Assessment of interactions and dosage recommendations of synthetic DMARDs-Evidence-based and consensus-based recommendations based on a systematic literature search.

Conventional synthetic (cs) and targeted synthetic (ts) disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) have potential interactions with a multitude of drugs. Furthermore, they sometimes have a lower therapeutic index, particularly in cases of limited organ functions. The aim of this work was to establish evidence-based recommendations on the therapeutic use of DMARDs in the context of drug interactions and dosage recommendations. A systematic literature search was carried out on the issue of drug interactions and dosages in cases of patients with limited kidney function and higher age and suffering from rheumatoid arthritis. A total of 2756 scientific publications were screened and 154 selected of which 68 were scrutinized in detail. Furthermore, the respective product information was also analyzed. A multitude of possible interactions of synthetic DMARDs with different drugs were detected, which were then assessed with respect to the clinical significance and consequences. A consensus process led to making recommendations with which the interactions were classified: A: dangerous combination, B: avoid combination (if possible, pausing DMARD treatment), C: possible combination requiring increased monitoring and potential adjustments in dosage and D: pharmacological interaction without relevance in DMARD standard doses. Apart from that dosage recommendations were established for each csDMARD and tsDMARD depending on kidney function and age. There are 3 primary recommendations and 11 core recommendations on interactions and dosages of csDMARDs and tsDMARDs meant as a practical help for therapeutic decision making and to improve safety in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

Healthcare utilization and unmet needs of patients with antisynthetase syndrome: An international patient survey.

Antisynthease syndrome (ASSD) is a rare, complex and understudied autoimmune disease. Internet-based studies can overcome barriers of traditional on-site research and are therefore very appealing for rare diseases. The aim of this study was to investigate patient-reported symptoms, diagnostic delay, symptoms, medical care, health status, working status, disease knowledge and willingness to participate in research of ASSD patients by conducting an international web-based survey. The multilingual questionnaire was created by an international group of rheumatologists and patients and distributed online. 236 participants from 22 countries completed the survey. 184/236 (78.0%) were female, mean age (SD) was 49.6 years (11.3) and most common antisynthetase antibody was Jo-1 (169/236, 71.6%). 79/236 (33.5%) reported to work full-time. Median diagnostic delay was one year. The most common symptom at disease onset was fatigue 159/236 (67.4%), followed by myalgia 130/236 (55.1%). The complete triad of myositis, arthritis and lung involvement verified by a clinician was present in 42/236 (17.8%) at disease onset and in 88/236 (37.3%) during the disease course. 36/236 (15.3%) reported to have been diagnosed with fibromyalgia and 40/236 (16.3%) with depression. The most reported immunosuppressive treatments were oral corticosteroids 179/236 (75.9%), followed by rituximab 85/236 (36.0%). 73/236 (30.9%) had received physiotherapy treatment. 71/236 (30.1%) reported to know useful online information sources related to ASSD. 223/236 (94.5%) were willing to share health data for research purposes once a year. Our results reiterate that internet-based research is invaluable for cooperating with patients to foster knowledge in rare diseases.

[Assessment of interactions and dosage recommendations of synthetic DMARDs-Evidence-based and consensus-based recommendations based on a systematic literature search]. / Bewertung von Wechselwirkungen und Dosierungsempfehlungen von synthetischen DMARDs ­ Evidenz- und konsensbasierte Empfehlungen auf Basis einer systematischen Literatursuche.

Conventional synthetic (cs) and targeted synthetic (ts) disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) have potential interactions with a multitude of drugs. Furthermore, they sometimes have a lower therapeutic index, particularly in cases of limited organ functions. The aim of this work was to establish evidence-based recommendations on the therapeutic use of DMARDs in the context of drug interactions and dosage recommendations. A systematic literature search was carried out on the issue of drug interactions and dosages in cases of patients with limited kidney function and higher age and suffering from rheumatoid arthritis. A total of 2756 scientific publications were screened and 154 selected of which 68 were scrutinized in detail. Furthermore, the respective specialist subject information was also analyzed. A multitude of possible interactions of synthetic DMARDs with different drugs were detected, which were then assessed with respect to the clinical significance and consequences. A consensus process led to making recommendations with which the interactions were classified: A: dangerous combination, B: avoid combination (if possible, pausing DMARD treatment), C: possible combination requiring increased monitoring and potential adjustments in dosage and D: pharmacological interaction without relevance in DMARD standard doses. Apart from that dosage recommendations were established for each csDMARD and tsDMARD depending on kidney function and age. There are 3 primary recommendations and 11 core recommendations on interactions and dosages of csDMARDs and tsDMARDs meant as a practical help for therapeutic decision making and to improve safety in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

Safety management in treatment with antimalarials in rheumatology. Interdisciplinary recommendations on the basis of a systematic literature review.

