Sequential administration of Prevnar 13™ and PNEUMOVAX™ 23 in healthy participants 50 years of age and older.

In most countries worldwide, pneumococcal conjugate vaccines have been included in the infant immunization program, resulting in a significant reduction in the burden of pneumococcal disease in children and adults. Shifting serotype distribution due to the indirect effect of infant vaccination with the 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) may continue to increase the gap between 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23) and PCV13 serotype coverage for older adults in the coming years. This clinical study (V110-029; NCT02225587) evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of sequential administration of PCV13 followed approximately 8 weeks later, or approximately 26 weeks later, by PPSV23 in healthy adults ≥50 years of age. Both dosing intervals were generally well tolerated as measured by the nature, frequency, and intensity of reported adverse events (AEs) in both vaccination groups. Serotype-specific opsonophagocytic activity (OPA) geometric mean titers (GMTs) measured 30 days following receipt of PPSV23 in either group and at Week 30 were generally comparable between the 2 groups for 6 serotypes unique to PPSV23 and 12 serotypes shared between PCV13 and PPSV23, regardless of the interval between receipt of PCV13 and PPSV23. In addition, administration of PPSV23 given either 8 weeks or 26 weeks following PCV13 did not negatively impact immune responses induced by PCV13. Furthermore, administration of PPSV23 given either 8 weeks or 26 weeks after PCV13 elicited serotype-specific OPA GMTs to serotypes unique to PPSV23, which could provide earlier protection against pneumococcal disease caused by these serotypes in comparison with the current Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommended interval of at least 12 months.

Immunogenicity following revaccination or sequential vaccination with 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23) in older adults and those at increased risk of pneumococcal disease: a review of the literature.

Introduction: Immunogenicity studies evaluating sequential administration of pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) followed by 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23) or revaccination with PPSV23 have raised concerns that PPSV23 may not elicit higher antibody levels than those measured following PCV or first PPSV23 dose.Areas covered: Recent literature was evaluated for evidence of blunted immune response (hyporesponsiveness), focusing on studies using adequate intervals between doses in accordance with vaccination recommendations. In eight of nine studies that evaluated revaccination with PPSV23 at an interval of ≥5 years after the previous dose, immunoglobulin G geometric mean concentrations and/or opsonophagocytic assay geometric mean titers for most serotypes increased from pre- to post-repeat vaccination and were comparable between repeat and primary vaccination groups post-vaccination. In seven studies in which PPSV23 was administered after PCVs (8 weeks to 1 year apart), responses to PPSV23 were comparable to those seen after initial PCV dose for shared vaccine serotypes. Studies in which PCVs were administered after PPSV23 were not evaluated.Expert opinion: Published data suggest immune responses following repeat vaccination with PPSV23, or sequential PCV/PPSV23 vaccination, are robust, without evidence of hyporesponsiveness. PPSV23 vaccination of at-risk adults is essential to ensure broad protection against all 23 vaccine serotypes.

Efficacy and effectiveness of a 23-valent polysaccharide vaccine against invasive and noninvasive pneumococcal disease and related outcomes: a review of available evidence.

Introduction: Routine pneumococcal vaccination for adults aged ≥60 or ≥65 years and those with underlying at-risk and high-risk conditions is recommended in many countries. However, studies estimating the effectiveness of 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23) have revealed mixed results, partly due to variability in study design and endpoints used to assess outcomes.Areas covered: The authors conducted a literature review of independently randomized trials and real-world studies published from 2010 to 2020 that assessed the effectiveness and efficacy of PPSV23 against vaccine-type or any-serotype invasive and noninvasive pneumococcal disease in adults aged ≥60 years. The authors also evaluated differences in study design that may contribute to the heterogeneity of available evidence.Expert opinion: Policy decisions regarding the inclusion of vaccines into national immunization plans should consider study quality and limitations. This review shows that PPSV23 is effective against vaccine-type invasive pneumococcal disease and vaccine-type pneumococcal pneumonia and can lower the burden of vaccine-type pneumococcal pneumonia. PPSV23-conferred protection may be lower in adults aged ≥75 years, those with certain underlying conditions, and individuals who were vaccinated >5 years before disease onset. This is an important finding that supports the benefit of PPSV23 vaccination for older adults.

The Japanese 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine randomized clinical trial: Further reflections on the design and results.

