Associations between CMS's Clinical Performance Measures project benchmarks, profit structure, and mortality in dialysis units.

Prior studies observing greater mortality in for-profit dialysis units have not captured information about benchmarks of care. This study was undertaken to examine the association between profit status and mortality while achieving benchmarks. Utilizing data from the US Renal Data System and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' end-stage renal disease (ESRD) Clinical Performance Measures project, hemodialysis units were categorized as for-profit or not-for-profit. Associations with mortality at 1 year were estimated using Cox regression. Two thousand six hundred and eighty-five dialysis units (31,515 patients) were designated as for-profit and 1018 (15,085 patients) as not-for-profit. Patients in for-profit facilities were more likely to be older, black, female, diabetic, and have higher urea reduction ratio (URR), hematocrit, serum albumin, and transferrin saturation. Patients (19.4 and 18.6%) in for-profit and not-for-profit units died, respectively. In unadjusted analyses, profit status was not associated with mortality (hazard ratio (HR)=1.04, P=0.09). When added to models with profit status, the following resulted in a significant association between profit status (for-profit vs not-for-profit) and increasing mortality risk: URR, hematocrit, albumin, and ESRD Network. In adjusted models, patients in for-profit facilities had a greater death risk (HR 1.09, P=0.004). More patients in for-profit units met clinical benchmarks. Survival among patients in for-profit units was similar to not-for-profit units. This suggests that in the contemporary era, interventions in for-profit dialysis units have not impaired their ability to deliver performance benchmarks and do not affect survival.

Clinical performance measures: the changing status of peritoneal dialysis.

BACKGROUND: The Peritoneal Dialysis-Clinical Performance Measures Project (PD-CPM) characterizes peritoneal dialysis within the U.S. Current survey results are reported and compared to those of previous years. METHODS: Prevalence data from random national samples of adult peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients participating in the United States End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) program have been collected annually since 1995. RESULTS: In 1995, 79% of the respondents used continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) rather than automated peritoneal dialysis (APD). The mean hematocrit (Hct) of PD patients was 32% and only 66% of individuals had a measurement of dialysis adequacy reported. The mean weekly Kt/Vurea (wKt/V) and weekly creatinine clearance (wCCr) reported for CAPD patients in 1995 were 1.9 and 67 L/1.73 m2/week, respectively. In 2000 the median age of PD patients was 55 years and 63% were white. The leading cause of ESRD was diabetes mellitus (34%) and 54% of adult PD patients performed some form of APD rather than CAPD. Age, sex, size, hematocrit, peritoneal permeability, dialysis adequacy, residual renal function and nutritional indices did not differ between APD and CAPD patients. The mean hemoglobin (Hb) for the 2000 PD-CPM population was 11.6 +/- 1.4 g/dL (mean +/- 1 SD) and 11% of patients had an average Hb below 10 g/dL. The average serum albumin was 3.5 +/- 0.5 g/dL by the bromcresol green method and 56% of subjects had an average serum albumin equal to or above 3.5 g/dL (or 3.2 g/dL by bromcresol purple). In 2000 85% of patients had a dialysis adequacy measurement reported and the mean calculated wKt/V and wCCr were 2.3 +/- 0.6 and 72.7 +/- 24.9 liters/1.73 m2/week for CAPD patients and 2.3 +/- 0.6 and 71.6 +/- 25.1 L/1.73 m2/week for APD patients. PD subjects had a mean body weight of 76 +/- 19 kg and body mass index (BMI) of 27.5 +/- 6.4 kg/m2. The protein equivalent of nitrogen appearance (nPNA) of these patients was 0.95 +/- 0.31 g/kg/day, their normalized creatinine appearance rate (nCAR) equaled 17 +/- 6.5 mg/kg/day, resulting in a percent lean body mass (%LBM) of 64 +/- 17% of actual body weight. Serum albumin correlated in a positive fashion with BMI, nPNA, nCAR and %LBM, but not with wCCr. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of indicator variables monitored by the PD-CPM have improved since 1995. PD patients have higher hemoglobins and a greater proportion of patients meet the criteria for adequate dialysis. Serum albumin values, however, remain marginal and unchanged over the five-year project. Furthermore, serum albumin values fail to correlate with the intensity of renal replacement therapy and are not strongly correlated with alternative estimates of nutritional status.

