RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The Attune TKR was introduced in 2011 as a successor to its predicate design The PFC Sigma. However, following reports of early failures, there are ongoing concerns related to increased loosening rates. Given the concerns, this study aimed to compare revision rates of the Attune implant to an established predicate, and other implant designs used in a high-volume arthroplasty center. METHODS: We identified 10,202 patients who underwent primary cemented TKR at our institution with a minimum of 1 year follow-up, involving 2406 Attune TKR (557 S +), 4642 PFC TKR, 3154 other designs. Primary outcomes were revision for all-causes, aseptic loosening of any component, and aseptic tibial loosening. Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox regression models were used to compare groups. Matched cohorts were selected for radiographic analysis. RESULTS: 308 knees were revised. The Attune cohort had the lowest risk of revision, with a rate of 2.98 per 1000 implant-years while the PFC and All Other Implant groups had a rate of 3.15 and 4.4 respectively. Aseptic loosing was the most common cause for revision, with 76% (65/88) involving the tibia. Survival analysis showed no significant differences between the Attune and other cohorts. Radiolucent lines were detected in 7.1% of the Attune S + group, 6.8% of the standard Attune group, and 6.3% of the PFC group, with no significant differences found between them. CONCLUSION: This study represents the largest non-registry review of the Attune TKR in comparison to a predicate and other designs. There was no significant increased revision rate for all-cause revision or aseptic loosening, or peri-implant radiolucencies. It appears that increased loosening may not be as concerning as originally thought. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The principle of joint reconstruction surgery is to try to recreate the native joint biomechanics and stability. With respect to acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) surgery, much focus to date has been on restoring the superoinferior stability. There is concern that persistent horizontal instability following ACJ reconstruction could lead to poorer patient outcomes; therefore, we evaluated whether acromioclavicular (AC) ligament repair offers improved horizontal stability in conjunction with ACJ reconstruction. METHODS: A whole-body human cadaver was used. The ACJ was exposed and subjected to a constant 70N load on the lateral end of the clavicle to test the anteroposterior (AP), superoinferior (SI), and horizontal pivot angle (HPA) around the ACJ. The AC and coracoclavicular (CC) ligaments were subsequently divided, and the above three parameters were re-tested. Ligament augmentation and reconstruction system (Corin Group, Cirencester, UK), LockDown (LockDown Medical Limited, Redditch, UK), Endobutton (Smith and Nephew Inc., London, UK), and Neoligament implant (Xiros Ltd., Leeds, UK) were used to reconstruct the CC ligaments and tested with and without AC repair. RESULTS: The native ACJ allowed an average 2.48 mm AP and 3.88 mm SI translation with a 27° HPA. All synthetic implants significantly improved the vertical stability of the ACJ but allowed up to a four-fold increase in AP translation. Coupled with ACJ repair, all the reconstructions were far superior, especially in restoring horizontal stability. CONCLUSION: The implants varied in their approach to fixation and concentrated primarily on the reconstruction of CC ligaments. Our study was able to demonstrate that AC repair significantly improves the stability of the construct and significantly reduces vertical and horizontal instability.
RESUMO
AIMS: Talonavicular (TN) arthrodesis is a common procedure to treat arthritis of the TN joint.It can also form part of a wider triple fusion to restore the architecture of the foot.Traditional methods of arthrodesis are not universally successful. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of those who had a TN fusion using the IOFiX system. Data was collected retrospectively from the hospital operation database. Inclusion criteria included patients who underwent a TN fusion between 2012 and 19 with the IOFiX system. All patients were over 16 years of age and at least one year post operation.Patient demographics were obtained, as well as rate of union and rate of re-operation for analysis. RESULTS: 35 patients were identified. The mean age was 58 years (range 34-85). The most common indication was osteoarthritis of the TN joint (n = 19), followed by acquired adult flat foot (n = 8), rheumatoid arthritis (n = 3), avascular necrosis (n = 2) and a previous nonunion.(n = 1). 9 % (n = 3) of patients did not achieve union by one year and 14 % (n = 5) required another operation subsequent to their initial surgery: four to remove metalwork, and one to treat non-union of the arthrodesis. The use of bone graft did not affect complication rates. TN fusion, when performed as part of a triple fusion, showed a tendency for reducing the rate of non-union, however this did not achieve statical significance. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that the IOFiX system offers a reliable and acceptable alternative technique for patients undergoing a TN fusion. Further work is required to assess if early signs of improved outcome when used in triple fusion, over isolated TN fusion,are significant.