The recent article by Gessner et al. discussed several concerns regarding the design and results of the clinical trial by Maruyama et al. in 2010 on the vaccine efficacy (VE) of 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine. First, Gessner et al. questioned the integrity of the study randomization and blinding. Maruyama et al. have indicated that study participants were individually randomized and blinding was maintained throughout the study. Second, Gessner et al. questioned the internal validity of the trial results. Gessner et al. applied the reported VE against pneumococcal pneumonia and assumptions to estimate how much all-cause pneumonia could be prevented resulting in a "VE" estimate of 19.5%. This estimate does not truly qualify as a VE estimate, but as vaccine effectiveness estimate from a hypothetical cohort. The randomized, placebo-controlled trial conducted by Maruyama et al. met the methodological standards for a randomized control trial and its results are unquestionably valid.

Response to Shami et al. 'Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of a sequential pneumococcal vaccination compared to single dose vaccination strategy for adults in Hong Kong' (Hum Vacc Immunother 2020).

The recently published article by Shami et al. describes a cost-effectiveness analysis of sequential pneumococcal vaccination with 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) followed by 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23), compared with a single PPSV23 dose, in adults in Hong Kong. Sequential vaccination was cost-saving versus PPSV23 alone. The model assumed vaccine effectiveness (VE) of 0% for PPSV23 against all-cause non-bacteremic pneumonia; this was based on studies with flawed methodologies and studies that did not evaluate non-bacteremic pneumococcal disease. In recent studies and meta-analyses, PPSV23 VE pneumococcal pneumonia, including against non-bacteremic pneumococcal pneumonia, ranged from 27% to 64%. In other cost-effectiveness analyses, assumptions for PPSV23 VE against non-bacteremic pneumococcal pneumonia, had dramatic effects on cost-effectiveness estimates. Future analyses must carefully consider PPSV23 VE assumptions to ensure accuracy.

A Japanese nationwide survey of 23-valent pneumococcal capsular polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23) revaccination coverage rate among elderly adults aged 65 and older and physician's attitude.

In July 2017, the Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases issued guidance for the administration of the PPSV23 revaccination. Despite increasing recognition of its protective benefits, levels of PPSV23 revaccination coverage rate in Japanese elderly population are unclear at present. Here, we report the results of a survey to know PPSV23 revaccination rates among elderly patients aged 65 and older. We asked an array of questions related to PPSV23 revaccination to Elderly adults and doctors across Japan via Web-based surveys in June 2018. The sampled population consisted of 5,085 men and women aged 65 and older. The PPSV23 revaccination coverage rate was estimated by survey questions regarded vaccination counts, intervals, and vaccine type. In addition, 400 internal medicine physicians were surveyed and asked about their reasons for recommending PPSV23 revaccination to elderly patients. In total, 1,648 elderly adults had received at least one PPSV23 dose; of these, 58 had received it at least twice (revaccination coverage rate: 3.5%). The most commonly cited justification for revaccination with PPSV23 among the surveyed physicians was that the benefits of revaccination exceed the risks of revaccination. In addition, multivariate analysis showed revaccinated status was most strongly associated with recommendations from peers (e.g. spouse, family, friends) among elderly subjects. This study reports PPSV23 revaccination coverage rate among Japanese adults aged 65 and older for the first time and concludes that the coverage rate is very low.

A Japanese nationwide survey of 23-valent pneumococcal capsular polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23) coverage among patients with chronic medical condition aged 50 and older.

The 23-valent capsular polysaccharide pneumococcal vaccine (PPSV23) was introduced in Japan's routine immunization schedule October 2014. It was recommended for adults aged 65 years (including those ≥65 during the transition period), and for adults 60-64 with cardiac, renal, or respiratory dysfunction equivalent to Level 1 physical disability. Several studies have shown that patients aged 50+ with chronic medical conditions (CMC) are at elevated risk of pneumococcal infection. Nonetheless, PPSV23 vaccination rates among this population remains low. In our study, we report the results of a survey investigation into PPSV23 vaccination rates among Japanese patients aged 50+ with CMC. Patients aged 50+ comprised the patient population (n = 5,078) and internal medicine physicians comprised the doctor population (n = 400) located all over Japan were asked an array of questions relevant to PPSV23 immunization in June 2018 via Web-based surveys. PPSV23 coverages among chronic patients aged 50-59, 60-64, and 65+ years were respectively 1.3%, 2.9%, and 37.8%. The high disease-specific PPSV23 rates seen in the 65+ group was 50.0% and 49.4%, for chronic liver disease and chronic lung disease, respectively. Doctors most frequently cited a lack of municipal subsidies as justification for recommending the vaccine to patients with CMC aged 50-64 years, and deference to patients' wishes as justification for patients with CMC aged 65+. In conclusion, PPSV23 has poor coverage among Japanese adults aged 50-64 with CMC. Doctors and local authorities need to raise public awareness to improve the vaccination rate, given the high risk of pneumococcal infectious disease among patients with CMC.

