Disparities in the Utilization of MRI for Prostate Cancer Detection: A Population-Based Study.

BACKGROUND: Racial disparities exist in prostate cancer (PCa) care and outcomes. Ultrasound-guided biopsy may miss a significant portion of clinically significant PCa while magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) improves its detection. This study aims to investigate demographic and SES factors influencing MRI utilization for PCa detection. METHODS: SEER-Medicare data were used to assess use of pre-diagnostic MRI in 90,908 patients diagnosed with primary PCa (2012-2019). Modified Poisson regression models adjusted for socioeconomic factors such as income, education, Medicare buy-in and dual eligibility were used to examine factors associated with MRI use. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: Pre-diagnostic MRI utilization increased substantially between 2012 (3.8%) and 2019 (32.6%). The disparity in utilization between non-Hispanic Black and non-Hispanic White patients decreased by more than half from 43% (RR = 0.57, 95%CI = 0.48-0.67) in 2012 to 20% (RR = 0.80, 95%CI = 0.74-0.86) in 2019. Rural residents were 35% less likely (RR = 0.65, 95%CI = 0.61-0.69) to undergo MRI, while those in the Central US (vs West) were 49% less likely (RR = 0.49, 95%CI = 0.48-0.51). No significant disparities in MRI use were identified between ages ≥75 and 64-75. SES factors associated with MRI were income, education, Medicare buy-in and dual eligibility. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed increased MRI utilization over time including among those 75 and older. Racial disparities decreased, while wide urban/rural disparities remained. Targeted public health interventions should focus on geographical factors, as "urban/rural designations" and "US region" were associated with the most prominent disparities. Future research should explore pathways contributing to these disparities, using a multidisciplinary approach, including geographical studies, to help eliminate healthcare inequities.

Treatment Intensification With Novel Hormonal Therapy in Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer: Patient Identification and Clinical Rationale.

The clinical rationale for treatment of castration-sensitive prostate cancer (CSPC) with novel hormonal therapy (NHT) or androgen receptor pathway inhibitor is reviewed. A PubMed search was conducted to identify relevant publications on NHTs for CSPC treatment. Level 1 clinical evidence demonstrated that intensification of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with NHT prolongs life and improves or maintains quality of life in patients with metastatic CSPC (mCSPC). Despite these results, real-world evidence demonstrated that 47%-88% of patients with mCSPC are treated with single agent ADT. Possible explanations for the underutilization of NHTs include patient characteristics, misperceptions about the overall survival benefit, lack of physician and patient awareness of the magnitude of clinical trial results, physician bias, safety concerns, misconceptions about the magnitude of prostate-specific antigen response needed for patient improvement, and barriers to NHT access. For patients with biochemical recurrence and no evidence of metastatic disease, limited clinical data exist with no consensus on an effective treatment strategy. Therefore, treatment strategies are developed using patient risk stratification according to clinicopathological characteristics, genomics, and next-generation imaging. Patients with high-risk biochemical recurrence may benefit from the early initiation of NHT based on outcomes from the phase III EMBARK trial. Lifestyle management is also an important aspect of treatment for CSPC, helping to mitigate the side effects of hormonal treatment and ensuring patients can maintain treatment while optimizing quality of life. In conclusion, to improve outcomes in patients with mCSPC, it is important to implement solutions addressing the barriers to underutilization of treatment intensification.

Fatigue Management in Advanced Prostate Cancer: Real-World Insights From Qualitative Interviews With Patients.