BACKGROUND: Antimalarial medication (AM) plays an important role in the treatment of rheumatic diseases. OBJECTIVE: Updated evidence-based recommendations on the safety management of rheumatological treatment with AM are presented. METHODS: A systematic literature search in the databases Medline (PubMed) and Cochrane identified 1160 studies on the safety of treatment with AM in rheumatology. In addition, a manual search was carried out and 67 publications considered to be particularly relevant by the authors were analyzed in more detail. These publications served as a basis for consensus-based recommendations. RESULTS: Treatment with AM in rheumatology should be carried out with hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) with a dosage not exceeding 5 mg/kg body weight/day. Patients should undergo a basic ophthalmological examination within the first 6 months of AM treatment. Pre-existing maculopathy, renal insufficiency (glomerular filtration rate, GFR <60 ml/min), tamoxifen comedication, a daily dose of >5 mg/kg HCQ or treatment with chloroquine (CQ) show an increased risk for AM-induced retinopathy. These patients should undergo an annual ophthalmological check from the beginning of the treatment, whereas patients with no risk factors are recommended to start this only after 5 years of taking the medication. The ophthalmological examination should comprise at least both an appropriate subjective and an objective method and these are usually an automated visual field test and optical coherence tomography (OCT). A visual field test revealing a parafoveal sensitivity loss and an OCT showing a parafoveal circumscribed loss of the photoreceptor layer or focal interruptions of the structural line of the outer segment are signs of a possible AM retinopathy. Determination of creatine kinase (CK) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) in blood is appropriate to screen for cardiomyopathy and myopathy and should be checked before starting the treatment and then ca. every 3 months. The use of cardiac biomarkers, such as brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) or troponin in serum, electrocardiograph (ECG) or cardiac imaging should be considered depending on the situation. An intake of HCQ is safe during pregnancy and breastfeeding according to the current state of knowledge and is protective for mother and child in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. CONCLUSION: The updated recommendations on AM treatment in rheumatology in particular include a more rigorous measuring of doses, risk stratification in monitoring and defined ophthalmological examination methods to detect a possible retinopathy.

[Current state, goals and quality standards of outpatient care in rheumatology: position paper of the Professional Association of German Rheumatologists (BDRh)]. / Aktueller Stand, Ziele und Qualitätsstandards der ambulanten Versorgung in der Rheumatologie: Positionspapier des Berufsverbandes der deutschen Rheumatologen (BDRh).

Even in the era of modern guidelines, the treatment of rheumatic diseases is only as good as the framework of rheumatological care within which the treatment is carried out. The access to high-quality medical treatment for all patients is therefore essentially decisive for the prognosis of the patients. This article describes the current state of outpatient treatment in rheumatology and demonstrates which quality projects, such as treatment contracts, outpatient specialized medical treatment (ASV), digitalization and training as specialized rheumatological assistant (RFA), have been created in order to ensure the treatment of our patients. Furthermore, standards are defined that can guarantee a contemporary and guideline-conform treatment in outpatient rheumatological units. As an example it is an affirmation of the Professional Association of German Rheumatologists (BDRh) for ensuring optimal care for all rheumatology patients through early or emergency rheumatology clinics, treat to target, appropriate delegation of medical duties and diversification of treatment, thus an assurance of the quality and comprehensive treatment in rheumatology. The important topic of safeguarding the next generation of rheumatologists, which is indispensable for this, is also discussed.

[Current guidance of the German Society of Rheumatology for the care of patients with rheumatic diseases during the SARS-CoV-2/Covid 19 pandemic]. / Aktuelle Handlungsempfehlungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Rheumatologie für die Betreuung von Patienten mit rheumatischen Erkrankungen während der SARS-CoV­2/Covid 19-Pandemie.

