Baroreflex sensitivity assessed with the sequence method is associated with ventricular arrhythmias in patients implanted with a defibrillator for the primary prevention of sudden cardiac death.

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular ejection fraction lacks accuracy in predicting sudden cardiac death, resulting in unnecessary implantation of cardioverter defibrillators for the primary prevention of sudden cardiac death. Baroreflex sensitivity could help to stratify patients at risk of ventricular arrhythmia. AIM: To assess the association between cardiac baroreflex sensitivity and ventricular arrhythmias in patients implanted with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator for the primary prevention of sudden cardiac death after myocardial infarction. METHODS: This case-control single-centre study took place between 2015 and 2016. Cases (n=10) had experienced ventricular arrhythmias treated by the implantable cardioverter defibrillator in the previous 3 years; controls (n=22) had no arrhythmia during the same period. Baroreflex sensitivity was assessed using the temporal sequence method (mean slope) and cross-spectral analysis (low-frequency gain and high-frequency gain). RESULTS: The mean age was 65 years; 94% of the patients were men. 24-hour Holter electrocardiogram autonomous nervous system variables, left ventricular ejection fraction and N-terminal prohormone of B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) concentration did not differ between cases and controls. The mean slope was lower in cases than in controls (8 vs. 15ms/mmHg [P=0.009] in the supine position; 7 vs. 12ms/mmHg [P=0.038] in the standing position). The mean slope in the supine position was still significantly different between groups after adjustment for age, left ventricular ejection fraction and NT-proBNP (P=0.03). By comparison, low-frequency gain and high-frequency gain did not differ between groups in either the supine or the standing position. CONCLUSION: Patients with ventricular arrhythmias had a lower mean slope compared with those who were free of arrhythmia. A prospective study is needed to confirm this association.

Prognostic value of plasma MR-proADM vs NT-proBNP for heart failure in people with type 2 diabetes: the SURDIAGENE prospective study.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) is the gold standard prognostic biomarker for diagnosis and occurrence of heart failure. Here, we compared its prognostic value for the occurrence of congestive heart failure with that of plasma mid-region pro-adrenomedullin (MR-proADM), a surrogate for adrenomedullin, a vasoactive peptide with vasodilator and natriuretic properties, in people with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: Plasma MR-proADM concentration was measured in baseline samples of a hospital-based cohort of consecutively recruited participants with type 2 diabetes. Our primary endpoint was heart failure requiring hospitalisation. RESULTS: We included 1438 participants (age 65 ± 11 years; 604 women and 834 men). Hospitalisation for heart failure occurred during follow-up (median 64 months) in 206 participants; the incidence rate of heart failure was 2.5 (95% CI 2.2, 2.9) per 100 person-years. Plasma concentrations of MR-proADM and NT-proBNP were significantly associated with heart failure in a Cox multivariable analysis model when adjusted for age, diabetes duration, history of coronary heart disease, proteinuria and baseline eGFR (adjHR [95%CI] 1.83 [1.51, 2.21] and 2.20 [1.86, 2.61], respectively, per 1 SD log10 increment, both p < 0.001). MR-proADM contributed significant supplementary information to the prognosis of heart failure when we considered the clinical risk factors (integrated discrimination improvement [IDI, mean ± SEM] 0.021 ± 0.007, p = 0.001) (Table 3). Inclusion of NT-proBNP in the multivariable model including MR-proADM contributed significant complementary information on prediction of heart failure (IDI [mean ± SEM] 0.028 ± 0.008, p < 0.001). By contrast, MR-proADM did not contribute supplementary information on prediction of heart failure in a model including NT-proBNP (IDI [mean ± SEM] 0.003 ± 0.003, p = 0.27), with similar results for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and preserved ejection fraction. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: MR-proADM is a prognostic biomarker for heart failure in people with type 2 diabetes but gives no significant complementary information on prediction of heart failure compared with NT-proBNP.

