Indications, Techniques, and Barriers for Pancreas Transplant Biopsy: A Consensus Perspective From a Survey of US Centers.

BACKGROUND: Pancreas transplant biopsy practices for the diagnosis of rejection or other pathologies are not well described. METHODS: We conducted a survey of staff at US pancreas transplant programs (March 22, 2022, to August 22, 2022) to assess current program practices and perceptions about the utility and challenges in the performance and interpretation of pancreas allograft biopsies. RESULTS: Respondents represented 65% (76/117) of active adult pancreas transplant programs, capturing 66% of recent pancreas transplant volume in the United States. Participants were most often nephrologists (52%), followed by surgeons (46%), and other staff (4%). Pancreas allograft biopsies were performed mostly by interventional radiologists (74%), followed by surgeons (11%), nephrologists (8%), and gastroenterologists (1%). Limitations in the radiologist's or biopsy performer's comfort level or expertise to safely perform a biopsy, or to obtain sufficient/adequate samples were the two most common challenges with pancreas transplant biopsies. Pancreas transplant biopsies were read by local pathologists at a majority (86%) of centers. Challenges reported with pancreas biopsy interpretation included poor reliability, lack of reporting of C4d staining, lack of reporting of rejection grading, and inconclusive interpretation of the biopsy. Staff at a third of responding programs (34%) stated that they rarely or never perform pancreas allograft biopsies and treat presumed rejection empirically. CONCLUSIONS: This national survey identified significant variation in clinical practices related to pancreas allograft biopsies and potential barriers to pancreas transplant utilization across the United States. Consideration of strategies to improve program experience with percutaneous pancreas biopsy and to support optimal management of pancreas allograft rejection informed by histology is warranted.

Kidney paired donation in developing countries: A global perspective.

Purpose of review: We review the key principles of kidney paired donation (KPD) and discuss the status and unique considerations for KPD in developing countries. Recent findings: Despite the advantages of KPD programs, they remain rare among developing nations, and the programs that exist have many differences with those of in developed countries. There is a paucity of literature and lack of published data on KPD from most of the developing nations. Expanding KPD programs may require the adoption of features and innovations of successful KPD programs. Cooperation with national and international societies should be encouraged to ensure endorsement and sharing of best practices. Summary: KPD is in the initial stages or has not yet started in the majority of the emerging nations. But the logistics and strategies required to implement KPD in developing nations differ from other parts of the world. By learning from the KPD experience in developing countries and adapting to their unique needs, it should be possible to expand access to KPD to allow more transplants to happen for patients in need world-wide.

Maximizing opportunities for kidney transplantation in older adults.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To summarize the current state of evidence related to the outcomes of older adults who need and receive kidney transplants, and strategies to facilitate appropriate transplant access in this at-risk group. RECENT FINDINGS: Older adults are a rapidly growing subgroup of the kidney transplant waitlist. Compared to younger adults, older kidney transplant recipients have increased mortality after kidney transplant and lower death-censored graft survival. In determining suitability for transplantation in older patients, clinicians must balance procedural and immunosuppression-related risk with incremental survival when compared with dialysis. To appropriately increase access to transplantation in this population, clinicians and policy makers consider candidates' chronological age and frailty, as well as the quality of and waiting time for a donated allograft. Given risk of deterioration prior to transplant, candidates should be rapidly evaluated, listed, and transplanted using living donor and or less than ideal deceased donor organs when available. SUMMARY: Access to transplantation for older adults can be increased through targeted interventions to address frailty and reduce waiting times through optimized organ use. Focused study and educational interventions for patients and providers are needed to improve the outcomes of this vulnerable group.

The Agony and the Ecstasy: Stories from Organ Transplant Recipients.