In the current SARS-CoV-2 pandemic there are many questions regarding the safe treatment of patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases. Many of these questions cannot yet be answered on an evidence-based basis and this does not make patient care easy. The German Society for Rheumatology (DGRh) hopes that these initial recommendations will provide support for specific issues in the care of patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases in view of the current threat posed by SARS-CoV-2. In order to take advantage of the dynamic worldwide gain in knowledge for our patients, the recommendations will be updated regularly. The updated versions of the recommendations are deposited on the homepage of the DGRh.

[Safety management of the treatment with antimalarial drugs in rheumatology. Interdisciplinary recommendations based on a systematic literature search]. / Sicherheitsmanagement der Therapie mit Antimalariamitteln in der Rheumatologie. Interdisziplinäre Empfehlungen auf der Basis einer systematischen Literaturrecherche.

BACKGROUND: Antimalarial medication (AM) plays an important role in the treatment of rheumatic diseases. OBJECTIVE: Updated evidence-based recommendations on the safety management of rheumatological treatment with AM are presented. METHODS: A systematic literature search in the databases Medline (PubMed) and Cochrane identified 1160 studies on the safety of treatment with AM in rheumatology. In addition, a manual search was carried out and 67 publications considered to be particularly relevant by the authors were analyzed in more detail. These publications served as a basis for consensus-based recommendations. RESULTS: Treatment with AM in rheumatology should be carried out with hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) with a dosage not exceeding 5 mg/kg body weight/day. Patients should undergo a basic ophthalmological examination within the first 6 months of AM treatment. Pre-existing maculopathy, renal insufficiency (glomerular filtration rate, GFR <60 ml/min), tamoxifen comedication, a daily dose of >5 mg/kg HCQ or treatment with chloroquine (CQ) show an increased risk for AM-induced retinopathy. These patients should undergo an annual ophthalmological check from the beginning of the treatment, whereas patients with no risk factors are recommended to start this only after 5 years of taking the medication. The ophthalmological examination should comprise at least both an appropriate subjective and an objective method and these are usually an automated visual field test and optical coherence tomography (OCT). A visual field test revealing a parafoveal sensitivity loss and an OCT showing a parafoveal circumscribed loss of the photoreceptor layer or focal interruptions of the structural line of the outer segment are signs of a possible AM retinopathy. Determination of creatine kinase (CK) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) in blood is appropriate to screen for cardiomyopathy and myopathy and should be checked before starting the treatment and then ca. every 3 months. The use of cardiac biomarkers, such as brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) or troponin in serum, electrocardiograph (ECG) or cardiac imaging should be considered depending on the situation. An intake of HCQ is safe during pregnancy and breastfeeding according to the current state of knowledge and is protective for mother and child in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. CONCLUSION: The updated recommendations on AM treatment in rheumatology in particular include a more rigorous measuring of doses, risk stratification in monitoring and defined ophthalmological examination methods to detect a possible retinopathy.

[Treatment algorithm for rheumatoid arthritis : According to the S2e guidelines 2018]. / Therapiealgorithmus der rheumatoiden Arthritis : Nach der S2e-Leitlinie 2018.

Every patient suffering from active rheumatoid arthritis should be treated with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) but methotrexate initially remains the first choice treatment. Treatment should comply with the treat-to-target principle. The therapeutic aim is remission if attainable or at least a low disease activity. Remission is defined as a simplified disease activity score index (SDAI) of ≤3.3 or as fulfilling the so-called Boolean criteria. A first evaluation of the response is due after 12 weeks. At this time there should be a measurable response defined as an improvement of at least 50% of the composite score, e.g. the DAS28. If no improvement has been achieved, treatment should be continued with either a second DMARD strategy conventionally with synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs) or an alternative with biological (bDMARD) or targeted synthetic (tsDMARDs) DMARD, depending on whether there are risk factors for a severe disease progression. A change within bDMARDs and tsDMARDs as well as therapeutic de-escalation are both possible measures in the further course of treatment.

Rituximab in routine care of severe active rheumatoid arthritis : A prospective, non-interventional study in Germany.

