The impact of increasing saline flush volume to reduce the amount of residual air in the delivery system of aortic prostheses-a randomized controlled trial.

Background: Air embolism is a known risk during thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) and is associated with an incomplete deairing of the delivery system despite the saline lavage recommended by the instructions for use (IFU). As the delivery systems are identical and residual air remains frequently in the abdominal aortic aneurysm sac, endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) can be used to examine the effectiveness of deairing maneuvers. We aimed to evaluate whether increasing the flush volume can result in a more complete deairing. Methods: Patients undergoing EVAR were randomly assigned according to flushing volume (Group A, 1× IFU; Group B, 4× IFU). The Terumo Aortic Anaconda and Treo and Cook Zenith Alpha Abdominal stent grafts were randomly implanted in equal distribution (10-10-10). The quantity of air trapped in the aneurysm sac was measured using a pre-discharge computed tomography angiography (CTA). Thirty patients were enrolled and equally distributed between the two groups, with no differences observed in any demographic or anatomical factors. Results: The presence of air was less frequent in Group A compared to that in Group B [7 (47%) vs. 13 (87%), p = .02], and the air volume was less in Group A compared to that in Group B (103.5 ± 210.4 vs. 175.5 ± 175.0 mm3, p = .04). Additionally, the volume of trapped air was higher with the Anaconda graft type (p = .025). Discussion: These findings suggest that increased flushing volume is associated with a higher amount of trapped air; thus, following the IFU might be associated with a reduced risk of air embolization. Furthermore, significant differences were identified between devices in terms of the amount of trapped air. Clinical trial registration: [NCT04909190], [ClinicalTrials.gov].

Pulsatile Changes of the Aortic Diameter May Be Irrelevant Regarding Endograft Sizing in Patients With Aortic Disease.

PURPOSE: Endovascular aortic repair has become the preferred elective treatment of infrarenal aortic aneurysms. Aortic pulsatility may pose problems regarding endograft sizing. The aims of this study are to determine the aortic pulsatility in patients with aortic disease and to evaluate the effect of pulsatility on the growth of aneurysms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, analyses of computed tomography angiography (CTA) images of 31 patients under conservative treatment for small abdominal aortic aneurysms were performed. Reconstructions of the raw electrocardiography (ECG) gated dataset at 30% and 90% of the R-R cycle were used. After lumen segmentation, total aortic cross-sectional area was measured in diastole and systole in the following zones: Z0, Z3, Z5, Z6, Z8, and Z9. Effective diameters (EDs) were calculated from the systolic (EDsys) and diastolic (EDdia) cross-sectional areas to determine absolute (EDsys - EDdia, mm) and relative pulsatility [(EDsys - EDdia) / EDdia, %]. Diameter of the aneurysms was measured on baseline images and the last preoperative follow-up study of each patient. RESULTS: A total of 806 measurements were completed, 24 pulsatility and 2 growth measurements per patient. The mean pulsatility values at each point were as follows: Z0: 0.7±0.8 mm, Z3: 1.0±0.6 mm, Z5: 1.0±0.6 mm, Z6: 0.8±0.7 mm, Z8: 0.7±1.0 mm, Z9: 0.9±0.9 mm. Follow-up time was 5.5±2.2 years during which a growth of 13.42±9.09 mm (2.54±1.55 mm yearly) was observed. No correlation was found between pulsatility values and growth rate of the aneurysms. CONCLUSION: The pulsatility of the aorta is in a submillimetric range for the vast majority of patients with aortic disease, thus probably not relevant regarding endograft sizing. Pulsatility of the ascending aorta is smaller than that of the descending segment, making an additional oversize of a Z0 implantation questionable. CLINICAL IMPACT: Endovascular aortic repair reqiures precise preoperative planning. Pulsatile changes of the aortic diameter may pose issues regarding endograft sizing. In our retrospective single-centre study, aortic pulsatility of patients with AAA was measured on ECG gated CTA images. Pulsatility values reached a maximum at the descending aorta, however absolute pulsatility values did not exceed 1 mm at any point along the aorta. Therefore, significance of aortic pulsatility regarding the sizing of EVAR prostheses is questionable. Correlation between pulsatility and AAA growth was not found.

