revision Carpal Tunnel Release Following Endoscopic Compared With Open Decompression.

Importance: Carpal tunnel release (CTR) technique may influence the likelihood of revision surgery. Prior studies of revision CTR following endoscopic CTR (ECTR) compared with open CTR (OCTR) have been limited by sample size and duration of follow-up. Objective: To estimate the incidence of revision CTR following ECTR compared with OCTR in a national cohort. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study used data from the US Veterans Health Administration. Participants included all adults (age ≥18 years) undergoing at least 1 outpatient CTR from October 1, 1999, to May 20, 2021. Data were analyzed from May 21, 2021, to November 27, 2023. Exposure: Index CTR technique. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was time to revision CTR, defined as repeat ipsilateral CTR during the study period. Secondary outcomes were indications for revision, findings during revision, and additional procedures performed during revision. Results: Among 134 851 wrists from 103 455 patients (92 510 [89.4%] male; median [IQR] age, 62 [53-70] years) undergoing at least 1 CTR, 1809 wrists underwent at least 1 revision at a median (IQR) of 2.5 (1.0-3.8) years. In competing-risks analysis, the cumulative incidence of revision was 1.06% (95% CI, 0.99%-1.12%) at 5 years and 1.59% (95% CI, 1.51%-1.67%) at 10 years. ECTR was associated with increased hazard of revision CTR compared with OCTR (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.56; 95% CI, 1.34-1.81; P < .001). The risk difference for revision CTR associated with ECTR compared with OCTR was 0.57% (95% CI, 0.31%-0.84%) at 5 years (number needed to harm, 176) and 0.72% (95% CI, 0.36%-1.07%) at 10 years (number needed to harm, 139). Regardless of index CTR technique, the most common indication for revision was symptom recurrence (1062 wrists [58.7%]). A reconstituted transverse carpal ligament (TCL) was more common after ECTR compared with OCTR, whereas scarring of the overlying tissues and of the median nerve itself were more common following OCTR. Incomplete transverse-carpal-ligament release was observed in 251 of the wrists undergoing revision CTR (13.94%) and was more common among revisions following ECTR (odds ratio, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.11-2.37; P = .01). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of revision CTR in the Veterans Health Administration, ECTR was associated with increased risk of revision compared with OCTR, but the absolute risk was low regardless of technique. Intraoperative findings at revision varied significantly according to index CTR technique.

Recovery Versus Remission: Clinical Insights.

Adverse myocardial remodeling can be reversed by medical, surgical, and device therapies leading to reduced heart failure (HF) morbidity and mortality and significant improvements in the structure and function of the failing heart. The growing population of HF patients who experience a degree of myocardial improvement should be better studied in terms of long-term outcomes and underlying biology to more clearly define the difference between recovery and remission. These investigations should also be focused in determining whether in chronic HF patients complete myocardial recovery is achievable at a meaningful rate and help us better understand, predict, and manipulate cardiac recovery.