OBJECTIVE: To assess safety, effectiveness and onset of effect of rituximab (RTX) in routine clinical treatment of severe, active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Prospective, multi-centre, non-interventional study in rheumatological outpatient clinics or private practices in Germany. RTX-naïve adult patients were to receive RTX according to marketing authorisation and at their physician's discretion. Also according to their physician's discretion, patients could receive a second cycle of RTX (re-treatment = treatment continuation). Major outcome was the change in Disease Activity Score based on 28-joints count and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) over 24 weeks and during 6 months of re-treatment. RESULTS: Overall, 1653 patients received at least one cycle RTX; 99.2% of these had received disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) pre-treatment and 75.5% anti-tumor necrosis factor(TNF)­α pre-treatment. After a mean interval of 8.0 months, 820 patients received RTX re-treatment. Mean DAS28-ESR decreased from 5.3 at baseline to 3.8 after 24 weeks (-1.5 [95% confidence interval, CI: -1.6; -1.4]), and from 4.1 at start of cycle 2 to 3.5 at study end (change from baseline: -1.8 [95% CI: -2.0; -1.7]). Improvements in DAS28-ESR and Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score occurred mainly during the first 12 weeks of RTX treatment, with further DAS28-ESR improvement until week 24 or month 6 of re-treatment. Improvements in DAS28-ESR and EULAR responses were more pronounced in seropositive patients. RF was a predictor of DAS28-ESR change to study end. Safety analysis showed the established profile of RTX. CONCLUSION: RTX was safe and effective in a real-life setting with rapid and sustained improvement in RA signs and symptoms.

[In-label treatment of inflammatory joint diseases]. / In-label-Therapie entzündlicher Gelenkerkrankungen.

The correct use of therapeutic agents in accordance with their approved label is a requirement for a safe therapy and is often linked to the possibility of reimbursement; however, the use of drugs outside the label approval (off-label treatment) is a commonly used practice in rheumatology. This occurs because sufficient clinical trials are often lacking, particularly for rare diseases. This overview gives an insight into the correct use of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). It should be noted that there are divergent treatment guidelines that are based on guidelines or recommendations from public authorities, such as the Federal Joint Committee (GBA). A further example is that modifying the dose when the treatment goal is reached is only intended for some of the drugs in the course of the disease. Clinical trials which address such questions could help to modify or add to the label, as for example has now been successfully achieved for the treatment with certolizumab in pregnancy.

[S2e guideline: treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with disease-modifying drugs]. / S2e-Leitlinie: Therapie der rheumatoiden Arthritis mit krankheitsmodifizierenden Medikamenten.

BACKGROUND: Medication-based strategies to treat rheumatoid arthritis are crucial in terms of outcome. They aim at preventing joint destruction, loss of function and disability by early and consistent inhibition of inflammatory processes. OBJECTIVE: Achieving consensus about evidence-based recommendations for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs in Germany. METHODS: Following a systematic literature research, a structured process among expert rheumatologists was used to reach consensus. RESULTS: The results of the consensus process can be summed up in 6 overarching principles and 10 recommendations. There are several new issues compared to the version of 2012, such as differentiated adjustments to the therapeutic regime according to time point and extent of treatment response, the therapeutic goal of achieving remission as assessed by means of the simplified disease activity index (SDAI) as well as the potential use of targeted synthetic DMARDs (JAK inhibitors) and suggestions for a deescalating in case of achieving a sustained remission. Methotrexate still plays the central role at the beginning of the treatment and as a combination partner in the further treatment course. When treatment response to methotrexate is inadequate, either switching to or combining with another conventional synthetic DMARD is an option in the absence of unfavourable prognostic factors. Otherwise biologic or targeted synthetic DMARDs are recommended according to the algorithm. Rules for deescalating treatment with glucocorticoids and-where applicable-DMARDs give support for the management of patients who have reached a sustained remission. DISCUSSION: The new guidelines set up recommendations for RA treatment in accordance with the treat-to-target principle. Modern disease-modifying drugs, now including also JAK inhibitors, are available in an algorithm.

[Getting older with rheumatoid arthritis-is there a burnout of the disease?] / Älterwerden mit rheumatoider Arthritis ­ brennt die Erkrankung aus?

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory disease. Synovitis is the main pathology and can lead to a progressive destruction of the joints. It is often said that RA "burns out", implying that the inflammation decreases spontaneously in the long term, mostly severe course of RA and reaches a stage with a stable absence of joint inflammation, even without treatment. To test this concept we analyzed the published evidence. Data of historic long-term inception cohorts of patients who have never been treated with antirheumatic drugs and patients who received conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD), show that the disease stays active with sustained radiological progression in the majority of patients. At best, the disease can show a milder course with time or a stage of absence of joint inflammation can be reached if patients responded very well to initial drug treatment. Terminating DMARD treatment in this situation bears the risk of a latent progressive joint destruction, the appearance of extra-articular manifestations and an increase in the cardiovascular risk. Hence there is no evidence for the existence of a "burnt out" RA with stable inactive disease without drug treatment in the long-term course. In a modern treatment strategy of RA following the treat-to-target principle and aiming at remission, the term "burnt out" RA should no longer be used.