Diagnostic performance of non-contrast magnetic resonance angiography in patients with lower extremity arterial disease / A kontrasztanyag nélküli mágnesesrezonancia-angiográfia diagnosztikus teljesítménye alsó végtagi veroérbetegekben

Hungary. Knowing the consequences of burnout syndrome, it is important to prevent and recognize symptoms as early as possible.

Midterm Results of Iliac Branch Devices in a Newly Established Aortic Center.

The first-line treatment of common iliac artery aneurysms is endovascular repair. International guidelines recommend the preservation of the internal iliac artery, which is best achieved by the implantation of an iliac bifurcation device (IBD). Our aim was to evaluate the initial midterm results of IBDs in the leading vascular center of Hungary. In this single-center retrospective study, relevant clinical data and the results of the imaging examinations were collected and analyzed in all patients who underwent IBD implantation between December 2010 and July 2021. Thirty-five patients (31 males, mean age: 67.9 ± 8.5 years) underwent endovascular treatment with 37 IBD implantations. Technical success was achieved in 88.2% of the patients, with no perioperative mortality or open surgical conversion. One patient was lost during follow-up. Internal iliac artery occlusion was detected in three (8.8%) patients, and reintervention was performed in five (14.7%) patients. Primary patency of the internal iliac branch was 97.1% at 1 month, 93% at 2 months, and 89.0% at 5 years. The average follow-up time was 20.1 ± 26.2 months, during which two (5.9%) deaths occurred. Our initial experience with iliac branch devices was associated with a low complication rate and a favorable outcome, which confirms the midterm success of this intervention.

Quiescent-Interval Single-Shot Magnetic Resonance Angiography May Outperform Carbon-Dioxide Digital Subtraction Angiography in Chronic Lower Extremity Peripheral Arterial Disease.

Nephroprotective imaging in peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is often crucial. We compared the diagnostic performance of non-contrast Quiescent-interval single-shot magnetic resonance angiography (QISS MRA) and carbon-dioxide digital subtraction angiography (CO2 DSA) in chronic lower extremity PAD patients. A 19-segment lower extremity arterial model was used to assess the degree of stenosis (none, <50%, 50−70%, >70%) and the image quality (5-point Likert scale: 1-non-diagnostic, 5-excellent image quality). Intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated for inter-rater reliability. Diagnostic accuracy and interpretability were evaluated using CO2 DSA as a reference standard. 523 segments were evaluated in 28 patients (11 male, mean age: 71 ± 9 years). Median and interquartile range of subjective image quality parameters for QISS MRA were significantly better compared to CO2 DSA for all regions: (aortoiliac: 4 [4−5] vs. 3 [3−4]; femoropopliteal: 4 [4−5] vs. 4 [3−4]; tibioperoneal: 4 [3−5] vs. 3 [2−3]; all regions: 4 [4−5] vs. 3 [3−4], all p < 0.001). QISS MRA out-performed CO2 DSA regarding interpretability (98.3% vs. 86.0%, p < 0.001). Diagnostic accuracy parameters of QISS MRA for the detection of obstructive luminal stenosis (70%<) as compared to CO2 DSA were as follows: sensitivity 82.6%, specificity 96.9%, positive predictive value 89.1%, negative predictive value 94.8%. Regarding the degree of stenosis, interobserver variability for all regions was 0.97 for QISS MRA and 0.82 for CO2 DSA. QISS MRA proved to be superior to CO2 DSA regarding subjective image quality and interpretability for the imaging of chronic lower extremity PAD.

Heart Rate-Dependent Degree of Motion Artifacts in Coronary CT Angiography Acquired by a Novel Purpose-Built Cardiac CT Scanner.

Although reaching target heart rate (HR) before coronary CT angiography (CCTA) is still of importance, adequate HR control remains a challenge for many patients. Purpose-built cardiac scanners may provide optimal image quality at higher HRs by further improving temporal resolution. We aimed to compare the amount of motion artifacts on CCTA acquired using a dedicated cardiac CT (DCCT) compared to a conventional multidetector CT (MDCT) scanner. We compared 80 DCCT images to 80 MDCT scans matched by sex, age, HR, and coronary dominance. Image quality was graded on a per-patient, per-vessel and per-segment basis. Motion artifacts were assessed using Likert scores (1: non-diagnostic, 2: severe artifacts, 3: mild artifacts, 4: no artifacts). Patients were stratified into four groups according to HR (<60/min, 60−65/min, 66−70/min and >70/min). Overall, 2328 coronary segments were evaluated. DCCT demonstrated superior overall image quality compared to MDCT (3.7 ± 0.4 vs. 3.3 ± 0.7, p < 0.001). DCCT images yielded higher Likert scores in all HR ranges, which was statistically significant in the 60−65/min, 66−70/min and >70/min ranges (3.9 ± 0.2 vs. 3.7 ± 0.2, p = 0.008; 3.5 ± 0.5 vs. 3.1 ± 0.6, p = 0.048 and 3.5 ± 0.4 vs. 2.7 ± 0.7, p < 0.001, respectively). Using a dedicated cardiac scanner results in fewer motion artifacts, which may allow optimal image quality even in cases of high HRs.

