Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 43
Filtrar
1.
ESMO Open ; 9(6): 103473, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38833966

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The RAS/MEK signaling pathway is essential in carcinogenesis and frequently altered in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), notably by KRAS mutations (KRASm) that affect 25%-30% of non-squamous NSCLC. This study aims to explore the impact of KRASm subtypes on disease phenotype and survival outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of the French Epidemiological Strategy and Medical Economics database for advanced or metastatic lung cancer from 2011 to 2021. Patient demographics, histology, KRASm status, treatment strategies, and outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: Of 10 177 assessable patients for KRAS status, 17.6% had KRAS p.G12C mutation, 22.6% had KRAS non-p.G12C mutation, and 59.8% were KRASwt. KRASm patients were more often smokers (96.3%) compared with KRASwt (85.8%). A higher proportion of programmed death-ligand 1 ≥50% was found for KRASm patients: 43.5% versus 38.0% (P < 0.01). KRASm correlated with poorer outcomes. First-line median progression-free survival was shorter in the KRASm than the KRASwt cohort: 4.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.7-4.3 months] versus 5.1 months (95% CI 4.8-5.3 months), P < 0.001. First-line overall survival was shorter for KRASm than KRASwt patients: 12.6 months (95% CI 11.6-13.6 months) versus 15.4 months (95% CI 14.6-16.2 months), P = 0.012. First-line chemoimmunotherapy offered better overall survival in KRAS p.G12C (48.8 months) compared with KRAS non-p.G12C (24.0 months) and KRASwt (22.5 months) patients. Second-line overall survival with immunotherapy was superior in the KRAS p.G12C subgroup: 12.6 months (95% CI 8.1-18.6 months) compared with 9.4 months (95% CI 8.0-11.4 months) for KRAS non-p.G12C and 9.6 months (8.4-11.0 months) for KRASwt patients. CONCLUSION: We highlighted distinct clinical profiles and survival outcomes according to KRASm subtypes. Notably KRAS p.G12C mutations may provide increased sensitivity to immunotherapy, suggesting potential therapeutic implications for sequencing or combination of therapies. Further research on the impact of emerging KRAS specific inhibitors are warranted in real-world cohorts.


Assuntos
Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Mutação , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas p21(ras) , Humanos , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/genética , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/mortalidade , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/patologia , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/tratamento farmacológico , Masculino , Feminino , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas p21(ras)/genética , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidade , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Idoso , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , França/epidemiologia
2.
ESMO Open ; 9(5): 103447, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38703431

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer (BC) is the second most common cancer that metastasizes to the brain. Particularly up to half of patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive (HER2+) metastatic breast cancer (mBC) may develop brain metastases over the course of the disease. Nevertheless, little is known about the prevalence and the outcome of brain and leptomeningeal metastases (BLMM) in HER2-low BC. We compared the cumulative incidence of BLMM and associated outcomes among patients with HER2-low, HER2-negative (HER2-) and HER2+ mBC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This cohort study was conducted from the Epidemiological Strategy and Medical Economics (ESME) mBC database and included patients treated for mBC between 2012 and 2020 across 18 French comprehensive cancer centers and with known HER2 and hormone receptor (HR) status. The cumulative incidence of BLMM after metastatic diagnosis was estimated using a competing risk methodology with death defined as a competing event. RESULTS: 19 585 patients were included with 6118 (31.2%), 9943 (50.8%) and 3524 (18.0%) being HER2-low, HER2- and HER2+ mBC, respectively. After a median follow-up of 48.6 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 47.7-49.3 months], BLMM were reported in 4727 patients: 1192 (25.2%) were diagnosed with BLMM at first metastatic diagnosis and 3535 (74.8%) after metastatic diagnosis. Multivariable analysis adjusted for age, histological grade, metastases-free interval and HR status showed that the risk of BLMM at metastatic diagnosis was similar in patients with HER2- compared to HER2-low mBC [odds ratio (OR) (95% CI) 1.00 (0.86-1.17)] and higher in those with HER2+ compared to HER2-low [OR (95% CI) 2.23 (1.87-2.66)]. Similar results were found after metastatic diagnosis; the risk of BLMM was similar in HER2- compared to HER2-low [subdistribution hazard ratio (sHR) (95% CI) 1.07 (0.98-1.16)] and higher in the HER2+ group [sHR (95% CI) 1.56 (1.41-1.73)]. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence and evolution of BLMM in HER2-low mBC are similar to those in patients with HER2- tumors. In contrast to patients with HER2+ mBC, the prognosis of BLMM remains dismal in this population.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Neoplasias da Mama , Neoplasias Meníngeas , Receptor ErbB-2 , Humanos , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , França/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Encefálicas/secundário , Neoplasias Encefálicas/epidemiologia , Incidência , Receptor ErbB-2/metabolismo , Neoplasias Meníngeas/secundário , Neoplasias Meníngeas/epidemiologia , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Adulto
3.
Lung Cancer ; 182: 107280, 2023 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37339550