BACKGROUND: Patients with advanced prostate cancer (PC) commonly experience fatigue related to the disease itself and its treatment, which affects their quality of life. There are limited real-world data available on patients' experiences of fatigue while receiving PC treatment and its management. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a cross-sectional, noninterventional qualitative study involving individual concept-elicitation interviews with patients in the United States. Patients with advanced PC aged ≥18 years who had experienced fatigue and were on androgen-deprivation therapy in combination with second-generation androgen receptor pathway inhibitors were interviewed and their experiences quantified. RESULTS: Of the 143 patients screened, 13 qualified and 11 completed the interview. Most patients used the term "fatigue" (n = 8) to describe their experiences of tiredness, exhaustion, lack of energy, and weakness. Most patients (n = 8) did not receive any form of educational support from their healthcare providers (HCPs), but some expressed an interest in receiving this support (pamphlets, n = 4; discussion with HCPs, n = 4; online resources, n = 3). Most patients (n = 9) self-discovered fatigue-management strategies over the course of their disease and treatment. Patients found that rigorous exercise (n = 5), regular naps (n = 2), increased rest (n = 3), and a healthy diet (n = 3) were the most effective approaches for managing their fatigue. CONCLUSION: Tools are needed to support HCPs with counseling patients with PC for effective management of disease- and treatment-related fatigue.

Real-world outcomes following biochemical recurrence after definitive therapy with a short prostate-specific antigen doubling time: potential role of early secondary treatment.

BACKGROUND: The natural history of biochemical recurrence (BCR) managed with delayed hormonal therapy is well documented by data from Johns Hopkins. However, as many patients receive treatment prior to metastasis, we evaluated the natural history and role of prostate-specific antigen doubling time (PSADT) in a more contemporary cohort of BCR patients with nonmetastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (nmCSPC). METHODS: Patients in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA; 01/01/06 to 06/22/20) with nmCSPC and BCR were divided into rapid ( ≤9 months) and less rapid ( >9 to ≤15 months) PSADT cohorts. Patients with PSADT >15 months were excluded as outcomes, even with delayed treatment, are excellent. Outcomes included time to first antineoplastic therapy after BCR, metastasis, metastasis-free survival (MFS), and overall survival (OS). Cox models adjusted for baseline demographics and clinical characteristics. RESULTS: Overall, 781 patients with BCR were identified (502 rapid; 279 less rapid PSADT). Rapid PSADT was associated with shorter time to first systemic antineoplastic therapy (median 11.4 vs. 28.3 months, adjusted hazard ratio [95% confidence interval] 2.17 [1.83-2.57]), metastasis (102.4 months vs. not reached, 1.79 [1.33-2.40]), MFS (76.1 vs. 106.3 months, 1.73 [1.33-2.24]), and OS (120.5 vs. 140.5 months, 1.76 [1.22-2.54]) versus less rapid PSADT. CONCLUSION: Most patients with rapid PSADT underwent secondary treatment within 1 year after BCR. More contemporary patients treated with early secondary treatment had better outcomes than historical data from patients who had delayed treatment. Whether these results reflect the benefits of early secondary treatment or overall improvements in prostate cancer outcomes over time requires further study.

Does insulin resistance predict prostate cancer? Results from the Reduction by Dutasteride of Prostate Cancer (REDUCE) Trial.

PURPOSE: Prior studies testing the association between insulin resistance (IR) and prostate cancer (PC) risk are inconsistent. We examined the association between Homeostatic Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR; calculated from fasting baseline insulin and glucose) and PC in REDUCE, a 4-year randomized trial of dutasteride vs. placebo for PC prevention. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: All patients had prestudy negative biopsies and underwent study mandated biopsies at 2 and 4 years regardless of prostate-specific antigen. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to investigate the associations between log-transformed or categorized HOMA-IR scores and PC risk. Multinominal regression was used to assess associations between HOMA-IR scores and tumor grade (low grade [grade group 1]; high-grade [grade groups 2-5]). RESULTS: Among 5430 REDUCE participants (1212 with PC; 856 low- and 356 high-grade), higher HOMA-IR was associated with lower PC risk (log-HOMA-IR: OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.80-0.99; p = .03; categorized HOMA-IR: p-trend = .04). When stratified by grade, HOMA-IR was significantly associated with reduced low-grade PC risk (log-HOMA-IR: OR, 0.84; 95% CI , 0.74-0.94; p = .003; categorized HOMA-IR: p-trend = .002) but was unrelated to high-grade PC (log-HOMA-IR: OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.86-1.21; p = .81; categorized HOMA-IR: p-trend = .26). Results were similar in placebo and treatment arms. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, higher HOMA-IR was associated with a reduced risk of low-grade PC but was not associated with high-grade disease. The mechanisms to explain these findings are unclear.

