IFNα induces CCR5 in CD4+ T cells of HIV patients causing pathogenic elevation.

BACKGROUND: Among people living with HIV, elite controllers (ECs) maintain an undetectable viral load, even without receiving anti-HIV therapy. In non-EC patients, this therapy leads to marked improvement, including in immune parameters, but unlike ECs, non-EC patients still require ongoing treatment and experience co-morbidities. In-depth, comprehensive immune analyses comparing EC and treated non-EC patients may reveal subtle, consistent differences. This comparison could clarify whether elevated circulating interferon-alpha (IFNα) promotes widespread immune cell alterations and persists post-therapy, furthering understanding of why non-EC patients continue to need treatment. METHODS: Levels of IFNα in HIV-infected EC and treated non-EC patients were compared, along with blood immune cell subset distribution and phenotype, and functional capacities in some cases. In addition, we assessed mechanisms potentially associated with IFNα overload. RESULTS: Treatment of non-EC patients results in restoration of IFNα control, followed by marked improvement in distribution numbers, phenotypic profiles of blood immune cells, and functional capacity. These changes still do not lead to EC status, however, and IFNα can induce these changes in normal immune cell counterparts in vitro. Hypothesizing that persistent alterations could arise from inalterable effects of IFNα at infection onset, we verified an IFNα-related mechanism. The protein induces the HIV coreceptor CCR5, boosting HIV infection and reducing the effects of anti-HIV therapies. EC patients may avoid elevated IFNα following on infection with a lower inoculum of HIV or because of some unidentified genetic factor. CONCLUSIONS: Early control of IFNα is essential for better prognosis of HIV-infected patients.

The treatment for HIV, known as antiretroviral therapy (ART), does not cure HIV but enables individuals to live longer, healthier lives. In this study, we compared immune responses between elite controllers (ECs), who control their HIV infection without any treatment, and ART-treated and untreated patients. We demonstrate that IFNα, a small protein crucial in controlling immune system, is excessively produced at the onset of HIV infection and at levels that persist, resulting in poor HIV control without therapy. We show a mechanism for lack of control of HIV by IFNα. While inhibiting HIV, IFNα also simultaneously increases the HIV co-receptor, CCR5, thereby facilitating virus entry into the target cell. This is avoided by ECs which we hypothesize is associated with a lower infectious inoculum of HIV.

Early elevated IFNα is a key mediator of HIV pathogenesis.

BACKGROUND: A complete understanding of the different steps of HIV replication and an effective drug combination have led to modern antiretroviral regimens that block HIV replication for decades, but these therapies are not curative and must be taken for life. "Elite controllers" (ECs) is a term for the 0.5% of HIV-infected persons requiring no antiretroviral therapy, whose status may point the way toward a functional HIV cure. Defining the mechanisms of this control may be key to understanding how to replicate this functional cure in others. METHODS: In ECs and untreated non-EC patients, we compared IFNα serum concentration, distribution of immune cell subsets, and frequency of cell markers associated with immune dysfunction. We also investigated the effect of an elevated dose of IFNα on distinct subsets within dendritic cells, natural killer cells, and CD4+ and CD8 + T cells. RESULTS: Serum IFNα was undetectable in ECs, but all immune cell subsets from untreated non-EC patients were structurally and functionally impaired. We also show that the altered phenotype and function of these cell subsets in non-EC patients can be recapitulated when cells are stimulated in vitro with high-dose IFNα. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated IFNα is a key mediator of HIV pathogenesis.

Currently, HIV infection is not curable, but infected individuals can manage their condition by taking daily doses of antiretroviral therapy. Some individuals, known as elite controllers (ECs), control their infection without antiretroviral treatment, and studying how their immune system responds to HIV exposure could lead to a potential cure for others. Here, we compare immune cell responses between ECs and untreated non-ECs. We find that IFNα, a small protein with an important role in controlling white blood cell activity, is produced in excess in immune cells from non-ECs compared with ECs during early infection. This insight provides an important clue for the future development of a targeted cure for HIV.

Persistent HIV-1 transcription during ART: time to reassess its significance?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Despite suppressive antiretroviral therapy (ART), HIV-1 reservoirs persist and reignite viral replication if therapy is interrupted. Persistence of the viral reservoir in people with HIV-1 (PWH) is the main obstacle to an HIV-1 cure. The reservoirs are not transcriptionally silent, and viral transcripts can be detected in most ART-treated individuals. Here, we review the recent progress in the characterization of persistent HIV-1 transcription during ART. RECENT FINDINGS: Evidence from several studies indicates that, although cell-associated unspliced (US) HIV-1 RNA is abundantly expressed in ART-treated PWH, intact full-length US transcripts are rare and most US RNA is derived from defective proviruses. The transcription- and translation-competent defective proviruses, previously considered irrelevant, are increasingly being linked to residual HIV-1 pathogenesis under suppressive ART. Recent data suggest a continuous crosstalk between the residual HIV-1 activity under ART and the immune system. Persistent HIV-1 transcription on ART, despite being mostly derived from defective proviruses, predicts viral rebound upon therapy interruption, suggesting its role as an indicator of the strength of the host antiviral immune response that is shaping the viral rebound. SUMMARY: In light of the recent findings, the significance of persistent HIV-1 transcription during ART for the long-term health of PWH and the cure research should be reassessed.