Increased Risk for Meningococcal Disease Among Men Who Have Sex With Men in the United States, 2012-2015.

BACKGROUND: Several clusters of serogroup C meningococcal disease among men who have sex with men (MSM) have been reported in the United States in recent years. The epidemiology and risk of meningococcal disease among MSM is not well described. METHODS: All meningococcal disease cases among men aged 18-64 years reported to the National Notifiable Disease Surveillance System between January 2012 and June 2015 were reviewed. Characteristics of meningococcal disease cases among MSM and men not known to be MSM (non-MSM) were described. Annualized incidence rates among MSM and non-MSM were compared through calculation of the relative risk and 95% confidence intervals. Isolates from meningococcal disease cases among MSM were characterized using standard microbiological methods and whole-genome sequencing. RESULTS: Seventy-four cases of meningococcal disease were reported among MSM and 453 among non-MSM. Annualized incidence of meningococcal disease among MSM was 0.56 cases per 100000 population, compared to 0.14 among non-MSM, for a relative risk of 4.0 (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.1-5.1). Among the 64 MSM with known status, 38 (59%) were infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). HIV-infected MSM had 10.1 times (95% CI, 6.1-16.6) the risk of HIV-uninfected MSM. All isolates from cluster-associated cases were serogroup C sequence type 11. CONCLUSIONS: MSM are at increased risk for meningococcal disease, although the incidence of disease remains low. HIV infection may be an important factor for this increased risk. Routine vaccination of HIV-infected persons with a quadrivalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine in accordance with Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommendations should be encouraged.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of pertussis epidemiology in Latin America and the Caribbean: 1980-2015.

OBJECTIVES: In Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC), pertussis disease incidence has reportedly increased since 2000 despite high vaccine coverage. A systematic review of pertussis literature and a meta-analysis was conducted to understand the burden of disease in LAC. METHODS: A systematic literature review was completed, using relevant search terms. Original articles describing pertussis epidemiology and vaccine coverage in LAC published between 1980 and 2015 were identified. Applying a Bayesian meta-analysis random-effects model, we calculated pooled estimates and corresponding 95% credible intervals (95% CrIs) for pertussis incidence, case fatality ratio (CFR), pertussis prevalence among contacts, and coverage with three doses of diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis (DTP) vaccine (DTP3). RESULTS: A total of 59 studies meeting our selection criteria were identified, representing 15 countries. Of the 59, 15 of them provided incidence data, with 7 of the 15 reporting a pertussis case definition. The pertussis incidence estimate for the 1980-1999 period was 17.8 cases per 100 000 persons (95% CrI: 5.9-29.7); for the 2000-2015 period, it was 2.5 cases per 100 000 persons (95% CrI: 1.8-3.2). For the 1980-2015 period, the CFR, in 19 studies reviewed, was 3.9% (95% CrI: 2.9%-4.9%); for that same period, in 5 studies reviewed, pertussis prevalence among contacts was 24.9% (95% CrI: 13.7%-36.1%). Pooled DTP3 vaccine coverage estimates, in a total of 20 studies reviewed for the following three time periods, were: 1980-1990, 72.4% (95% CrI: 64.6%-80.2%); 1991-2000, 79.0% (95% CrI: 66.1%-91.9%); and 2001-2015, 90.0% (95% CrI: 87.7%-92.3%). CONCLUSION: A decrease in pertussis incidence and an achievement of moderately high DTP3 vaccine coverage since the early 2000s was observed. The review highlights the need for increased publication of pertussis data at the country level and for LAC as a whole in order to better understand the true burden of the disease. Application of a standardized case definition and use of active case finding would aid in obtaining more accurate estimates of the disease burden in LAC.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of pertussis epidemiology in Latin America and the Caribbean: 1980-2015 / Examen sistemático y metanálisis de las características epidemiológicas de la tos ferina en América Latina y el Caribe: 1980-2015 / Revisão sistemática e metanálise da epidemiologia da coqueluche na América Latina e Caribe: 1980 a 2015