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer survivors are at high risk of developing a second primary cancer (SPC). We explored the Unicancer Epidemiology Strategy Medical-Economics for advanced or metastatic lung cancer (AMLC) database to assess the impact of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) on the risk of SPC in patients with advanced/metastatic lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study used data from patients with AMLC, with treatment initiated between January 1st 2015 and December 31st 2018. Patients with lung cancer as the second primary cancer were excluded and a 6-months landmark threshold was applied to exclude patients with synchronous SPC, patients dead without SPC or with a follow-up inferior to 6 months. A propensity score (PS) was calculated on the following baseline covariates: Age at locally advanced or metastatic diagnosis, sex, smoking status, metastatic status, performance status and histological type. The inverse probability of treatment weighting approach was used on the analyses aiming to assess the impact of ICI administered for AMLC, on the risk of occurrence of SPC. RESULTS: Among the 10 796 patients, 148 (1.4%) patients had a diagnosis of SPC in a median interval of 22 (min-max: 7-173) months. All the patients (100%) with locally advanced or metastatic LC received at least one systemic treatment including (chemotherapy regimen (n = 9 851, 91.2%); ICI (n = 4 648, 43.0%); targeted treatment (n = 3 500; 32.4%). 40 (0.9%) SPC were reported in the 4 648 patients with metastatic LC treated with ICI vs 108 (1.7%) out of the 6 148 who did not receive immunotherapy (p < 0.0001). The multivariate analysis identified that treatment with ICI in patients with AMLC is associated with a reduced risk of SPC (HR = 0.40, 95% CI 0.27-0.58). CONCLUSION: Treatment with ICI in AMLC patients was associated with a significantly reduced risk of SPC. Prospective studies are required to confirm these results.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Pulmonares , Segunda Neoplasia Primária , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiologia , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Pontuação de Propensão , Pulmão
4.
Strahlenther Onkol ; 197(12): 1051-1062, 2021 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34673991

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Patients with locally advanced grade 2-3 extremity/truncal soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are at high risk of recurrence. The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and feasibility of neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) in selected grade 2-3 patients with limb or trunk wall STS, and to compare this schedule to a sequential approach combining neoadjuvant chemotherapy and adjuvant radiotherapy. METHODS: We retrospectively included patients who underwent neoadjuvant cCRT at two comprehensive cancer centers from 1992-2016. We then compared these results to those of patients treated with preoperative chemotherapy and postoperative radiotherapy from a third comprehensive cancer center with a propensity score matched analysis. RESULTS: A total of 53 patients were treated by neoadjuvant cCRT; 58 patients could be matched with 29 patients in each treatment group after propensity score matching. Disease-free survival and overall survival at 5 years were 54.9 and 63.5%, respectively with neoadjuvant cCRT, with no significant difference when compared to the sequential treatment group. R0 resection rate was higher (90.9 vs 44.8%, p < 0.01) in the cCRT group than in the sequential treatment group during a shorter therapeutic sequence (118 vs 210.5 days, p < 0.01), with no impact on the surgical procedure or postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: cCRT is feasible with acceptable immediate and late toxicities. It could facilitate surgery by increasing the R0 resection rate and improve patient compliance by shortening the therapeutic sequence.