Mechanisms governing lineage plasticity and metabolic reprogramming in cancer.

Dynamic alterations in cellular phenotypes during cancer progression are attributed to a phenomenon known as 'lineage plasticity'. This process is associated with therapeutic resistance and involves concurrent shifts in metabolic states that facilitate adaptation to various stressors inherent in malignant growth. Certain metabolites also serve as synthetic reservoirs for chromatin modification, thus linking metabolic states with epigenetic regulation. There remains a critical need to understand the mechanisms that converge on lineage plasticity and metabolic reprogramming to prevent the emergence of lethal disease. This review attempts to offer an overview of our current understanding of the interplay between metabolic reprogramming and lineage plasticity in the context of cancer, highlighting the intersecting drivers of cancer hallmarks, with an emphasis on solid tumors.

Select black men are potential candidates for prostate hemi-ablation based on radical prostatectomy histopathology for intermediate-risk prostate cancer-a multicenter SEARCH cohort study.

IMPORTANCE AND OBJECTIVE: Partial gland ablation (PGA) is increasingly popular as a treatment for men with intermediate-risk prostate cancer (IR-PCa) to preserve functional outcomes while controlling their cancer. We aimed to determine the impact of race and clinical characteristics on the risk of upstaging (≥pT2c) and having adverse pathological outcomes including seminal vesicle invasion (SVI), extra prostatic extension (EPE) and lymph node invasion (LNI) at radical prostatectomy (RP) among men with IR disease eligible for PGA with hemi-ablation (HA). DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. SETTING: Multicenter. PARTICIPANTS AND MEASURES: We studied patients diagnosed with unilateral IR-PCa treated with RP between 1988 and 2020 at 9 different Veterans Affairs hospitals within the SEARCH cohort. We analyzed differences in clinicopathological characteristics and outcome variables (odds of ≥pT2c and SVI, EPE and LNI) by race using multivariable logistic regression after adjusting for covariates. RESULTS: Among 3127 patients, 33% were African American (AA) men with unilateral IR-PCa undergoing RP. Compared to non-AA men, AA individuals were younger (61 vs. 65 years, p < 0.001), presented with a higher prostate specific antigen (PSA) category (≥10 ng/ml; 34 vs. 26%, p < 0.001), and had a lower clinical stage (p < 0.001). Among the 2,798 (89.5%) with ≥pT2c stage, AA men exhibited higher ≥ pT2c rates (93 vs. 89%, p < 0.001), primarily due to increased pT2c staging (64 vs. 57%), where upstaging beyond pT2 was lower than non-AA men (29 vs. 32%). On multivariable analysis, AA men were found to have higher odds of ≥pT2c (odds ratio [OR]: 1.39 CI, 1.02-1.88, p = 0.04), lower odds of EPE (OR: 0.73 CI, 0.58-0.91, p < 0.01) and no statistically significant associations with LNI (OR: 0.79 CI, 0.42-1.46, p = 0.45) and SVI (OR: 1 CI, 0.74-1.35, p = 0.99) compared to non-AA men. On multivariable analysis, clinical features associated with higher odds of ≥pT2c were pre-operative PSA ≥ 15 (OR = 2.07, P = 0.01) and higher number of positive cores (HPC) on biopsy (OR = 1.36, P < 0.001). Similarly, PSA ≥ 15, Gleason grade ≥3 and HPC on biopsy were associated with higher odds of SVI, EPE and LNI, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In men with IR-PCa undergoing RP, AA men demonstrated an overall higher likelihood of ≥pT2c with lower upstaging beyond pT2, lower likelihood of EPE and no significant difference in likelihood of SVI and LNI compared to non-AA men. These findings support select AA men to be potential candidates for PGA, such as HA. Clinical factors are predictive of higher pathological stage and adverse pathological outcomes at RP and could be considered when selecting candidates for PGA.

