Pathological Diagnosis, Work-Up and Reporting of Breast Cancer 1st Central-Eastern European Professional Consensus Statement on Breast Cancer.

This text is based on the recommendations accepted by the 4th Hungarian Consensus Conference on Breast Cancer, modified on the basis of the international consultation and conference within the frames of the Central-Eastern European Academy of Oncology. The recommendations cover non-operative, intraoperative and postoperative diagnostics, determination of prognostic and predictive markers and the content of cytology and histology reports. Furthermore, they address some specific issues such as the current status of multigene molecular markers, the role of pathologists in clinical trials and prerequisites for their involvement, and some remarks about the future.

[Pathological diagnosis, work-up and reporting of breast cancer. Recommendations from the 4th Breast Cancer Consensus Conference]. / Az emlorák patológiai diagnosztikája, feldolgozása és kórszövettani leletezése. Szakmai útmutatás a IV. Emlorák Konszenzus Konferencia alapján.

There have been some relevant changes in the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer to implement the updating of the 2016 recommendations made during the 3rd national consensus conference on the disease. Following a wide interdisciplinary consultation, the present recommendations have been finalized after their public discussion at the 4th Hungarian Breast Cancer Consensus Conference. The recommendations cover non-operative, intraoperative and postoperative diagnostics, the determination of prognostic and predictive markers and the content of the cytology and histology reports. Furthermore, it touches some special issues such as the current status of multigene molecular markers, the role of pathologists in clinical trials and prerequisites for their involvement, some relevant points about the future. The most important changes include the integration of the TNM 8th edition, the WHO classification of breast tumors 5th edition, the ASCO/CAP HER2 assessment guidelines from 2018, and the Yokohama terminology for cytology reporting; a more detailed text on tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and size determination after neoadjuvant therapy and a broader discussion of molecular tests.

Quantitative Analysis of Carbonic Anhydrase IX Uncovers Hypoxia-Related Functional Differences in Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma Subtypes.

Upregulation of carbonic anhydrase IX (CAIX) was found to be associated with unfavorable prognosis and resistance to treatment in a broad spectrum of malignancies, recently also in classical Hodgkin's lymphoma (cHL). As demonstrated, variable CAIX expression in a significant number of cHL cases was associated with poor treatment response. The current study focused on the quantification CAIX immunopositivity and its relative expression compared to the total CD30+ neoplastic pool using digital image analysis. One hundred and one lymph node samples featuring cHL histology were analyzed for both CD30 and CAIX by immunohistochemistry. Whole histological slides were scanned and immunopositivity was determined as the histoscore (H-score) using the DensitoQuant software module (3DHistech Kft., Budapest, Hungary). CAIX positivity was observed in the HRS-cells of 56/101 cases (55.44%) and frequently observed in the proximity of necrotic foci. CAIX H-scores were highly variable (range: 2.16-90.36, mean 18.7 ± 18.8). Individual CAIX values were independent of the much higher CD30 values (range 3.46-151.3, mean 52.37 ± 30.74). The CAIX/CD30 index proved to be the highest in the aggressive lymphocyte-depleted (LD) subtype (CAIX/CD30: 0.876). The CAIX expression and the CAIX/CD30 relative index can be precisely determined by image analysis, and values reflect the extent of a tumor mass undergoing hypoxic-stress-related adaptation in the most aggressive forms of cHL.

[Pathological diagnosis, work-up and reporting of breast cancer. Recommendations of the 3rd Hungarian Consensus Conference on Breast Cancer]. / Az emlõrák patológiai diagnosztikája, feldolgozása és kórszövettani leletezése. Szakmai útmutatás a III. Emlõrák Konszenzus Konferencia alapján.

There have been relevant changes in the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer to implement the updating of the 2010 recommendations made during the 2nd national consensus conference on the disease. Following a wide interdisciplinary consultation, the present recommendations have been finalized after their public discussion at the 3rd Hungarian Consensus Conference on Breast Cancer. The recommendations cover non-operative and intraoperative diagnostics, the work-up of operative specimens, the determination of prognostic and predictive markers and the content of the cytology and histology reports. Furthermore, it touches some special issues such as the current status of multigene molecular markers, the role of pathologists in clinical trials and prerequisites for their involvement, some relevant points about the future.

Estrogen receptor negative and progesterone receptor positive breast carcinomas-how frequent are they?

Estrogen receptor (ER) testing has become an important part of breast cancer reporting as the ER status is a predictor of hormonal treatment efficacy. Progesteron receptors (PR) are often tested in parallel, and the best response to hormonal manipulations can be expected in tumors positive for both receptors. The existence of breast cancers with an ER negative and PR positive phenotype is controversial. A series of cases with this phenotype were reevaluated to clarify the existence and the frequency of this entity. A total of 205/6587 (3.1%; range of the rate per department: 0.3-7.1%.) cases reported to have the ER-negative and PR-positive status by immunohistochemistry were collected from 9 Hungarian departments. After careful reevaluation of the tumor slides and control tissues with a 1% cut-off for positivity and restaining of the questionable cases, all but 1 of the reevaluable 182 cases changed their original phenotype. Most cases converted to dual positives (n = 124) or dual negatives (n = 31) or unassessable / questionable. ER-negative and PR-positive breast cancers are very rare if existing. Such a phenotype should prompt reassessment.

Comparison of Pathvysion and Poseidon HER2 FISH assays in measuring HER2 amplification in breast cancer: a validation study.