Nutritional markers during peritoneal dialysis: data from the 1998 Peritoneal Dialysis Core Indicators Study.

OBJECTIVE: This analysis explores the nutritional status of adult U.S. peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. DESIGN: The Peritoneal Dialysis Core Indicators Study is a prospective cross-sectional prevalence survey describing the care provided to a random sample of adult U.S. PD patients. METHODS AND POPULATION: Prevalence data were collected from a national random sample of 1381 adult PD patients participating in the United States End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) program. RESULTS: The median age of these patients was 55 years, 61% were Caucasian; the leading cause of ESRD was diabetes mellitus. Age, sex, size, peritoneal permeability, dialysis adequacy, and nutritional indices did not differ between patients on continuous ambulatory PD and patients on automated PD. The dialysis prescriptions employed achieved mean weekly Kt/V urea (wKt/V) and creatinine clearance (wCCr) values of 2.22 +/- 0.57 and 67.8 +/- 22.5 L/1.73 m2/week, respectively. The PD patients were large, with a mean body weight of 77 +/- 21 kg and body mass index (BMI) of 27 +/- 8.6 kg/m2. The mean serum albumin of these patients was 3.5 +/- 0.51 g/dL, and 43% of values fell below the National Kidney Foundation Dialysis Outcomes Quality Initiative's desired range. The PD patients had a normalized protein equivalent of nitrogen appearance (nPNA) of 1.0 +/- 0.57 g/kg/day, a normalized creatinine appearance rate (nCAR) of 17 +/- 7.3 mg/kg/day, and an estimated lean body mass (%LBM) of 62% +/- 18% of body weight. Serum albumin correlated positively with patient size, nCAR, and nPNA, but negatively with age, the presence of diabetes mellitus, female gender, erythropoietin dose, the creatinine dialysate-to-plasma ratio results of peritoneal equilibration testing, and the dialysis portion of the wCCr. The duration of ESRD experience correlated negatively with both serum albumin and patient size, although these relationships were complex. CONCLUSION: Peritoneal dialysis patients generally have marginal serum albumin levels, a finding incongruent with alternative measures of nutritional status, such as weight, BMI, and creatinine generation. Serum albumin is reduced in patients with high peritoneal permeability (i.e., rapid transporters) and, because these patients generally have higher than average wCCr values, serum albumin is inversely correlated with the dialysis component of the wCCr. The presumptive nutritional indicators (BMI, %LBM, nPNA, and serum albumin) provide disparate estimates, varying from 10% to 50% for the prevalence of nutritionally stressed PD patients.

Duration of dialysis and its relationship to dialysis adequacy, anemia management, and serum albumin level.

An analysis of the relationship between intermediate outcomes and duration of dialysis therapy in hemodialysis patients was performed by linking Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) Core Indicators data with data obtained from HCFA form 2728 at the initiation of dialysis therapy. Patients who recently initiated hemodialysis therapy were less likely to meet Dialysis Outcomes Quality Initiative guidelines than patients with a longer duration of dialysis therapy. For both urea reduction ratio and Kt/V, odds ratios for adequate dialysis were approximately 0.20 for a duration of dialysis therapy less than 0.5 years and 0.42 to 0.63 for a duration of dialysis therapy of 0.5 to 1.0 years compared with a duration of dialysis therapy of 2.0 years or greater. For patients with a duration of dialysis therapy less than 0.5 years (compared with >/=2.0 years), the odds ratio for a hematocrit less than 28% was approximately 3.0, that for a hematocrit 33% or greater was approximately 0.6, and that for a serum albumin level of 3.5 g/dL or greater (bromcresol green method) or 3.2 g/dL or greater (bromcresol purple method) was approximately 0.4. There was a direct relationship between glomerular filtration rate at the initiation of dialysis therapy and both serum albumin and hematocrit values. Patients administered recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) predialysis were more likely to have greater hematocrits. There also was a direct relationship between hematocrit and serum albumin level. Therefore, several actionable items in regard to attentive overall medical care can result in an improvement in the percentage of patients newly started on hemodialysis therapy who meet intermediate outcomes, including the administration of rHuEPO predialysis, correction of iron deficiency, and timely placement of a permanent dialysis access.

Subcutaneous erythropoietin results in lower dose and equivalent hematocrit levels among adult hemodialysis patients: Results from the 1998 End-Stage Renal Disease Core Indicators Project.

