Concurrent intraosseous cartilaginous lesions in patients with multiple osteochondromas identified on total-body MR imaging.

PURPOSE: To assess the prevalence of intraosseous cartilaginous lesions in patients with multiple osteochondromas based on total-body (TB) MRI examinations, used for screening purposes. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Between 2013 and 2020, TB-MRI examinations were performed in 366 patients with proven multiple osteochondromas syndrome, to rule out malignant progression. For this study, presence, or absence of intraosseous central or eccentrical chondroid lesions, defined as lobulated lesions with low signal intensity on T1-weighted images, replacing bone marrow and high signal intensity equal to fluid on T2-weighted images in the bone marrow of the meta-diaphysis of (one of) the long bones, were recorded in the long bones as part of a TB-MRI protocol. RESULTS: In 62 patients out of the 366 MO patients (17%), one or more intraosseous chondroid lesions (either enchondroma or atypical cartilaginous tumor) were detected. The age of the patients at time of diagnosis ranged from 17 to 61 years (mean, 36). Size of the lesions varied from 4 to 69 mm (mean, 16.3 mm). The most common location was the proximal femur (n = 29), followed by the distal femur and proximal humerus (n = 18 and n = 10, respectively). In nine of the patients with an intraosseous chondroid lesion, a second and/or third TB-MRI were available during the period of evaluation (mean interval, 2.7 years between the exams). In none of these patients increase of these intraosseous lesions was noticed. CONCLUSION: Intraosseous chondroid lesions (enchondroma and ACT) appear to occur more frequently in MO patients than in the general population. TB-MRI allows to detect these, besides the identification of OC with suspicious features.

Shoulder arthroplasty volume standards: the more the better?

INTRODUCTION: The wide use of hip and knee arthroplasty has led to implementation of volume standards for hospitals and surgeons. For shoulder arthroplasty, the effect of volume on outcome has been researched, but no volume standard exists. This review assessed literature reporting on shoulder arthroplasty volumes and its relation to patient-reported and functional outcomes to define an annual volume threshold. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for articles published until February 2018 reporting on the outcome of primary shoulder arthroplasty in relation to surgeon or hospital volume. The primary outcome was predefined as any patient-reported outcome. The secondary outcome measures were length of stay, costs, rates of mortality, complications, readmissions, and revisions. A meta-analysis was performed for outcomes reported by two or more studies. RESULTS: Eight retrospective studies were included and did not consistently show any associations of volume with in-hospital complications, revision, discharge to home or cost. Volume was consistently associated with length of stay (shorter length of stay for higher volume) and in-hospital complications (fewer in-hospital complications for higher volume). It was not consistently associated with mortality. Functional outcomes were not reported. CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence to support the concept that only the number of shoulder arthroplasties annually performed (either per hospital or per surgeon) results in better patient-reported and functional outcomes. Currently, published volume thresholds are only based on short-term parameters such as length and cost of hospital stay.

Radial head resection and hemi-interposition arthroplasty in patients with multiple hereditary exostoses: description of a new surgical technique.

Multiple hereditary exostoses (MHE) are a rare disorder characterized by the growth of bony protrusions. Elbow involvement is found in a considerable number of patients and varies from the presence of a simple osteochondroma to severe forearm deformities and radial head dislocation. Patients encounter a variety of symptoms, for example, pain, functional impairment, and cosmetic concerns. Several types of surgical procedures, therefore, can be offered, ranging from excision of symptomatic osteochondromas to challenging reconstructions. In this paper, we will discuss the essential basics of visualizing, planning, and treatment options of forearm deformities in MHE. In more detail, we will describe our current surgical technique as a salvage procedure for Masada type II forearm deformities in patients with MHE.

Tips to avoid nerve injury in elbow arthroscopy.

Elbow arthroscopy is a technical challenging surgical procedure because of close proximity of neurovascular structures and the limited articular working space. With the rising number of elbow arthroscopies being performed nowadays due to an increasing number of surgeons performing this procedure and a broader range of indications, a rise in complications is foreseen. With this editorial we hope to create awareness of possible complications of elbow arthroscopy, particularly nerve injuries, and provide a guideline to avoid complications during elbow arthroscopy.

Multiple osteochondromas (MO) in the forearm: a 12-year single-centre experience.

Multiple osteochondromas (MO) are a rare autosomal dominant disorder characterized by the presence of osteochondromas located on the long bones and axial skeleton. Patients present with growth disturbances and angular deformities of the long bones as well as limited motion of affected joints. Forearm involvement is found in a considerable number of patients and may vary from the presence of a simple osteochondroma to severe forearm deformities and radial head dislocation. Patients encounter a variety of problems and symptoms e.g., pain, functional impairment, loss of strength and cosmetic concerns. Several surgical procedures are offered from excision of symptomatic osteochondromas to challenging reconstructions of forearm deformities. We describe visualizing, planning and treating these forearm deformities in MO and, in particular, a detailed account of the surgical correction of Masada type I and Masada type II MO forearm deformities.

Current concepts in the management of radial head fractures.

Fracture of the radial head is a common injury. Over the last decades, the radial head is increasingly recognized as an important stabilizer of the elbow. In order to maintain stability of the injured elbow, goals of treatment of radial head fractures have become more and more towards restoring function and stability of the elbow. As treatment strategies have changed over the years, with an increasing amount of literature on this subject, the purpose of this article was to provide an overview of current concepts of the management of radial head fractures.

Efficacy of Different Rotator Cuff Repair Techniques.

The purpose of this review article is to describe the currently used techniques for rotator cuff repair and after treatment. The literature was searched for the different surgical techniques and additional treatment including: [1] full arthroscopic and arthroscopic assisted rotator cuff repair, [2] acromioplasty as an additional treatment to rotator cuff repair, [3] the use of plasma rich platelets (PRP) after rotator cuff repair, [4] the single and double row fixation techniques, [5] long head of the biceps brachii tenotomy or tenodesis with rotator cuff repair, [6] scaffolds in rotator cuff surgery, and [7] early motion or immobilization after rotator cuff repair. The rationale, the results, and the scientific evidence were reported for the eligible procedures.

Complex forearm deformities: operative strategy in posttraumatic pathology.

Complex posttraumatic forearm deformities have a significant impact on the integrity of the upper extremity leading to pain, instability in both the proximal and/or distal radioulnar articulation, and reduced range of forearm motion. Corrective osteotomy or more advanced procedures for malunited fractures or other posttraumatic deformities of the upper extremity, especially in the forearm are challenging procedures. In this review we will discuss the essential aspects of anatomy and pathomechanics, clinical and radiological assessment and the pathway from preoperative planning to the actual deformity correction surgery, either with one-stage correction or using gradual lengthening with external fixation ("callotasis techniques") and finally the functional outcome we can expect for our patients. In addition we will analyze the modern computer-assisted techniques available to date.