Epidemiology, treatment patterns, and clinical outcomes in de novo oligometastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to better characterize the epidemiology, clinical outcomes, and current treatment patterns of de novo oligometastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (omHSPC) in the United States Veterans Affairs Health Care System. METHODS: In this observational retrospective cohort study, 400 de novo metastatic hormone-sensitive PC (mHSPC) patients diagnosed from January 2015 to December 2020 (follow-up through December 2021) were randomly selected. omHSPC was defined as five or less total metastases (excluding liver) by conventional imaging. Kaplan-Meier methods estimated overall survival (OS) and castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC)-free survival from mHSPC diagnosis date and a log-rank test compared these outcomes by oligometastatic status. RESULTS: Twenty percent (79 of 400) of de novo mHSPC patients were oligometastatic. Most baseline characteristics were similar by oligometastatic status; however, men with non-omHSPC had higher median prostate-specific antigen at diagnosis (151.7) than omHSPC (44.1). First-line (1L) novel hormonal therapy was similar between groups (20%); 1L chemotherapy was lower in omHSPC (5%) versus non-omHSPC (14%). More omHSPC patients received metastasis-directed therapy/prostate radiation therapy (14%) versus non-omHSPC (2%). Median OS and CRPC-free survival (in months) were higher in omHSPC versus non-omHSPC (44.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 33.9-not estimated vs. 26.2; 95% CI, 20.5-32.5, p = .0089 and 27.6; 95% CI, 22.1-37.2 vs. 15.3; 95% CI, 12.8-17.9, p = .0049), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 20% of de novo mHSPC were oligometastatic, and OS was significantly longer in omHSPC versus non-omHSPC. Although potentially "curative" therapy use was higher in omHSPC versus non-omHSPC, the percentages were still relatively low. Future studies are warranted given potential for prolonged responses with multimodal therapy inclusive of systemic and local therapies.

Real-world evidence of 18F-fluciclovine Positron emission tomography/computed tomography performance for recurrent prostate cancer in the Veterans Affairs Health System.

BACKGROUND: There are no population-level studies assessing 18F-fluciclovine (fluciclovine) utilization of Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for biochemically recurrent prostate cancer (PC). We assessed fluciclovine PET/CT in the Veterans Affairs Health Care System. METHODS: Of 1153 men with claims suggesting receipt of fluciclovine PET/CT, we randomly reviewed charts of 300 who indeed underwent fluciclovine PET/CT. The primary outcome was fluciclovine PET/CT result (positive or negative). Comparison among groups stratified by androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) (yes vs. no) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) (≤1 vs. >1 ng/mL) at imaging were performed. Logistic regression tested associations between PSA, ADT receipt, and race with fluciclovine PET/CT positive imaging. RESULTS: Fluciclovine PET/CT positivity rate was 33% for patients with PSA 0-0.5 ng/mL, 21% for >0.5-1.0, 54% for >1.0-2.0, and 66% for >2.0 (p < 0.01). A 59% positivity rate ocurred in patients treated with concurrent ADT versus 37% in those not on ADT (p < 0.01). White were more likely to have a positive scan versus Black patients (55% vs. 38%; p = 0.02). Patients whose primary treatment was radical prostatectomy had a lower positivity rate (33%) versus those treated with radiotherapy (55%) (p < 0.001). On multivariable logistic regression, PSA > 1 ng/mL (all men odds ratio [OR]: 4.06, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.07-7.96; men on ADT only OR: 4.42, 95% CI: 1.73-11.26) and use of ADT (OR: 3.94, 95% CI: 1.32-11.75), and White (all men OR: 2.22, 95% CI: 1.20-4.17) predicted positive fluciclovine PET/CT. CONCLUSION: This real-world study assessing 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT performance in an equal access health care system confirms higher detection rates than traditional imaging methods, but positivity is highly influenced by PSA at time of imaging. Additionally, patients currently receiving ADT have at least four times higher likelihood of a positive scan, showing that scan positivity isn't negatively affected by ADT status in this study. Finally, White men were more likely to have a positive scan, the reasons for which should be explored in future studies.

