The use of dedicated long-axis views focused on the left atrium improves the accuracy of left atrial volumes and emptying fraction measured by cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

BACKGROUND: The use of apical views focused on the left atrium (LA) has improved the accuracy of LA volume evaluation by two-dimensional (2D) echocardiography. However, routine cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) evaluation of LA volumes still uses standard 2- and 4-chamber cine images focused on the left ventricle (LV). To investigate the potential of LA-focused CMR cine images, we compared LA maximuml (LAVmax) and minimum (LAVmin) volumes, and emptying fraction (LAEF), calculated on both standard and LA-focused long-axis cine images, with LA volumes and LAEF obtained by short-axis cine stacks covering the LA. LA strain was also calculated and compared between standard and LA-focused images. METHODS: LA volumes and LAEF were obtained from 108 consecutive patients by applying the biplane area-length algorithm to both standard and LA-focused 2- and 4-chamber cine images. Manual segmentation of a short-axis cine stack covering the LA was used as the reference method. In addition, LA strain reservoir (εs), conduit (εe) and booster pump (εa) were calculated using CMR feature-tracking. RESULTS: Compared to the reference method, the standard approach significantly underestimated LA volumes (LAVmax: bias - 13 ml; LOA = + 11, - 37 ml; LAVmax i: bias - 7 ml/m2; LOA = + 7, - 21 ml/m2; LAVmin; bias - 10 ml, LOA: + 9, - 28 ml; LAVmin i: bias - 5 ml/m2, LOA: + 5, - 16 ml/m2), and overestimated LA-EF (bias 5%, LOA: + 23, - 14%). Conversely, LA volumes (LAVmax: bias 0 ml; LOA: + 10, - 10 ml; LAVmax i: bias 0 ml/m2; LOA: + 5, - 6 ml/m2; LAVmin: bias - 2 ml; LOA: + 7, - 10 ml; LAVmin i: bias - 1 ml/m2; LOA: + 3, - 5 ml/m2) and LAEF (bias 2%, LOA: + 11, - 7%) by LA-focused cine images were similar to those measured using the reference method. LA volumes by LA-focused images were obtained faster than using the reference method (1.2 vs 4.5 min, p < 0.001). LA strain (εs: bias 7%, LOA = 25, - 11%; εe: bias 4%, LOA = 15, - 8%; εa: bias 3%, LOA = 14, - 8%) was significantly higher in standard vs. LA-focused images (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: LA volumes and LAEF measured using dedicated LA-focused long-axis cine images are more accurate than using standard LV-focused cine images. Moreover, LA strain is significantly lower in LA-focused vs. standard images.

The Dysfunctional Right Ventricle in Dilated Cardiomyopathies: Looking from the Right Point of View.

Dilated cardiomyopathies (DCMs) are a heterogenous group of primary myocardial diseases, representing one of the leading causes of heart failure, and the main indication for heart transplantation. While the degree of left ventricular dilation and dysfunction are two key determinants of adverse outcomes in DCM patients, right ventricular (RV) remodeling and dysfunction further negatively influence patient prognosis. Consequently, RV functional assessment and diagnosing RV involvement by using an integrative approach based on multimodality imaging is of paramount importance in the evaluation of DCM patients and provides incremental prognostic and therapeutic information. Transthoracic echocardiography remains the first-line imaging modality used for the assessment of the RV, and newer techniques such as speckle-tracking and three-dimensional echocardiography significantly improve its diagnostic and prognostic accuracy. Nonetheless, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is considered the gold standard imaging modality for the evaluation of RV size and function, and all DCM patients should be evaluated by CMR at least once. Accordingly, this review provides a comprehensive overview of the anatomy and function of the RV, and the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and prognostic value of RV dysfunction in DCM patients, based on traditional and novel imaging techniques.

Impact of correcting the 2D PISA method on the quantification of functional tricuspid regurgitation severity.