Assuntos
Terapia Neoadjuvante , Sarcoma , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Quimiorradioterapia/métodos , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Extremidades/patologia , Humanos , Terapia Neoadjuvante/métodos , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sarcoma/patologia , Sarcoma/terapia , Resultado do Tratamento
5.
ESMO Open ; 6(3): 100106, 2021 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33865192

RESUMO

Squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) are among the most frequent solid tumors in humans. SCCs, related or not to the human papillomavirus, share common molecular features. Immunotherapies, and specifically immune checkpoint inhibitors, have been shown to improve overall survival in multiple cancer types, including SCCs. However, only a minority of patients experience a durable response with immunotherapy. Epigenetic modulation plays a major role in escaping tumor immunosurveillance and confers resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Preclinical evidence suggests that modulating the epigenome might improve the efficacy of immunotherapy. We herein review the preclinical and the clinical rationale for combining immunotherapy with an epidrug, and detail the design of PEVOsq, a basket clinical trial combining pembrolizumab with vorinostat, a histone deacetylase inhibitor, in patients with SCCs of different locations. Sequential blood and tumor sampling will be collected in order to identify predictive and pharmacodynamics biomarkers of efficacy of the combination. We also present how clinical and biological data will be managed with the aim to enable the development of a prospective integrative platform to allow secure and controlled access to the project data as well as further exploitations.


Assuntos
Alphapapillomavirus , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Imunoterapia , Papillomaviridae , Estudos Prospectivos
6.
Respir Med Res ; 78: 100788, 2020 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32980653

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Anti Programmed Death-ligand (PD1/PD-L1) directed immune-checkpoint-inhibitors (ICI) are widely used to treat patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who progress after first line chemotherapy. The best strategy after early progression under first line has not been specifically studied. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, retrospective study including all consecutive NSCLC patients progressing within the first 3 months following introduction of first-line chemotherapy and being treated with second line ICI monotherapy or chemotherapy between March 2010 and November 2017. We analysed the clinicopathological data and outcome under second line chemotherapy vs. second line ICI: objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS. RESULTS: We identified 176 patients with refractory disease, 99 who received subsequent immunotherapy and 77 undergoing chemotherapy. The 2 populations were comparable regarding the main prognostic criteria, median age was 60, main histology was adenocarcimoma (68.2%). PFS was not significantly different between both treatments 1.9 [1.8-2.1] versus 1.6 month [1.4-2.0] (P=0.125). Compared to chemotherapy, ICI treated patients had a superior OS (P=0.03) (Median [95% CI] OS 4.6 [2.8-6.7] versus 4.2 months [3.4-5.9] and a non-significant improvement in ORR (17.2% versus 7.9%, respectively, P=0.072). Poor performance status (ECOG PS≥2) and a higher number of metastatic sites (≥3) were associated with poorer prognosis. KRAS-mutated patients did not seem to benefit more from ICI than chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: ICI appears to be the preferred second-line treatment for patients who are refractory to first line chemotherapy.


Assuntos
Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/tratamento farmacológico , Resistencia a Medicamentos Antineoplásicos/efeitos dos fármacos , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/farmacologia , Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/diagnóstico , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/patologia , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Feminino , França , Humanos , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/farmacologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
7.
Comput Methods Programs Biomed ; 177: 269-275, 2019 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31319955

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: In this paper, we introduce a new R package goftte for goodness-of-fit assessment based on cumulative sums of model residuals useful for checking key assumptions in the Cox regression and Fine and Gray regression models. METHODS: Monte-Carlo methods are used to approximate the null distribution of cumulative sums of model residuals. To limit the computational burden, the main routines used to approximate the null distributions are implemented in a parallel C++ programming environment. Numerical studies are carried out to evaluate the empirical type I error rates of the different testing procedures. The package and the documentation are available to users from CRAN R repositories. RESULTS: Results from simulation studies suggested that all statistical tests implemented in goftte yielded excellent control of the type I error rate even with modest sample sizes with high censoring rates. CONCLUSIONS: As compared to other R packages goftte provides new useful method for testing functionals, such as Anderson-Darling type test statistics for checking assumptions about proportional (sub-) distribution hazards. Approximations for the null distributions of test statistics have been validated through simulation experiments. Future releases will provide similar tools for checking model assumptions in multiplicative intensity models for recurrent data. The package may help to spread the use of recent advocated goodness-of-fit techniques in semiparametric regression for time-to-event data.


