Myofascial pain - A major player in musculoskeletal pain.

Myofascial pain is a soft tissue pain syndrome with local and referred musculoskeletal pain arising from trigger points. Myofascial pain and myofascial pain syndromes are among some of the most common acute and chronic pain conditions. Myofascial pain can exist independently of other pain generators or can coexist with or is secondary to other acute and chronic painful musculoskeletal conditions. Myofascial pain is most effectively treated with a multimodal treatment plan including injection therapy (known as trigger point injections, physical therapy, postural or ergonomic correction, and treatment of underlying musculoskeletal pain generators. The objectives of this review are to outline the prevalence of myofascial pain, describe the known pathophysiology of myofascial pain and trigger points, discuss the clinical presentation of myofascial pain, and present evidence-based best practices for pharmacologic, non-pharmacologic, and interventional treatments for myofascial pain.

Implantable Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for Peripheral Neuropathic Pain: A Systematic Review of Prospective Studies.

Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) has been utilized for over 50 years with accumulating evidence of efficacy in a variety of chronic pain conditions. The level and strength of evidence supporting the use of PNS for peripheral neuropathic pain remains unclear. The purpose of this review is to synthesize data from prospective studies on the efficacy of PNS for neuropathic pain as it pertains to pain intensity, neurological deficits/neuropathy (e.g., weakness, sensory deficits, gait/balance), and other secondary outcomes (quality of life, satisfaction, emotional functioning, and adverse events). In compliance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, this review identified articles from MEDLINE(R), EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus. Overall, per the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria, pooled results demonstrate very low quality or low quality of evidence supporting modest to substantial improvement in pain and neurological function after PNS implantation for treatment of peripheral neuropathic pain. PNS for phantom limb pain was the only indication that had moderate level evidence. Future prospective and well-powered studies are warranted to assess the efficacy of PNS for peripheral neuropathic pain.

Multispecialty perspective on intradural disc herniation: diagnosis and management - A case report.

BACKGROUND: Intradural disc herniation (IDH) is a very rare and challenging diagnosis, with an estimated incidence of less than 1.5%. The pathogenesis of IDH remains uncertain. Definitive management remains surgical; however, some cases may initially be managed non-surgically. CASE: A middle-aged male with presented with acute right-sided lumbar radiculopathy following heavy lifting. History was significant for prior lumbar disc herniation managed non-surgically. Lumbar MRI demonstrated a large disc herniation. The patient was initially treated non-surgically with epidural steroid injections. At 4-months, he re-injured and follow-up images demonstrated the herniated disc penetrating the dura and the diagnosis of intradural disc herniation. CONCLUSIONS: The present case is rare because the IDH occurred at the L3-4 level and resulted in unilateral radiculopathy without cauda-equina symptoms and occurred in the absence of prior surgery. This patient was initially treated non-surgically with satisfactory relief, however, reinjury led to progression of IDH with new neurological deficits necessitating surgery.

The impact of spinal cord stimulation on opioid utilization in failed back surgery syndrome and spinal surgery naïve patients.

Background: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been utilized for failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) with well-documented improvements in pain and function. However, limited studies have investigated the relationship between spinal surgery, SCS and opioid use outcomes. Methods: A narrative review utilizing the scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles (SANRA) methodology looking at trials involving SCS and opiates. Results: Twenty-six studies met inclusion criteria. Surgery-naïve subjects had the greatest mean opioid dose reduction of 50.39% morphine milliequivalents, and the greatest number of patients who discontinued opioids at 53.72%. No statistical analysis was performed due to heterogeneous data. Conclusion: SCS has a positive impact on opioid reduction, regardless of prior spinal surgical history. However, due to a lack of homogenous data, a formal conclusion comparing outcomes between spinal surgical histories cannot be drawn. There is an inherent difficulty in evaluating this topic given its complexity and multifactorial origin. Studies would require collaboration between pain physicians, societies and industry. Even then, patient biases such as psychological and expectation would be difficult to account for. This topic remains an ongoing challenge for interventional pain physicians.