Objectives In Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC), pertussis disease incidence has reportedly increased since 2000 despite high vaccine coverage. A systematic review of pertussis literature and a meta-analysis was conducted to understand the burden of disease in LAC. Methods A systematic literature review was completed, using relevant search terms. Original articles describing pertussis epidemiology and vaccine coverage in LAC published between 1980 and 2015 were identified. Applying a Bayesian meta-analysis random-effects model, we calculated pooled estimates and corresponding 95% credible intervals (95% CrIs) for pertussis incidence, case fatality ratio (CFR), pertussis prevalence among contacts, and coverage with three doses of diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis (DTP) vaccine (DTP3). Results A total of 59 studies meeting our selection criteria were identified, representing 15 countries. Of the 59, 15 of them provided incidence data, with 7 of the 15 reporting a pertussis case definition. The pertussis incidence estimate for the 1980-1999 period was 17.8 cases per 100 000 persons (95% CrI: 5.9-29.7); for the 2000-2015 period, it was 2.5 cases per 100 000 persons (95% CrI: 1.8-3.2). For the 1980-2015 period, the CFR, in 19 studies reviewed, was 3.9% (95% CrI: 2.9%-4.9%); for that same period, in 5 studies reviewed, pertussis prevalence among contacts was 24.9% (95% CrI: 13.7%-36.1%). Pooled DTP3 vaccine coverage estimates, in a total of 20 studies reviewed for the following three time periods, were: 1980-1990, 72.4% (95% CrI: 64.6%-80.2%); 1991-2000, 79.0% (95% CrI: 66.1%-91.9%); and 2001-2015, 90.0% (95% CrI: 87.7%-92.3%). Conclusion A decrease in pertussis incidence and an achievement of moderately high DTP3 vaccine coverage since the early 2000s was observed. The review highlights the need for increased publication of pertussis data at the country level and for LAC as a whole in order to better understand the true burden of the disease. Application of a standardized case definition and use of active case finding would aid in obtaining more accurate estimates of the disease burden in LAC.

RESUMEN Objetivos En América Latina y el Caribe, la incidencia de la tos ferina habría aparentemente aumentado desde el 2000, a pesar de la alta cobertura de vacunación. Se realizó una revisión sistemática de la bibliografía sobre tos ferina y un metanálisis para conocer la carga de esta enfermedad en América Latina y el Caribe. Métodos. La revisión bibliográfica sistemática se realizó utilizando términos de búsqueda pertinentes. Se encontraron artículos originales que describían las características epidemiológicas de la tos ferina y la cobertura de vacunación en América Latina y el Caribe publicados entre 1980 y el 2015. Aplicando un modelo bayesiano de efectos aleatorios para el metanálisis, se obtuvieron estimaciones combinadas y los correspondientes intervalos de credibilidad del 95% (ICr) para la incidencia, la tasa de letalidad y la prevalencia entre contactos de la tos ferina, y la cobertura con tres dosis de vacuna contra la difteria, el tétanos y la tos ferina (DTP3). Resultados Se encontraron en total 59 estudios de 15 países que cumplían con los criterios de selección. De ellos, 15 proporcionaban datos sobre incidencia. Siete de estos 15 contenían una definición de caso de tos ferina. La incidencia estimada de tos ferina para el período 1980-1999 fue de 17,8 casos por 100 000 (ICr 95%: 5,9-29,7) y para el período 2000-2015, de 2,5 casos por 100 000 (ICr 95%: 1,8-3,2). En cuanto a la tasa de letalidad, para el período 1980-2015 en 19 estudios examinados fue de 3,9% (ICr 95%: 2,9%-4,9%); en el mismo período, en 5 estudios examinados la prevalencia de tos ferina entre los contactos fue de 24,9% (ICr 95%: 13,7%-36,1%). Las estimaciones combinadas de cobertura con DTP3 en un total de 21 estudios examinados para los siguientes tres períodos fueron: en 1980-1990, 72,4% (ICr 95%: 64,6%-80,2%); en 1991-2000, 79,0% (ICr 95%: 66,1%-91,9%) y en el 2001-2015, 90,0% (ICr 95%: 87,7%-92,3%). Conclusiones Se observó una disminución de la incidencia de la tos ferina y el logro de una cobertura moderadamente alta con la vacuna DTP3 desde principios del siglo XXI. En el examen se subraya la necesidad de incrementar la publicación de datos sobre la tos ferina en los países y en América Latina y el Caribe en su conjunto, para conocer mejor la verdadera carga de enfermedad. La adopción de una definición de caso normalizada y la búsqueda activa de casos ayudarán a obtener estimaciones más precisas de la carga de enfermedad en América Latina y el Caribe.