Branched endovascular aortic repair of a contained rupture in chronic aortic dissection / Krónikus aortadissectio talaján kialakult tartott ruptura endovascularis mutéte elágazó grafttal

A late complication of aortic dissection is the dilatation of the weakened aortic wall. The only urgent endovascular alternative to high-risk open surgery in the treatment of postdissection aneurysms is branched endovascular aortic repair (BEVAR), which is extremely difficult due to the intimal membrane in the aorta lumen and the compressed true lumen. In this case report, we present the first application of BEVAR for aortic dissection in Hungary. Our 76-year-old male patient underwent type B aortic dissection 13 years before, for which supraaortic debranching was followed by thoracic stent graft implantation. The patient was admitted with acute chest pain associated with a con-tained rupture of a ten centimetre dilatation of the thoracoabdominal aorta. Our aortic team recommended endo-vascular surgery due to the extremely high risk of open surgery, which the patient accepted. Following selective embolization of the proximal segment of the left subclavian artery, a complex aortic intervention was performed. A new thoracic stent graft was started from the in situ thoracic graft, followed by a branched thoracoabdominal graft, the four branches of which were connected to the celiac trunk, the superior mesenteric artery and the two renal arter-ies. We also implanted a bifurcation graft under the branched graft and a left iliac bifurcation graft due to the complex dissection of the left iliac artery system. After an uneventful procedure, the patient was discharged home on the fourth postoperative day.

Complex Aortic Interventions Can Be Safely Introduced to the Clinical Practice by Physicians Skilled in Basic Endovascular Techniques.

Our purpose was to evaluate the risk associated with the learning curve of starting a complex aortic programme in an Eastern European country. A retrospective study was conducted involving the initial 20 patients (16 males, mean age: 65 ± 11 years) undergoing fenestrated/branched endovascular aortic repair in a single centre. Demographic, anatomical, procedural, and postoperative variables were collected. Our elective patient cohort consisted of 9 pararenal aneurysms (45%) and 11 thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (55%), with the latter including 4 chronic dissection cases (20%). A total of 71 branch vessels were incorporated (3.5 ± 0.9 per patient). The per vessel technical success rate was 100%. In-hospital mortality was 5% (1/20). At an average follow-up of 14 ± 22 months, the primary clinical success rate was 45% (9/20) and the secondary clinical success was achieved in 75% of cases (15/20). All-cause mortality at 14 months was 20% (4/20; aortic related: 1/20, 5%). Four bridging stent occlusions were found (5.6%). Mortality and reintervention rates were comparable to the initial results of high-volume centres, while the complexity of our cases and the per vessel technical success rate was comparable to the values reported as late experience. The morbidity of the learning curve could be decreased if operators are skilled in basic endovascular procedures.

Endoanchoring may be effective in the endovascular aortic repair of juxtarenal aneurysms / Az endocsavarozás hatékony lehet a juxtarenalis aortaaneurysmák endovascularis kezelésében

Methods: In our retrospective study, we analysed data from patients undergoing EVAR surgery augmented with prophylactic endosuturing. Demographic and anamnestic data, results of surgery and follow-up examinations and imaging studies were analyzed. Results: Between January 1, 2019 and September 30, 2021, 14 cases (11 men, mean age 70.4 +/- 8.1 years) underwent EVAR surgery with prophylactic endosuturing. In 86% of cases (12/14), endosuturing was performed due to a hostile neck, using an average of 6.4 +/- 1.7 screws. No technical complications occurred. No mechanical complications or persistent Ia endoleak were observed during the mean follow-up of 7.0 +/- 9.9 months. Reintervention did not occur. One patient was lost during follow-up due to a disease unrelated to the aorta, resulting in a mortality rate of 7% (1/14) and a clinical success rate of 92.9% (13/14). Discussion: In accordance with recent publications, we found a low complication rate and a technical success rate above 90%. Conclusion: We demonstrated the efficacy of the Medtronic Heli-FX system in a high-risk patient population. The technique can be successfully and safely used for endovascular treatment of infrarenal aneurysms complicated with hostile neck.

