Stop the Bleed® in medical schools: Early advocacy and promising results.

OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that medical students would be empowered by hemorrhage-control training and would support efforts to include Stop the Bleed® (STB) in medical education. DESIGN: This is a multi-institution survey study. Surveys were administered immediately following and 6 months after the course. SETTING: This study took place at the Association of American Medical Colleges-accredited medical schools in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were first-year medical students at participating institutions. A total of 442 students completed post-course surveys, and 213 students (48.2 percent) also completed 6-month follow-up surveys. INTERVENTION: An 1-hour, in-person STB course. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Student empowerment was measured by Likert-scale scoring, 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 5 (Strongly Agree). The usage of hemorrhage-control skills was also measured. RESULTS: A total of 419 students (95.9 percent) affirmed that the course taught the basics of bleeding control, and 169 (79.3 percent) responded positively at follow-up, with a significant decrease in Likert response (4.65, 3.87, p < 0.001). Four hundred and twenty-three students (97.0 percent) affirmed that they would apply bleeding control skills to a patient, and 192 (90.1 percent) responded positively at follow-up (4.61, 4.19, p < 0.001). Three hundred and sixty-one students (82.8 percent) believed that they were able to save a life, and 109 (51.2 percent) responded positively at follow-up (4.14, 3.56, p < 0.001). Four hundred and twenty-five students (97.0 percent) would recommend the course to another medical student, and 196 (92.0 percent) responded positively at follow-up (4.68, 4.31, p < 0.001). Six students (2.8 percent) used skills on live patients, with success in five of the six instances. CONCLUSIONS: Medical students were empowered by STB and have used hemorrhage-control skills on live victims. Medical students support efforts to include STB in medical education.

The use of inferior vena cava filters in spine trauma: A nationwide study using the National Trauma Data Bank.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence and variation of inferior vena cava filter (IVCF) use in the spine trauma population and evaluate patient and facility level factors associated with their use. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. Participants/Outcome Measures: Patients with spinal injuries were identified by ICD-9 codes from the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB), the best validated national trauma database. Patients whose spine injuries were operatively treated and those who received IVCF were identified from procedure description fields. Additional information compiled included patient demographics, injury severity score (ISS), time until surgery, concomitant fractures, and facility level information. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to examine the relationship of associated factors for IVCF use. RESULTS: Of the 120,920 patients identified with spinal injuries, 2.4% received prophylactic IVCF. Of the 13,273 patients with operatively treated spinal injuries, 8.2% received prophylactic IVCF. Of the 7,770 patients with spinal cord injury (SCI), 10.8% received prophylactic IVCF. The interquartile ranges of placement rates among centers demonstrated greater than 10 fold variation. Based on multivariate logistic regression, ISS score >12 demonstrated the strongest association with prophylactic IVCF (adjusted OR = 4.908). Concomitant pelvic and lower extremity fractures (adj OR 2.573 and 2.522) were also associated with their use. CONCLUSIONS: Currently the only data regarding existing IVCF use in the spine trauma population amounts to surveys. The present study provides the most detailed and objective information regarding their use in this setting. Even in the operatively treated and SCI subgroups, prophylactic filters were used in only a small percentage of cases but placement rates varied widely among centers. More severely injured patients (ISS >12) had highest odds of receiving prophylactic IVCF. Further study is needed to clarify their role in this vulnerable population.

Venous Sinus Thrombosis in Blunt Trauma: Incidence and Risk Factors.

