Exploring Localized Muscle Fatigue Responses at Current Upper-Extremity Ergonomics Threshold Limit Values.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate localized muscle fatigue responses at three upper-extremity ergonomics threshold limit value (TLV) duty cycles. BACKGROUND: Recently, a TLV equation was published to help mitigate excessive development of localized muscle fatigue in repetitive upper limb tasks. This equation predicts acceptable levels of maximal voluntary contraction (% MVC) for a given duty cycle (DC). Experimental validation of this TLV curve has not yet been reported, which can help guide utilization by practitioners. METHOD: Eighteen participants performed intermittent isometric elbow flexion efforts, in three separate counter-balanced sessions, at workloads defined by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygenists' (ACGIH) TLV equation: low DC (20% DC, 29.6% MVC), medium DC (40% DC, 19.7% MVC), and high DC (60% DC, 13.9% MVC). Targeted localized muscle fatigue (LMF) of the biceps brachii was tracked across numerous response variables, including decline in strength (MVC), electromyography (EMG) amplitude and mean power frequency (MnPF), and several psychophysical ratings. RESULTS: At task completion, biceps MnPF and MVC (strength) were significantly different between each TLV workload, with the high DC condition eliciting the largest declines in MnPF and MVC. CONCLUSION: Findings demonstrate that working at different DCs along the ACGIH TLV curve may not be equivalent in preventing excessive LMF. Higher DC workloads elicited a greater LMF response across several response variables. APPLICATION: High DC work of the upper extremity should be avoided to mitigate excess LMF development. Current TLVs for repetitive upper-extremity work may overestimate acceptable relative contraction thresholds, particularly at higher duty cycles.

A biomechanical evaluation of different footrest heights during standing computer work.

Working at a standing desk is a popular strategy to help reduce low back pain development during prolonged computer work. The purpose of this study was to examine how muscle activity, joint kinematics, weight distribution, balance and low back discomfort were affected by utilising footrests at different heights while working at a standing desk. Sixteen individuals performed a computer task at a standing workstation under four conditions: flat ground stance, and standing with one leg elevated on a low (10 cm), medium (20 cm), or high (30 cm) footrest. Footrest usage altered lumbo-pelvic and bilateral hip joint angles, muscle activity, weight distribution, and range of sway in the elevated limb. Additionally, footrest height altered lumbo-pelvic and hip joint position in the elevated limb. Discomfort increased with time across all conditions. Results suggest that intermittent utilisation of a footrest should be considered to promote changes in posture and muscle activity during prolonged computer use. Practitioner summary: This laboratory study showed that utilising a footrest between the heights of 10-30 cm during standing computer work may be beneficial to promote changes in posture and muscle activity over time. However, we recommend exercising caution while maintaining any standing position beyond 10 min of consecutive use. Abbreviations: LBP: low back pain; PD: pain developer; NPD: non-pain developer; GMe: gluteus medius; TFL: tensor fascia lata; LES: lumbar erector spinae; COP: centre of pressure; NDI: northern digital incorporated; CV: coefficient of variation; WHQ: waterloo handedness questionnaire; WFQ: waterloo footedness questionnaire; VAS: visual analogue scale; OBDI: Oswestry back disability index; IBS: International Society of Biomechanics; sEMG: surface electromyography; MVIC: maximum voluntary isometric contraction; RMS: root mean square; A/P: anterior/posterior; M/L: medial/lateral; % MVE: percentage of maximum voluntary excitation; ROM: range of motion; MCID: minimum clinically important difference.

Nine Degree-of-Freedom Kinematic Modeling of the Upper-Limb Complex for Constrained Workspace Evaluation.

The design of rehabilitation devices for patients experiencing musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) requires a great deal of attention. This article aims to develop a comprehensive model of the upper-limb complex to guide the design of robotic rehabilitation devices that prioritize patient safety, while targeting effective rehabilitative treatment. A 9 degree-of-freedom kinematic model of the upper-limb complex is derived to assess the workspace of a constrained arm as an evaluation method of such devices. Through a novel differential inverse kinematic method accounting for constraints on all joints1820, the model determines the workspaces in which a patient is able to perform rehabilitative tasks and those regions where the patient needs assistance due to joint range limitations resulting from an MSD. Constraints are imposed on each joint by mapping the joint angles to saturation functions, whose joint-space derivative near the physical limitation angles approaches zero. The model Jacobian is reevaluated based on the nonlinearly mapped joint angles, providing a means of compensating for redundancy while guaranteeing feasible inverse kinematic solutions. The method is validated in three scenarios with different constraints on the elbow and palm orientations. By measuring the lengths of arm segments and the range of motion for each joint, the total workspace of a patient experiencing an upper-limb MSD can be compared to a preinjured state. This method determines the locations in which a rehabilitation device must provide assistance to facilitate movement within reachable space that is limited by any joint restrictions resulting from MSDs.

Disrupting prolonged sitting reduces IL-8 and lower leg swell in active young adults.

BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests that disrupting prolonged bouts of sitting with short bouts of physical activity can significantly reduce blood glucose and improve insulin sensitivity; however, limited research is available on the impact of such disruptions on inflammation and swelling. The purpose of this study was to determine whether short bouts of exercise performed each hour during a 4 h sitting session were able to negate the effects of prolonged sitting (PS) on several cardiometabolic outcomes. METHODS: Eligible participants (n = 10) attended two laboratory sessions: PS (uninterrupted sitting for 4 h) and disrupted sitting (DS; 4 h sitting session disrupted by 3 min of exercise each hour (60-s warm-up at 50 W, 5 s of unloaded cycling, 20-s sprint at 5% body weight, and 95-s cool-down at 50 W)). The exercise bouts were performed at minute 60, 120, and 180. Blood and saliva samples, and measures of heart rate and blood pressure were assessed before (T1) and after (T2) each session; leg swell was measured continuously. RESULTS: Concentrations of salivary IL-8 increased during PS (T1: 0.19 ± 0.32; T2: 0.50 ± 1.00 pg/µg of protein) but decreased during DS (T1: 0.41 ± 0.23; T2: 0.22 ± 0.11 pg/µg of protein, d: 0.51, p = 0.002). Leg swell increased and plateaued in PS, but was attenuated during DS. CONCLUSION: It appears that short bouts of exercise significantly reduce swelling in the lower leg and IL-8 levels in the saliva, indicating that even among healthy, active, young adults, disrupting prolonged sitting can significantly reduce swelling and systemic inflammation.

Estimates of persistent inward current in human motor neurons during postural sway.

Persistent inward current (PIC) plays a critical role in setting the gain of spinal motor neurons. In humans, most estimates of PIC are made from plantarflexor or dorsiflexor motor units in a seated position. This seated and static posture negates the task-dependent nature of the monoaminergic drive and afferent inhibition that modulate PIC activation. Our purpose was to estimate PIC during both the conventional seated posture and in a more functionally relevant anterior postural sway. We hypothesized that paired motor unit estimates of PIC would be greater when during standing compared with sitting. Soleus motor neuron PIC was estimated via the paired motor unit (PMU) technique. For each motor unit pair, difference in reference unit firing frequency (ΔF) estimates of PIC were made during isometric ramps in plantarflexion force during sitting (conventional approach) and during standing anterior postural sway (new approach). Baseline reciprocal inhibition (RI) was also measured in each posture using the poststimulus time histogram technique. ΔF estimates during standing postural sway were not different [2.64 ± 0.95 pulses/s (pps), P = 0.098] from seated PIC estimates (3.15 ± 1.45 pps) measured from the same motor unit pair. Similarly, reciprocal inhibition at the onset of each task was the same in standing (-0.60 ± 0.32, P = 0.301) and seated (-0.86 ± 0.82) postures. PMU recordings made during standing postural sway met all assumptions that underlay the PMU technique, including rate modulation ≥0.5 pps (3.11 ± 1.90 pps), rate-rate correlation r ≥ 0.7 (0.84 ± 0.13), and time between reference and test unit recruitment ≥1 s (1.83 ± 0.81 s). This study presents a novel, functionally relevant standing method for investigating PIC in humans.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Paired motor unit (PMU) estimates of persistent inward current (PIC) in human soleus motor units are typically made in seated posture. Our study demonstrates that these estimates can be made during standing forward sway, a task that more accurately reflects the postural role of human soleus muscle. PMU recordings made during standing postural sway were validated using all previously published criteria used to test the assumptions of the PMU technique. Standing estimates of PIC did not differ from seated estimates made from the same motor unit pairs.

EFFECTS OF A BAND LOOP ON LOWER EXTREMITY MUSCLE ACTIVITY AND KINEMATICS DURING THE BARBELL SQUAT.

BACKGROUND: Medial knee collapse can signal an underlying movement issue that, if uncorrected, can lead to a variety of knee injuries. Placing a band around the distal thigh may act as a proprioceptive aid to minimize medial collapse of the knee during squats; however, little is known about EMG and biomechanics in trained and untrained individuals during the squat with an elastic band added. HYPOTHESIS/PURPOSE: To investigate the effects of the TheraBand® Band Loop on kinematics and muscle activity of the lower extremity during a standard barbell back squat at different intensities in both trained and untrained individuals. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional, repeated measures. METHODS: Sixteen healthy, male, university aged-participants were split into two groups of eight, consisting of a trained and untrained group. Participants performed both a 3-repetition maximum (3-RM) and a bodyweight load squat for repetitions to failure. Lower extremity kinematics and surface electromyography of four muscles were measured bilaterally over two sessions, an unaided squat and a band session (band loop placed around distal thighs). Medial knee collapse, measured as a knee width index, and maximum muscle activity were calculated. RESULTS: During the 3-RM, squat weight was unaffected by band loop intervention (p = 0.486) and the trained group lifted more weight than the untrained group (p<0.007). The trained group had a greater squat depth for both squat conditions, regardless of the band (p = 0.0043). Knee width index was not affected by the band during the eccentric phase of bodyweight squats in the trained (band: 0.76 ± 0.08, no band: 0.73 ± 0.08) or untrained group (band: 0.77 ± 0.70, no band: 0.75 ± 0.13) (p = 0.670). During the concentric phase, knee width index was significantly lower for 3-RM squats, regardless of group. CONCLUSION: Despite minimal changes in kinematics for the untrained group, increased muscle activity with the band loop may suggest that a training aid may, over time, lead to an increase in barbell squat strength by increasing activation of agonist muscles more than traditional, un-banded squats. Greater maximal muscle activity in most muscles during band loop sessions may provide enhanced knee stability via increased activation of stabilizing muscles. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.