Plasma copeptin, kidney disease, and risk for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in two cohorts of type 2 diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease and kidney damage are tightly associated in people with type 2 diabetes. Experimental evidence supports a causal role for vasopressin (or antidiuretic hormone) in the development of diabetic kidney disease (DKD). Plasma copeptin, the COOH-terminal portion of pre-provasopressin and a surrogate marker of vasopressin, was shown to be positively associated with the development and progression of DKD. Here we assessed the association of plasma copeptin with the risk of cardiovascular events during follow-up in two prospective cohorts of type 2 diabetic patients, and we examined if this association could be mediated by deleterious effects of vasopressin on the kidney. METHODS: We studied 3098 and 1407 type 2 diabetic patients from the French cohorts DIABHYCAR and SURDIAGENE, respectively. We considered the incidence during follow-up (median: 5 years) of a combined end point composed of myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, hospitalization for congestive heart failure, or cardiovascular death. Copeptin concentration was measured in baseline plasma samples by an immunoluminometric assay. RESULTS: The cumulative incidence of cardiovascular events during follow-up by sex-specific tertiles of baseline plasma copeptin was 15.6% (T1), 18.7% (T2) and 21.7% (T3) in DIABHYCAR (p = 0.002), and 27.7% (T1), 34.1% (T2) and 47.6% (T3) in SURDIAGENE (p < 0.0001). Cox proportional hazards survival regression analyses confirmed the association of copeptin with cardiovascular events in both cohorts: hazard ratio with 95% confidence interval for T3 vs. T1 was 1.29 (1.04-1.59), p = 0.02 (DIABHYCAR), and 1.58 (1.23-2.04), p = 0.0004 (SURDIAGENE), adjusted for sex, age, BMI, duration of diabetes, systolic blood pressure, arterial hypertension, HbA1c, total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, triglycerides, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), urinary albumin concentration (UAC), active tobacco smoking, and previous history of myocardial infarction at baseline. No interaction was observed between plasma copeptin and eGFR (p = 0.40) or UAC (p = 0.61) categories on the risk of cardiovascular events in analyses of pooled cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Plasma copeptin was positively associated with major cardiovascular events in people with type 2 diabetes. This association cannot be solely accounted for by the association of copeptin with kidney-related traits.

Association of Circulating Biomarkers (Adrenomedullin, TNFR1, and NT-proBNP) With Renal Function Decline in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A French Prospective Cohort.

OBJECTIVE: We explored the prognostic value of three circulating candidate biomarkers-midregional-proadrenomedullin (MR-proADM), soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 (sTNFR1), and N-terminal prohormone brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP)-for change in renal function in patients with type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Outcomes were defined as renal function loss (RFL), ≥40% decline of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) from baseline, and rapid renal function decline (RRFD), absolute annual eGFR slope <-5 mL/min/year. We used a proportional hazard model for RFL and a logistic model for RRFD. Adjustments were performed for established risk factors (age, sex, diabetes duration, HbA1c, blood pressure, baseline eGFR, and urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio [uACR]). C-statistics were used to assess the incremental predictive value of the biomarkers to these risk factors. RESULTS: Among 1,135 participants (mean eGFR 76 mL/min, median uACR 2.6 mg/mmol, and median GFR slope -1.6 mL/min/year), RFL occurred in 397, RRFD developed in 233, and 292 died during follow-up. Each biomarker predicted RFL and RRFD. When combined, MR-proADM, sTNFR1, and NT-proBNP predicted RFL independently from the established risk factors (adjusted hazard ratio 1.59 [95% CI 1.34-1.89], P < 0.0001; 1.33 [1.14-1.55], P = 0.0003; and 1.22 [1.07-1.40], P = 0.004, respectively) and RRFD (adjusted odds ratio 1.56 [95% CI 1.7-2.09], P = 0.003; 1.72 [1.33-2.22], P < 0.0001; and 1.28 [1.03-1.59], P = 0.02, respectively). The combination of the three biomarkers yielded the highest discrimination (difference in C-statistic = 0.054, P < 0.0001; 0.067, P < 0.0001 for RFL; and 0.027, P < 0.0001 for RRFD). CONCLUSIONS: In addition to established risk factors, MR-proADM, sTNFR1, and NT-proBNP improve risk prediction of loss of renal function in patients with type 2 diabetes.