Assuntos
Biometria/métodos , Cirrose Hepática Biliar/diagnóstico , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Software , Algoritmos , Bilirrubina/análise , Simulação por Computador , Bases de Dados Factuais , Humanos , Cirrose Hepática Biliar/sangue , Método de Monte Carlo , Linguagens de Programação , Tempo de Protrombina , Análise de Regressão
8.
Rev Mal Respir ; 36(5): 583-590, 2019 May.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31202602

RESUMO

The central nervous system (CNS), through carcinomatous meningitis or solid brain metastases, is the most common site of recurrence in non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) with activating mutations. Our retrospective study describes the population of patients with CNS metastases of NSCLC harboring activating mutation with targeted therapy (EGFR, ALK, BRAF, HER2) in 4 French regional reference hospitals. 60 patients were analyzed. The proposed treatments were heterogeneous and included combinations of chemotherapy, targeted therapy and radiotherapy±associated with topical treatments. Median overall survival following CNS metastasis in these patients was 15.8 months for meningitis carcinoma and 26 months for brain metastases. In patients with brain metastases, the addition of targeted therapy treatment allows a significant improvement in median progression free survival from 5.9 months to 10.6 months (HR 0.48 CI95 [0.24 to 0.97] P=0.035). These patients seem therefore benefit from systemic therapy and particularly targeted therapy with better survival than usual.


Assuntos
Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/patologia , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/terapia , Neoplasias do Sistema Nervoso Central/secundário , Neoplasias do Sistema Nervoso Central/terapia , Mutação com Ganho de Função , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Quinase do Linfoma Anaplásico/genética , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/genética , Neoplasias do Sistema Nervoso Central/genética , Progressão da Doença , Receptores ErbB/genética , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas B-raf/genética , Receptor ErbB-2/genética , Estudos Retrospectivos
10.
Comput Biol Med ; 100: 239-246, 2018 09 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30055524

RESUMO

Phase II trials that evaluate target therapies based on a biomarker must be well designed in order to assess anti-tumor activity as well as clinical utility of the biomarker. Classical phase II designs do not deal with this molecular heterogeneity and can lead to an erroneous conclusion in the whole population, whereas a subgroup of patients may well benefit from the new therapy. Moreover, the target population to be evaluated in a phase III trial may be incorrectly specified. Alternative approaches are proposed in the literature that make it possible to include two subgroups according to biomarker status (negative/positive) in the same study. Jones, Parashar and Tournoux et al. propose different stratified adaptive two-stage designs to identify a subgroup of interest in a heterogeneous population that could possibly benefit from the experimental treatment at the end of the first or second stage. Nevertheless, these designs are rarely used in oncology research. After introducing these stratified adaptive designs, we present an R package (ph2hetero) implementing these methods. A case study is provided to illustrate both the designs and the use of the R package. These stratified adaptive designs provide a useful alternative to classical two-stage designs and may also provide options in contexts other than biomarker studies.


Assuntos
Biomarcadores Tumorais , Ensaios Clínicos Fase II como Assunto , Neoplasias/metabolismo , Neoplasias/terapia , Humanos
11.
Ann Oncol ; 29(8): 1828-1835, 2018 08 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29860427

RESUMO

Background: Prediction of metastatic outcome in sarcomas is challenging for clinical management since they are aggressive and carry a high metastatic risk. A 67-gene expression signature, the Complexity INdex in SARComas (CINSARC), has been identified as a better prognostic factor than the reference pathological grade. Since it cannot be applied easily in standard laboratory practice, we assessed its prognostic value using nanoString on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) blocks to evaluate its potential in clinical routine practice and guided therapeutic management. Methods: A code set consisting of 67 probes derived from the 67 genes of the CINSARC signature was built and named NanoCind®. To compare the performance of RNA-seq and nanoString (NanoCind®), we used expressions of various sarcomas (n = 124, frozen samples) using both techniques and compared predictive values based on CINSARC risk groups and clinical annotations. We also used nanoString on FFPE blocks (n = 67) and matching frozen and FFPE samples (n = 45) to compare their level of agreement. Metastasis-free survival and agreement values in classification groups were evaluated. Results: CINSARC strongly predicted metastatic outcome using nanoString on frozen samples (HR = 2.9, 95% CI: 1.23-6.82) with similar risk-group classifications (86%). While more than 50% of FFPE blocks were not analyzable by RNA-seq owing to poor RNA quality, all samples were analyzable with nanoString. When similar (risk-group) classifications were measured with frozen tumors (RNA-seq) compared with FFPE blocks (84% agreement), the CINSARC signature was still a predictive factor of metastatic outcome with nanoString on FFPE samples (HR = 4.43, 95% CI: 1.25-15.72). Conclusion: CINSARC is a material-independent prognostic signature for metastatic outcome in sarcomas and outperforms histological grade. Unlike RNA-seq, nanoString is not influenced by the poor quality of RNA extracted from FFPE blocks. The CINSARC signature can potentially be used in combination with nanoString (NanoCind®) in routine clinical practice on FFPE blocks to predict metastatic outcome.


