Use of Identical INN "Imiglucerase" for Different Drug Products: Impact Analysis of Adverse Events in a Proprietary Global Safety Database.

INTRODUCTION: Approved in 1994 and assigned the International Nonproprietary Name (INN) imiglucerase by the World Health Organization, Cerezyme® (Sanofi Genzyme) is an enzyme replacement therapy used to treat Gaucher disease in > 90 countries. At least two therapies approved outside the USA and the European Union, Abcertin® and Asbroder®, have adopted the identical INN imiglucerase. Both drugs were approved via regulatory pathways not aligned with World Health Organization Similar Biotherapeutic Product guidelines. OBJECTIVE: We analyzed whether the use of the identical INN "imiglucerase" for these drugs impacts adverse event (AE) reporting in the Sanofi Global Safety Database. METHODS: First, we reviewed all imiglucerase individual case safety reports (referred to as cases) including AE data reported between January 2012 and March 2018 that contained Abcertin or Asbroder in the narrative. In a second analysis, we examined cases from Mexico reported between May 2013 and March 2018 to assess changes in imiglucerase reporting following the 2015 approval of Asbroder in Mexico. RESULTS: Fifty-six cases mentioning Asbroder and none mentioning Abcertin were retrieved in the first analysis. Upon close review, the AEs of 45 cases (80.4%) were attributed to Asbroder, one (1.8%) to Cerezyme; the specific drug attribution for the AEs of ten cases (17.9%) could not be determined. In the second analysis, a substantial increase in cases and AEs was observed in the period after Asbroder approval (73 cases with 150 AEs pre-approval vs 132 cases with 333 AEs post-approval). Twenty-three of 132 (17.4%) post-approval cases reported discontinuation of treatment (19 related to Asbroder AEs, and four related to Cerezyme AEs). Infusion-associated reactions occurred in 25/132 cases (17 Asbroder related, six Cerezyme related, two indeterminate). CONCLUSIONS: This analysis demonstrates two potential consequences of identical INN use between Cerezyme and Asbroder: (1) an aggregate safety profile for Cerezyme that includes other products using the identical INN leading to inaccurate pharmacovigilance data and (2) healthcare providers switching, substituting, or potentially assuming interchangeability between the products. Identical INN use without the brand name differentiator may compromise pharmacovigilance data, potentially masking differences in safety profiles between products.

The objective of this study was to assess the consequences of multiple drugs using the identical International Nonproprietary Name (INN) "imiglucerase" on adverse event reporting in the Sanofi Genzyme Global Safety Database. The World Health Organization established the INN system to identify drugs that are made of the same pharmaceutical substance and recommends that different products have distinct INN names. The INN imiglucerase was assigned in 1994 to Cerezyme^® (Sanofi Genzyme), an orphan drug for the treatment of a rare disease known as Gaucher disease. In 2015, Asbroder^® (ISU Abxis) was approved for Gaucher disease in Mexico and has adopted the INN imiglucerase. It was not approved as a biosimilar to Cerezyme. Most importantly, in a significant proportion of the adverse event cases reported, patients received a combination therapy of Asbroder and Cerezyme or Asbroder and "imiglucerase", suggesting that the shared INN may have led to misconceived interchangeability of these products. Such confusion among healthcare providers poses a potentially serious risk to patient safety and health. These results are especially worrisome because they relate to products sharing an INN that were not approved as biosimilars. The findings from this study are also consistent with the view that Cerezyme and Asbroder may have different safety profiles. The implications of drug products having the same INN are discussed in the article as well as recommended solutions. To our knowledge, this is one of the first reports on real-world safety experience with biologics sharing the same INN name.

Throwing a spotlight on under-recognized manifestations of Gaucher disease: Pulmonary involvement, lymphadenopathy and Gaucheroma.

BACKGROUND: Gaucher disease (GD) is a rare lysosomal storage disorder classically subdivided into type 1 (non-neuronopathic) GD, and types 2 and 3 (neuronopathic) GD. It is typically characterized by clinical manifestations including anemia, thrombocytopenia, hepatosplenomegaly, bone lesions, and (in more severe forms) neurological impairment. However, less-commonly reported and often under-recognized manifestations exist, which potentially have a significant impact on patient outcomes. Greater efforts are needed to understand, recognize, and manage these manifestations. OBJECTIVES: This review provides a synthesis of published information about three under-recognized GD manifestations (pulmonary involvement, lymphadenopathy, and Gaucheroma) and recommends diagnostic, management, and treatment strategies based on the available literature and author experience. The authors aim to raise awareness about these serious, progressive, and sometimes life-threatening conditions, which are often diagnosed late in life. CONCLUSIONS: Little is known about the incidence, pathophysiology, prognostic factors, and optimal management of pulmonary involvement, lymphadenopathy, and Gaucheroma in patients with GD. Enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) has shown limited efficacy for the prevention and treatment of these manifestations. More research is needed to evaluate the potential effect of substrate reduction therapy (SRT) with glucosylceramide synthase (GCS) inhibitors, and to develop additional approaches to treat these GD manifestations. Improvements in data collection registries and international data-sharing are required to better understand the impact of these manifestations on GD patients, help develop effective management strategies, and, ultimately, improve patient outcomes.

Long-term adverse event profile from four completed trials of oral eliglustat in adults with Gaucher disease type 1.

BACKGROUND: Eliglustat is a first-line oral treatment for adults with Gaucher disease type 1 who have an extensive, intermediate or poor CYP2D6 metabolizer phenotype (> 90% of patients). Whereas enzyme replacement therapy for Gaucher disease has been widely used for more than two decades, eliglustat has only been in commercial use since 2014. Clinicians and patients want to better understand which adverse events are most commonly associated with eliglustat, as well as their severity, frequency, and duration. METHODS: This pooled analysis of treatment-emergent adverse events combines data from four completed eliglustat clinical trials involving 393 Gaucher disease type 1 patients. It represents 1400 patient-years of eliglustat exposure and a mean treatment duration of 3.6 years (maximum: 9.3 years). RESULTS: Eighty-one percent of patients remained in their respective trial until commercial availability of eliglustat (US patients only) or until trial completion. Nine patients (2.3%) withdrew from their respective trial due to one or more adverse events reported as eliglustat treatment-related; all but one of these events were mild or moderate. Overall, 97% of adverse events were mild or moderate and 86% were reported by the investigator as unrelated to eliglustat treatment. The overall rate of adverse events decreased over time and did not increase with increasing eliglustat dose. We evaluated frequency, duration, and severity of 14 adverse event terms reported at least once as treatment-related in 2% or more of all patients: dyspepsia (5.9%), headache (5.3%), abdominal pain upper (5.1%), dizziness (5.1%), diarrhea (4.6%), nausea (4.6%), arthralgia (3.6%), constipation (3.3%), abdominal pain (2.8%), gastroesophageal reflux disease (2.8%), fatigue (2.8%), palpitations (2.8%), abdominal distension (2.5%), and gastritis (2.3%). For abdominal pain upper, diarrhea, nausea, abdominal pain, and headache events, median duration was less than 14 days. All 14 adverse event terms, except for arthralgia and headache, were reported only once per patient in more than 70% of patients experiencing the event. CONCLUSIONS: This final pooled analysis of treatment-emergent adverse events reinforces the favorable safety profile of eliglustat. The majority of the most frequently reported treatment-related adverse events were mild or moderate, transient, and occurred only once per patient.