Transplantation affords recipients of a donated organ a second chance at life. However, the gift of life can incur impactful costs to the donor, the recipient, and their caregivers. In this collection of stories, thirteen authors explore their journey to transplantation and afterward-from physical pain and deconditioning; to navigating well-intentioned but rigid clinicians; to developing a greater appreciation of life, their community, and their abilities. We explore the recurring themes woven throughout the stories, including the solemn responsibility of accepting an organ, the challenges of living a new life with a body and mind changed by transplantation, the difficulty of preserving one's sense of self when one's clinicians are dominantly focused on the organ, and the spectrum of gifts that organ donation and transplantation provide.

Deceased Donor Procurement Biopsy Practices, Interpretation, and Histology-Based Decision-Making: A Survey of US Kidney Transplant Centers.

Introduction: The utility of kidney procurement biopsies is controversial. Understanding the current landscape of how clinicians obtain and use biopsies in organ evaluation may help inform consensus-building efforts. Methods: An electronic survey was distributed to clinicians at US kidney transplant programs (April 22, 2021-June 30, 2021) to evaluate donor biopsy indications, frequency, processing and interpretation, and impact of findings on practices. Results: Responses from staff involved in organ acceptance (73% surgeons, 20% nephrologists, 6% coordinators) at 95 transplant centers were analyzed, representing 40% of US transplant centers and 50% of recent deceased donor kidney transplant volume. More than a third of centers (35%) reported obtaining procurement biopsies on most-to-all kidneys. Most clinicians decided when to biopsy jointly with the Organ Procurement Organization (OPO) (82%) based on formal criteria for the decision (72%), although 41% reported having requested a biopsy outside of the criteria. Most respondents used a semiquantitative scoring system for interpretation (57%). Many respondents reported rarely or never having access to renal specialty pathologists (37%) or to telepathology (59%). Most respondents reported that a favorable biopsy result would encourage them to accept a "marginal" donor kidney (72%); nearly half (46%) indicated that an unfavorable biopsy result would lead to decline of a standard criteria kidney. Conclusion: Procurement biopsies are commonly used in organ acceptance decisions despite inconsistent access to experienced renal pathologists and heterogeneous approaches to criteria, scoring, and interpretation. Ongoing study and consensus building are needed to direct procurement biopsy practice toward increasing organ utilization and reducing allocation inefficiency.

Post-pancreatic transplant enteric leaks: The role of the salvage operation.

Enteric drainage in pancreas transplantation is complicated by an enteric leak in 5%-8%, frequently necessitating pancreatectomy. Pancreatic salvage outcomes are not well studied. Risk factors for enteric leak were examined and outcomes of attempted graft salvage were compared to immediate pancreatectomy. Pancreas transplants performed between 1995 and 2018 were reviewed. Donor, recipient, and organ variables including demographics, donor type, ischemic time, kidney donor profile index, and pancreas donor risk index were analyzed. Among 1153 patients, 33 experienced enteric leaks (2.9%). Donors of allografts that developed leak were older (37.9y vs. 29.0y, p = .001), had higher KDPI (37% vs. 24%, p < .001), higher pancreas donor risk index (1.83 vs. 1.32, p < .001), and longer cold ischemic time (16.5 vs. 14.8 h, p = .03). Intra-abdominal abscess and higher blood loss decreased the chance of successful salvage. Enteric leak increased 6-month graft loss risk (HR 13.9[CI 8.5-22.9], p < .001). However, 50% (n = 12) of allografts undergoing attempted salvage survived long-term. After 6 months of pancreas graft survival, salvage and non-leak groups had similar 5-year graft survival (82.5% vs. 81.5%) and mortality (90.9% vs. 93.5%). Enteric leaks remain a challenging complication. Pancreatic allograft salvage can be attempted in suitable patients and accomplished in 50% of cases without significantly increased graft failure or mortality risk.

Solid Organ Transplantation in SARS-CoV-2 Recovered Transplant Candidates: a Comprehensive Review of Recent Literature.