IFNα induces CCR5 in CD4+ T-cells, causing its anti- HIV inefficiency and its subsequent pathogenic elevation, partially controlled by anti-HIV therapy.

Like EC, we find that ART-treated patients control serum IFNα concentration and show few immune cell alterations enabling a healthy but fragile medical status. However, treatment interruption leads to elevated IFNα reflecting virus production indicating that like EC, ART does not achieve a virological cure. The immune system becomes overwhelmed by multiple immune cell abnormalities as found in untreated patients. These are chiefly mediated by elevated IFNα inducing signaling checkpoints abnormalities, including PD1, in cytotoxic immune cells. Importantly, during acute infection, elevated IFNα correlated with HIV load and we found that IFNα enhances CCR5, the HIV coreceptor in CD4+ T-cells, impairing its anti-viral response and accounting for the pathogenic vicious cycle: HIV → IFNα ↗ → infected CD4+ T-cells ↗ →HIV ↗. This study opens immunotherapeutic perspectives showing the need to control IFNα in order to convert ART patients into EC.

Early Elevated IFNα Identified as the Key Mediator of HIV Pathogenesis and its low level a Hallmark of Elite Controllers.

Advances in HIV therapy came from understanding its replication. Further progress toward "functional cure" -no therapy needed as found in Elite Controllers (EC)- may come from insights in pathogenesis and avoidance by EC. Here we show that all immune cells from HIV-infected persons are impaired in non-EC, but not in EC. Since HIV infects few cell types, these results suggest an additional mediator of pathogenesis. We identify that mediator as elevated pathogenic IFNα, controlled by EC likely by their preserved potent NK-cells and later by other killer cells. Since the earliest days of infection predict outcome genetic or chance events must be key to EC, and since we found no unique immune parameter at the onset, we suggest a chance infection with a lower HIV inoculum. These results offer an additional approach toward functional cure: a judicious targeting of IFNα for all non-EC patients.

Kinetics and Persistence of the Cellular and Humoral Immune Responses to BNT162b2 mRNA Vaccine in SARS-CoV-2-Naive and -Experienced Subjects: Impact of Booster Dose and Breakthrough Infections.

Background: Understanding and measuring the individual level of immune protection and its persistence at both humoral and cellular levels after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination is mandatory for the management of the vaccination booster campaign. Our prospective study was designed to assess the immunogenicity of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine in triggering the cellular and humoral immune response in healthcare workers up to 12 months after the initial vaccination, with one additional boosting dose between 6 and 12 months. Methods: This prospective study enrolled 208 healthcare workers (HCWs) from the Liège University Hospital (CHU) of Liège in Belgium. Participants received two doses of BioNTech/Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine (BNT162b2) and a booster dose 6-12 months later. Fifty participants were SARS-CoV-2 experienced and 158 were naïve before the vaccination. Blood sampling was performed at the day of the first (T0) and second (T1) vaccine doses administration, then at 2 weeks (T2), 4 weeks (T3), 6 months (T4) and 12 months (T5) after the second dose. Between T4 and T5, participants also got the third boosting vaccine dose. A total of 1145 blood samples were collected. All samples were tested for the presence of anti-Spike antibodies, using the DiaSorin LIAISON SARS-CoV-2 Trimeric S IgG assay, and for anti-Nucleocapsid antibodies, using Elecsys anti-SARS-CoV-2 assay​​. Neutralizing antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 Wuhan-like variant strain were quantified in all samples using a Vero E6 cell-based neutralization assay. Cell-mediated immune response was evaluated at T4 and T5 on 80 and 55 participants, respectively, by measuring the secretion of IFN-γ on peripheral blood lymphocytes using the QuantiFERON Human IFN-γ SARS-CoV-2, from Qiagen. We analyzed separately the naïve and experienced participants. Findings: We found that anti-spike antibodies and neutralization capacity levels were significantly higher in SARS-CoV-2 experienced HCWs compared to naïve HCWs at all time points analyzed except the one after boosting dose. Cellular immune response was also higher in experienced HCWs six months following vaccination. Besides the impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection history on immune response to BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine, we observed a significant negative association between age and persistence of humoral response. The booster dose induced an increase in humoral and cellular immune responses, particularly in naive individuals. Breakthrough infections resulted in higher cellular and humoral responses after the booster dose. Conclusions: Our data strengthen previous findings demonstrating that immunization through vaccination combined with natural infection is better than 2 vaccine doses immunization or natural infection alone. The benefit of the booster dose was greater in naive individuals. It may have implications for personalizing mRNA vaccination regimens used to prevent severe COVID-19 and reduce the impact of the pandemic on the healthcare system. More specifically, it may help prioritizing vaccination, including for the deployment of booster doses.