Regulation of calcium signalling by adenine-based second messengers.

cADPR [cyclic ADPR (ADP-ribose)], NAADP (nicotinic acid-adenine dinucleotide phosphate) and ADPR belong to the family of adenine-containing second messengers. They are metabolically related and are all involved in the regulation of cellular Ca(2+) homoeostasis. Activation of specific plasma membrane receptors is connected to cADPR formation in many cell types and tissues. In contrast receptor-mediated formation of NAADP and ADPR has been shown only in a few selected cellular systems. The intracellular Ca(2+) channel triggered by cADPR is the RyR (ryanodine receptor); in the case of NAADP, both activation of RyR and a novel Ca(2+) channel have been proposed. In contrast, ADPR opens the non-specific cation channel TRPM2 [TRP (transient receptor potential) melastatin 2] that belongs to the TRP family of ion channels.

Cellular effects and metabolic stability of N1-cyclic inosine diphosphoribose and its derivatives.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Recently, a number of mimics of the second messenger cyclic ADP-ribose (cADPR) with replacement of adenosine by inosine were introduced. In addition, various alterations in the molecule ranging from substitutions at C8 of the base up to full replacement of the ribose moieties still retained biological activity. However, nothing is known about the metabolic stability and cellular effects of these novel analogues. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: cADPR and the inosine-based analogues were incubated with CD38, ADP-ribosyl cyclase and NAD-glycohydrolase and metabolism was analysed by RP-HPLC. Furthermore, the effect of the analogues on cytokine expression and proliferation was investigated in primary T-lymphocytes and T-lymphoma cells. KEY RESULTS: Incubation of cADPR with CD38 resulted in degradation to adenosine diphosphoribose. ADP-ribosyl cyclase weakly catabolised cADPR whereas NAD-glycohydrolase showed no such activity. In contrast, N1-cyclic inosine 5'-diphosphoribose (N1-cIDPR) was not hydrolyzed by CD38. Three additional N1-cIDPR analogues showed a similar stability. Proliferation of Jurkat T-lymphoma cells was inhibited by N1-cIDPR, N1-[(phosphoryl-O-ethoxy)-methyl]-N9-[(phosphoryl-O-ethoxy)-methyl]-hypoxanthine-cyclic pyrophosphate (N1-cIDP-DE) and N1-ethoxymethyl-cIDPR (N1-cIDPRE). In contrast, in primary T cells neither proliferation nor cytokine expression was affected by these compounds. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The metabolic stability of N1-cIDPR and its analogues provides an advantage for the development of novel pharmaceutical compounds interfering with cADPR mediated Ca2+ signalling pathways. The differential effects of N1-cIDPR and N1-cIDPRE on proliferation and cytokine expression in primary T cells versus T-lymphoma cells may constitute a starting point for novel anti-tumor drugs.

TSST-1 induces Th1 or Th2 differentiation in naïve CD4+ T cells in a dose- and APC-dependent manner.

Superantigens are potent activators of the immune system, causing a variety of diseases, ranging from food poisoning to septic shock. Here, we examined the effects of different toxic shock syndrome toxin 1 (TSST-1) concentrations on the activation, proliferation and synthesis of interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) and interleukin-4 (IL-4) in purified naïve human CD4+ T cells in a serum-free in vitro system. TSST-1 given in low doses (1-10 pg/ml) generates a pronounced T helper 2 (Th2)-like cytokine profile, characterized by elevated IL-4-expressing T-cell populations and reduced IFN-gamma-producing populations, whereas higher doses (100 pg/ml) induce a Th1-like profile, with increased expression of IFN-gamma and reduced expression of IL-4. These patterns were even more pronounced by adding exogenous cytokines like IL-12 and IL-4 and by the type of antigen-presenting cells (APCs). Thus, B cells induced Th2 shifts, whereas monocytes favoured Th1 induction. Moreover, IL-12 in conditions with B cells counteracted their Th2 bias. Interestingly, in purified naïve T-cell cultures, containing a small population of HLA-DR+ T cells, Th1/Th2 differentiation can be induced by TSST-1 too. There, Th-cell polarization is strongly dependent on TSST-1 concentration, indicating that this is a key parameter in regulating the differentiation of T cells. In conclusion, our data show that Th1/Th2 differentiation of TSST-1-stimulated naïve T cells is controlled by the type of APCs, and in APC-depleted cultures, it depends on the presence of HLA-DR+ cells and TSST-1 concentration.