Purpose of Review: As the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic continues to surge, determining the safety and timing of proceeding with solid organ transplantation (SOT) in transplant candidates who have recovered from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and who are otherwise transplant eligible is an important concern. We reviewed the current status of protocols and the outcomes of SOT in SARS-CoV-2 recovered patients. Recent Findings: We identified 44 published reports up through 7 September 2021, comprising 183 SOT [kidney = 115; lung = 27; liver = 36; heart = 3; simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) = 1, small bowel = 1] transplants in SARS-CoV-2 recovered patients. The majority of these were living donor transplants. A positive SARS-CoV-2 antibody test, although not obligatory in most reports, was a useful tool to strengthen the decision to proceed with transplant. Two consecutive real-time polymerase chain test (RT-PCR) negative tests was one of the main prerequisites for transplant in many reports. However, some reports suggest that life-saving transplantation can proceed in select circumstances without waiting for a negative RT-PCR. In general, the standard immunosuppression regimen was not changed. Summary: In select cases, SOT in COVID-19 recovered patients appears successful in short-term follow-up. Emergency SOT can be performed with active SARS-CoV-2 infection in some cases. In general, continuing standard immunosuppression regimen may be reasonable, except in cases of inadvertent transplantation with active SARS-CoV-2. Available reports are predominantly in kidney transplant recipients, and more data for other organ transplants are needed.

Use of Organs from SARS-CoV-2 Infected Donors: Is It Safe? A Contemporary Review.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: As the prevalence of individuals with recovered coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) increases, determining if and when organs from these donors can be safely used is an important priority. We examined current knowledge of outcomes of transplant using donors with recovered COVID-19. RECENT FINDINGS: A literature search of PubMed and Google scholar databases was conducted to identify articles with terms "SARS-CoV2," "COVID-19," "donor recovered," and "transplantation" published through 08/10/2021. We identified 25 reports detailing 94 recipients of both abdominal and thoracic transplants from donors with both prior and active COVID-19 infection. Rates of transmission to the recipient and of transplanted organ dysfunction were low among reports of donors with prior COVID-19 infection. End organ dysfunction and transmission were more common with active infection, although few reports are available. Standardized reporting is needed to better assess the impact of donor symptomatology, cycle thresholds, and individual recipient risk factors on postoperative outcomes. SUMMARY: Available reports suggest that transplantation from COVID-19 donors may be feasible and safe, at least in short term follow-up. Nevertheless, there is a need for standardized testing and management protocols which should be tailored for available resources. While increased availability of COVID-19 vaccinations will mitigate risks of donor-derived COVID-19 and simplify management, continued vigilance is warranted during the ongoing public health emergency.

Clinician and patient attitudes toward use of organs from hepatitis C viremic donors and their impact on acceptance: A contemporary review.

BACKGROUND: The use of Hepatitis C (HCV) NAT positive allografts remains unusual and is clustered at few centers. We conducted a contemporary literature review to assess whether patient and clinician attitudes toward viremic organs impact acceptance. METHODS: Databases including PubMed, MEDLINE, and SCOPUS databases were reviewed to identify studies focused on evaluating patient and provider perceptions of HCV NAT positive organ use within the DAA era (January 2015-April 2021). Search included MeSH terms related to Hepatitis C, transplantation, and patient and clinician attitudes. Two investigators extracted study characteristics including information on willingness to accept viremic organs, HCV-specific outcomes knowledge, HCV-specific concerns, and factors that contributed to acceptance or non-acceptance. RESULTS: Eight studies met all inclusion criteria. These included three pretransplant patient-directed studies, two post-transplant patient-directed studies, one pre- and post-transplant patient-directed study, and two clinician-directed studies. Common themes identified were concerns regarding HCV cure rates, viremic organ quality, DAA cost, stigma, and the possibility of HCV transmission to household members. The perception of decreased waitlist time was associated with viremic organ acceptance. Physician trust played a mixed role in acceptance patterns. CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge of high cure rates, shorter waitlist times, and higher organ quality appear to have the highest impact on organ acceptance.

