Vacuum assisted closure improves the quality of life in patients with diabetic foot.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is the most common endocrine disease worldwide. One of the most important chronic complications of this disease is the development of diabetic foot. The management of diabetic foot wounds is quite important with respect to public health. AIMS: To determine the effect of Vacuum Assisted Closure (VAC) therapy on the quality of life in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers and compare it with standart wound care. METHODS: Between May 2007 to December 2008, 67 consecutive patients with diabetic foot ulcers were randomly assigned to VAC therapy (Group 1, n : 30) or standart wound care (Group 2, n : 37). The SF-36 questionnaire was administered the day before and in the month following wound healing. Global analyses of the 8 domains and 2 comprehensive indexes of SF-36, Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) were performed. Clinical measures included standard antidiabetic treatment, daily wound care including antiseptic bath, debridement, toe removal for gangrene when necessary, and wound care with conventional methods or VAC. Healing time was calculated as the time from hospital admission to the time of re-epithelization. RESULTS: There were no differences in the mean age, ulcer size and pulse status of the patients in both groups. Healing time in the VAC group was significantly reduced (p < 0.05). All 8 domains of SF-36 and MCS and PCS scores improved remarkably after VAC therapy. CONCLUSION: Vacuum Assisted Closure therapy was found to be effective in the treatment of chronic diabetic ulcers. The improvement of quality of life demonstrates a clear-cut indication in this particular group of patients.

Abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery: retroperitoneal or transperitoneal approach?

AIM: Mortality and morbidity of abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery have decreased significantly in time and transperitoneal approach (TPA) still preserves its popularity although retroperitoneal approach (RPA) is known to cause lower incidence and shortened duration of ileus, shorter intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay, earlier oral intake and less patient discomfort or pain. METHODS: One hundred and fifty patients that underwent abdominal aortic aneurysm repair at our Cardiovascular Surgery Center between January, 1990 and March, 2000 were reviewed and analyzed based on the elective/emergent nature of the surgery and the type of the incision as either TPA or RPA. RESULTS: Significantly shorter mechanical ventilation (15.2+/-3.8 vs 10.1+/-2.3 hours) and nasogastric decompression periods (40.6+/-10.7 vs 9.1+/-2.2 hours), less need for intravenous fluid supplementation and shorter ICU stay (29.5+/-14.8 vs 18.6+/-1.9 hours) were observed with the retroperitoneal approach (P<0.001). Need for allogeneic blood transfusion was, similar (1.3+/-1.4 vs0.9+/-0.4, P>0.05). Analysis of mortality and morbidity revealed bleeding as the major cause of mortality for ruptured aneurysm. A similar comparison between TPA and RPA groups, however, revealed no significant difference (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: | Retroperitoneal approach is a reliable technique causing less fluid-electrolyte imbalance with rapid restoration of gastrointestinal physiology. It causes less discomfort to patients with reduced need for analgesia. A shorter weaning period from mechanical ventilation is among the benefits for patients with co-morbid states.

Determinants of hospital mortality after repeat mitral valve surgery for rheumatic mitral valve disease.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to detect the risk factors for hospital mortality in patients who underwent reoperative mitral valve replacement. METHODS: Rheumatic mitral valve patients who underwent primary mitral valve replacement (386 cases) and repeat mitral valve replacement (94 cases) were analysed retrospectively. The incremental effects of the reoperative procedure on hospital mortality were studied by comparing primary and reoperative procedures and analyzing a series of possible predisposing factors. RESULTS: Operative mortality for repeat procedures was found significantly higher than the first operations (respectively 12.8% versus 4.3%, p=0.022). Risc factors affecting the hospital mortality in reoperation group were determined as advanced age, diameter of left atrium, prolonged bypass time and development of postoperative low output state. The indication for surgery also had a significant role in patients' outcome. Mortality found significantly higher in cases operated due to endocarditis or mitral mechanical valve thrombosis compared to other reoperation groups. CONCLUSION: Patients over age of 70 years, with a left atrial diameter over 60 mm, reoperated due to endocarditis and mechanical valve thrombosis, should be reevaluated for risk assessment while giving the decision of optimal operation timing. Especially patients with left ventricular hypertrophy and decreased myocardial reservoirs, efficient myocardial protection during the operation had an important role.

Is routine intravascular shunting necessary for carotid endarterectomy in patients with contralateral occlusion? A review of 5-year experience of carotid endarterectomy with local anaesthesia.

OBJECTIVES: Endarterectomy of a stenotic internal carotid artery in the presence of contralateral carotid occlusion (CCO) is often assessed as a high-risk procedure. We have assessed the requirement for shunting in patients with CCO operated under local anaesthetic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 1998 and 2003, 429 patients (319 males and 110 females, mean age 65.7+/-6.2, range 48-84) underwent 500 carotid endarterectomies under local anaesthetic with awake neurological testing. Fifty-five patients (12.8%) had CCO. Preoperative risk factors, intra- and postoperative events were noted and analyzed. Short-term and mid-term follow-up (mean 16.4+/-5.8 months, range 3-38 months) was also recorded. RESULTS: The rate of shunting in patients with or without CCO (10.9% vs. 9.1%) was not significantly different. Stroke rates for CCO and non-CCO groups were 3.6 and 0.5%, respectively. Only the presence of preoperative cerebral infarction increased the risk of stroke. Patients that needed shunting were found to have significantly higher overall rate of adverse events, mortality and stroke. CONCLUSIONS: Routine use of intravascular shunting for a stenotic carotid artery with contralateral occlusion may not be necessary. The choice of using a shunt is safe when made intraoperatively by assessing the neurological status of the patient continuously. This requires expertise and strong cooperation between the anaesthesiologist and the surgical teams.