Systematic Comparison of Experimental Crystallographic Geometries and Gas-Phase Computed Conformers for Torsion Preferences.

We performed exhaustive torsion sampling on more than 3 million compounds using the GFN2-xTB method and performed a comparison of experimental crystallographic and gas-phase conformers. Many conformer sampling methods derive torsional angle distributions from experimental crystallographic data, limiting the torsion preferences to molecules that must be stable, synthetically accessible, and able to be crystallized. In this work, we evaluate the differences in torsional preferences of experimental crystallographic geometries and gas-phase computed conformers from a broad selection of compounds to determine whether torsional angle distributions obtained from semiempirical methods are suitable priors for conformer sampling. We find that differences in torsion preferences can be mostly attributed to a lack of available experimental crystallographic data with small deviations derived from gas-phase geometry differences. GFN2 demonstrates the ability to provide accurate and reliable torsional preferences that can provide a basis for new methods free from the limitations of experimental data collection. We provide Gaussian-based fits and sampling distributions suitable for torsion sampling and propose an alternative to the widely used "experimental torsion and knowledge distance geometry" (ETKDG) method using quantum torsion-derived distance geometry (QTDG) methods.

Evaluating fast methods for static polarizabilities on extended conjugated oligomers.

Given the importance of accurate polarizability calculations to many chemical applications, coupled with the need for efficiency when calculating the properties of sets of molecules or large oligomers, we present a benchmark study examining possible calculation methods for polarizable materials. We first investigate the accuracy of the additive model used in GFN2, a highly-efficient semi-empirical tight-binding method, and the D4 dispersion model, comparing its predicted additive polarizabilities to ωB97XD results for a subset of PubChemQC and a compiled benchmark set of molecules spanning polarizabilities from approximately 3 Å3 to 600 Å3, with some compounds in the range of approximately 1200-1400 Å3. Although we find additive GFN2 polarizabilities, and thus D4, to have large errors with polarizability calculations on large conjugated oligomers, it would appear an empirical quadratic correction can largely remedy this. We also compare the accuracy of DFT polarizability calculations run using basis sets of varying size and level of augmentation, determining that a non-augmented basis set may be used for large, highly polarizable species in conjunction with a linear correction factor to achieve accuracy extremely close to that of aug-cc-pVTZ.

Deep Learning Coordinate-Free Quantum Chemistry.

Computing quantum chemical properties of small molecules and polymers can provide insights valuable into physicists, chemists, and biologists when designing new materials, catalysts, biological probes, and drugs. Deep learning can compute quantum chemical properties accurately in a fraction of time required by commonly used methods such as density functional theory. Most current approaches to deep learning in quantum chemistry begin with geometric information from experimentally derived molecular structures or pre-calculated atom coordinates. These approaches have many useful applications, but they can be costly in time and computational resources. In this study, we demonstrate that accurate quantum chemical computations can be performed without geometric information by operating in the coordinate-free domain using deep learning on graph encodings. Coordinate-free methods rely only on molecular graphs, the connectivity of atoms and bonds, without atom coordinates or bond distances. We also find that the choice of graph-encoding architecture substantially affects the performance of these methods. The structures of these graph-encoding architectures provide an opportunity to probe an important, outstanding question in quantum mechanics: what types of quantum chemical properties can be represented by local variable models? We find that Wave, a local variable model, accurately calculates the quantum chemical properties, while graph convolutional architectures require global variables. Furthermore, local variable Wave models outperform global variable graph convolution models on complex molecules with large, correlated systems.

Evaluation of Thermochemical Machine Learning for Potential Energy Curves and Geometry Optimization.

While many machine learning (ML) methods, particularly deep neural networks, have been trained for density functional and quantum chemical energies and properties, the vast majority of these methods focus on single-point energies. In principle, such ML methods, once trained, offer thermochemical accuracy on par with density functional and wave function methods but at speeds comparable to traditional force fields or approximate semiempirical methods. So far, most efforts have focused on optimized equilibrium single-point energies and properties. In this work, we evaluate the accuracy of several leading ML methods across a range of bond potential energy curves and torsional potentials. The methods were trained on the existing ANI-1 training set, calculated using the ωB97X/6-31G(d) single points at nonequilibrium geometries. We find that across a range of small molecules, several methods offer both qualitative accuracy (e.g., correct minima, both repulsive and attractive bond regions, anharmonic shape, and single minima) and quantitative accuracy in terms of the mean absolute percent error near the minima. At the moment, ANI-2x, FCHL, and a new libmolgrid-based convolutional neural net, the Colorful CNN, show good performance.