The National Kidney Foundation's Dialysis Outcome Quality Initiative (NKF-DOQI) guidelines recommend that epoetin alfa should be administered by the subcutaneous route in hemodialysis patients. We determined whether hematocrit levels in hemodialysis patients differed by route of epoetin alfa administration after controlling for demographic factors and iron status. Data were available for 7,092 of the 7,658 patients randomly chosen for inclusion in the 1997 Health Care Financing Administration Core Indicators sample. Epoetin alfa was administered to 96% of the study cohort and was administered subcutaneously in 10% of patients. After controlling for hematocrit, patient characteristics, adequacy of dialysis, iron status, serum albumin, postdialysis weight, and duration of dialysis, the epoetin alfa dose by the intravenous route was 193.6 units/kg/wk (95% confidence interval, 189.5 to 197.8 units/kg/wk) compared with 167.4 units/kg/wk (95% confidence interval, 153.9 to 180.8 units/kg/wk) for the subcutaneous route (P < 0.001). The mean hematocrit for the subcutaneous route was 32.7% +/- 3.4% and for the intravenous route was 33.0% +/- 3.2% (P < 0.05). Factors independently associated with increased hematocrit included male gender, white race, older patient age, greater number of years on dialysis, higher serum albumin concentration, higher urea reduction ratio, and percent transferrin saturation (all P < 0.001). After controlling for patient factors and weekly epoetin alfa dose, there was no association between route of epoetin alfa administration and hematocrit level (P = 0.144). Patients receiving epoetin alfa by the subcutaneous route had comparable hematocrit values using a lower epoetin alfa dose than patients receiving epoetin alfa intravenously. These data support the NKF-DOQI recommendation that epoetin alfa be administered subcutaneously in long-term hemodialysis patients.

Impact of facility size and profit status on intermediate outcomes in chronic dialysis patients.

Little information is available regarding the influence of dialysis facility size or profit status on intermediate outcomes in chronic dialysis patients. We have combined data from the Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) Core Indicators Project; the end-stage renal disease (ESRD) facility survey; and the HCFA On-Line Survey, Certification, and Reporting System to analyze trends in this area. For hemodialysis patients, larger facilities were more likely than smaller facilities to perform dialysis on patients who were younger than 65 years of age, black, or undergoing dialysis 2 years or more (P < 0.001). Nonprofit facilities were more likely to perform dialysis on patients with diabetes mellitus as a cause of ESRD and less likely to perform dialysis on patients with hypertension as a cause of ESRD compared with for-profit units (P < 0.05). By multivariate analysis, larger facility size was modestly associated with a greater Kt/V value and urea reduction ratio, but not with hematocrit or serum albumin values. Facility profit status was not associated with these intermediate outcomes. For peritoneal dialysis patients, there were no significant differences in patient demographics based on facility size. More patients in nonprofit units had been undergoing dialysis 2 or more years than patients in for-profit units (P < 0.05). By univariate analysis, patients in larger facilities were more likely to have an adequacy measure performed than patients from smaller facilities (P < 0.05). There were few substantial differences in intermediate outcomes in chronic dialysis patients based on facility size or profit status.

Intermediate outcomes by race and ethnicity in peritoneal dialysis patients: results from the 1997 ESRD Core Indicators Project. National ESRD Core Indicators Workgroup.

BACKGROUND: Hispanics are the fastest growing minority group in the United States, and approximately 10% of all end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients are Hispanic. Few data are available, however, regarding dialysis adequacy and anemia management in Hispanic patients receiving peritoneal dialysis in the U.S. METHODS: Data from the Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) ESRD Core Indicators Project were used to assess racial and ethnic differences in selected intermediate outcomes for peritoneal dialysis patients. RESULTS: Of the 1219 patients for whom data were available from the 1997 sample, 9% were Hispanic, 24% were non-Hispanic blacks, and 59% were non-Hispanic whites. Hispanics were more likely to have diabetes mellitus as a cause of ESRD compared to blacks or whites, and both Hispanics and blacks were younger than white patients (both p < 0.001). Although whites had higher weekly Kt/V and creatinine clearance values compared to blacks or Hispanics (p < 0.05), blacks had been dialyzing longer (p < 0.01) and were more likely to be anuric compared to the other two groups (p < 0.001). Blacks had significantly lower mean hematocrit values (p < 0.001) and a greater proportion of patients who had a hematocrit level less than 28% (p < 0.05) compared to Hispanics or whites, despite receiving significantly larger weekly mean epoetin alfa doses (p < 0.05) and having significantly higher mean serum ferritin concentrations (p < 0.01). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed significant differences by race/ethnicity for experiencing a weekly Kt/V urea < 2.0 and hypertension, but not for other intermediate outcomes examined (weekly creatinine clearance < 60 L/week/1.73 m2, Hct < 30%, and serum albumin < 3.5/3.2 g/dL). CONCLUSION: Hispanics had adequacy values similar to blacks and anemia parameters similar to whites. Additional studies are needed to determine the etiologies of the differences in intermediate outcomes by racial and ethnic groupings in peritoneal dialysis patients.

Adolescent patients--healthy or hurting? Missed opportunities to screen for suicide risk in the primary care setting.

CONTEXT: Adolescent suicide rates have increased dramatically in recent decades. Suicide is the third leading cause of mortality among persons aged 10 to 19 years. Several official guidelines recommend screening for suicidal behavior in the primary care setting. OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of adolescent suicidal behavior known to primary care providers and to determine the knowledge, attitudes, and practice of primary care physicians in Maryland regarding screening for risk factors for adolescent suicide. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study using mailed survey. SETTING: Maryland from May to July 1995. PARTICIPANTS: All pediatrician (n = 816) and family physician (n = 592) members of the state chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Academy of Family Physicians, respectively, who were actively providing ambulatory care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Adolescent suicidal behavior known to primary care providers and predictors of routine screening for risk factors for adolescent suicide. RESULTS: The response rate was 66%. Three hundred twenty-eight physicians (47%) reported that 1 or more adolescent patients attempted suicide in the previous year, but only 158 (23%) either frequently or always screened adolescent patients for suicide risk factors. Significant factors correlating with routine screening for suicide risk factors included frequently or always counseling about the safer storage of firearms in the home (odds ratio [OR], 5.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.8-10.2); agreeing or strongly agreeing that they were sufficiently trained and knew how to screen for risk factors (OR, 3.2; 95%/CI, 1.7-6.3); agreeing or strongly agreeing that they had enough time during the well visit to screen for mental health problems (OR, 2.9: 95% CI, 1.6-5.3); frequently or always counseling about child passenger safety (OR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.6-4.7); spending more than 5 minutes in anticipatory guidance during the well visit (OR, 2.7: 95% CI, 1.5-4.6); practicing in an urban setting (OR, 2.3; 95)% CI, 1.2-4.7); agreeing or strongly agreeing that physicians can be effective in preventing adolescent suicide and that what they do during an office visit may help prevent adolescent suicide (OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.2-3.4); and female sex (OR. 1.9; 95% CI, 1.1-3.2). CONCLUSION: Despite the substantial proportion of primary care providers who encountered suicidal adolescent patients, most providers still do not routinely screen their patients for suicidality or associated risk factors. More training is needed and desired by the survey respondents. Patient confidentiality issues must be addressed. Development and widespread use of a short, easily administered, reliable, and valid screening tool are recommended to help busy clinicians obtain more complete information during all visits.

Can dialysis therapy be improved? A report from the ESRD Core Indicators Project.

We assessed the association between quality improvement interventions conducted during the End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Core Indicators Project and changes in the adequacy of hemodialysis between 1993 and 1996. Improvement of hemodialysis adequacy was measured by baseline and annual urea reduction ratios (URRs) in representative samples of ESRD Network patients. Random samples of in-center hemodialysis patients aged 18 years and older who had received hemodialysis during the fourth quarters of 1993, 1994, 1995, and 1996 were used to calculate Network-specific outcomes. A mean URR was calculated for each patient using the first pretreatment and posttreatment blood urea nitrogen for October, November, and December of each study year. Both national and Network-specific interventions were used to provide feedback reports and technical assistance to treatment centers to foster improvement in hemodialysis adequacy. All Networks distributed reports on the patterns of treatment center URR levels and physician and patient educational materials to each center in the Network. Each Network selected an annual 10% sample of treatment centers in 1994 and 1995 and conducted quality improvement activities to assist the selected centers to improve dialysis adequacy. We defined Network-specific interventions by a survey of the 18 Networks conducted during 1995 to determine the characteristics of Network-specific activities used to improve adequacy of hemodialysis. The outcome of interest was the change over time in Network-specific URR value. Sustained improvement in the URR occurred within all 18 Networks between 1993 and 1996. The mean national URR increased from 62.7% in 1993 to 66. 8% in 1996. The proportion of patients with URR >/= 65% increased from 43% in 1993 to 68% in 1996. Networks reported implementing a variety of intervention strategies that included educational activities, continuous quality improvement workshops, on-site assistance, and supervision of selected treatment facilities until care improved. Network-specific interventions independently associated with an increased rate of improvement in URR included prolonged supervision of the selected facilities. We concluded that the sustained improvement in hemodialysis care that occurred after the inception of the ESRD Core Indicators Project was associated with specific ESRD Network interventions.

Racial/ethnic analysis of selected intermediate outcomes for hemodialysis patients: results from the 1997 ESRD Core Indicators Project.

Principal goals of the End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Core Indicators Project are to improve the care provided to ESRD patients and to identify categorical variability in intermediate outcomes of dialysis care. The purpose of the current analysis is to extend our observations about the variability of intermediate outcomes of ESRD care among different racial and gender groups to a previously unreported group, Hispanic Americans. This group is a significant and growing minority segment of the ESRD population. A random sample of Medicare-eligible adult, in-center, hemodialysis patients was selected and stratified from an end-of-year ESRD patient census for 1996. Of the 6,858 patients in the final sample, 45% were non-Hispanic whites, 36% were non-Hispanic blacks, and 11% were Hispanic. Whites were older than blacks or Hispanics (P < 0.001). Hispanics were more likely to have diabetes mellitus as a primary diagnosis than either blacks or whites (P < 0.001). Even though they received longer hemodialysis times and were treated with high-flux hemodialyzers, blacks had significantly lower hemodialysis doses than white or Hispanic patients (P < 0.001). The intradialytic weight losses were greater for blacks (P < 0.05). The delivered hemodialysis dose was lower for blacks than for whites or Hispanics whether measured as a urea reduction ratio (URR) or as the Kt/V calculated by the second generation formula of Daugirdas (median 1. 32, 1.36, and 1.37, respectively, P < 0.001). Hispanics and whites had modestly higher hematocrits than blacks (33.2, 33.2, and 33.0%, respectively, P < 0.01). There was no significant difference among groups in the weekly prescribed epoetin alfa dose ( approximately 172 units/kg/week). A significantly greater proportion of Hispanic patients had transferrin saturations >/=20% compared with the other two groups (P < 0.001). Logistic regression modeling revealed that whites were significantly more likely to have serum albumin <3. 5(BCG)/3.2(BCP) gm/dL (OR 1.4, p < 0.01); blacks were significantly more likely to have a delivered Kt/V < 1.2 (OR 1.4, P < 0.001) and hematocrit <30%, (OR 1.2; P < 0.05) and both blacks and Hispanics were significantly more likely to have a delivered URR < 65% (OR 1.5, P < 0.001 and 1.2, P < 0.05, respectively).

Erythropoietin and iron use in peritoneal dialysis patients. Report from the 1997 HCFA end-stage renal disease core indicators project.

The HCFA ESRD Core Indicators Project is designed to assess several key indicators of care in peritoneal dialysis patients, including anemia management. Information on hematocrit levels, epoetin alfa dosing, estimates of iron stores, and iron therapy as obtained in a national sample of 1,219 peritoneal dialysis patients are described. The average hematocrit was 32.8% +/- 3.8%, and severe anemia (hematocrit < 25%) occurred in 1.4% of PD patients. The mean weekly epoetin alfa dose was 134.6 U/kg. In general, there was an inverse relationship between hematocrit and epoetin alfa doses. Most (83%) of PD patients received iron therapy, with only 8% of patients receiving intravenous iron. The mean serum ferritin was 303 ng/mL, with 64% of patients having a ferritin greater than 100 ng/mL. The mean transferrin saturation was 28%, with 60% of patients having a value of less than 20%. There was an inverse relationship between serum ferritin levels and hematocrit but no relationship between hematocrit and transferrin. It is concluded that there could be improvement in the epoetin alfa and iron management in many patients.

Trends in clinical indicators of care for adult peritoneal dialysis patients in the United States from 1995 to 1997. ESRD Core Indicators Workgroup.

BACKGROUND: This article describes the changes in four core indicator variables: dialysis adequacy, hematocrit, serum albumin, and blood pressure in peritoneal dialysis CAPD and cycler patients over a three-year period. METHODS: A national random sample of adult peritoneal dialysis patients in the United States was drawn each study period. Clinical data abstraction forms were completed by facility staff for patients selected for the sample, returned to the respective network, then forwarded to the Health Care Financing Administration for analysis. RESULTS: The mean weekly Kt/V urea for CAPD patients increased from 1.91 in 1995 to 2.12 in 1997 (P < 0.001) and for cycler patients, from 2.12 in 1996 to 2.24 in 1997 (P < 0.05). The mean weekly creatinine clearance for CAPD patients increased from 61.48 liter/week/1.73 m2 in 1995 to 65.84 liter/week/1.73 m2 in 1997 (P < 0.05). For cycler patients, it increased from 63.37 liter/week/1.73 m2 in 1996 to 67.45 liter/week/1.73 m2 in 1997 (P < 0.05). Despite this increase in adequacy values, less than 40% of peritoneal dialysis patients in 1997 had weekly Kt/V urea or creatinine clearance values that met subsequently published National Kidney Foundation's Dialysis Outcomes Quality Initiative (DOQI) guidelines. These data suggest that the dialysis prescription may not be adequately modified to compensate for increased body weight and for decreased residual renal function as years on dialysis increase. The average hematocrit value increased modestly in both CAPD and cycler patients from 1995 to 1997, and the number of patients with a hematocrit of less than 25% decreased from 6% in 1995 to 1.4% in 1997 (P < 0.001). Both serum albumin values and systolic and diastolic blood pressure values were essentially unchanged during the three-year period of observation. CONCLUSIONS: Despite improvements in dialysis adequacy and hematocrit values, there remains much room for improvement in these core indicator values.

Cycler adequacy and prescription data in a national cohort sample: the 1997 core indicators report. Health Care Financing Administration Peritoneal Dialysis Core Indicators Study Group.

BACKGROUND: The Health Care Financing Administration Peritoneal Dialysis Core Indicator Project obtains data yearly in four areas of patient care: dialysis adequacy, anemia, blood pressure, and nutrition. METHODS: Adequacy and dialysis prescription data were obtained using a standardized data abstraction form from a random sample of adult U.S. peritoneal dialysis patients who were alive on December 31, 1996. RESULTS: For the cohort receiving cycler dialysis, 22% were unable to meet the National Kidney Foundation Dialysis Outcome Quality Initiatives (NKF-DOQI) dialysis adequacy guidelines because they did not have at least one adequacy measure during the six-month period of observation. Thirty-six percent of patients met NKF-DOQI guidelines for weekly Kt/V urea, 33% met guidelines for weekly creatinine clearance (CCr), and 24% met guidelines for both urea and creatinine clearances. The mean weekly adequacy values were 2.24 +/- 0.56 for Kt/V urea and 67.5 +/- 24.4 liter/1.73 m2 for CCr, and the median values were 2.20 and 62.25 liter/1.73 m2, respectively. The mean prescribed 24-hour volume was 12,040 +/- 3255 ml, and the median prescribed volume was 11,783 ml. Only 60% of patients were prescribed at least one daytime dwell. By logistic regression analysis, risk factors for an inadequate dose of dialysis included being in the highest quartile of body surface area (odds ratio = 3.3 for CCr and 3.4 for Kt/V urea) and a duration of dialysis greater than two years (odds ratio = 4.2 for CCr and 2.1 for Kt/V urea). CONCLUSION: There is much room for improvement in providing an adequate dose of dialysis to cycler patients. Practitioners should be more aggressive in increasing dwell volumes, adding daytime dwells, and adjusting nighttime dwell times in order to compensate for the loss of residual renal function over time. These changes can only be accomplished if practitioners measure periodically the dose of dialysis as outlined in the NKF-DOQI guidelines.

Relationship between urea reduction ratio, demographic characteristics, and body weight for patients in the 1996 National ESRD Core Indicators Project.

The 1996 Health Care Financing Administration's (HCFA) Core Indicators Project for in-center, hemodialysis patients collects information on the quality of care delivered in four clinical areas that were anticipated to predict patient outcomes. Included among these clinical performance measurements is the delivered dose of hemodialysis, measured by the fractional reduction of urea achieved during a single hemodialysis session (urea reduction ratio [URR]). A random sample (N = 7,310) of adult (aged > or =18 years), in-center hemodialysis patients was selected, and a one-page data collection form for each patient was sent to the dialysis facility in which care was provided during the last quarter of 1995. The dialysis facilities provided information for 6,861 (94%) patients, and at least one paired predialysis and postdialysis blood urea nitrogen (BUN) concentration was reported for 6,655 (97%) of these patients. The URR of this cohort was 65.5% +/- 8.0% (mean +/- SD), and 41% of patients had a URR less than 65%. The mean dialysis session length was 203 minutes, and more than half of the patients received dialysis with a dialyzer membrane with a KUf less than 10 mL/mm Hg/h. The patients with a URR less than 65% had a mean body weight approximately 10 kg greater than patients with a URR of 65% or greater. This relationship was present for all demographic characteristics studied, including age, gender, race, and primary cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Patients receiving dialysis for less than 6 months were more likely to have a URR less than 65% than patients on dialysis for longer periods. By multivariate analysis, variables significantly associated with a delivered URR less than 65% were body weight in the heaviest quartile (odds ratio [OR] = 6.1), male gender (OR = 2.6), on dialysis therapy less than 6 months (OR = 2.5), youngest quartile of age (<49 years) (OR = 2.0), lowest quartile of serum albumin values less than 3.6 g/dL (bromcresol green method) or less than 3.3 g/dL (bromcresol purple method) (OR = 1.6), black (OR = 1.5), dialyzed with a dialyzer KUf less than 20 mL/mm Hg/h (OR = 1.8), lowest quartile hematocrit (<29.7%) (OR = 1.2), and shorter dialysis session length (OR = 1.02/min). In conclusion, both patient-specific demographic variables and treatment-specific parameters are significantly associated with ESRD patients receiving a URR less than 65%. Furthermore, these data suggest statistically significant linkages between the delivered dose of hemodialysis and other independent outcome predictors such as serum albumin concentration. Prospective study is required to determine whether intervention strategies to improve the delivered dose of hemodialysis will affect this outcome predictor or whether serum albumin and dialysis dose share a common cause not amenable to increasing the URR.

1996 Peritoneal Dialysis Core Indicators Study: report on nutritional indicators.

OBJECTIVE: The 1996 Peritoneal Dialysis Core Indicators Study illustrates the conduct of peritoneal dialysis in the United States during 1996. DESIGN AND PATIENT POPULATION: The survey is a medical records audit of 1317 randomly selected adult U.S.A. Medicare patients using peritoneal dialysis during 1996. OUTCOME MEASURES: Abstracted data included basic demographic characteristics, dialysis prescription, delivered dialysis dose, residual renal function, serum albumin, hematocrit, anemia management, and patient status. RESULTS: The survey included 785 patients using continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) and 423 using automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) primarily in the form of continuous cycling peritoneal dialysis (CCPD). Except for the prescription mechanics and a greater likelihood that African-Americans would use CAPD, the groups did not differ substantially from one another. Evaluation of patient weight (W), body mass index (BMI), residual renal function, average serum albumin, protein equivalent of nitrogen appearance (nPNA), and dialysis efficiency as weekly fractional urea nitrogen removal (wKt/Vurea) and weekly creatinine clearance (wCrCl) revealed a picture of reasonable dialysis delivery and marginal protein nutrition. Additionally, there was little evidence that "dialysis efficiency," over the range assessed, had a major influence on nutritional status. Despite a tendency toward obesity (body weight = 76.6+/-20.0 kg and BMI = 27+/-7), 47% of patients had an average serum albumin below"normal" (3.5 g/dL by bromcresol green) and 70% had a nPNA below 1.0 g/kg/day. CONCLUSIONS: Peritoneal dialysis patients appear to have marginal protein reserves despite surfeit energy stores.

1996 peritoneal dialysis--core indicators report.

The 1996 Peritoneal Dialysis-Core Indicators Study (PD-CIS) retrospectively reviews a random sample of peritoneal dialysis patients from the United States End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) program. Peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients are more likely to have a primary diagnosis of glomerulonephritis, less likely to be of African-American heritage, and are younger than hemodialysis patients. One third of PD patients now perform some form of automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) rather than continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). The dialysis prescriptions currently employed do not appear to be based on kinetic principles, and the intensity of dialysis achieved is below the proposed minimal guidelines for 30% of patients. In 1996, the mean dialysis index or wKt/Vurea for CAPD patients was 2.0 +/- 0.5 and was not significantly altered from the 1995 value of 2.1. Eighty-four percent of CAPD patients perform four or fewer exchanges daily, and only 27% of patients have prescriptions using infusion volumes greater than 2 L. Although hematocrits have improved since 1995, 30% of PD patients have a hematocrit below 30%. The mean serum albumin for PD patients is 3.5 g/dL, and 25% of patients have a 6-month average serum albumin value below 3.2 g/dL. In general, the indices monitored as predictive of health and well-being of PD patients afford significant opportunity for improvement.

Changes in dialysis units' quality improvement practices from 1994 to 1996.

In 1994, the Health Care Financing Administration initiated a nationwide effort to improve care to Medicare's end stage renal disease (ESRD) beneficiaries by reshaping the manner in which the ESRD Network Organizations measure and assess the quality of dialysis services. The new approach was named the ESRD Health Care Quality Improvement Program (HCQIP). It embodies themes such as the development of quality indicators and support for continuous improvement. Projects such as the ESRD Core Indicators Project and the National Anemia Cooperative Project are geared toward assisting dialysis providers to improve patient care. In an effort to document changes in dialysis quality practices associated with the ESRD HCQIP, surveys were sent by Network staff to the head nurses of all dialysis units in 1994, and a random sample of units in 1996. Analysis of the survey responses was performed identifying self-reported changes in dialysis units' quality improvement activities. Results indicate that practice changes are taking place, that they are generalizable to all dialysis units in the country, and that they are associated with improvement in patient outcomes. Trends in quality improvement activities are identified and conclusions are drawn about what impact these activities have on patient care.

Evaluation of two intervention strategies to stimulate quality improvement projects in the hospital: the H. pylori example.

A multistate quality improvement project conducted to improve the care of hospitalized Medicare patients with peptic ulcer disease is described. This randomized control study design compared the effectiveness of two intervention strategies (mailed information vs. on-site presentations with feedback) in stimulating hospitals to conduct diagnostic journeys to determine root causes for performance deficits and to develop and implement plans to improve performance.

Quality improvement activity directed at the national level: examples from the Health Care Financing Administration.

Quality improvement projects coordinated by the Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) are currently underway to improve the care provided to Medicare beneficiaries. We describe five national quality improvement projects, the End Stage Renal Disease Core Indicators Project, the National Anemia Cooperative Project, the Ambulatory Care Quality Improvement Project, and the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project. We outline the types of intervention strategies employed and compare the approaches used for fee-for-service sites and for managed care plans.

Improvement in adequacy of delivered dialysis for adult in-center hemodialysis patients in the United States, 1993 to 1995.

The objective of this review is to describe the adequacy of delivered dialysis provided to in-center hemodialysis patients in the United States and to compare the findings with published guidelines. The medical records of random samples of 6,138, 6,919, and 6,861 patients in hemodialysis facilities were studied from all Medicare-eligible adult in-center hemodialysis patients alive on December 31, 1993, 1994, and 1995, respectively. The main clinical measure used was the urea reduction ratio (URR), the mean of which was 0.63 in 1993, 0.64 in 1994, and 0.66 in 1995. The proportion of patients with URR > or = 0.65, as recommended by the Renal Physicians Association and a National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement, increased from 43% in 1993 to 49% in 1994 and 59% in 1995. In each of these 3 years, women were more likely than men to have a URR > or = 0.65 (1993: 54% v 31%, odds ratio 2.6; 1994: 61% v 38%, odds ratio 2.5; and 1995: 70% v 50%, odds ratio 24), as were older patients (65+ years) compared with younger patients (18 to 44 years) (1993: 47% v 37%, odds ratio 1.4; 1994: 54% v 45%, odds ratio 1.5; and 1995: 65% v 53%, odds ratio 1.6) and white patients compared with black patients (1993: 46% v 36%, odds ratio 1.5; 1994: 53% v 43%, odds ratio 1.5; and 1995: 63% v 54%, odds ratio 1.4). There was also substantial geographic variation in the proportion of patients receiving hemodialysis with a URR > or = 0.65. In conclusion, marked differences existed in 1993, 1994, and 1995 between observed practice and consensus guidelines for the delivery of adequate dialysis. Nevertheless, notable improvement occurred during this time period. A system to monitor further improvements in hemodialysis care in the United States is in place.