PURPOSE: The aim of our study was to determine the incidence and risk factors of dural venous sinus thrombosis and epidural hemorrhage in the setting of a blunt trauma causing a calvarial fracture crossing a dural venous sinus. METHODS: A retrospective review of 472 blunt trauma patients with calvarial fracture crossing a dural venous sinus was performed. Two hundred ten patients who underwent computed tomography venography were identified and evaluated for the presence of dural venous sinus thrombosis and/or epidural hemorrhage. Site and displacement of fractures, as well as age, sex, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, and mechanism of injury, were considered for potential predictive value of thrombosis and/or epidural hemorrhage. RESULTS: We found a 23% incidence of dural venous sinus thrombosis in patients with a fracture traversing a dural venous sinus. Significant predictors of thrombosis included temporal fracture (38% incidence) and skull base fracture (31% incidence). Occipital fracture not involving the skull base was associated with a significantly decreased risk of thrombosis, with an incidence of 9%. Decreased GCS score and fall from height greater than 10 feet additionally predicted dural venous sinus thrombosis. Significant predictors of epidural hemorrhage included parietal fractures and displaced fractures, although a large percentage of nondisplaced fractures in other bones demonstrated epidural hemorrhage as well. CONCLUSIONS: Dural venous sinus thrombosis in the setting of blunt trauma with a calvarial fracture crossing a dural venous sinus has an incidence of 23%. Increased suspicion for thrombosis is warranted in patients with temporal or skull base fractures, low GCS score, and recent fall from great height.

Pain management for blunt thoracic trauma: A joint practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma and Trauma Anesthesiology Society.

INTRODUCTION: Thoracic trauma is the second most prevalent nonintentional injury in the United States and is associated with significant morbidity. Analgesia for blunt thoracic trauma was first addressed by the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST) with a practice management guideline published in 2005. Since that time, it was hypothesized that there have been advances in the analgesic management for blunt thoracic trauma. As a result, updated guidelines for this topic using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) framework recently adopted by EAST are presented. METHODS: Five systematic reviews were conducted using multiple databases. The search retrieved articles regarding analgesia for blunt thoracic trauma from January1967 to August 2015. Critical outcomes of interest were analgesia, postoperative pulmonary complications, changes in pulmonary function tests, need for endotracheal intubation, and mortality. Important outcomes of interest examined included hospital and intensive care unit length of stay. RESULTS: Seventy articles were identified. Of these, 28 articles were selected to construct the guidelines. The overall risk of bias for all studies was high. The majority of included studies examined epidural analgesia. Epidural analgesia was associated with lower short-term pain scores in most studies, but the quality and quantity of evidence were very low, and no firm evidence of benefit or harm was found when this modality was compared with other analgesic interventions. The quality of evidence for paravertebral block, intrapleural analgesia, multimodal analgesia, and intercostal nerve blocks was very low as assessed by GRADE. The limitations with the available literature precluded the formulation of strong recommendations by our panel. CONCLUSION: We propose two evidence-based recommendations regarding analgesia for patients with blunt thoracic trauma. The overall risk of bias for all studies was high. The limitations with the available literature precluded the formulation of strong recommendations by our panel. We conditionally recommend epidural analgesia and multimodal analgesia as options for patients with blunt thoracic trauma, but the overall quality of evidence supporting these modalities is low in trauma patients. These recommendations are based on very low-quality evidence but place a high value on patient preferences for analgesia. These recommendations are in contradistinction to the previously published Practice Management Guideline published by EAST.

Preperitoneal pelvic packing: Technique and outcomes.

Significant pelvic ring fractures are usually secondary to high-energy trauma, and when associated with other life-threatening injuries and hemodynamic instability, result in high mortality rates ranging from 40 to 60%. The major cause of death during the first 24 h after pelvic trauma is attributed to acute blood loss, with later mortality secondary to multisystem organ failure. In a majority of patients, the source of pelvic bleeding is from disruption of the presacral venous plexus and bony fracture sites, while arterial injury is present in only 10-15%. The optimal management algorithm for hemodynamically unstable patients with pelvic fractures remains controversial. The principles of care center on resuscitation, external stabilization of the pelvis, and hemorrhage control with angiography and embolization (AE) and/or preperitoneal pelvic packing (PPP). AE is effective in controlling arterial bleeding and its role in the management of hemodynamically unstable patients with pelvic fractures is supported by the EAST guidelines. However, since most patients suffer from venous bleeding, PPP can be an alternate life saving technique to control hemorrhage, especially if AE is not immediately available.

Pediatric gunshot wound recidivism: Identification of at-risk youth.

