[Contribution of the pharmaceutical record in the analysis of drug interactions during retrocession in a centre for cancer research]. / Contribution du dossier pharmaceutique dans l'analyse des interactions médicamenteuses lors de la rétrocession dans un centre de lutte contre le cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To implement the pharmaceutical record in retrocession, to evaluate its contribution to the analysis of drug interactions and to estimate the sustainability of this approach. METHODS: This prospective, descriptive, monocentric study was conducted over five months. All patients presenting at the retrocession were eligible. After having offered them the pharmaceutical record and having completed it, drug interactions were sought. If the impact was considered significant, a pharmaceutical intervention was transmitted to the referring physician of the institution and recorded in the computerized patient record. RESULTS: The pharmaceutical record was offered to 497 patients, i.e., 87 % of eligible patients. At the first meeting, 7 % of patients (n=34) were aware of it and 72 % had one open. In total, 395 pharmaceutical records were filled in at least once, 41 of which we created. Only 25 patients (5 %) refused the process and 90 % of the existing records were filled by the pharmacy. In total, 419 prescriptions were analysed for 330 patients: the pharmaceutical record was therefore a useful tool for 66 % of patients. For 17 % (n=57) of them, or 11 % of included patients, 99 drug interactions with a high risk of clinical impact were detected with the retroceded drug. On average, the presentation, creation and feeding of the drug record took one minute each and the analysis of interactions 14minutes. CONCLUSIONS: Easy to implement, the pharmaceutical record is a useful tool to search for drug interactions with retroceded drugs. It helps to optimize patient follow-up, despite the limited information available.

[CAR-T cells: Lymphocytes that express a chimeric antigen receptor]. / CAR-T cells : lymphocytes exprimant un récepteur chimérique à l'antigène.

CAR-T cells are genetically modified human lymphocytes and gene therapy medicinal products. They are developed to treat cancers that express a membrane antigen targeted by the CAR. The FDA approved the two first-in-class medicinal products in 2017 and EMA in August 2018; both are autologous CAR-T cells targeting CD19 that is expressed at the surface of normal B-cells throughout their differentiation, and on B-cell lymphoid malignancies. Clinical efficacy was demonstrated for B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemias, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia, although the marketing authorizations are less liberal in terms of indications. Manufacturing of these personalized treatments necessitates that a novel organization and supply chain be set in place, to ensure product preservation, patient safety and compliance with complex regulatory requirements. Side effects are commensurate with clinical efficacy and can be life-threatening: proper management imposes tight coordination between various specialists, particularly between hematologists and intensive care practitioners. High pricing for these treatments is part of a long-term trend for increasing costs of innovations in hematology and oncology; it questions the ability of healthcare systems to sustain their reimbursement.

Efficacy and safety of micafungin for prophylaxis of invasive fungal infections in patients undergoing haplo-identical hematopoietic SCT.

Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) such as candidiasis and mold infections have caused significant morbidity and mortality among immunocompromised patients in recent years. Micafungin, a new echinocandin, inhibits fungal cell wall ß-glucan synthesis, with potent activity against most species of Candida and Aspergillus. The aim of this observational study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of micafungin in prophylaxis of IFIs in 26 high-risk adult patients with various hematological diseases receiving haplo-identical Allo-SCT. Only two patients had a history of possible aspergillosis before transplant treated by voriconazole. The patients received a median of four lines (2-7) of treatment before Allo-SCT. Thirteen patients (50%) received at least one prior Auto-SCT; and eight patients (31%) received a previous Allo-SCT. Patients received a median of 29 infusions (range, 15-85) of micafungin (50 mg/day i.v. as a 1-h infusion). The treatment was initiated at the beginning of the transplant conditioning regimen until the hospital discharge. None of our patients discontinued the treatment for drug-related adverse events. Micafungin was not associated with any hepatotoxicity. Only one patient (4%) discontinued the treatment because of early disease progression. In all patients no Candida and/or Aspergillus species was documented after 3 and 6 months from transplant. None of our patients presented a positive galactomannan antigenemia >0.5. Nine patients (35%) presented a CMV reactivation. Four patients presented an acute GVHD grade II and two patients presented a chronic GVHD. The median follow-up was 11 months (3-23). At the last follow-up, there were 20 patients (77%) who were alive; four patients (12%) died because of disease progression and two patients because of graft failure. Micafungin has a good safety and tolerability profile, with an efficacy in preventing IFI in this high-risk population. Our data provide support for an efficacy study in a prophylaxis setting, but prospective and comparative clinical trials using micafungin are urgently needed to define the role of this drug in prophylaxis after haplo-identical Allo-SCT.

Anti-GM-CSF monoclonal antibody therapy for refractory acute leukemia.

Several phase I trials and pilot studies using Monoclonal Antibody (MoAb) have been performed in B-cell neoplasms, but this approach has not until now been extensively tested in myeloid leukemias. Recently, we evaluated the use of anti-Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor MoAb (Anti-GM-CSF MoAb) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Eight patients fulfilled inclusion criteria and received a single course of Anti-GM-CSF MoAb infusion during 5 to 15 days. Anti-GM-CSF MoAb was well tolerated and was detectable in pharmacokinetics studies. Using Human Anti-Rat Antibodies (HARA), we also observed an immunological response to the MoAb. Despite sufficient levels detected in the serum and biological activity of Anti-GM-CSF MoAb in vivo, no anti-leukemic effect was noted, except for one patient who had a decrease of 50% in the marrow blast cell mass. These observations indicate that leukemic proliferation in vivo involves a complex network spanning many mechanisms, and inhibition of leukemia is not effective if only one of these key targets is attacked. The development of these new approaches may be more effective in the future.