Assuntos
Perfilação da Expressão Gênica/métodos , Sarcoma/genética , Transcriptoma/genética , Idoso , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Seguimentos , Formaldeído/química , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inclusão em Parafina , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Prognóstico , RNA/química , RNA/genética , RNA/isolamento & purificação , Sarcoma/mortalidade , Sarcoma/patologia , Análise de Sequência de RNA , Fixação de Tecidos/métodos
12.
Ann Oncol ; 29(7): 1588-1593, 2018 07 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29722789

RESUMO

Background: Different methods have been proposed to analyze adverse events (AEs) associated with targeted therapies. While these AEs lead to dose adjustments for many patients, conventional reporting methods do not take drug administration into consideration. This paper underlines the importance of jointly reporting AEs and drug administration using prevalence, and proposes a complementary approach to reporting. Patients and methods: The prevalence method estimates the probability of progression-free patients being in a particular health state (state 1: AEs with full dose; state 2: AEs with reduced dose; state 3: no AEs with reduced dose) at different time points. To take into account the impact of dose adjustments on efficacy, the weighted prevalence method can be used by assigning utility weights to the different health states. The benefit of these methods was illustrated using data from a phase II trial of regorafenib. Results: Only 4.6% of progression-free patients developed mucositis/stomatitis (grade ≥2) at 3 months. The prevalence of patients not experiencing this AE but whose dose was reduced or treatment interrupted was 58.1%. The weighted prevalence of the regorafenib toxicity profile and dose reduction was higher in the control arm. Conclusion: This case study confirms the importance of jointly analyzing AEs and drug administration. The weighted prevalence approach is an average score that incorporates the dimension of drug administration into AE assessment. This can be helpful for regulatory agencies as well as for clinicians to evaluate the benefit-risk ratio of therapies in their treatment choice. Clinical trial: NCT01900743.


Assuntos
Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/epidemiologia , Terapia de Alvo Molecular/efeitos adversos , Compostos de Fenilureia/administração & dosagem , Compostos de Fenilureia/efeitos adversos , Piridinas/administração & dosagem , Piridinas/efeitos adversos , Sarcoma/tratamento farmacológico , Método Duplo-Cego , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/etiologia , Seguimentos , França/epidemiologia , Humanos , Mucosite/epidemiologia , Mucosite/etiologia , Prevalência , Prognóstico , Sarcoma/patologia , Estomatite/epidemiologia , Estomatite/etiologia , Taxa de Sobrevida
13.
Contemp Clin Trials ; 68: 109-115, 2018 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29608972

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In medical oncology, changes in practices are almost always based on randomized trials but medical history shows that it is different in surgical oncology. In the past, many surgical procedures were routinely performed without a rigorous evaluation of the risk-benefit. To highlight the complexity of developing randomized surgical trials, disquisitions on methodology presented in the medical literature. This is particularly true when we consider breast reconstruction after surgical treatment for breast cancer. It is illusory to perform and conduct a randomized clinical trial (RCT) when a surgical procedure is routinely used by most surgeons. METHODS: As a case study, we present the scientific rationale and the design of the MAPAM01 trial which evaluates the security of the nipple sparing mastectomy. Other alternative approaches, such as propensity score and CUSUM, are presented. RESULTS: In this situation, to design surgical trials using alternative methodological approaches present a particularly important challenge both for surgeons and methodologists. Alternative approach to randomized trials can be useful to evaluate surgical procedures routinely used. CONCLUSION: Close collaboration between surgeons and methodologists is needed to propose appropriate and well-designed surgical trials.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Mamoplastia/métodos , Mastectomia/métodos , Tratamentos com Preservação do Órgão/métodos , Projetos de Pesquisa/normas , Pesquisadores , Cirurgiões , Adulto , Feminino , França , Humanos , Colaboração Intersetorial , Oncologia/métodos , Oncologia/normas , Mamilos , Estudos Observacionais como Assunto , Melhoria de Qualidade , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto
14.
Cancer Radiother ; 22(1): 17-24, 2018 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29395854