AIMS: In functional tricuspid regurgitation (FTR) patients, tricuspid leaflet tethering and relatively low jet velocity could result in proximal flow geometry distortions that lead to underestimation of TR. Application of correction factors on two-dimensional (2D) proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) equation may increase its reliability. This study sought to evaluate the impact of the corrected 2D PISA method in quantifying FTR severity. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 102 patients with FTR, we compared both conventional and corrected 2D PISA measurements of effective regurgitant orifice area [EROA vs. corrected (EROAc)] and regurgitant volume (RegVol vs. RegVolc) with those obtained by volumetric method (VM) using three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE), as reference. Both EROAc and RegVolc were larger than EROA (0.29 ± 0.26 vs. 0.22 ± 0.21 cm2; P < 0.001) and RegVol (24.5 ± 20 vs. 18.5 ± 14.25 mL; P < 0.001), respectively. Compared with VM, both EROAc and RegVolc resulted more accurate than EROA [bias = -0.04 cm2, limits of agreement (LOA) ± 0.02 cm2 vs. bias = -0.15 cm2, LOA ± 0.31 cm2] and RegVol (bias = -3.29 mL, LOA ± 2.19 mL vs. bias = -10.9 mL, LOA ± 13.5 mL). Using EROAc and RegVolc, 37% of patients were reclassified in higher grades of FTR severity. Corrected 2D PISA method led to a higher concordance of TR severity grade with the VM method (ĸ = 0.84 vs. ĸ = 0.33 for uncorrected PISA, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Compared with VM by 3DE, the conventional PISA underestimated FTR severity in about 50% of patients. Correction for TV leaflets tethering angle and lower velocity of FTR jet improved 2D PISA accuracy and reclassified more than one-third of the patients.

Atrial Functional Tricuspid Regurgitation as a Distinct Pathophysiological and Clinical Entity: No Idiopathic Tricuspid Regurgitation Anymore.

Functional tricuspid regurgitation (FTR) is a strong and independent predictor of patient morbidity and mortality if left untreated. The development of transcatheter procedures to either repair or replace the tricuspid valve (TV) has fueled the interest in the pathophysiology, severity assessment, and clinical consequences of FTR. FTR has been considered to be secondary to tricuspid annulus (TA) dilation and leaflet tethering, associated to right ventricular (RV) dilation and/or dysfunction (the "classical", ventricular form of FTR, V-FTR) for a long time. Atrial FTR (A-FTR) has recently emerged as a distinct pathophysiological entity. A-FTR typically occurs in patients with persistent/permanent atrial fibrillation, in whom an imbalance between the TA and leaflet areas results in leaflets malcoaptation, associated with the dilation and loss of the sphincter-like function of the TA, due to right atrium enlargement and dysfunction. According to its distinct pathophysiology, A-FTR poses different needs of clinical management, and the various interventional treatment options will likely have different outcomes than in V-FTR patients. This review aims to provide an insight into the anatomy of the TV, and the distinct pathophysiology of A-FTR, which are key concepts to understanding the objectives of therapy, the choice of transcatheter TV interventions, and to properly use pre-, intra-, and post-procedural imaging.

Right heart chambers geometry and function in patients with the atrial and the ventricular phenotypes of functional tricuspid regurgitation.