BACKGROUND: Although penetrating injury is the most common reason for pediatric trauma recidivism, there is a paucity of literature specifically looking at this population. The objective of this study was to identify those in the pediatric community at the highest levels of risk for experiencing gunshot wound (GSW) on multiple occasions. METHODS: A retrospective review querying our urban Level I trauma database was performed. Patients aged 0 year to 18 years sustaining GSW from 2000 to 2011 were selected. This was further refined to include those who returned to the hospital for another firearm injury. Demographic data, including age of initial and subsequent presentation, sex, race, zip code, home address, and disposition were compiled. RESULTS: During the 12-year study period, 896 pediatric patients were discharged from the hospital after initial firearm injury with subsequent 8.8% recidivism rate. All recidivists were male, and 86% were 16 years to 18 years old at the time of the first injury. The subsequent incident occurs within the first year, 2 years, and 3 years 32%, 53%, and 66% of the time, respectively. Nine individuals in our study group experienced GSW on three separate occasions, with a mortality rate of 22%. Regarding the domicile, 53% of the patients were located in a 3-sq mi area containing four public high schools. CONCLUSION: Using demographic data, we have been able to identify an at-risk population where there is a greater than 1 in 12 chance of getting shot multiple times. Use of this type of demographic data can help target those at highest risk by allocating resources that can have the greatest impact on this societal burden. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic study, level III.

Guidance Document for the Prehospital Use of Tranexamic Acid in Injured Patients.

Tranexamic acid (TXA) is being administered already in many prehospital air and ground systems. Insufficient evidence exists to support or refute the prehospital administration of TXA, and results are pending from several prehospital studies currently in progress. We have created this document to aid agencies and systems in best practices for TXA administration based on currently available best evidence. This document has been endorsed by the American College of Surgeons-Committee on Trauma, the American College of Emergency Physicians, and the National Association of EMS Physicians.

Acute splenic syndrome in an African-American male with sickle cell trait on a commercial airplane flight.

BACKGROUND: Patients with sickle cell trait (SCT) generally suffer few effects of sickle cell disease. Acute splenic syndrome is a rare but well-documented complication of SCT that can present in the setting of low oxygen tension that occurs with major changes in altitude, either by unpressurized air flight or ground travel such as mountain climbing. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to increase emergency physician awareness of the rare diagnosis of altitude-induced splenic infarction in patients with SCT by presenting and reviewing recorded literature. CASE REPORT: This is an unusual case of a man with SCT who suffered acute splenic syndrome while on a pressurized airplane flight subsequently requiring splenectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Although it is a rare phenomenon, patients with SCT who are exposed to high altitudes can be subject to splenic syndrome. There are many patients who are unaware that they have SCT, which makes the diagnosis challenging for emergency physicians. In addition, because patients with SCT generally do not have complications related to their disease, diagnosing splenic syndrome might be delayed, potentially resulting in inadequate hydration, pain management, and other supportive treatment, which ultimately leads to worsening splenic syndrome and splenectomy.

Screening for thoracolumbar spinal injuries in blunt trauma: an Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma practice management guideline.

BACKGROUND: Thoracolumbar spine (TLS) injuries have an incidence rate of 5% in blunt trauma patients. The Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma published Practice Management Guidelines for the Screening of Thoracolumbar Spine Fracture in 2007. The Practice Management Guidelines Committee was assembled to reevaluate the literature. METHODS: A search of the United States National Library of Medicine and the National Institutes of Health database was performed using MEDLINE through PubMed (www.pubmed.gov). The search retrieved English-language articles from March 2005 to December 2011 that referenced traumatic TLS injuries and fractures. The questions posed were the following: (1) What is the appropriate imaging modality to screen patients for TLS injuries? (2) Which trauma patients require radiographic screening for TLS injuries? (3)Does a patient who is awake and alert without distracting injuries require radiologic workup to rule out TLS injuries? RESULTS: Thirty-seven articles that referenced traumatic TLS injuries in association with screening published between March 2005 and December 2011 were collected and disseminated to the committee. Twelve were found to be relevant. Nine publications from the previous 2006 guidelines were reviewed and referenced to create and validate the updated guidelines. CONCLUSION: Practice patterns have changed regarding screening blunt trauma patients for TLS injuries. Software reformatted multidetector computed tomographic scans are more sensitive and accurate than plain films. Multidetector computed tomographic scans have become the screening modality of choice and the criterion standard in screening for TLS injuries. The literature supports a Level 1 recommendation to validate this based on a preponderance of Class II data. Patients without altered mentation or significant mechanism may be excluded by clinical examination without imaging. Patients with gross neurologic deficits or concerning clinical examination findings with negative imaging should receive a magnetic resonance imaging expediently, and the spine service should be consulted.