Model-based adaptive filter for a dedicated cardiovascular CT scanner: Assessment of image noise, sharpness and quality.

BACKGROUND: Filtered back projection (FBP) and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) are ubiquitously applied in the reconstruction of coronary CT angiography (CCTA) datasets. However, currently no data is available on the impact of a model-based adaptive filter (MBAF2), recently developed for a dedicated cardiac scanner. PURPOSE: Our aim was to determine the effect of MBAF2 on subjective and objective image quality parameters of coronary arteries on CCTA. METHODS: Images of 102 consecutive patients referred for CCTA were evaluated. Four reconstructions of coronary images (FBP, ASIR, MBAF2, ASIR + MBAF2) were co-registered and cross-section were assessed for qualitative (graininess, sharpness, overall image quality) and quantitative [image noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR)] image quality parameters. Image noise and signal were measured in the aortic root and the left main coronary artery, respectively. Graininess, sharpness, and overall image quality was assessed on a 4-point Likert scale. RESULTS: As compared to FBP, ASIR, and MBAF2, ASIR + MBAF2 resulted in reduced image noise [53.1 ± 12.3, 30.6 ± 8.5, 36.3 ± 4.2, 26.3 ± 4.0 Hounsfield units (HU), respectively; p < 0.001], improved SNR (8.4 ± 2.6, 14.1 ± 3.6, 11.8 ± 2.3, 16.3 ± 3.3 HU, respectively; p < 0.001) and CNR (9.4 ± 2.7, 15.9 ± 4.0, 13.3 ± 2.5, 18.3 ± 3.5 HU, respectively; p < 0.001). No difference in sharpness was observed amongst the reconstructions (p = 0.08). Although ASIR + MBAF2 was non-superior to ASIR regarding overall image quality (p = 0.99), it performed better than FBP (p < 0.001) and MBAF2 (p < 0.001) alone. CONCLUSION: The combination of ASIR and MBAF2 resulted in reduced image noise and improved SNR and CNR. The implementation of MBAF2 in clinical practice may result in improved noise reduction performance and could potentiate radiation dose reduction.

Fenestrated endovascular repair of a thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm in chronic dissection / Krónikus aortadissectio talaján kialakult thoracoabdominalis aneurysma endovascularis kezelése fenesztrált sztentgrafttal.

Összefoglaló. Az aortadissectio krónikus stádiumában kialakuló thoracoabdominalis tágulatok megoldása multidiszciplináris megközelítést, nagy felkészültséget és fejlett technológiát igényel. A jellemzoen többlépcsos mutétsorozat mortalitása és morbiditása az endovascularis technológia fejlodésével csökkent, de még mindig jelentos. A fenesztrált endovascularis aortamutét a thoracoabdominalis nyitott mutét alternatívája, mely kisebb mortalitással és morbiditással, rövidebb kórházi tartózkodással jár. Aortadissectio esetén történo alkalmazása az aorta lumenében lévo membrán miatt kihívást jelent. Esetbemutatásunkban egy 56 éves nobeteget demonstrálunk, aki tíz évvel korábban A-típusú dissectio miatt aorta ascendens rekonstrukción esett át. A követés során csaknem a teljes aorta tágulata alakult ki, melynek megoldása három lépésben történt. Az elso lépésben a disszekált aortaív nyitott mutétjét végeztük 'frozen elephant trunk' technikával, majd az aorta descendens tágulatának endovascularis kezelése történt sztentgraft-implantációval. A mutétsorozat záró lépése egy fenesztrált endovascularis aortamutét volt, mely egyben ezen technikának az aortadissectio esetében történt elso hazai alkalmazását jelenti. Orv Hetil. 2021; 162(31): 1260-1264. Summary. Thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms developing in the chronic phase of an aortic dissection require multidisciplinary approach, experienced operators and advanced technology. The mortality and morbidity rate of these multistage operations were reduced with the latest technical achievements in endovascular repair, but they are still significant. Fenestrated endovascular aortic repair, an alternative of thoracoabdominal open repair, is associated with less mortality and morbidity, shorter hospital stay. Using fenestrated devices in aortic dissection is usually technically demanding due to the dissection membrane. We report the case of a 56-year-old woman, who underwent ascending aortic repair due to type A aortic dissection. During the follow-up, a large thoracoabdominal aneurysm developed involving also the arch. We performed a three-stage operation starting with the open repair of the aortic arch using a 'frozen elephant trunk' device followed by a thoracic endovascular aortic repair of the descending aorta. The final stage was a fenestrated endovascular aortic repair, which is the first use of this technique in aortic dissection in Hungary. Orv Hetil. 2021; 162(31): 1260-1264.