ANGPTL2 is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events and death in diabetic patients.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: A high serum angiopoietin-like 2 (ANGPTL2) concentration is an independent risk factor for developing diabetes and is associated with insulin resistance and atherosclerosis. In this work, we have examined the impact of serum ANGPTL2 on improving cardiovascular (CV) risk stratification in patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: A prospective, monocentric cohort of consecutive type 2 diabetes patients (the SURDIAGENE cohort; total of 1353 type 2 diabetes patients; 58% men, mean ± SD age 64 ± 11 years) was followed for a median of 6.0 years for death as primary endpoint and major adverse CV events (MACE; i.e. CV death, myocardial infarction or stroke) as a secondary endpoint. Patients with end-stage renal disease, defined as a requirement for dialysis or a history of kidney transplantation, were excluded. Patients were grouped into quartiles according to ANGPTL2 concentrations at inclusion: <11.2 (Q1), 11.2-14.7 (Q2), 14.8-19.5 (Q3) or >19.5 (Q4) ng/ml. RESULTS: During follow up, 367 patients (representing 4.5% of the total person-years) died and 290 patients (representing 3.7% of the total person-years) presented with MACE. Both the survival and MACE-free survival rates were significantly different between ANGPTL2 quartiles (logrank 82.12, p < 0.0001 for death; and logrank 65.14, p < 0.0001 for MACE). Patients with ANGPTL2 concentrations higher than 19.5 ng/ml (Q4) had a significantly higher risk of death and MACE than those with ANGPTL2 levels of 19.5 ng/ml or less (Q1-3) (HR for death 2.44 [95% CI 1.98, 3.00], p < 0.0001; HR for MACE 2.43 [95% CI 1.92, 3.06], p < 0.0001) after adjustment for sex, age and established CV risk factors. Using ANGPTL2 concentrations, prediction of the risk of mortality, as assessed by integrated discrimination improvement (IDI), was significantly improved (IDI 0.006 ± 0.002, p = 0.0002). CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: In patients with type 2 diabetes, serum ANGPTL2 concentrations were independently associated with death and MACE. Therefore, ANGPTL2 is a promising candidate biomarker for improving risk stratification in type 2 diabetes patients, and may prove to be a valuable therapeutic target.

Plasma Adrenomedullin and Allelic Variation in the ADM Gene and Kidney Disease in People With Type 2 Diabetes.

Production of adrenomedullin (ADM), a vasodilator peptide, increases in response to ischemia and hypoxia in the vascular wall and the kidney. This may be an adaptive response providing protection against organ damage. We investigated the hypothesis that ADM has a nephroprotective effect in two prospective cohorts of patients with type 2 diabetes recruited in France. The highest tertile of plasma MR-proADM (a surrogate for ADM) concentration at baseline was associated with the risk of renal outcomes (doubling of plasma creatinine concentration and/or progression to end-stage renal disease) during follow-up in both cohorts. Four SNPs in the ADM gene region were associated with plasma MR-proADM concentration at baseline and with eGFR during follow-up in both cohorts. The alleles associated with lower eGFR were also associated with lower plasma MR-proADM level. In conclusion, plasma MR-proADM concentration was associated with renal outcome in patients with type 2 diabetes. Our data suggest that the ADM gene modulates the genetic susceptibility to nephropathy progression. Results are consistent with the hypothesis of a reactive rise of ADM in diabetic nephropathy, blunted in risk alleles carriers, and with a nephroprotective effect of ADM. A possible therapeutic effect of ADM receptor agonists in diabetic renal disease would be worth investigating.