Reducing Racial Inequalities in Prostate Cancer Treatment: Healthcare Access Barriers.

Inequalities in healthcare for patients with prostate cancer can result in treatment and mortality disparities. Despite Black men with prostate cancer having higher incidence and mortality from prostate cancer, the study by Hammarlund and colleagues found that they are less likely to receive appropriate treatment compared with their White counterparts. Given that Black men with prostate cancer have similar or better survival when participating in clinical trials or receiving equal treatment from an equal access to healthcare system, identifying factors contributing to inequitable treatment is essential to improve the overall health and survival of Black men with prostate cancer. See related article by Hammarlund and colleagues, Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2024;33:435-41.

Prostate cancers with distinct transcriptional programs in Black and White men.

BACKGROUND: Black men are at a higher risk of prostate cancer (PC) diagnosis and present with more high-grade PC than White men in an equal access setting. This study aimed to identify differential transcriptional regulation between Black and White men with PC. METHODS: We performed microarray of radical prostatectomy tissue blocks from 305 Black and 238 White men treated at the Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Differential expression, gene set enrichment analysis, master regulator analysis, and network modeling were conducted to compare gene expression by race. Findings were validated using external datasets that are available in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. The first was a multi-institutional cohort of 1152 prostate cancer patients (596 Black, 556 White) with microarray data (GEO ID: GSE169038). The second was an Emory cohort of 106 patients (22 Black, 48 White, 36 men of unknown race) with RNA-seq data (GEO ID: GSE54460). Additionally, we analyzed androgen receptor (AR) chromatin binding profiles using paired AR ChIP-Seq datasets from Black and White men (GEO IDs: GSE18440 and GSE18441). RESULTS: We identified 871 differentially expressed genes between Black and White men. White men had higher activity of MYC-related pathways, while Black men showed increased activity of inflammation, steroid hormone responses, and cancer progression-related pathways. We further identified the top 10 transcription factors (TFs) in Black patients, which formed a transcriptional regulatory network centered on the AR. The activities of this network and the pathways were significantly different in Black vs. White men across multiple cohorts and PC molecular subtypes. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest PC in Black and White men have distinct tumor transcriptional profiles. Furthermore, a highly interactive TF network centered on AR drives differential gene expression in Black men. Additional study is needed to understand the degree to which these differences in transcriptional regulatory elements contribute to PC health disparities.

Prostate cancer in transgender women: A propensity score-matched analysis of disease severity and survival.

BACKGROUND: Despite the rise in gender-affirming care, our understanding of prostate cancer (PCa) in transgender women (TGW) remains in its infancy. Health disparities and lack of PCa awareness and screening are possible barriers to providing quality care for this population. In addition, the implication of hormonal manipulation for the aggressiveness of PCa in TGW is yet to be determined. Here, this study sought to compare oncological characteristics and survival outcomes between transgender and cisgender (CG) patients with PCa via two national data sets. METHODS: The Veterans Affairs Informatics and Computing Infrastructure database (1999-2020) and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database (2010-2017) were reviewed. Demographic and clinical details were analyzed. Logistic regression analysis was performed on propensity score-matched groups to identify predictors of high-risk disease and metastasis in patients with PCa. Groups were matched 5:1 (CG:TGW) on the basis of age, race, year of diagnosis, and Charlson Comorbidity Index score. Primary outcomes included metastatic presentation, high-risk localized disease, overall survival (OS), and prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM). RESULTS: A total of 1194 patients were included (199 TGW; 995 CG). Associations between transgender identity and metastatic presentation (odds ratio [OR], 0.38; p = .2), high-risk localized disease (OR, 1.19; p = .50), or PCSM (hazard ratio [HR], 0.65; p = .3) were not detected. Transgender identity was associated with improved OS (HR, 0.67; p = .014). CONCLUSIONS: PCa-specific outcomes seem comparable between TGW and CG men, although the study was underpowered to detect modest differences. Further investigation into the incidence and outcomes of PCa in TGW is warranted.