Presumptive antibiotic use in tube thoracostomy for traumatic hemopneumothorax: an Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma practice management guideline.

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic use in injured patients requiring tube thoracostomy (TT) to reduce the incidence of empyema and pneumonia remains a controversial practice. In 1998, the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST) developed and published practice management guidelines for the use of presumptive antibiotics in TT for patients who sustained a traumatic hemopneumothorax. The Practice Management Guidelines Committee of EAST has updated the 1998 guidelines to reflect current literature and practice. METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed to include prospective and retrospective studies from 1997 to 2011, excluding those studies published in the previous guideline. Case reports, letters to the editor, and review articles were excluded. Ten acute care surgeons and one statistician/epidemiologist reviewed the articles under consideration, and the EAST primer was used to grade the evidence. RESULTS: Of the 98 articles identified, seven were selected as meeting criteria for review. Two questions regarding presumptive antibiotic use in TT for traumatic hemopneumothorax were addressed: (1) Do presumptive antibiotics reduce the incidence of empyema or pneumonia? And if true, (2) What is the optimal duration of antibiotic prophylaxis? CONCLUSION: Routine presumptive antibiotic use to reduce the incidence of empyema and pneumonia in TT for traumatic hemopneumothorax is controversial; however, there is insufficient published evidence to support any recommendation either for or against this practice.

Therapeutic hypothermia for treatment of intractable intracranial hypertension after liver transplantation.

A comatose 23-year-old woman with acute liver failure due to an overdose of acetaminophen had indications of intracranial hypertension and underwent liver transplantation. Her level of arousal did not improve, and on postoperative day 1, clinical signs of cerebral herniation became apparent. An intracranial pressure monitor was placed, and intracranial hypertension was documented. Elevations in intracranial pressure persisted despite maximal osmotherapy, and therapeutic hypothermia was started. Normalization of intracranial pressure was rapid. Findings on neurological examination improved and the patient was discharged from the hospital with no neurological impairment.

Short simulation training improves objective skills in established advanced practitioners managing emergencies on the ward and surgical intensive care unit.

BACKGROUND: Several studies evaluating simulation training in intensive care unit (ICU) physicians have demonstrated improvement in leadership and management skills. No study to date has evaluated whether such training is useful in established ICU advanced practitioners (APs). We hypothesized that human patient simulator-based training would improve surgical ICU APs' skills at managing medical crises. METHODS: After institutional review board approval, 12 APs completed ½ day of simulation training on the SimMan, Laerdal system. Each subject participated in five scenarios, first as team leader (pretraining scenario), then as observer for three scenarios, and finally, again as team leader (posttraining). Faculty teaching accompanied each scenario and preceded a debriefing session with video replay. Three experts scored emergency care skills (Airway-Breathing-Circulation [ABCs] sequence, recognition of shock, pneumothorax, etc.) and teamwork leadership/interpersonal skills. A multiple choice question examination and training effectiveness questionnaire were completed before and after training. Fellows underwent the same curriculum and served to validate the study. Pre- and postscores were compared using the Wilcoxon signed rank test with two-tailed significance of 0.05. RESULTS: Improvement was seen in participants' scores combining all parameters (73% ± 13% vs. 80% ± 11%, p = 0.018). AP leadership/interpersonal skills (+12%), multiple choice question examination (+4%), and training effectiveness questionnaire (+6%) scores improved significantly (p < 0.05). Fellows teamwork leadership/interpersonal skills scores were higher than APs (p < 0.001) but training brought AP scores to fellow levels. Interrater reliability was high (r = 0.77, 95% confidence interval 0.71-0.82; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Human patient simulator training in established surgical ICU APs improves leadership, teamwork, and self-confidence skills in managing medical emergencies. Such a validated curriculum may be useful as an AP continuing education resource.