TURALIO® Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy Program (tREMS): 3-year retrospective hepatic safety assessment.

Aim: Hepatic safety data assessment from the TURALIO® (pexidartinib) Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (tREMS) Program. Methods: Retrospective 3-year assessment (August 2019 to June 2022) of hepatic events from the TURALIO® (pexidartinib) Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy Program. Results: A total of 451 patients, 369 prescribers, 2 wholesalers/distributors and 2 pharmacies were enrolled and certified. Twenty-one (4.7%) patients met the criteria for a hepatic adverse event or laboratory abnormality suggestive of serious and potentially fatal liver injury, all with onset within 2 months of therapy. No new hepatic safety signals were identified. Conclusion: Results are consistent with the phase 3 ENLIVEN trial data. Liver enzyme monitoring, combined with early intervention, including dose modification and discontinuation, conducted in patients treated with pexidartinib mitigate the risk of potential hepatotoxicity.

Safety findings from the 3-year data collected in the TURALIO^® Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy ProgramPexidartinib (TURALIO^®) is an oral drug that is used to treat adults with tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT) that cannot be fixed with surgery. TGCTs are rare, noncancerous tumors that cause pain, stiffness and difficulty moving. Pexidartinib works by blocking a protein that helps these tumors grow. Before pexidartinib, there were no good treatments for TGCT and surgery often could not remove all the tumors, so they would frequently grow back.Pexidartinib was approved in 2019 after a clinical trial showed it worked well in adults with TGCT. However, pexidartinib can sometimes cause serious liver harm for some patients. To handle this risk, a program called the tREMS (TURALIO^® Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy) was established to ensure that pexidartinib is used safely.The tREMS Program teaches doctors, pharmacists and patients about the safe use of pexidartinib and potential liver risks and enrolls patients in a registry to watch their health. Doctors and pharmacies must be certified, and patients need regular liver tests. In the first 3 years, 451 patients and 369 doctors joined the program. Unintended liver issues were found in around 5% of patients, a rate that is about the same as that seen in pexidartinib clinical trials, and no new safety concerns were found. About half of patients with liver issues could reverse them by stopping pexidartinib. No patient had permanent liver damage, needed a transplant or died from liver problems. These results show that the tREMS Program is working well to keep patients with TGCT safe while taking pexidartinib.

Real-world drug utilization and treatment patterns in patients with tenosynovial giant cell tumors in the USA.

Aim: Real-world treatment patterns in tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT) patients remain unknown. Pexidartinib is the only US FDA-approved treatment for TGCT associated with severe morbidity or functional limitations and not amenable to improvement with surgery. Objective: To characterize drug utilization and treatment patterns in TGCT patients. Methods: In a retrospective observational study using IQVIA's linked prescription and medical claims databases (2018-2021), TGCT patients were stratified by their earliest systemic therapy claim (pexidartinib [N = 82] or non-FDA-approved systemic therapy [N = 263]). Results: TGCT patients treated with pexidartinib versus non-FDA-approved systemic therapies were predominantly female (61 vs 50.6%) and their median age was 47 and 54 years, respectively. Pexidartinib-treated patients had the highest 12-month probability of remaining on treatment (54%); 34.1% of pexidartinib users had dose reduction after their first claim. Conclusion: This study provides new insights into the unmet need, utilization and treatment patterns of systemic therapies for the treatment of TGCT patients.

Treatment patterns in patients with tenosynovial giant cell tumors in the USAThis database study is the first investigation of how drugs are used to treat patients with tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT) in the real world. We researched adult TGCT patients from IQVIA's prescription and medical claims databases who started treatment with pexidartinib (N = 82) or other non-US FDA-approved systemic therapies (N = 263). The patients included in this analysis were mostly women (61.0 and 50.6%) and their median age was 47 and 54 years for pexidartinib and other non-FDA-approved systemic therapies, respectively. The patients treated with pexidartinib were most likely to remain on treatment (54.0%) at the end of the first year. Most patients (79.3%) started pexidartinib treatment at a total daily dose of 800 mg/day, as per the product label. Only 34.1% of patients had reduced medication dose during follow-up. Of note, this study found that TGCT patients were treated with other systemic therapies which remain unproven to be safe and effective in medical studies of TGCT. Given the unmet need, and with pexidartinib being the only approved systemic treatment in USA, there is an opportunity for the larger population of adult TGCT patients to benefit from its use. Further research is needed to identify barriers for access to pexidartinib and treatment of TGCT patients.

