RESUMO
Worldwide, Ascochyta blight is caused by a complex of host-specific fungal pathogens, including Ascochyta pisi, Didymella pinodes, and Didymella pinodella. The application of foliar fungicides is often necessary for disease management, but a better understanding of pathogen prevalence, aggressiveness, and fungicide sensitivity is needed to optimize control. Leaf and stem samples were obtained from 56 field pea production fields in 14 counties in North Dakota from 2017 to 2020 and isolates were collected from lesions characteristic of Ascochyta blight. Based on fungal characteristics and sequencing the ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 region, 73% of isolates were confirmed to be D. pinodes (n = 177) and 27% were A. pisi (n = 65). Across pathogens, aggressiveness was similar among some isolates in greenhouse assays. The in vitro pyraclostrobin sensitivity of all D. pinodes isolates collected from 2017 to 2020 was lower than that of the three baseline isolates. Sensitivity of 91% of A. pisi isolates collected in 2019 and 2020 was lower than the sensitivity of two known sensitive isolates. Resistance factors (Rf) from mean EC50 values of pyraclostrobin baseline/known sensitive isolates to isolates collected from 2017 to 2020 ranged from 2 to 1,429 for D. pinodes and 1 to 209 for A. pisi. In vitro prothioconazole sensitivity of 91% of D. pinodes isolates collected from 2017 to 2020 was lower than the sensitivity of the baseline isolates and 98% of A. pisi isolates collected from 2019 to 2020 was lower than the sensitivity of the known sensitive isolates. Prothioconazole Rf ranged from 1 to 338 for D. pinodes and 1 to 127 for A. pisi. Based on in vitro results, 92% of D. pinodes and 98% of A. pisi isolates collected displayed reduced-sensitivity/resistance to both fungicides when compared to baseline/known sensitive isolates. Disease control under greenhouse conditions of both pathogens provided by both fungicides was significantly lower in isolates determined to be reduced-sensitive or resistant in in vitro assays when compared to sensitive. Results reported here reinforce growers desperate need of alternative fungicides and/or management tools to fight Ascochyta blight in North Dakota and neighboring regions.
RESUMO
In the semiarid regions of North Dakota and Montana, low annual precipitation favors production of high-quality durum wheat (Triticum turgidum subsp. durum). However, conducive weather conditions for disease epidemics have occurred more frequently in recent years. Modification of planting date can reduce disease risk by decreasing the timeframe in which a susceptible crop overlaps with conducive disease conditions. The effect of planting date on fungal leaf spotting diseases (leaf spot), ergot, Fusarium head blight (FHB), and yield of durum was evaluated in 11 experiments across four sites in eastern Montana and western North Dakota. Six durum cultivars with differing levels of susceptibility to leaf spot and FHB were planted at three planting dates from 2017 to 2019. Early planting maximized yield and influenced ergot incidence. Although there was no effect of planting date, reduced susceptibility to leaf spot and FHB was associated with a reduction in leaf spotting disease severity and deoxynivalenol, respectively, in the harvested grain. Growers in the semiarid regions of these states should prioritize the selection of disease-resistant cultivars to help manage sporadic disease outbreaks and continue to plant early to maximize yield.