Adaptation of the Psychological Wellbeing Scale in Mexican medical students / Adaptación de la Escala de Bienestar Psicológico en estudiantes Mexicanos de medicina

Abstract Introduction The Ryff Scale of Psychological Well-Being is the most widely used instrument for assessing the eudemonic perspective of well-being. Although it has been adapted for the Spanish population, it has not been modified for health science students in the Mexican population. Objective Adapt and obtain the psychometric properties of this scale for medical students in the Mexican population. Method The study was conducted with 1,974 undergraduate students, 1,551 from the UNAM Medicine Faculty and 423 from the La Salle University Mexican School of Medicine. The analysis was undertaken using the IBM SPSS Statistics 21 and AMOS 21 SPSS programs. Results An instrument with a robust structure derived from the exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses carried out was obtained, with satisfactory explained variance, adequate internal consistency obtained through the Cronbach's alpha coefficient, and appropriate discrimination. Discussion and conclusion Our adaptation is a suitable version for Mexican medical students with four final dimensions; purpose in life, personal rejection and self-acceptance, personal control, and personal growth.

Resumen Introducción La Escala de Bienestar Psicológico de Carol Ryff es la más utilizada para evaluar la perspectiva eudaimónica de bienestar. Si bien se ha adaptado para población española no se ha adaptado para estudiantes de ciencias de la salud de población mexicana. Objetivo Realizar adaptación y obtener propiedades psicométricas de esta escala para estudiantes de medicina de población mexicana. Método El estudio se desarrolló con 1974 estudiantes de pregrado, 1551 de la Facultad de Medicina de la UNAM y 423 de la Escuela Mexicana de Medicina de la Universidad La Salle. El análisis desarrollado se realizó mediante el programa IBM SPSS Statistics 21 y AMOS 21 de SPSS. Resultados Se obtuvo un instrumento con una estructura sólida derivada de los análisis factoriales exploratorios y confirmatorios desarrollados, con una varianza explicada satisfactoria, una consistencia interna obtenida mediante el coeficiente alfa de Cronbach adaptada y una discriminación favorable. Discusión y conclusión El artículo es una adaptación del instrumento adecuada para estudiantes de medicina mexicanos con cuatro dimensiones finales; proyecto de vida, rechazo personal y auto aceptación, control personal y crecimiento personal.

[Level of teaching competence at the Undergraduate Medical Internship of UNAM's Faculty of Medicine]. / Nivel de competencia docente en el Internado Médico de Pregrado de la Facultad de Medicina de la UNAM.

BACKGROUND: There is no systematic evaluation of teaching performance in the clinical area at UNAM Faculty of Medicine. The study purpose is to assess the teaching competence level in the Undergraduate Medical Internship (UMI). METHODS: The paper describes the process of psychometric validity for the instrument designed to evaluate teaching competence in the UMI. This instrument was constructed from two previously developed instruments. The final version with 54 items in a Likert scale was studied with exploratory factorial analysis. Four dimensions were obtained: Solution of clinical problems, Psychopedagogy, Mentoring, and Evaluation. The instrument had a reliability of 0.994, with an explained variance of 77.75%. RESULTS: To evaluate the teaching competence level, we administered 844 questionnaires to a sample of students with a response rate of 89%. We obtained an overall global score of 89.4 ± 9.6 (mean ± SD). The dimension Solution of clinical problems was the one with a greater value, in contrast with the dimension of Evaluation, which had a lower score. CONCLUSION: The teachers of the UMI are considered educators with high level of teaching competence, according to the perceptions of the undergraduate internal doctors. The evaluation of teaching competence level is very important for institutions that look for the continuous professional development of its faculty.