Metabolic Response to Androgen Deprivation Therapy of Prostate Cancer.

Prostate cancer (PC) stands as the most frequently diagnosed non-skin cancer and ranks as the second highest cause of cancer-related deaths among men in the United States. For those facing non-metastatic PC necessitating intervention, solely local treatments may not suffice, leading to a possible transition toward systemic therapies, including androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), chemotherapy, and therapies targeting androgen. Yet, these systemic treatments often bring about considerable adverse effects. Additionally, it is observed that overweight men are at a higher risk of developing aggressive forms of PC, advancing to metastatic stages, and succumbing to the disease. Consequently, there is a pressing demand for new treatment options that carry fewer side effects and enhance the current standard treatments, particularly for the majority of American men who are overweight or obese. In this article, we will review the metabolic response to ADT and how lifestyle modulation can mitigate these ADT-associated metabolic responses with a particular focus on the two clinical trials, Carbohydrate and Prostate Study 1 (CAPS1) and Carbohydrate and Prostate Study 2 (CAPS2), which tested the effects of low-carbohydrate diets on the metabolic side effects of ADT and PC progression, respectively. Furthermore, we will summarize the findings of serum metabolomic studies to elucidate the potential mechanisms by which ADT and low-carbohydrate diets can affect the metabolic response to mitigate the metabolic side effects while maximizing therapeutic efficacy.

Prostate-Specific Antigen Values in Transgender Women Receiving Estrogen.

This study examines prostate-specific antigen values among transgender women in the Veterans Health Administration receiving estrogen.

ONECUT2 acts as a lineage plasticity driver in adenocarcinoma as well as neuroendocrine variants of prostate cancer.

Androgen receptor- (AR-) indifference is a mechanism of resistance to hormonal therapy in prostate cancer (PC). Here we demonstrate that ONECUT2 (OC2) activates resistance through multiple drivers associated with adenocarcinoma, stem-like and neuroendocrine (NE) variants. Direct OC2 gene targets include the glucocorticoid receptor (GR; NR3C1) and the NE splicing factor SRRM4, which are key drivers of lineage plasticity. Thus, OC2, despite its previously described NEPC driver function, can indirectly activate a portion of the AR cistrome through epigenetic activation of GR. Mechanisms by which OC2 regulates gene expression include promoter binding, enhancement of genome-wide chromatin accessibility, and super-enhancer reprogramming. Pharmacologic inhibition of OC2 suppresses lineage plasticity reprogramming induced by the AR signaling inhibitor enzalutamide. These results demonstrate that OC2 activation promotes a range of drug resistance mechanisms associated with treatment-emergent lineage variation in PC and support enhanced efforts to therapeutically target OC2 as a means of suppressing treatment-resistant disease.

Patient Perceptions of Standardized Risk Language Used in ACR Prostate MRI PI-RADS Scores.