Predicting the Safe Use of Deceased After Circulatory Death Liver Allografts in Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis.

OBJECTIVES: The use of deceased after circulatory death liver allografts in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis is controversial, given the increased risk of graft complications in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. We hypothesized that transplant of deceased after circulatory death livers into recipients with primary sclerosing cholangitis when appropriately selected using the UK deceased after circulatory death scoring system is not associated with increased graft failure and mortality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed 99 229 transplants (between January 2001 and December 2018) from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database. Deceased after circulatory death transplants were stratified by the UK scoring system as low risk or high risk. We identified 3958 patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis who received deceased after brain death transplant and 95 patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis who received deceased after circulatory death transplant. RESULTS: As expected, 5-year graft survival was lower in the circulatory death recipient group (69.0% vs 78.4%; P = .02). However, 5-year graft survival was significantly lower in the high-risk versus low-risk UK scoring system group (60.0% vs 75.4%; P = .02), with rate in the low-risk group similar to the brain death recipient group (78.4% vs 75.4%; P = .52). On multivariate analysis, the high-risk group had significantly increased risk of graft loss (hazard ratio of 1.92; P = .01). However, the low-risk group had equivalent graft survival to the brain death recipient group (hazard ratio of 1.23; P = .31). CONCLUSIONS: Graft failure was higher in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis who received livers from deceased after circulatory death donors; however, the risk of graft loss was abrogated using appropriately matched donor and recipient combinations.

Hepaticojejunostomy for Benign Disease: Long-Term Stricture Rate and Management.

The objective of the study was to determine the long-term stricture rate of hepaticojejunostiomy (HJ) performed for benign disease, to compare stricture rates for transplant patients and nontransplant patients, and to compare the success rates of procedural and surgical treatment options. Hospital charts of 135 consecutive patients undergoing HJ between 1998 and 2016 were analyzed retrospectively. The primary outcome was stricture formation. Secondary outcomes were time to stricture diagnosis and success rates of various interventions. The anastomotic stricture rate was 13.3 per cent (18). The mean follow-up period was 4.3 years. The mean time to stricture diagnosis was 2.3 years. Stricture rates were similar between the transplant (19.2%) and nontransplant, non-Whipple group (13%). Strictures were treated with radiological intervention with a 44.4 per cent success rate; each required multiple interventions. Mortality from liver disease after failure of nonoperative management of HJ strictures reached 30 per cent (3). Five of ten patients who failed radiological intervention underwent HJ revision; the success rate was 80 per cent. Anastomotic strictures of HJ performed for benign disease occur in 13 per cent of patients and typically develop within 2.5 years postoperatively. Yet, given the dangerous sequelae of chronic biliary obstruction and potential delay in presentation, a follow-up is recommended for up to 10 years. When strictures occur, HJ revision should be considered early, after two failed radiological interventions.

Cutaneous angiosarcoma metastatic to small bowel with nodal involvement.

A 77-year-old male with a history of metastatic scalp angiosarcoma presented with intractable gastrointestinal bleeding from a jejunal mass detected on capsule endoscopy. He underwent laparoscopic-assisted resection of the mass. Intraoperatively, an isolated small bowel mass with bulky lymphadenopathy was seen and resected en bloc. Pathology showed a 6.8cm high-grade metastatic angiosarcoma with nodal involvement and negative margins. Angiosarcoma is a sarcoma with a grim prognosis. The incidence is 2% of all soft tissue sarcomas; cutaneous lesions comprise 27% of manifestations and usually appear on head and neck. Risk factors include lymphedema, neurofibromatosis, vinyl chloride, arsenic, and anabolic steroids. Overall 5-year survival is 30-35% and is higher in patients younger than 60, those without metastasis, tumors less than 5 cm, and favorable histology. Angiosarcoma metastasis to small bowel is rare but nodal involvement is even more unusual, reported only three times in the literature. This case is the first with nodal involvement to present at a resectable stage. To diagnose disease when still at a resectable stage, a high index of suspicion must be maintained with any gastrointestinal symptoms in a patient with a history of angiosarcoma. Laparoscopic-assisted resection is safe for the resection of small bowel angiosarcoma.