Introducción: en la Facultad de Medicina de la Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM) no hay una evaluación sistemática del desempeño docente del área clínica. El propósito de este estudio fue evaluar el nivel de competencia docente en el Internado Médico de Pregrado (IMP). Método: se describe el proceso de la validación psicométrica de un instrumento diseñado para evaluar la competencia docente en el IMP. El instrumento se construyó a partir de dos instrumentos previamente desarrollados y con base en el análisis factorial exploratorio de un instrumento con 54 reactivos y una escala tipo Likert, se obtuvieron cuatro dimensiones. El instrumento tuvo una confiabilidad de 0.994, con una varianza explicada de 77.75%. Resultados: para evaluar en nivel de competencia docente, se utilizaron 844 cuestionarios, lo que constituye la muestra de estudiantes, con una tasa de respuesta del 89%. Se obtuvo una media global de 89.4 ± 9.6 de desviación estándar. La Solución de problemas clínicos fue la que obtuvo mayor valoración, en contraste con la dimensión de Evaluación, que observó menor valoración. Conclusiones: los docentes del IMP son considerados educadores con alto nivel de competencia docente, según las percepciones de los médicos internos de pregrado. Se advierte cómo la evaluación de la competencia docente es indispensable en cualquier institución que busque el desarrollo profesional continuo de sus profesores.

[Diagnostic and formative assessment of competencies at the beginning of undergraduate medical internship]. / valuación diagnóstica y formativa de competencias en estudiantes de medicina a su ingreso al internado médico de pregrado.

INTRODUCTION: Research on diagnostic and formative assessment competencies during undergraduate medical training is scarce in Latin America. OBJECTIVE: To assess the level of clinical competence of students at the beginning of their medical internship in a new curriculum. METHODS: This was an observational cross-sectional study in UNAM Faculty of Medicine students in Mexico City: a formative assessment of the second class of Curriculum 2010 students as part of the integral evaluation of the program. The assessment had two components: theoretical and practical. RESULTS: We assessed 577 students (65.5%) of the 880 total population that finished the 9th semester of Curriculum 2010. The written exam consisted of 232 items, with a mean of 61.0 ± 19.6, a difficulty index of 0.61, and Cronbach's alpha of 0.89. The mean of the objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) was 62.2 ± 16.8, with a mean Cronbach's alpha of 0.51. Results were analyzed by knowledge area and exam stations. CONCLUSIONS: The overall results provide evidence that students achieve sufficiently the competencies established in the curriculum at the beginning of the internship, that they have the necessary foundation for learning new and more complex information, and integrate it with existing knowledge to achieve significant learning and continue their training.

[Teacher's perfomance assessment in Family Medicine specialization]. / Evaluación del desempeño docente en la especialización de Medicina Familiar.

BACKGROUND: In Mexico there is no systematic evaluation of teachers in medical specialties. It is difficult to identify appropriate teaching practices. The lack of evaluation has limited the recognition and improvement of teaching. The objective of this study was to analyze feedback from students about teaching activities of teachers-tutors responsible for the specialization course in family medicine, and evaluate the evidence of reliability and validity of the instrument applied online. METHODS: It was an observational and cross-sectional study. Seventy eight teachers of Family Medicine of medical residency were evaluated by 734 resident´s opinion. The anonymous questionnaire to assess teaching performance by resident's opinion and it is composed of 5 dimensions using a Likert scale. Descriptive and inferential statistics (t test, one-way ANOVA and factor analysis) were used. RESULTS: Residents stated that teaching performance is acceptable, with an average of 4.25 ± 0.93. The best valued dimension was "Methodology" with an average of 4.34 ± .92 in contrast to the "assessment" dimension with 4.16 ± 1.04. CONCLUSION: Teachers of specialization in family medicine have acceptable performance by resident's opinion. The online assessment tool meets the criteria of validity and reliability.

Introducción: en México no hay una evaluación sistemática del desempeño docente en las especializaciones médicas, lo que reduce la posibilidad de identificación de prácticas educativas adecuadas, su mejora y reconocimiento. El estudio pretende analizar la opinión de los residentes acerca de las actividades docentes de los profesores-tutores responsables del curso de especialización en medicina familiar, y valorar la fiabilidad y validez del instrumento aplicado en línea. Método: estudio observacional y transversal, la población de estudio fueron setenta y ocho profesores titulares de medicina familiar de la residencia médica de la Facultad de Medicina de la Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México evaluados por 734 residentes. Se utilizó un cuestionario anónimo de evaluación del desempeño docente por opinión del residente, integrado por 37 enunciados y 5 dimensiones con una escala de respuesta tipo Likert. Se utilizó estadística descriptiva e inferencial (t de Student, ANOVA de un factor y análisis factorial). Resultados: los residentes opinaron que el desempeño docente en general es aceptable, con una media de 4.25 ± 0.93, la dimensión con mayor puntaje fue la de metodología con 4.34 ± 0.92 en contraste con la dimensión de evaluación con la menor media de 4.16 ± 1.04. Conclusiones: los profesores de la especialización tienen un desempeño aceptable según la opinión de los residentes. El instrumento de evaluación en línea reúne los criterios de validez y confiabilidad.