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Helical TomoTherapy® allows precise and homogeneous tumour coverage and excellent sparing of organs at risk. We present here our treatment technique, dosimetric results, and our first clinical data for patients receiving total body irradiation as part of the conditioning regimen before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The cohort consisted of 11 patients who were treated in our institution between August 2014 and January 2016. The total dose was 12Gy in six fractions in three days. We collected the dose distribution information in the treatment volumes, organs at risk and area of junction. We report retrospectively the clinical events during the first 6 months after the procedure. RESULTS: Median age was 31 years (range, 18-57 years). Median D98% was 11.5Gy (range: 6.6-11.9Gy). The median of the mean doses to the lungs was 8.7Gy (range: 8.5-9.3Gy). The mean dose for the junction area was 12Gy (range: 11.9-12.1Gy). All patients had the total procedure, and all underwent successful engraftment. During the first six months, nine patients had at least one grade 3 or 4 toxicity that was due essentially to graft versus host disease. No patient had radiation pneumonitis. The toxicities were both more frequent and of higher grade during the first three months. CONCLUSION: Total body irradiation using helical TomoTherapy® is feasible. It allows a very good homogeneity of dose and conformity with an acceptable tolerance. It could deliver higher doses to sites at high risk of recurrence (bone marrow, sanctuary sites), while sparing major normal organs like lungs, liver, and kidneys. This reduction of dose could lead to reduced severity and frequency of late complications.


Assuntos
Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada , Irradiação Corporal Total , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Leucemia/terapia , Linfoma de Células T/terapia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Tratamentos com Preservação do Órgão , Órgãos em Risco , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Transplante de Células-Tronco , Irradiação Corporal Total/métodos , Adulto Jovem
15.
J Tissue Eng Regen Med ; 12(2): e1237-e1250, 2018 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28719946

RESUMO

Autologous fat grafting is a common procedure for soft-tissue reconstruction but is associated with a graft resorption rate ranging from 20% to 80%. To improve the fat graft survival rate, a new technique, called cell-assisted lipotransfer (CAL), was developed. With CAL, fat is injected along with adipose-derived stromal cells that are assumed to improve fat survival rate. We conducted an evidence-based meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CAL as compared with conventional autologous fat grafting (non-CAL). The databases MEDLINE (via PubMed), Cochrane Library, EBSCO, Web of Science, and EMBASE were searched for reports of clinical trials, case series, and cohorts available from 2008 to 2016. We conducted a meta-analysis of the efficacy of CAL with data analysis concerning fat survival rate. The incidence of complications and the need for multiple procedures were evaluated to determine the safety of CAL. We identified 25 studies (696 patients) that were included in the systematic review; 16 studies were included in the meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of CAL. The fat survival rate was significantly higher with CAL than non-CAL (64% vs. 44%, p < .0001) independent of injection site (breast and face). This benefit of CAL was significant for only injection volumes <100 ml (p = .03). The two groups did not differ in frequency of multiple procedures after fat grafting, but the incidence of complications was greater with CAL than non-CAL (8.4% vs. 1.5%, p = .0019). The CAL method is associated with better fat survival rate than with conventional fat grafting but only for small volumes of fat grafting (<100 ml). Nonetheless, the new technique is associated with more complications and did not reduce the number of surgical procedures needed after the first fat grafting. More prospective studies are required to draw clinical conclusions and to demonstrate the real benefit of CAL as compared with common autologous fat grafting.