Primary Anastomosis versus Ostomy after Colon Resection during Debulking of Ovarian Carcinomatosis: A NSQIP Analysis.

Ovarian carcinomatosis poses a dilemma for the surgeon. When resecting colon for tumor invasion, one must decide between diversion and primary anastomosis (PA). We examined the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program to determine whether PA associated with more complications than ostomy. The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program dataset was queried for patients with ovarian carcinomatosis between 2007 and 2012. Current Procedural Terminology codes were used to further identify patients undergoing colectomy with PA or ostomy. Logistic regression was used to evaluate 30-day morbidity and mortality. The 1013 ovarian carcinomatosis patients who underwent elective colon surgery were divided into primary repair (n = 453, 43.5%) or ostomy (n = 586, 56.5%) groups. Preoperative demographics were similar; however, ostomy patients had more severe preoperative laboratory derangements. The 30-day mortality and postoperative transfusion requirements were higher in the ostomy group. On multivariate analysis controlling for confounders, the differences were no longer significant. In conclusion, 30-day mortality and postoperative complications were increased in the ostomy group. Given the laboratory derangements in this group, this may reflect tendency to allocate ostomies to more ill patients. Primary repair in a selected population does not worsen outcomes. Prospective evaluation would help determine the impact of PA in the ovarian carcinomatosis population.

Liver Transplantation to the Active Smoker: Transplant Provider Opinions and How They Have Changed : Transplantation in Smokers: A Survey.

Awareness of smoking complications in liver transplantation patients is increasing. No study in the past 15 years has addressed attitudes toward offering transplantation to smokers. Our aim was to determine smoking policies nationwide. We conducted a survey of liver transplantation centers. The seven-question survey was sent to medical and surgical directors of liver transplantation. Results were analyzed in R 3.1.1 using two-tailed t testing and ANOVA. Fifty one of 110 centers (46 %) responded. Volume transplanted annually ranged from 10 to 190. Most respondents acknowledged a policy on smoking (38/51, 75 %). Most centers with policies required cessation (32/38, 84 %). All other centers did encourage attempts at cessation (19/19, 100 %). Whether smoking cessation was required differed by region (p = 0.02). Southern programs more commonly required smoking cessation (87.5 vs. 38.4 %, p < 0.001). The highest rates of smoking cessation were noted in the Southwest (90.0 %) and the lowest in the Northeast (26.2 %). There was a trend toward requiring cessation in larger-volume centers. Most respondents had a tobacco policy and tended to require abstinence; however, ultimately centers were divided on requiring cessation. Regional differences were noted, with the South more commonly requiring cessation. Our results indicate lack of consensus among transplantation centers regarding access of smokers to liver transplantation.

Intra-abdominal desmoid tumor after liver transplantation: A case report.

We are reporting the first documented case of an abdominal desmoid tumor presenting primarily after liver transplantation. This tumor, well described in the literature as occurring both in conjunction with familial adenomatous polyposis as well as in the post-surgical patient, has never been noted after solid organ transplantation and was therefore not included in our differential upon presentation. Definitive diagnosis required the patient to undergo surgical excision and immunochemical staining of the mass for confirmation. A review of the literature showed no primary tumors after transplantation. In a population of patients who received a small bowel transplant after they developed short gut post radical resection of aggressive fibromatosis, only rare recurrences were seen. No connection of tumor development with immunosuppression or need to decrease immunosuppressant treatment has been demonstrated in these patients. Our case and the literature show the risk of this tumor presenting in the post-transplantation patient and the need for a high index of suspicion in patients who present with a complex mass after transplantation to prevent progression of the disease beyond a resectable lesion. Results of a thorough search of the literature are detailed and the medical and surgical management of both resectable and unresectable lesions is reviewed.