[Correlations between the dimensions of clinical learning environments from the perspective of medical residents]. / Correlaciones entre las dimensiones de los ambientes clínicos de aprendizaje desde la percepción de los médicos residentes.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to establish correlations between the dimensions of clinical learning environments (ACA) considering variables like: health institutions, hospital offices, specialty, and year of residency. METHODS: 4,189 doctors were evaluated through an online survey in 2012. RESULTS: The results revealed that the dimension of "educational processes" correlated best with others; specialties with the best ACA from the view of the medical residents were Internal Medicine and Surgery; and the third year residents had less favorable perceptions of their ACA. CONCLUSIONS: The pursuance of the academic program is relevant to physicians in training and teachers play an important role in the educational process.

[Diagnostic assessment of knowledge and competencies in medical students at the end of the second year of medical school: the challenge of building an airplane while it's flying]. / Evaluación diagnóstica de conocimientos y competencias en estudiantes de medicina al término del segundo año de la carrera: el reto de construir el avión mientras vuela.

INTRODUCTION: In Latin America there is almost no published information about knowledge retention and formative assessment of competencies in medical students, during medical school training and curricular changes. OBJECTIVE: To assess knowledge level and clinical competencies in medical students at the end of the second year in a new curriculum. METHODS: Observational, cross-sectional study in UNAM Faculty of Medicine students. A diagnostic evaluation was performed in the first class of the "Plan of Studies 2010" curriculum, as part of an integral program evaluation strategy. The assessment had two components: theoretical and practical. RESULTS: 456 (87%) of the 524 students that successfully completed the second year of Plan 2010 were assessed. The written test had 211 items, a mean score of 60 ± 14.5, mean difficulty index of 0.60, reliability with Cronbach's alpha of 0.85. The OSCE mean global score was 58 ± 9, Cronbach's alpha of 0.36, and G-coefficient of 0.48, and results were provided for each station. Results by area of knowledge, course, and station were reported. CONCLUSIONS: The results in general are acceptable, compared with previous written evaluations at the end of the second year, suggesting that the new program is achieving its educational goals. Competencies were formally assessed for the first time in our Institution, establishing a starting point for follow-up. The study provided useful information to the institution, teachers and students.

Evaluación del aprendizaje en la educación médica / Learning assessment in medical education

El propósito de este artículo es proporcionar un panorama general de la evaluación educativa en el contexto de las ciencias de la salud, específicamente en el campo de la Medicina. Para ello, se realizó una revisión del estado del arte de la evaluación, enfatizando los conceptos fundamentales en el desarrollo teórico y metodológico, así como los alcances de la evaluación educativa en la educación superior. Se enfatiza la necesidad de desarrollar instrumentos de evaluación congruentes con los perfiles de egreso de los planes y programas de estudio de la carrera de medicina y se pone en perspectiva la evaluación de la competencia médica a través de instrumentos como el Examen Clínico Objetivo Estructurado (ECOE), que por sus características es considerado como una herramienta útil en el ámbito de la evaluación de la competencia medica a nivel internacional.

The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of educational evaluation in the context of health sciences, specifically in the field of medicine. To do this, a review of the state of the art of evaluation was performed, emphasizing the fundamental concepts in theoretical and methodological development and the scope of educational evaluation in higher education. The need to develop evaluation instruments consistent with the graduate profiles according to the syllabus of medicine is highlighted, and the evaluation of medical competence through instruments such as the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE), which by its characteristics is considered as a useful tool in the field of assessment of medical competency in the international context, is also assessed.