Should We Operate Nonagenarians with Symptomatic Giant Paraesophageal Hernias?

Introduction: Hiatal hernia (HH) is a common disorder of the upper gastrointestinal (UGI) tract that general surgeons encounter. Giant paraesophageal is a subtype of HH in which more than 30% of the stomach is located in the chest. It can cause symptoms such as dysphagia, UGI bleeding, gastroesophageal reflux disease, and vomiting. As the life expectancy of the general population increases, the incidence of giant HH increases and can cause morbidity, including recurrent admissions and prolonged length of hospitalization. In this article, we describe a cohort of nonagenarian patients with HH who were admitted to our institution and were treated either surgically or medically. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed our prospectively maintained database of all nonagenarians who were admitted to our center between 2018 and 2022 with the diagnosis of HH. We compared the demographic data, clinical data, and outcomes between patients undergoing operative and nonoperative management. Results: Twenty patients of age over 90 years were hospitalized with HH-related symptoms. Six underwent surgery, whereas 14 received medical management. Surgical patients had fewer overall hospitalization days, shorter length of stay, and less blood product requirements. Notably two cases of in-hospital mortality occurred in the nonoperative group, whereas none occurred in the operative group. All surgical procedures were performed laparoscopically, with two minor perioperative complications. Conclusion: In selected nonagenarian patients, laparoscopic HH repair is safe and should be considered favorably. It can reduce hospitalization time and can mitigate morbidity.

Robotic Heller's myotomy using the new Hugo™ RAS system: first worldwide report.

BACKGROUND: Achalasia is a rare disorder of the esophagus characterized by motor dysfunction in the esophagus and relaxation failure of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES). Currently, surgical myotomy procedures are considered the standard of care. Robotic Heller's myotomy (RHM) with fundoplication has been gaining popularity due to documented advantages in the precision of myotomy as well as avoiding the potential reflux following per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). To the best of our knowledge, RHM has thus far has been performed exclusively by the da Vinci surgical system. The new Hugo RAS™ system offers a unique modular design and an open console which offers better maneuverability and docking options. In this study, we present the first worldwide series of patients undergoing RHM using the new Hugo RAS™ platform. Our objective is to propose optimal operating configuration and setup to fully harness the advantages of the unique modular design of this system. METHODS: Ten consecutive achalasia patients underwent Robotic Heller's myotomy (RHM) with the Hugo RAS™ system. We prospectively collected patient data, including demographics, comorbidities, ASA class, Eckardt scores, pre-operative manometric data, and EndoFlip parameters. Additionally, we recorded the docking and total operative times. RESULTS: Between December 2022 and August 2023, 10 patients underwent RHM with the Hugo™ RAS system. Patients had a median age of 42.5 years, 60% were female, and mean BMI was 23.2. Fifty percent had achalasia type 2 and 50% type 1. The median pre-operative integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) was 24.9. Median docking time was 10 min and overall operative time was 129.5 min. All patients, except one with acute coronary syndrome, had an uneventful peri-operative course and were discharged on post-operative day 2. CONCLUSION: The Hugo™ RAS system is well designed for robotic Heller myotomy. The operative and clinical results are similar to the currently used robotic system; however, the modular design of the system has some differences. These translate to better docking angles and maneuverability as well as console surgeon's ergonomics. Further experience is needed to explore the advantages of the system's modular design and function.

The Angle of His as a Measurable Element of the Anti-reflux Mechanism.

BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common condition, resulting from the loss of the anti-reflux barrier. Laparoscopic fundoplication is the surgical procedure of choice for treatment of GERD; however, there remains a debate on the exact mechanism through which it prevents reflux. OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to understand the relationship between reflux, fundoplication, and the angle of His on an experimental model. METHODS: The study was conducted on four groups of fresh explanted swine stomachs: control group, myotomy, myotomy with Nissen fundoplication, and myotomy with Toupet fundoplication. The stomachs were placed in a specially designated container on an inclinable platform which would increase the hydrostatic pressure on the esophago-gastric junction. Measurements of the angle of His using fluoroscopy and the esophago-gastric orifice area using endoscopy were performed, and the occurrence of reflux was documented. RESULTS: Each group of the study contained nine swine stomachs. In the control and myotomy groups, the angle became wider as the incline level increased the pressure and was significantly different between the groups (p < .001). Both groups demonstrated an increase in the orifice area as the incline level increased the pressure. There was a significant correlation between the angle of His and the area of the esophago-gastric orifice (p < .001). In the control group, the reflux began at the 0°. In the myotomy group, it began at the + 15° incline (less pressure). Reflux rarely occurred in the Nissen and Toupet groups, with the breaking point being mostly defined as "beyond - 30°". A significant difference was noted in the occurrence of reflux between fundoplication and the non-fundoplication groups (p < 0.001), while there was no significant difference between the Toupet and Nissen groups (p = 0.134). Analysis showed a significant independent correlation between both the angle of His and the orifice area with the presence of reflux (p = .002 and p = .024 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we developed an experimental model to enable careful evaluation of the elements of the anti-reflux mechanism, of which, the angle of His has a measurable element. We demonstrated that as the angle of His becomes wider the esophago-gastric orifice area becomes larger. Additionally, a wider angle of His and a larger esophago-gastric orifice area were correlated independently with more reflux. This suggests that the fundoplication creates an acute angle of His which is correlated with a smaller area of the esophago-gastric orifice and eventually with a lower incidence of reflux.

Post-POEM Contrast-Enhanced Swallow Study: Is It Always Necessary?

BACKGROUND: Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is rapidly becoming the procedure of choice for treating esophageal achalasia. In most centers, contrast-enhanced swallow studies (CESS) are routinely performed postoperatively to confirm mucosal integrity. The aim of this study was to determine the necessity of performing these studies routinely after POEM. METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of patients who underwent POEM between December 2012 and November 2020 was performed. All patients underwent a CESS on the first postoperative day. Medical records including vital signs, complete blood count, and POD-1 CESS were evaluated. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-four consecutive patients were included in the study. Sixty-nine (51.49%) CESS showed abnormal findings; while most findings did not change the postoperative course, five (7.2%) demonstrated tunnel leaks, which did alter the overall management. Screening patients for fever, tachycardia, or leukocytosis on POD-1 had a 100% sensitivity and a 62% specificity for finding a clinically significant complication on CESS. CONCLUSIONS: The study findings suggest that performing routine contrast-enhanced swallow studies on all patients is not necessary following POEM, as leaks can be screened for by clinical or laboratory abnormalities. Herein, we propose an algorithm based on objective measurable findings for the selection of patients who should undergo CESS.

Pediatricians as Case Managers Reduce the Exposure to Computerized Tomography in Children Experiencing Minor Head Trauma.

BACKGROUND: Head trauma is one of the most common reasons for pediatric emergency medicine department (PED) visits. Computerized tomography (CT) scan is considered the criterion standard for the diagnosis of traumatic brain injury but was shown to increases the risk of malignancies. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed collected data of all children (ages 0-16 years) experiencing mild head trauma who were admitted to a single center, from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2015. Comparison between patients treated by pediatricians/pediatric emergency medicine physicians (PEMP) with those treated by surgeons regarding CT rates and prognosis was done. RESULTS: During the previously mentioned period, 4232 children presented to the PED after minor head trauma, the average age was 5.4 (±4) years and 67.1% were male. Head CT was done in 7.7%, of which 30.7% had positive findings. Younger children tended to have higher percentage of positive findings on CT scan (60%, 43.8%, 26.6%, P = 0.003, for children up to 5 months, 5-24 months, and older than 24 months, respectively). Pediatricians ordered less CT scans when compared with surgeons (5.4% vs 8.5%, P < 0.001). Moreover, they had higher rates of positive findings on CT scan (52.5% vs 25.8%, P < 0.001). When all other characteristics were similar, if the case manager was a pediatrician, the patient's chances to undergo a CT scan were 4.3 times lower than if the case manager was a surgeon (odds ratio, 4.277; confidence interval, 2.274-7.104). No difference in readmissions or other complications were found between the 2 groups. DISCUSSION: This study highlights that when the case manager of children with minor head trauma is a pediatrician/PEMP, CT scan rates and thus exposure to radiation are diminished without a failure to detect clinically important traumatic brain injury.In conclusion, our findings suggest that when possible, all children experiencing minor head trauma should be treated by a pediatrician/PEMP in the PED.