Assuntos
Tecido Adiposo/transplante , Lipídeos/química , Células-Tronco/citologia , Animais , Humanos , Viés de Publicação , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
16.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 25(2): 535-541, 2018 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29159738

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Pelvic exenteration remains one of the most mutilating procedures, with important postoperative morbidity, an altered body image, and long-term physical and psychosocial concerns. This study aimed to assess quality of life (QOL) during the first year after pelvic exenteration for gynecologic malignancy performed with curative intent. METHODS: A French multicentric prospective study was performed by including patients who underwent pelvic exenteration. Quality of life by measurement of functional and symptom scales was assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 (version 3.0) and the EORTC QLQ-OV28 questionnaires before surgery, at baseline, and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after the procedure. RESULTS: The study enrolled 97 patients. Quality of life including physical, personal, fatigue, and anorexia reported in the QLQ-C30 was significantly reduced 1 month postoperatively and improved at least to baseline level 1 year after the procedure. Body image also was significantly reduced 1 month postoperatively. Global health, emotional, dyspnea, and anorexia items were significantly improved 1 year after surgery compared with baseline values. Unlike younger patients, elderly patients did not regain physical and social activities after pelvic exenteration. CONCLUSIONS: Therapeutic decision on performing a pelvic exenteration can have a severe and permanent impact on all aspects of patients' QOL. Deterioration of QOL was most significant during the first 3 months after surgery. Elderly patients were the only group of patients with permanent decreased physical and social function. Preoperative evaluation and postoperative follow-up evaluation should include health-related QOL instruments, counseling by a multidisciplinary team to cover all aspects concerning stoma care, sexual function, and long-term concerns after surgery.


Assuntos
Imagem Corporal , Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos/cirurgia , Exenteração Pélvica/psicologia , Exenteração Pélvica/reabilitação , Qualidade de Vida , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Seguimentos , Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos/patologia , Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos/psicologia , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Período Pós-Operatório , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Inquéritos e Questionários
17.
J Nutr Health Aging ; 20(8): 878-888, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27709238

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The estimation of the risk of poor tolerance and overdose of antineoplastic agents protocols represents a major challenge in oncology, particularly in older patients. We hypothesize that age-related modifications of body composition (i.e. increased fat mass and decreased lean mass) may significantly affect tolerance to chemotherapy. METHOD: We conducted a systematic review for the last 25 years (between 1990 and 2015), using US National library of Medicine Medline electronic bibliographic database and Embase database of cohorts or clinical trials exploring (i) the interactions of body composition (assessed by Dual X-ray Absorptiometry, Bioelectrical Impedance Analyses, or Computerized Tomography) with pharmacokinetics parameters, (ii) the tolerance to chemotherapy, and (iii) the consequences of chemotherapies or targeted therapies on body composition. RESULTS: Our search identified 1504 articles. After a selection (using pre-established criteria) on titles and abstract, 24 original articles were selected with 3 domains of interest: impact of body composition on pharmacokinetics (7 articles), relationship between body composition and chemotoxicity (14 articles), and effect of anti-cancer chemotherapy on body composition (11 articles). The selected studies suggested that pharmacokinetic was influenced by lean mass, that lower lean mass could be correlated with toxicity, and that sarcopenic patients experienced more toxicities that non-sarcopenic patients. Regarding fat mass, results were less conclusive. No studies specifically explored the topic of body composition in older cancer patients. CONCLUSIONS: Plausible pathophysiological pathways linking body composition, toxicity, and pharmacokinetics are sustained by the actual review. However, despite the growing number of older cancer patients, our review highlighted the lack of specific studies in the field of anti-neoplastic agents toxicity regarding body composition conducted in elderly.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Composição Corporal/fisiologia , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
18.
Ann Oncol ; 27(11): 1981-1987, 2016 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27502711