[Rituximab for the treatment of poly- and dermatomyositis : Results from the GRAID-2 registry]. / Rituximab zur Behandlung von Poly- und Dermatomyositis : Die Ergebnisse des GRAID-2-Registers.

INTRODUCTION: In the treatment of poly- and dermatomyositis, only a limited number of treatment modalities are established. OBJECTIVE: The goal of the GRAID-2 registry was to study off-label use of biologic drugs for this indication in Germany. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Analysis of the data of the GRAID-2 registry for poly- and dermatomyositis. RESULTS: In 22 of the 23 patients in the GRAID-2 registry, rituximab (RIX) was administered, while 1 patient was given tocilizumab as off-label therapy. The 22 patients who received RIX treatment were analyzed. At the start of treatment, the following active manifestations were present: myositis (n = 18), lung involvement (mainly interstitial lung disease; n = 10), arthritis (n = 10), skin manifestation (n = 9), and Raynaud syndrome (n = 5). Nine of the patients were Jo-1-antibody positive. All patients had previous treatments with multiple conventional immunosuppressive drugs. Treatment with RIX was given as infusions of 1 g i. v., which were repeated after 2 weeks. Patients received a mean of 3.09 ± 2.27 infusions (equivalent to 1.5 cycles of 2 × 1 g, max. 5 cycles). Tolerability of RIX treatment was rated as very good in 16 of 22 patients (72%), good in 5 (23%), and moderate in 1 (5%). In all, 27 adverse events were documented, with the majority being infections, whereby 2 severe infections occurred (6.59 per 100 patient-years). Eighty six percent of the patients showed complete remission of their myositis and 79% of their arthritis. The mean value of creatinine kinase in plasma fell from 1505 ± 2534 U/l before the start of treatment to 39 ± 134 U/l at the last visit. Regarding lung involvement, 1 of 10 of the patients showed complete and 6 of 10 partial remissions. In 2 of 10 patients, lung disease was stable during treatment. CONCLUSION: RIX is the preferred off-label biologic drug for poly- and dermatomyositis in Germany. In spite of a strongly pretreated group of patients, the tolerability is acceptable, although the patient number in this investigation is small. Moreover, the results lead to the assumption that the majority of the patients had a good or even very good therapeutic response to RIX.

[Efficacy and safety analysis of off-label treatment with biologics in autoinflammatory diseases : Experiences from a German registry (GRAID2)]. / Wirksamkeits- und Sicherheitsanalyse von Off-label-Biologikatherapien bei Patienten mit autoinflammatorischen Erkrankungen : Erfahrungen aus einem Deutschen Register (GRAID2).

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of therapy with biologics in patients with autoinflammatory diseases (AIF) or macrophage activating syndrome (MAS) in a real-life setting in Germany. METHODS: The German Register of Autoimmune Diseases 2 (GRAID2) is a retrospective, non-interventional, multicenter registry collecting data from all patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases refractory to conventional therapy and treated with initial off-label biologics between August 2006 and December 2013. Patients with MAS could be included without prior treatment with a biologic agent. RESULTS: Data from 26 patients with AIF and 5 with MAS were collected. Of the AIF patients 13 (50%) were diagnosed with adult onset Still's disease (AOSD), 6 (23%) with familial Mediterranean fever (FMF), 4 (15.4%) with tumor necrosis factor-associated periodic syndrome (TRAPS), 1 (3.8%) patient with cryopyrin-associated periodic syndrome (CAPS) and 2 (8%) with undifferentiated fever syndromes. The 5 MAS patients suffered from rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with chronic myeloid leukemia, systemic lupus erythematosus and in 2 cases AOSD. In 1 patient a chronic neurological disease was documented without further differentiaton. All patients with TRAPS were primarily treated with etanercept and all CAPS patients with canakinumab. The AOSD and FMF patients were treated with anakinra as the first line off-label biologic in 6 out of 13 and 5 out of 6 cases, respectively. The MAS patients responded very well or well to therapy in 40% and 60% had a moderate response. There were no non-responders. Within the group of AIF patients the physicians documented a very effective or effective treatment in 38.5%, a moderate response in 30.8% and no response in 30.7%. The tolerance was very good in 5 out of 5 of the MAS and in 92% of the AIF patients. CONCLUSION: The data of this retrospective register provide indications for an effective and safe treatment with off-label biologic medication in patients with AIF and MAS in daily practice.