AIMS: Atrial functional tricuspid regurgitation (A-FTR) is a recently defined phenotype of functional tricuspid regurgitation (FTR) associated with persistent/permanent atrial fibrillation. Differently from the classical ventricular form of FTR (V-FTR), patients with A-FTR might present with severely dilated right atrium and tricuspid annulus (TA), and with preserved right ventricular (RV) size and systolic function. However, the geometry and function of the right ventricle, right atrium, and TA in patients with A-FTR and V-FTR remain to be systematically evaluated. Accordingly, we sought to: (i) study the geometry and function of the right ventricle, right atrium, and TA in A-FTR by two- and three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography; and (ii) compare them with those found in V-FTR. METHODS AND RESULTS: We prospectively analysed 113 (44 men, age 68 ± 18 years) FTR patients (A-FTR = 55 and V-FTR = 58) that were compared to two groups of age- and sex-matched controls to develop the respective Z-scores. Severity of FTR was similar in A-FTR and V-FTR patients. Z-scores of RV size were significantly larger, and those of RV function were significantly lower in V-FTR than in A-FTR (P < 0.001 for all). The right atrium was significantly enlarged in both A-FTR and V-FTR compared to controls (P < 0.001, Z-scores > 2), with similar right atrial (RA) maximum volume (RAVmax) between A-FTR and V-FTR (P = 0.2). Whereas, the RA minimum volumes (RAVmin) were significantly larger in A-FTR than in V-FTR (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Despite similar degrees of FTR and RAVmax size, A-FTR patients show larger RAVmin and smaller TA areas than V-FTR patients. Conversely, V-FTR patients show dilated, more elliptic and dysfunctional right ventricle than A-FTR patients.

Automated left atrial volume measurement by two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography: feasibility, accuracy, and reproducibility.

AIMS: A byproduct of left atrial (LA) strain analysis is the automated measurement of LA maximal volume (LAVmax), which may decrease the time of echocardiography reporting, and increase the reproducibility of the LAVmax measurement. However, the automated measurement of LAVmax by two-dimensional speckle-tracking analysis (2DSTE) has never been validated. Accordingly, we sought to (i) assess the feasibility of automated LAVmax measurement by 2DSTE; (ii) compare the automated LAVmax by 2DSTE with conventional two-dimensional (2DE) biplane and three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) measurements; and (iii) evaluate the accuracy and reproducibility of the three echocardiography techniques. METHODS AND RESULTS: LAVmax (34-197 mL) were obtained from 198/210 (feasibility 94%) consecutive patients (median age 67 years, 126 men) by 2DSTE, 2DE, and 3DE. 2DE and 2DSTE measurements resulted in similar LAVmax values [bias = 1.5 mL, limits of agreement (LOA) ± 7.5 mL], and slightly underestimated 3DE LAVmax (biases = -5 mL, LOA ± 17 mL and -6 mL, LOA ± 16 mL, respectively). LAVmax by 2DSTE and 2DE were strongly correlated to those obtained by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) (r = 0.946 and r = 0.935, respectively; P < 0.001). However, LAVmax obtained by 2DSTE (bias = -9.5 mL, LOA ± 16 mL) and 2DE (bias = -8 mL, LOA ± 17 mL) were significantly smaller than those measured by CMR. Conversely, 3DE LAVmax were similar to CMR (bias = -2 mL, LOA ± 10 mL). Excellent intra- and inter-observer intraclass correlations were found for 3DE (0.995 and 0.995), 2DE (0.990 and 0.988), and 2DSTE (0.990 and 0.989). CONCLUSION: Automated LAVmax measurement by 2DSTE is highly feasible, highly reproducible, and provided similar values to conventional 2DE calculations in consecutive patients with a wide range of LAVmax.

Multimodality cardiac imaging and new display options to broaden our understanding of the tricuspid valve.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The prognostic impact of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) and the subsequent development of percutaneous procedures targeting the tricuspid valve (TV), has brought to the forefront the role of imaging for the assessment of the forgotten valve. As illustrated in several studies and summarized in this review, currently a multimodality imaging approach is required to understand the pathophysiology of TR, due to the complex TV anatomy and the close relationship between the severity of TR and the extent of the remodeling of the right heart chambers. RECENT FINDINGS: Recently, the advance in the tranhscatheter treatment of the TV has led to a growing interest in the development of dedicated software packages and new display modalities to increase our understanding of the TV. As a consequence, a transversal knowledge of the different imaging modalities is required for contemporary cardiac-imaging physicians. SUMMARY: This review highlights the main features, and the pros and cons of echocardiography, cardiac computed tomography, cardiac magnetic resonance and emerging technologies, as 3D printing and virtual reality, in the assessment of patients with TR.