Excessive prescription duration is a major contributor of inappropriate antibiotic use in primary care.

OBJECTIVES: In France, 75% of systemic antibiotics are prescribed by general practitioners (GPs) in primary care. We aimed to estimate the burden of inappropriate use related to excessive prescription duration. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In 2021, we performed a cross-sectional and pharmaco-economic study of a network of six GPs. The references for optimal durations were those of the French national guidelines for antibiotic prescription. RESULTS: Out of 196 antibiotic prescriptions, 33.7 % were of excessive duration, with a mean excess of 0.9 [0.86-0.94] to 1.6 [1.45-1.72] days per prescription. Ear, nose, and throat, respiratory tract, and skin and skin structure infections were the main infections associated with excessive prescription. The pharmaco-economic analysis showed that the cost of excessive prescription duration would range from an estimated 151 to 262 million € in France in 2021. CONCLUSION: Addressing excessive antibiotic prescription duration by GPs may represent a powerful and cost-saving tool in antimicrobial stewardship programs.

Outcomes in orthopedic device infections due to Streptococcus agalactiae: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Group B streptococci (Streptococcus agalactiae) (GBS) is a rare cause of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) occurring in patients with comorbidities and seems to be associated with a poor outcome. Depiction of GBS PJI is scarce in the literature. METHODS: A retrospective survey in 2 referral centers for bone joint infections was done Patients with a history of PJI associated with GBS between 2014 and 2019 were included. A descriptive analysis of treatment failure was done. Risk factors of treatment failure were assessed. RESULTS: We included 61 patients. Among them, 41 had monomicrobial (67%) infections. The median duration of follow-up was 2 years (interquartile range 2.35) Hypertension, obesity, and diabetes mellitus were the most reported comorbidities (49%, 50%, and 36% respectively). Death was observed in 6 individuals (10%) during the initial management. The rate of success was 63% (26/41). Removal of the material was not associated with remission (p = 0.5). We did not find a specific antibiotic regimen associated with a better outcome. CONCLUSION: The results show that S. agalactiae PJIs are associated with high rates of comorbidities and a high treatment failure rate with no optimal treatment so far.

Late delivery of antibiotics: a new proxy for antimicrobial stewardship?

OBJECTIVES: To analyse the time elapsed between the prescription of antibiotics and their pick-up at the pharmacy and identify their determinants. METHODS: We used the National Health Insurance reimbursement databases on antibiotics delivery in 2021 in La Manche, Western France. Delayed delivery was defined as the time between prescription and antibiotic pick-up of >24 hours. RESULTS: We enrolled 207 250 prescriptions, of whom 18 728 (9.0%) collected their antibiotics at the community pharmacy >24 hours after prescription. Independent factors associated with delayed delivery were age >15 years (15-64 years: OR, 2.08 [1.98-2.19]; p < 0.001 and >65 years OR, 3.27 [3.09-3.46]; p < 0.001), male sex (OR, 00.77 [0.75-0.80]; p < 0.001), low income (OR, 1.08 [1.02-1.15]; p = 0.013), chronic diseases (OR, 1.29 [1.25-1.34]; p < 0.001), prescription during the weekend (OR, 1.49 [1.43-1.56]; p < 0.001), summer season (OR, 1.11 [1.07-1.16]; p < 0.001), lock-down period (OR, 4.15 [3.80-4.53]; p < 0.001), and distance from the patient home to his general practitioner office and the pharmacy >10 km (OR, 1.17 [1.13-1.21]; p < 0.001). DISCUSSION: The delayed delivery of antibiotics after prescription is not uncommon, especially in elderly patients, those with low income or chronic diseases, in case of weekend prescriptions, summer season and when the pharmacy is > 10 km away from the patient's home and his general practitioner office. If confirmed, this potential indicator of unnecessary prescriptions, readily available in some databases, may be used to target antimicrobial stewardship programmes and monitor the effect of interventions.

Valvular and infection-associated risk factors as criteria to guide the use of echocardiography in patients with native joint infections.

