Recommendations for international harmonisation, implementation and further development of suitable scientific approaches regarding the assessment of mixture effects.

Legal frameworks lay down requirements for risk assessment of combined exposure to multiple chemicals and their implementation where scientific methods are accepted by responsible authorities. In order to protect human health, an assessment of potential risks that might result from co-exposure to multiple chemical substances is requested by European legislation. Several approaches for risk assessment of mixtures of chemicals have been proposed, but none has been widely implemented in regulatory risk assessments, so far. EuroMix, an EU Horizon 2020 funded project, contributed to the improvement of internationally harmonised approaches for risk assessment of chemical mixtures. Based on in vitro and in silico tests, an integrated test strategy involving hazard and exposure assessment was developed and a web tool to conduct such assessments was provided. One further task within EuroMix was to make recommendations for international harmonisation, implementation and further development of suitable scientific approaches regarding the assessment of mixture effects. This paper briefly describes objectives and outcome of the EuroMix project as well as recent findings from OECD, WHO and EFSA addressing combined exposure to multiple chemicals. Building on this, five steps addressing further development needs and implementation of existing tools especially for risk managers and policy makers are proposed.

(Q)SAR tools for the prediction of mutagenic properties: Are they ready for application in pesticide regulation?

The assessment of human health risks resulting from the presence of metabolites in groundwater and food residues has become an important element in pesticide authorisation. In this context, the evaluation of mutagenicity is of particular interest and a paradigm shift from exposure-triggered testing to in silico-based screening has been recommended in the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) Guidance on the establishment of the residue definition for dietary risk assessment. In addition, it is proposed to apply in silico predictions when experimental mutagenicity testing is not possible due to a lack of sufficient quantities of the pesticide metabolite. This, combined with animal welfare and economic considerations, has led to a situation where an increasing number of in silico studies are submitted to regulatory authorities. Whilst there is extensive experience with in silico predictions for mutagenicity in the chemical and pharmaceutical industry, their suitability in pesticide regulation is still insufficiently considered. Therefore, we herein discuss critical issues that need to be resolved to successfully implement (Quantitative) Structure-Activity Relationship ((Q)SAR) as an accepted tool in pesticide regulation. For illustration purposes, the results of a pilot study are included. The presented study highlights a need for further improvement regarding the predictivity and applicability domain of (Q)SAR systems for pesticides and their metabolites, but also raises other questions such as model selection, establishment of acceptance criteria, harmonised approaches to the combination of model outputs into overall conclusions, adequate reporting and data sharing. © 2020 The Authors. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.