[Thoracic aortic stentgraft implantations in Hungary from 2012 to 2016]. / Mellkasiaortastentgraft-beültetések Magyarországon 2012 és 2016 között.

Thoracic aortic endograft implantation has become a widespread procedure in recent years, yet no report is available about Hungarian outcomes. Examination of our results is crucial to define further treatment strategies. Analysis of perioperative data from Hungarian thoracic endograft implantations based on the experience of 5 years is presented. Our retrospective, multicentric study analysed voluntarily reported data from all Hungarian institutions where thoracic endograft implantations are performed. Information was collected from every procedure performed in 5 years. Between 2012 and 2016, 131 thoracic stent graft implantations were performed in Hungary (67.18% male, mean age 62.80 years). 25.19% of the procedures were acute. 13.74% of the patients were diabetic. Indications for the procedure were aneurysm (64.89%), dissection (17.56%), aortic trauma (6.87%) and other conditions (10.69%). 73.91% of the dissection cases were acute. 16.47% of repaired aneurysms were ruptured. Additional preoperative revascularization (debranching) was performed in 26.72% of the cases. Postoperative stroke occured in 4.58%, temporary hemodialysis was needed in 1.53%, bowel ischaemia was present in 2.29% and reoperation within 30 days was needed in 5.34% of all cases. Thirty-day mortality of the procedure was 9.92%, 5-year long-term mortality reached 16.03%. Endovascular repair of the thoracic aorta is an effective procedure and our national data comfirmed its advantages compared to open thoracic surgery. Further use of the procedure in Hungary depends on the centralised care in vascular surgery and financial matters. Multidisciplinary cooperation and proper logistics are needed to provide patients with optimal treatment. Orv Hetil. 2018; 159(2): 53-57.

[Endovascular treatment of blunt thoracic aortic injuries]. / Tompa trauma okozta mellkasi aortasérülések endovascularis ellátása.

INTRODUCTION: A new era has begun in the last two decades with the advent of endovascular methods in the therapy of blunt thoracic aorta injuries. Our experiences with the endovascular interventions of blunt aortic trauma in the Cardiovascular Center of Semmelweis University are summarised here. METHODS: We included those patients who underwent endovascular intervention due to blunt aortic trauma in a university hospital between 1998 and 2014. The statistical analysis was performed with the use of Excel. RESULTS: 41 patients were selected from our database. There were 34 males, the average age was 47 years (±17 years). Among the 41 patients 15 underwent an acute procedure (12 ruptures) and 26 patients received delayed treatment (in 4 cases due to growing of the pseudoaneurysm). There was only one early postoperative death. Late mortality was 22.5% and 7.5% was related to the aortic injury. CONCLUSION: Our late mortality and complication rates were similar to other studies, which reinforces international experiences. In the cases when delayed treatment is feasible, the patient can be stabilized and the CTA images can be analyzed for precise stentgraft planning. The treatment of blunt thoracic aorta injured patients should take place in specialized centers capable of such endovascular interventions.

Thoracic Aortic Strain is Irrelevant Regarding Endograft Sizing in Most Young Patients.