BACKGROUND: Native joint and bone infections (NJBI) are associated with infective endocarditis (IE) in 15% of cases. There are no studies analyzing the use of cardiac imaging in cases of NJBI. The objective of this study was to identify factors associated with echocardiography suggestive of IE in patients with NJBI. METHODS: This medical records review was conducted in patients hospitalized for NJBI between 2007 and 2017 in Rheumatology and Infectious Diseases departments of 2 university hospitals. Patients included had a microbiologically proven NJBI during their hospitalization. RESULTS: In this cohort of 546 patients, median age 66 years, echocardiography was suggestive of IE in 66 (12%). In multivariate analysis, factors associated with echocardiography suggestive of IE were 2 or more positive blood cultures (OR 11.55 (CI95% 3.24-74.20)), cardiac conditions with a high risk of IE (OR 7.34 (CI95% 2.95-18.61)), unknown heart murmur (OR 4.59 (CI95% 1.79-11.74)), multifocal infection (OR 2.26 (CI95% 1.21-4.23)) and an infection due to S. bovis (OR 3.52 (CI95% 1.26-9.79)). The factor associated with the absence of an echocardiography evocative of IE was infection due to unconventional bacteria for IE (OR 0.13 (CI95% 0.01-0.76)). According to the factors associated with echocardiography evocative of IE, we propose the Normandy score based on three kinds of data: cardiac condition, bacterial strain and NJBI mechanism. Echocardiography should be realized when this score, whose negative predictive value is 100% CI95% (98-100%) for prescription of echocardiography, is more than zero. CONCLUSIONS: A score based on valvular condition, bacterial strain and NJBI mechanism could guide clinicians in prescribing echocardiography during NJBI with an excellent negative predictive value.

Microbiological diagnosis of suspected vertebral osteomyelitis with a focus on the yield of percutaneous needle biopsy: a 10-year cohort study.

This study aims to evaluate in patients hospitalized for vertebral osteomyelitis (VO) the effectiveness of bacteriological diagnosis and the yield of percutaneous needle biopsy (PNB) and to identify factors associated with the result of PNB. This retrospective, two-centre study was conducted between 2000 and 2009. Data on patients with VO were retrieved from the diagnosis database and confirmed by checking medical records. A total of 300 patients with VO were identified; 31 received antibiotics without bacteriological diagnosis, and 269 patients with spondylodiscitis imaging were included. Eighty-three (30.9%) and 18 (6.7%) infections were documented by blood cultures and by bacteriological samples other than PNB, respectively; 168 patients with no bacteriological diagnosis had PNB. Of these, 92 (54.8%) were positive and identified the pathogen and 76 (45.2%) were negative. The most common bacteria were Staphylococcus aureus (34.3%), Streptococcus spp. (20.6%) and coagulase-negative staphylococcus (14.8%). After multivariate analysis, the only factor associated with negative PNB was previous antibiotic intake (OR: 2.31 [1.07-5.00]). When VO was suspected on imaging, bacteriological investigation identified the microorganism in 209/300 (70%) of the cases. The yield of PNB was 54.8%. The only predictor of PNB negativity was previous antibiotic intake. Therefore, we believe that a second PNB should be done after a sufficient delay withdrawal of antibiotics if the first sample was negative. The study was retrospectively registered by the local ethics committee (N°E2019-61).

General practitioners' clinical practice on the management of cystitis in Normandy, France: A clinical vignettes-based study.

RATIONALE, AIMS, AND OBJECTIVES: The objective was to measure the quality of clinical practice for the management of cystitis in adult women in general practice by collaborating with quality circles and the regional centre for antibiotic counsel. METHOD: This descriptive cross-sectional study was performed in 2018 in Normandy, France. A questionnaire composed of clinical vignettes was used to evaluate practices of general practitioners (GPs) with regard to cystitis classified into four categories: simple, at risk of complication, recurrent, and caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria. The 2017 French Infectious Diseases Society's guidelines were used as a reference. RESULTS: A total of 142 GPs participated in the study (45.5% of the solicited). Fosfomycin-trometamol and pivmecillinam were cited as first-line treatments for simple cystitis by 134 (94%) and 38 (27%) participants, respectively. For at risk of complication cystitis, the treatments cited were cefixime by 64 participants (45%), ofloxacin by 50 (35%), pivmecillinam by 49 (35%), fosfomycin-trometamol by 38 (27%), nitrofurantoin by 36 (25%), and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid by 28 (20%). Mean compliance rates were 85% for simple cystitis, 39% for at risk of complication cystitis, 60% for recurrent cystitis and 14% for cystitis caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria. Two criteria had less than 10% of the compliant answers: comprehensive knowledge of cystitis complication risk factors (9%) and positivity thresholds of urine cultures (10%). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, diagnostic means, follow-up testing, and simple cystitis treatment (with fosfomycin predominantly mentioned) were broadly compliant. The use of critical antibiotics was too frequent for at risk of complication cystitis. There may be a need to improve the knowledge of professionals on antibiotic resistance and appropriate antibiotic use.