INTRODUCTION: Prostate MRI reports use standardized language to describe risk of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) from "equivocal" (Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System [PI-RADS] 3), "likely" (PI-RADS 4), to "highly likely" (PI-RADS 5). These terms correspond to risks of 11%, 37%, and 70% according to American Urological Association guidelines, respectively. We assessed how men perceive risk associated with standardized PI-RADS language. METHODOLOGY: We conducted a crowdsourced survey of 1,204 men matching a US prostate cancer demographic. We queried participants' risk perception associated with standardized PI-RADS language across increasing contexts: words only, PI-RADS sentence, full report, and full report with numeric estimate. Median perceived risk (interquartile range) and absolute under/overestimation compared with American Urological Association standards were reported. Multivariable linear mixed-effects analysis identified factors associated with accuracy of risk perception. RESULTS: Median perceived risks of csPCa (interquartile range) for the word-only context were "equivocal" 50% (50%-74%), "likely" 75% (68%-85%), and "highly likely" 87% (78%-92%), corresponding to +39%, +38%, and +17% overestimation, respectively. Median perceived risks for the PI-RADS-sentence context were 50% (50%-50%), 75% (68%-81%), and 90% (80%-94%) for PI-RADS 3, 4, and 5, corresponding to +39%, +38%, and +20% overestimation, respectively. Median perceived risks for the full-report context were 50% (35%-70%), 72% (50%-80%), and 84% (54%-91%) for PI-RADS 3, 4, and 5, corresponding to +39%, +35%, and +14% overestimation, respectively. For the full-report-with-numeric-estimate context describing a PI-RADS 4 lesion, median perceived risk was 70% (50%-%80), corresponding to +33% overestimation. Including numeric estimates increased correct perception of risk from 3% to 11% (P < .001), driven by men with higher numeracy (odds ratio 1.24, P = .04). CONCLUSION: Men overestimate risk of csPCa associated with standardized PI-RADS language regardless of context, especially for PI-RADS 3 and 4 lesions. Changes to PI-RADS language or data-sharing policies for imaging reports should be considered.

Applications of wearable activity monitors for prostate cancer survivors: A systematic scoping review.

BACKGROUND: Wearable technology is used to monitor and motivate physical activity (PA) and provides continuous, objective PA and sleep data outside the clinical setting. We reviewed the literature to understand how wearables are integrated into prostate cancer (PC) investigations in order to identify current practices, gaps, and research opportunities. METHODS: We conducted a literature search for articles using wearables, among PC survivors published between 2012 and 2022. We extracted study details, interventions and outcomes, participant baseline characteristics, and device characteristics and grouped them by study type: randomized control trials (RCTs) and non-randomized studies. RESULTS: Of 354 articles screened, 44 met eligibility criteria (23 RCTs, and 21 non-randomized). 89% used wearables to monitor PA metrics, 11%, sleep metrics, and 6.8%, both. Most studies involved exercise (70% RCTs, 9% non-randomized studies) or lifestyle interventions (30% RCTs, 9% non-randomized studies). Intervention delivery methods included personalized computer-based (48%), in-person (e.g., trainer) (20%), and education web or print-based (20%). Interventions occurred at the participant's home (48%) or at a gym (20%). 57% of the studies evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of the wearable as an activity-measuring device or as part of a remotely delivered computer-based intervention. Studies used wearables to monitor adherence to PA interventions, motivate behavior change, to assess patient outcomes (e.g., patient function, quality of life, mood), or as data collection tools. CONCLUSIONS: Wearables are primarily being used to assess daily activity and monitor adherence to exercise interventions in clinical studies involving PC survivors. Findings suggest that they are feasible for use in this population. More research is needed to understand how to integrate wearables into routine clinical care, expand their use to predict clinical outcomes, or to deliver tailored interventions for PC survivors.

Challenges and Opportunities in Establishing Appropriate Intermediate Endpoints Reflecting Patient Benefit: A Roadmap for Research and Clinical Application in Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer.

Defining meaningful endpoints for research of early-stage high-risk prostate cancer is challenging, with established measures such as overall survival and metastasis-free survival facing limitations related to feasibility and adequate reflection of patient relevance. Developing endpoints must cater to diverse perspectives across scientific, clinical, regulatory, and patient viewpoints. Endpoints such as pathological complete response, no evidence of disease, and prevention of prostate-specific antigen relapse may reflect patient benefit by accounting for diagnostic and treatment burdens.