Real-world treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization and costs among patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma.

Objective: To evaluate treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and costs among peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) patients in the USA. Methods: A retrospective cohort study, using the IQVIA PharMetrics® Plus claims database from 1 April 2011 to 30 November 2021, identified PTCL patients receiving systemic treatments. Three mutually exclusive subcohorts were created based on line of therapy (LOT): 1LOT, 2LOT and ≥3LOT. Common treatment regimens, median time on treatment, all-cause and PTCL-related HRU and costs were estimated. Results: Among 189 PTCL patients identified, 61.9% had 1LOT, 21.7% had 2LOT and 16.4% had ≥3LOT. The most common treatment regimens in the 1LOT were CHOP/CHOP-like, CHOEP/CHOEP-like and brentuximab vedotin; monotherapies were most common in the 2LOT and ≥3LOT. All-cause and PTCL-related hospitalizations and prescriptions PPPM increased with increasing LOT. Nearly 70% of total treatment costs were PTCL related. Conclusion: Higher utilization of combination therapies in the 1LOT and monotherapies in subsequent LOTs were observed, alongside high PTCL-related costs.

Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL) are a rare and fast-growing form of blood cancer. About 8000­12,000 people in the USA are diagnosed with PTCL every year. As it is a rare disease and has many types, and there is a limited understanding of the patients who have PTCL and the treatments they receive in the real world. The purpose of this study was to evaluate how these patients are treated, what are they treated with and what are the costs of these treatments in the USA. The data collected on these patients was divided into three groups based upon the number of lines of treatment/therapy (LOT) they received: 1LOT, 2LOT and ≥3LOT. This study researched different treatments and their duration in each line of therapy. Among 189 PTCL patients included in the study, the average age of patients was 55 years and 62% were male. Among these patients, 62% had 1LOT, 22% had 2LOT and 16% had ≥3LOT. The most common treatments in the 1LOT were traditional chemotherapy regimens followed by targeted therapies: CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone) or CHOP-like, CHOEP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, etoposide and prednisone) or CHOEP-like, and brentuximab vedotin. Treatment regimens with only one drug were most common in the 2LOT and ≥3LOT. The total cost of PTCL treatment in the USA is very high; 70% of this cost is related to their treatment with various drugs. More research is needed to better understand the treatment and cost of this rare cancer.

Elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia who only receive supportive care in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare database: demographics, treatment patterns and outcomes.

Aim: Elderly acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients are often not treated with antileukemic therapy due to their poor overall health condition, leaving supportive care as the sole treatment option. Objective: To evaluate patient characteristics, treatment patterns and outcomes of elderly patients with AML who are treated with supportive care only. Methods: A retrospective analysis of elderly AML patients included in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare database from 2008 to 2015. Results: Of elderly patients with AML (n = 7665), 3209 (41.9%) received supportive care only. Their mean age was 79 years, 50.5% were males; 48.2% died during the first 3 months and 67.3% died during the first 6 months. 82.2% died within the first year; only 13.2% survived >12 months. 77.9% patients died due to leukemia. Conclusion: In elderly AML patients treated with supportive care only, older age, concurrent hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease and acute myocardial infarction were identified as prognostic factors associated with decreased likelihood of survival. Ideally, these patients should be treated with antileukemic therapy in addition to supportive care, as most of them die from disease progression.

This study analyzed data on elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who were only treated with supportive care. The source of this data was the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database. Of the 7665 patients diagnosed with AML during 2008­2015, 3209 (41.9%) received supportive care only. Their mean age at index date was 79 years; slightly more than half of these were males (50.5%). Almost half of these patients (48.2%) died within the first 3 months and approximately two-thirds (67.3%) died within the first 6 months. Only a small proportion (13%) of these patients were alive after 1 year. These patients who were alive after one were likely to be in remission (there was decrease in the signs and symptoms of AML). The results of this study showed that elderly AML patients who only received supportive care were more likely to die early if they also had chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, history of acute myocardial infarction or hypertension. As elderly AML patients may be in poor general health and have other diseases (comorbidities), this could be the reason why they may not be treated with antileukemic therapy. Instead of treatment with supportive care only, these patients should ideally receive antileukemic therapy in addition to supportive care. More research should be done to find alternate treatments for these elderly AML patients.