BACKGROUND: The introduction of electrocardiogram gating in computed tomography (CT) angiography imaging of aortic disease raised questions whether diameters measured on diastolic images can lead to the undersizing of aortic endografts. As previous studies suggested that young patients may have the highest risk of an unintended undersize, the aim of our study was to analyze the strain of the thoracic aorta in a young patient cohort. METHODS: We assessed the descending aorta of 52 patients (35 men, mean age 41.1 ± 7.3 years) who underwent coronary CT angiography (CCTA) with suspected coronary artery disease. To reduce radiation dose, native calcium score scans triggered on late systole were compared with diastolic phase CCTA images. Cross-section areas were measured, and effective diameters were derived at 3 levels of the visible segment of the descending aorta (P1, P2, and P3) in systole and diastole. Aortic pulsatility (mm, dsystolic-ddiastolic) and strain (%, [dsystolic-ddiastolic]/ddiastolic) were calculated at each level. All measurements were performed 3 times by 2 independent readers to evaluate interreader and intrareader reproducibility. RESULTS: A total of 936 measurements were performed. Significant differences were found between systolic and diastolic diameters at each location (all P < 0.001). Average aortic pulsatility was 1.5 ± 0.6 mm at P1, 1.6 ± 0.7 mm at P2, and 1.7 ± 0.7 mm at P3, with a corresponding aortic strain of 6.7 ± 3.1% at P1, 7.4 ± 3.5% at P2, and 8.1 ± 3.6% at P3. The differences between the strain of the measurement levels were not significant (P = 0.344). Aortic strain and pulsatility did not show significant correlation with pulse pressure (P = 0.693), patient age (P = 0.649), or other anamnestic data. Intraclass correlation coefficient was in the range of 0.95-0.96 for interobserver and in the range of 0.95-0.97 for intraobserver analysis. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that descending aortic strain can be measured precisely and reliably on images of routine CCTA examinations with native scans acquired during systole. We demonstrated that young adults have an aortic strain of 6.7-8.1%. As the average thoracic aortic strain was still lower than the recommended prosthesis oversize of 10%, routine use of systolic phase imaging cannot be recommended: it has no clinical benefit for the vast majority of the patients but increases the risk of motion artefacts. We also demonstrated that large interindividual differences are present in the scale of thoracic aortic strain, a phenomenon that needs further investigations to be fully understood.

Thoracic aortic strain can affect endograft sizing in young patients.

OBJECTIVE: Aortic computed tomography angiography (CTA) examination with electrocardiography gating is becoming the clinical routine image acquisition protocol for diagnosis and intervention planning. To minimize motion artifact, the images are reconstructed in the diastolic phase of the cardiac cycle. The aim of our study was to quantify aortic strain in an elderly nonaneurysmatic patient cohort and to identify the phases of the R-R cycle that correspond to the minimal and maximal aortic diameters. The quantification of aortic strain may enable the improvement of intervention planning and the introduction of more effective dose-saving protocols for CTA scans. METHODS: We assessed CTA images of 28 patients (14 men; mean age, 74 years). Aortic calcium score was calculated on native images. Angiography images were reconstructed in equally spaced 10 phases of the R-R cycle. After semiautomatic centerline analysis, we measured the cross-sectional areas in each of the 10 phases at 9 specific segments between the ascending aorta and the common iliac bifurcation representing the attachment sites of thoracic and abdominal stent grafts. Area-derived effective diameter, pulsatility (Amax - Amin), and strain [(Amax - Amin)/Amin] were calculated. Repeated measurements were taken to evaluate inter-reader and intrareader reproducibility (10-10 patients each). RESULTS: A total of 4320 measurements were performed. We found significant difference between diastolic and systolic diameters (DD,Z0 = 33.2, DS,Z0 = 34.4; P < .001). Pulsatility values of the vessel diameters were 1.0 to 1.1 mm in the thoracic aorta, 0.7 to 0.9 mm in the abdominal aorta, and 0.5 to 0.6 mm in the common iliac arteries. Negative, moderate correlations were found between aortic strain and age (r = -0.586; P = .001), aortic strain and plaque area (r = -0.429; P = .026), and age and body mass index (r = -0.412; P = .029). We found positive, moderate correlation between age and plaque area (r = 0.594; P = .001). The aortic pulsatility curve has a positive extreme at 30% and a negative extreme at 90% of the R-R cycle throughout the aorta. Lin concordance coefficients were 0.987 for inter-reader and 0.994 for intrareader correlations. CONCLUSIONS: Aortic strain can be reliably quantified on electrocardiography-gated CTA images. Pulsatility of the aorta can be substantial in the thoracic aortic segments of young patients; therefore, the routine use of systolic images is not recommended. In addition, we demonstrated that images at 30% of the heart cycle correspond to the largest diameter of the aorta.