[Safety and efficacy of off-label use of biologic therapies in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases refractory to standard of care therapy : Data from a nationwide German registry (GRAID2)]. / Sicherheit und Wirksamkeitshinweise zum Off-label-Einsatz von Biologikatherapien nach Versagen konventioneller Therapien bei Patienten mit entzündlich rheumatischen Erkrankungen : Ergebnisse eines nationalen Registers (GRAID2).

BACKGROUND: The German Registry of Autoimmune Diseases 2 (GRAID2) is a retrospective, non-interventional, multicenter registry study collecting data from patients with inflammatory, mainly rheumatic diseases refractory to standard of care therapy and treated with an off-label biologic therapy. The retrospective documentation comprised case history, diagnosis, course of disease (including safety and global efficacy). The objective was to evaluate the global clinical outcome and safety of off-label biologic therapy in clinical practice. RESULTS: Data from 311 patients with an overall observation period of 338.5 patient-years were collected. The mean patients age was 47.8 years with 56.9% females. The most frequently documented diagnoses comprised rejection prophylaxis/therapy after renal transplantation (NTX, 18.3%), ANCA-vasculitides (17.4%), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE, 10.3%), autoinflammatory fever syndromes (8.4%), autoimmune myositis (7.4%) and pemphigus (5.8%). Documented biologic therapies included rituximab (RTX, 70.1%), tocilizumab (TCZ, 9.3%), infliximab (IFX, 7.1%), anakinra (ANK, 5.5%), adalimumab (ADA, 3.5%), etanercept (ETA, 2.3%) and certolizumab (CTZ, 0.6%). After initiation of off-label biologic treatment, tolerability was assessed by the physicians as "very good"/"good" in 95.5%. Altogether, 275 adverse events were documented and of these, 104 were classified as serious adverse events and occurred in 62 patients. In 19 of these patients severe infections (30.6%) were documented, resulting in a rate of 5.6 severe infections per 100 patient years. A total of six deaths were documented, while five of these cases were rated as not related to the biologics treatment. Notably, the use of RTX in patients with small vessel vasculitides and of TCZ in patients with large vessel vasculitides prior to their approval support their relevance in clinical management of patients with severe diseases. CONCLUSION: The results of this registry together with data of GRAID1 provide evidence that use of off-label biologic therapies in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases refractory to conventional treatment did not result in any new safety signal already known for these compounds or subsequently shown by clinical trials in certain entities.

[Familial chilblain lupus : Type 1 interferonopathy with model character]. / Familiärer Chilblain-Lupus : Typ-I-Interferonopathie mit Modellcharakter.

Familial chilblain lupus belongs to the group of type 1 interferonopathies and is particularly characterized by typical skin manifestations and ischemia of the acra. There are various mutations that can lead to this autosomal dominant disease. A mutation in the TREX-1 gene has been most frequently found; however, families with mutations in the SAMHD1 gene and recently in the gene which codes for the stimulator of interferon genes (STING) protein were also described. A common feature of these genetic defects is that they are all involved in the process of detection of intracellular free DNA, which as a result leads to increased production of type 1 interferons and the induced gene products. This then leads to autoinflammation and autoimmunity, which is characteristic for the disease. The activation of interferon-induced genes is controlled by the JAK-STAT system; therefore, JAK inhibitors were successfully used in several cases to treat type 1 interferonopathies. Experience with this treatment modality is continuously growing.

[A rare cause of severe panniculitis]. / Eine seltene Ursache einer schweren Pannikulitis.

A 58-year-old patient presented with a severe, episodic panniculitis of the upper legs. Necrosis of the fatty tissue and a suspected superinfection led to amputation of one leg. The panniculitis was caused by a hereditary deficiency of alpha-1 antitrypsin (AAT) due to a ZZ mutation of the AAT gene. Neutrophilic panniculitis is found in 0.1% of patients with the ZZ mutation and therefore is the rarest clinical manifestation of AAT deficiency. With the exception of mild COPD, the patient had no other typical clinical symptoms of AAT deficiency. Treatment with colchicum reduced the frequency and severity of the flares.