AIMS: The current study was done as a validation study prior to setting up a clinical HER2 testing service using the new commercial Poseidon HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) assay. However, it was felt that the experience of the authors of this study may be of interest to other laboratories when considering setting up a HER2 diagnostic facility. METHODS: 122 patients who had been diagnosed with invasive breast cancer were selected. Immunolabelling with HercepTest, PathVysion and Poseidon FISH assays were carried out using tissue microarray blocks. RESULTS: Concordance correlation coefficients showed near perfect agreement in average HER2 and centromere specific signal counts per cell and in the HER2/CEP17 ratios between the PathVysion and the Poseidon FISH assays. In addition, the kappa measure showed perfect agreement (kappa 0.9441, p<0.0001), and if only 2+ cases were considered there was substantial agreement (kappa 0.7671, p=0.0006), between the two assays. The sensitivity and the specificity of the Poseidon FISH kit were calculated to be 95.2% and 100%, respectively, whereas the positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were 100% and 99%, respectively. With regard to the ability to presume HER2 polysomy, the Poseidon FISH kit had a sensitivity of 93.3% and a specificity of 99.1%, with PPV and NPV of 93.3% and 99.1%, respectively, as assessed with PathVysion classification as the reference. CONCLUSIONS: Statistical analysis confirmed that the two FISH assays are comparable in terms of detection of HER2 gene amplification. Proceeding from these findings, the genetic diagnoses obtained with the Poseidon kit can be considered to be as valuable as the results from the Food and Drug Administration approved PathVysion assay, and its utilisation in routine HER2 diagnostics is proposed.

[The premalignant disease of the endometrium: endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia]. / Az endometrium rákmegelozo állapota: endometrialis intraepithelialis neoplasia.

The WHO 1994 classification for endometrial hyperplasias is based on the morphologic features of the lesions. This system characterizes the nuclear cytologic morphology as typical or atypical and describes the glandular architectural pattern as simple or complex. The main problem of this classification is the poor reproducibility. Although the predictive value of the atypical category is high, there are many typical hyperplasia cases with cancer progression. Modern molecular data related to endometrial tumorigenesis and precise computerized morphometric analysis have identified the lesion that may be considered as a precursor of endometrioid adenocarcinoma. By definition, this endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN) is a clonal proliferation of architecturally and cytologically altered endometrial glands which are prone to malignant transformation to endometrioid (type I) endometrial adenocarcinoma. The morphometric basis of EIN diagnosis is the D-score (DS), which is a logical combination of three morphometric features that represent the glandular complexity, glandular volume and cytological alterations. PTEN inactivation and K-ras mutation are the earliest genetic changes that can be revealed in these lesions. Hyperplasia cases that do not fit into the EIN categories are considered as benign or hormonal endometrial hyperplasia. This is the theoretical basis of a new classification system in premalignant endometrial diseases. Retrospective clinical data proved the high predictive value of the EIN scheme, so the decision on therapy can be more established. The reproducibility is excellent with application of precise definitions and PTEN immunohistochemistry. In the "Blue book" published in 2003 the WHO introduces the new morphometric- and molecular-based EIN system, and recommends it as an alternative classification method.

Familial clustering of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in a non-endemic geographical region. Report of two Hungarian cases and a review of the literature.

The aim of this study was to investigate the familial clustering of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) in a non-endemic geographical region on the basis of two case reports and a review of the literature. Following an upper respiratory infection, NPC (WHO type III) was detected in a 57-year-old female (Case 1) who presented with nasal symptoms and a year later in her 36-year-old son (Case 2) who presented with enlarged lymph nodes. After a full diagnostic work-up, cT2a cN0 cM0 (stage IIA; Case 1) and cT2a cN2 cM0 (stage III; Case 2) disease were identified, and telecobalt irradiation was administered to both patients. The mother achieved complete remission and has been disease-free during a 14-year follow-up period. After initial complete remission, the son experienced regional (cervical) and base of the skull relapses within 2 years, which were treated unsuccessfully by means of radical neck dissection, a second course of radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) was detected in pathology sections from both patients. The authors review 20 additional well-documented cases of familial clustering of NPC in non-endemic geographical regions from the English language literature. This clinical entity typically has WHO type III histology; it may occur following an upper respiratory tract infection, and EBV-related serological titers were elevated in all 20 investigated cases. No consequent promoting factors were identified. The present two cases and the review of the literature strongly suggest that familial clustering of NPC in non-endemic geographical areas may be related to EBV infections. The difference in outcome of our two cases may be explained by the fact that the disease in Case 2 was diagnosed 1 year later than that in Case 1 and hence at a more advanced stage.

[Metastasis of breast cancer presenting in the appendix]. / Meglepetést okozó appendix avagy primer emlorák metasztázisa okozta appendicitis.

A 45 year-old woman was referred to the Emergency Department of Jósa András County Hospital with typical history and signs of appendicitis. Other than abdominal findings during physical examination we discovered a palpable mass in the right breast. The patient was transferred to the Department of Surgery and she was operated on, appendicectomy was performed. Following the uncomplicated postoperative course investigations were carried out to diagnose the mass in the right breast (mammography, ultrasound, chest X-ray, bone scan). The pathology report of the appendix suggested the possibility of a metastasis of ductal breast carcinoma in the perforated appendix. Probably the inflammation was caused by the infiltration of the appendix wall leading to perforation. Following the investigations a right-sided mastectomy was performed with dissection of axillary lymph nodes. Immunohistochemical examination definitely proved that the metastasis in the appendix originated from the breast tumour.