RESUMO Objetivos Há relatos de que a incidência de coqueluche na América Latina e Caribe (ALC) tem aumentado desde o ano 2000, apesar da alta cobertura vacinal. Realizamos uma revisão sistemática e metanálise da literatura sobre a coqueluche para compreender a carga da doença na ALC. Métodos. Fizemos uma revisão sistemática da literatura usando termos de pesquisa relevantes. Identificamos artigos originais, publicados entre 1980 e 2015, que descrevessem a epidemiologia da coqueluche e a cobertura vacinal na ALC. Aplicando um modelo Bayesiano de efeitos aleatórios para a metanálise, calculamos estimativas agrupadas e seus correspondentes intervalos de credibilidade de 95% (CrIs 95%) para a incidência de coqueluche, a taxa de letalidade, a prevalência de coqueluche entre os contatos e a cobertura com três doses da vacina combinada para difteria, tétano e coqueluche (DTP3). Resultados Identificamos um total de 59 estudos que cumpriram os nossos critérios de seleção, representando 15 países. Destes 59, 15 apresentaram dados sobre a incidência, e 7 dos 15 apresentaram uma definição de "caso de coqueluche". A incidência estimada da coqueluche no período de 1980 a 1999 foi de 17,8 casos por 100.000 pessoas (CrI 95%: 5,9-29,7); no período de 2000 a 2015, foi de 2,5 casos por 100.000 pessoas (CrI 95%: 1,8-3,2). No período de 1980 a 2015, a taxa de letalidade, em 19 estudos revistos, foi de 3,9% (CrI 95%: 2,9%-4,9%); neste mesmo período, em 5 estudos revistos, a prevalência de coqueluche entre os contatos foi de 24,9% (CrI 95%: 13,7%-36,1%). A cobertura vacinal agrupada com DTP3, em um total de 21 estudos examinados nos seguintes três períodos, foi estimada em: 1980 a 1990, 72,4% (CrI 95%: 64,6%-80,2%); 1991 a 2000, 79,0% (CrI 95%: 66,1%-91,9%); 2001 a 2015, 90,0% (CrI 95%: 87,7%-92,3%). Conclusões Foi observada uma redução na incidência de coqueluche e uma cobertura vacinal com DTP3 relativamente alta desde o início da década de 2000. Esta revisão destaca a necessidade de melhorar a publicação de dados sobre a coqueluche ao nível nacional e na ALC como um todo, a fim de promover uma melhor compreensão sobre a verdadeira carga da doença. O uso de uma definição padronizada de "caso de coqueluche" e a busca ativa de casos ajudaria na obtenção de estimativas mais precisas da carga da doença na ALC.

Use of Serogroup B Meningococcal Vaccines in Adolescents and Young Adults: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, 2015.

At its June 2015 meeting, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommended that adolescents and young adults aged 16­23 years may be vaccinated with a serogroup B meningococcal (MenB) vaccine to provide short-term protection against most strains of serogroup B meningococcal disease. This report summarizes the deliberations of ACIP, the rationale for its decision, and recommendations for use of MenB vaccines in adolescents and young adults. Two MenB vaccines have recently been licensed by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use in the United States and approved for use in persons aged 10­25 years: MenB-FHbp (Trumenba, Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) and MenB-4C (Bexsero, Novartis Vaccines). Both MenB vaccines were licensed based on statutory regulations for accelerated approval, which enabled FDA to approve the MenB vaccines for serious or life-threatening diseases based on safety and demonstration that vaccine effectiveness, as measured by bactericidal antibody responses with assays using several MenB test strains that were representative of prevalent strains in the United States, is reasonably likely to predict clinical benefit. As a requirement for accelerated approval, confirmatory studies in the postmarketing period will be conducted to verify and further describe the effectiveness of the vaccines against an extended number of MenB strains that represent a broader diversity of endemic disease. Additional postlicensure safety data are also needed and will be reviewed by ACIP as they become available.

Use of Serogroup B Meningococcal Vaccines in Persons Aged ≥10 Years at Increased Risk for Serogroup B Meningococcal Disease: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, 2015.