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Time to progression (TTP) is often used as a primary end point in phase II clinical trials. Since the actual date of nadir and progression is never known, most calculated TTP are overestimated. This study evaluates the imprecision on the estimate of TTP under two hypothetical tumor kinetic settings and various assessment schedules. DESIGN: A two-component tumor growth model was used to account for treatment effect assuming exponential decay for tumor shrinkage and linear growth for progression. Evolution of tumor burden (TB) was modelized according to two scenarios using either a cytotoxic or a cytostatic agent and several assessment schedules. TB, nadir, progression and TTP were simulated for each visit schedule. RESULTS: For cytotoxic agents, our model predicted response at 1.5 weeks, a TB at nadir of 40.2 mm (starting from 100 mm) occurring at 6.7 weeks and true progression at 11.2 weeks with a TB of 48.2 mm. For cytostatic agents, our model predicted no response, a TB at nadir of 77 mm occurring at 9.2 weeks and true progression at 19.4 weeks with a TB of 92 mm. Depending on the assessment schedule, estimated TTP was increased from 0.8 to 36.8 weeks and from 0.6 to 28.6 weeks when compared with the true TTP and varied from 5.2% to 298% and from 1.66 to 109.58% when compared with the true TB at progression for cytotoxic and cytostatic agents, respectively. Our model further shows that for cytotoxic agents, evaluation of TB every 6 weeks is optimal to capture the true nadir, the time to nadir, the true progression and the true TTP, whereas for cytostatic agents, this evaluation is optimal every 10 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Our results emphasize the importance to estimate the effects of tested drugs on tumor shrinkage before design any phase II clinical trials to choose optimal TB evaluation's timing.


Assuntos
Pesquisa Biomédica/estatística & dados numéricos , Ensaios Clínicos Fase II como Assunto/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Progressão da Doença , Humanos , Carga Tumoral/efeitos dos fármacos
19.
Ann Oncol ; 27(8): 1633-8, 2016 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27217543

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In the era of personalized medicine, molecularly targeted therapies (MTT) have modified the outcome of some cancer types. The price of tumor control needs to be balanced with toxicity since these new therapies are administered continuously for several months or sometimes for several years. For cytotoxic drugs, the incidence of adverse event (AE) was traditionally reported as frequency and intensity. This simple measure is not sufficient to capture the recurrent nature and duration of AE. This paper presents two methods to better describe the toxicity burden across the time: prevalence and Q-TWiST. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Limitation of worst-grade method and advantages of prevalence and Q-TWiST in the analysis of toxicity were illustrated using data from a phase II trial and a hypothetically simulated clinical trial. RESULTS: Prevalence integrates the recurrent nature of AE. Using prevalence, it is possible to obtain a time profile of AE. Q-TWiST method evaluates the weighted time spent in each health state and also considers the recurrent nature of side-effects in order to assess the 'risk-benefit' ratio of a treatment. When interpreting Q-TWiST results, it is necessary to take into account overall survival and progression-free survival and to define a clinically relevant difference according to the setting. CONCLUSION: The two methods presented here capture different effects. They are helpful for physicians in their treatment choice (balance benefit risk), to counsel patients and to optimize supportive care. In order to ensure consistency and provide critical information required for medical decision-making, it is important to encourage the use of alternative statistical methods in the analysis of toxicities associated with MTT. CLINICAL TRIAL: NCT00541008.


Assuntos
Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/epidemiologia , Terapia de Alvo Molecular/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Ensaios Clínicos Fase II como Assunto , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Neoplasias/patologia , Medicina de Precisão , Qualidade de Vida
20.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 156(3): 577-585, 2016 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27075918

RESUMO

Use of parametric statistical models can be a solution to reduce the follow-up period time required to estimate long-term survival. Mould and Boag were the first to use the lognormal model. Competing risks methodology seems more suitable when a particular event type is of interest than classical survival analysis. The objective was to evaluate the ability of the Jeong and Fine model to predict long-term cumulative incidence. Survival data recorded by Institut Curie (Paris) from 4761 breast cancer patients treated and followed between 1981 and 2013 were used. Long-term cumulative incidence rates predicted by the model using short-term follow-up data were compared to non-parametric estimation using complete follow-up data. 20- or 25-year cumulative incidence rates for loco-regional recurrence and distant metastasis predicted by the model using a maximum of 10 years of follow-up data had a maximum difference of around 6 % compared to non-parametric estimation. Prediction rates were underestimated for the third and composite event (contralateral or second cancer or death). Predictive ability of Jeong and Fine model on breast cancer data was generally good considering the short follow-up period time used for the estimation especially when a proportion of patient did not experience loco-regional recurrence or distant metastasis.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Modelos Estatísticos , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Algoritmos , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição de Risco , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA