Preparing Future Doctors for Telemedicine: An Asynchronous Curriculum for Medical Students Implemented During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

PROBLEM: The COVID-19 pandemic led to changes in both the clinical environment and medical education. The abrupt shift to telemedicine in March 2020, coupled with the recommendation that medical students pause in-person clinical rotations, highlighted the need for student training in telemedicine. APPROACH: To maintain students' ability to participate in clinical encounters and continue learning in the new virtual environment, a telemedicine curriculum for clinical students was rapidly developed at Harvard Medical School (HMS) focusing on the knowledge and skills needed to conduct live video encounters. Curriculum leads created an interactive, flexible curriculum to teach students clinical skills, regulatory issues, professionalism, and innovations in telemedicine. This 5-module curriculum was delivered using various primarily asynchronous modalities including webinar-style presentations, prerecorded videos of physical exams from different disciplines, shadowing a synchronous telemedicine visit, peer discussions in small groups, and quizzes with both multiple-choice and open-ended questions. OUTCOMES: During May 2020, 252 clerkship and postclerkship medical students at HMS completed the telemedicine curriculum. All students completed a precourse survey and 216 (85.7%) completed the postcourse survey. Students' self-rated knowledge of telemedicine increased, on average, from 38 (15.1%) reporting being fairly/very knowledgeable over 4 domains before the course to 182 (84.3%) afterward (P < .001). The course was highly rated, with 176/205 (85.9%) students reporting that it met their learning needs and 167/205 (81.5%) finding the delivery methods to be effective. Of 101 (45.3%) students who answered an open-ended postcourse survey question, 91 (90.1%) reported asynchronous learning to be a positive experience. NEXT STEPS: As telemedicine becomes increasingly and likely permanently integrated into the health care system, providing medical students with robust training in conducting care virtually will be essential. This curriculum provides a promising and feasible framework upon which other schools can apply these emerging competencies to design their own telemedicine curricula.

Twelve tips for providing feedback to peers about their teaching.

When healthcare professionals provide feedback to peers after a teaching observation, there are benefits for both parties. In this article, we outline strategies to use before, during, and after teaching observations to engage in mutually-beneficial conversations that highlight best practices, identify solutions for teaching dilemmas, and initiate teaching relationships. We discuss the importance of choosing words wisely; giving feedback about teaching skills, not the teacher as a person; recognizing how colleagues view their teaching identities; and ensuring peers are emotionally ready for a post-observation conversation. We also explain how to use pronouns, questions, and active listening during feedback conversations. Finally, we explore the impact of biases on observations, how to establish peer observer credibility, and how to make the teaching observation process and feedback discussion valuable experiences for both parties so that it leads to long-lasting partnerships in the quest to improve educational quality.

Observation of clinical teaching: interest in a faculty development program for surgeons.

OBJECTIVES: Observation of clinical teaching is a powerful tool to develop faculty teaching skills. However, the process of being observed can be intimidating for any educator. Our aim is to assess interest in an Observation of Teaching Program within an academic surgical department. DESIGN: An electronic survey asking faculty to indicate interest in participation in a faculty development program that consists of a peer, expert, and/or cross-disciplinary physician observation of teaching was used. Faculty members were also asked whether they would like to observe other faculty as part of a peer-review track. The results were compiled for descriptive statistical analysis. SETTING: Electronic survey. PARTICIPANTS: In all, 46 faculty, all of whom have assigned medical student and resident teaching responsibilities, were introduced to the Observation of Teaching Program and surveyed on their interest in participating. RESULTS: A total of 87% (40/46) of faculty responded after 2 e-mails and 75% (30/40) indicated interest in the Observation of Teaching Program. All faculty who responded positively indicated interest in expert review (30/30), 90% (27/30) in peer review, 87% (26/30) in surgeon review, and 83% (25/30) in cross-disciplinary physician review. A total of 48% (19/40) indicated interest in observing others. Of those who were not interested in the Observation of Teaching Program, restrictions on time (4/10), not enough clinical care responsibilities (2/10), not wanting to be watched (2/10), and program did not seem effective (1/10) were cited as reasons for not participating. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical faculty are interested in being observed and receiving feedback about their clinical teaching by experts, peers, colleagues, and cross-disciplinary physicians. Professional development programs for surgeons should consider observation as a teaching methodology.