In October 2014, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) licensed the first serogroup B meningococcal (MenB) vaccine (MenB-FHbp [Trumenba, Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc.]) as a 3-dose series. In January 2015, FDA licensed a second MenB vaccine (MenB-4C [Bexsero, Novartis Vaccines]) as a 2-dose series. Both vaccines were approved for use in persons aged 10-25 years. Following outbreaks of serogroup B meningococcal disease on two college campuses in 2013, both MenB vaccines were granted Breakthrough Therapy designations, which expedites drug development and review by FDA, and were licensed based on accelerated approval regulations. On February 26, 2015, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommended use of MenB vaccines among certain groups of persons aged ≥10 years who are at increased risk for serogroup B meningococcal disease. This report summarizes information on MenB administration and provides recommendations and guidance for use of these vaccines among persons aged ≥10 years in certain groups who are at increased risk for serogroup B meningococcal disease, and reviews the evidence considered by ACIP to make these recommendations. Recommendations for broader use of MenB vaccines in adolescents and college students will be considered separately by ACIP.

Big data in global health: improving health in low- and middle-income countries.

Over the last decade, a massive increase in data collection and analysis has occurred in many fields. In the health sector, however, there has been relatively little progress in data analysis and application despite a rapid rise in data production. Given adequate governance, improvements in the quality, quantity, storage and analysis of health data could lead to substantial improvements in many health outcomes. In low- and middle-income countries in particular, the creation of an information feedback mechanism can move health-care delivery towards results-based practice and improve the effective use of scarce resources. We review the evolving definition of big data and the possible advantages of - and problems in - using such data to improve health-care delivery in low- and middle-income countries. The collection of big data as mobile-phone based services improve may mean that development phases required elsewhere can be skipped. However, poor infrastructure may prevent interoperability and the safe use of patient data. An appropriate governance framework must be developed and enforced to protect individuals and ensure that health-care delivery is tailored to the characteristics and values of the target communities.

Au cours de la dernière décennie, une augmentation massive de la collecte et de l'analyse des données s'est produite dans de nombreux domaines. Dans le secteur de la santé, cependant, il y a eu relativement peu de progrès en matière d'analyse et d'application des données malgré une hausse rapide de la production des données. Grâce à une gouvernance adéquate, les améliorations en matière de qualité, de quantité, de stockage et d'analyse des données de santé pourraient se traduire en des améliorations substantielles pour de nombreux résultats cliniques. Dans les pays à revenu faible et intermédiaire en particulier, la création d'un mécanisme de retour d'information peut faire évoluer la prestation des soins de santé vers une pratique axée sur les résultats et améliorer l'utilisation efficace des ressources limitées. Nous examinons l'évolution de la définition des mégadonnées («big data¼) et les avantages ­ et les problèmes ­ possibles de l'utilisation de ces données pour améliorer la prestation des soins de santé dans les pays à revenu faible et intermédiaire. Alors que les services basés sur la téléphonie mobile s'améliorent, la collection des mégadonnées peut signifier que les phases de développement requises ailleurs peuvent être omises. Cependant, une infrastructure faible peut empêcher l'interopérabilité et l'utilisation en toute sécurité des données du patient. Un cadre de gouvernance approprié doit être développé et appliqué pour protéger les individus et assurer que la prestation des soins de santé est adaptée aux caractéristiques et aux valeurs des communautés cibles.

En la última década, la recolección y análisis de datos ha aumentado enormemente en muchos campos. Sin embargo, en el sector de la sanidad ha habido relativamente pocos avances en el análisis y la aplicación de datos, a pesar de un aumento rápido en la generación de datos. Con una gestión adecuada, las mejoras en la calidad, cantidad, almacenamiento y análisis de datos de salud podrían conducir a mejoras considerables en muchos de los resultados sanitarios. En los países de ingresos bajos y medios en particular, la creación de un mecanismo de retroalimentación de información puede impulsar la prestación de servicios sanitarios hacia la práctica basada en resultados y mejorar el uso eficaz de los recursos escasos. Se revisó la definición cambiante de los grandes volúmenes de datos y las posibles ventajas ­ y problemas ­ de utilizar dichos datos para mejorar la prestación de servicios sanitarios en países de ingresos bajos y medios. La recogida de grandes volúmenes de datos a medida que mejoran los servicios basados en la telefonía móvil podría permitir la omisión de las fases de desarrollo requeridas en otros lugares. Sin embargo, una infraestructura deficiente puede impedir la interoperabilidad y el uso seguro de los datos del paciente. Es necesario desarrollar y aplicar un marco de gestión adecuado para proteger a las personas y garantizar que la prestación de servicios sanitarios se adapta a las características y los valores de las comunidades destinatarias.