Long-Term Outcomes in KEYNOTE-052: Phase II Study Investigating First-Line Pembrolizumab in Cisplatin-Ineligible Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Cancer.

PURPOSE: The phase II single-arm KEYNOTE-052 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of first-line pembrolizumab for patients with locally advanced or metastatic cisplatin-ineligible urothelial carcinoma (UC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three hundred seventy patients received pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks for up to 24 months. Positive tumor programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression was defined as combined positive score (CPS) ≥ 10. Response was assessed by independent central review every 9 weeks per RECIST v1.1. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR). RESULTS: At data cutoff (September 26, 2018), the minimum follow-up was 2 years since the last patient enrolled. ORR was 28.6% (95% CI, 24.1% to 33.5%); 33 patients (8.9%) and 73 patients (19.7%) achieved complete and partial response, respectively. The median duration of response was 30.1 months (95% CI, 18.1 months to not reached [NR]); responses lasted ≥ 12 and ≥ 24 months in 67% and 52% of patients, respectively. Forty patients with complete or partial response completed 2 years of study treatment, and 32 had ongoing response at completion. Median overall survival (OS) was 11.3 months (95% CI, 9.7 to 13.1 months), and 12- and 24-month OS rates were 46.9% and 31.2%, respectively. In patients with CPS ≥ 10, ORR was 47.3% (95% CI, 37.7% to 57.0%) and median OS was 18.5 months (95% CI, 12.2 to 28.5 months). In patients with lymph node-only disease, ORR was 49.0% (95% CI, 34.8% to 63.4%), and median OS was 27.0 months (12.4 months to NR). There were no new safety signals. CONCLUSION: First-line pembrolizumab confers meaningful and durable clinical response in cisplatin-ineligible patients with advanced UC and is associated with prolonged OS, particularly with PD-L1 CPS ≥ 10 and lymph node-only disease.

Pembrolizumab as First-line Therapy in Cisplatin-ineligible Advanced Urothelial Cancer (KEYNOTE-052): Outcomes in Older Patients by Age and Performance Status.

BACKGROUND: Patients with treatment-naive advanced urothelial cancer (UC) ineligible for cisplatin-based chemotherapy are typically older and have comorbidities, representing a difficult-to-treat population. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and antitumor activity of first-line pembrolizumab in subgroups of cisplatin-ineligible older patients (aged ≥65 and ≥75 yr) with advanced UC in KEYNOTE-052 (NCT02335424), including those with poor performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score 2 [ECOG PS2]). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Patients were cisplatin ineligible, had treatment-naive, histologically/cytologically confirmed, locally advanced/metastatic UC with measurable disease (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 [RECIST v1.1]), and had ECOG PS0-2. Patient subgroups analyzed were aged ≥65yr (n = 302), ≥75 yr (n = 179), ≥65yr with ECOG PS2 (≥65yr+ECOG PS2; n = 119), and ≥75 yr+ECOG PS2 (n = 78). INTERVENTION: All patients received pembrolizumab 200mg intravenously every 3 wk until confirmed progression, intolerable toxicity, patient withdrawal, or 24 mo of therapy. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) as per RECIST v1.1. The key secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), duration of response (DOR), and safety. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: ORRs for the ≥65yr, ≥75 yr, ≥65yr+ECOG PS2, and ≥75 yr+ECOG PS2 subgroups were 29%, 27%, 29%, and 31%, respectively; rates of complete and partial responses were similar across subgroups (9%, 5%, 6%, and 6%, and 20%, 22%, 23%, and 24%, respectively). Median DOR and OS were also consistent across the ≥65yr and ≥65yr+ECOG PS2 subgroups and the ≥75 yr and ≥75 yr+ECOG PS2 subgroups. Study limitations included open-label design, lack of a comparator group, and nature of post hoc exploratory analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical benefit of pembrolizumab in advanced UC appeared to be consistent regardless of age and/or poor performance status. PATIENT SUMMARY: This study looked at whether older age and poorer performance status affect how well patients with previously untreated advanced urothelial cancer ineligible for standard-of-care treatment respond to pembrolizumab. Outcomes with pembrolizumab were not affected by older age or poorer performance status, making it an effective option.

Vibegron (RVT-901/MK-4618/KRP-114V) Administered Once Daily as Monotherapy or Concomitantly with Tolterodine in Patients with an Overactive Bladder: A Multicenter, Phase IIb, Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Antimuscarinics have shown modest efficacy with unwanted side effects in patients with overactive bladder (OAB). Efficacy of vibegron, a new ß3-adrenergic receptor agonist, for OAB is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of once-daily oral vibegron in OAB patients (primary), and its safety, tolerability, and efficacy when administered alone or concomitantly with tolterodine (secondary). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: International, phase IIb, randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active comparator-controlled, two-part superiority trial (2011-2013) in OAB-wet or OAB-dry patients aged 18-75 yr (NCT01314872). INTERVENTIONS: Part 1: once-daily oral vibegron monotherapy (3 [V3], 15 [V15], 50 [V50], or 100 [V100] mg), tolterodine extended release 4mg (TER4), or placebo for 8 wk, or combination V50/TER4 for 4 wk and then V50 for 4 wk; part 2: V100/TER4, V100, TER4, or placebo for 4 wk. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Average daily micturitions at week 8 of part 1 (primary); urge incontinence episodes, total incontinence episodes, and urgency episodes (secondary). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Overall, 1395 patients were randomized. From baseline to week 8, V50 and V100 significantly decreased average daily micturitions (least square mean difference [95% confidence interval], -0.64 [-1.11, -0.18]; p=0.007 and -0.91 [-1.37, -0.44]; p<0.001, respectively) and the number of urge incontinence episodes (-0.72 [-1.11, -0.33] and -0.71 [-1.10, -0.32], respectively; both p<0.001) versus placebo. All vibegron doses were well tolerated. The incidence of dry mouth was higher with TER4 than with vibegron monotherapy. Results are limited by the relatively short treatment duration. CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily V50 and V100 improved OAB symptoms; vibegron was well tolerated as monotherapy and concomitantly with tolterodine. Further development is warranted. PATIENT SUMMARY: Antimuscarinics, commonly used to treat overactive bladder, produce modest efficacy and unwanted side effects. In this study, a different type of drug (vibegron) was efficacious and safe, alone or with an antimuscarinic (tolterodine).

A phase 2b multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of vaginal rings containing nomegestrol acetate or etonogestrel and 17ß-estradiol in the treatment of women with primary dysmenorrhea.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of investigational vaginal rings containing nomegestrol acetate (NOMAC) plus 17ß-estradiol (E2) or etonogestrel (ENG) plus E2 in women with moderate to severe primary dysmenorrhea. STUDY DESIGN: This was a Phase 2b randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter, double-blind study. We randomized participants to one of five treatment groups: four hormonal rings and one placebo ring. The investigational vaginal rings released 300 µg of E2 daily along with 700 µg or 900 µg of NOMAC or 100 µg or 125 µg of ENG. Each participant received 2 identical rings and was to insert each for 21 days followed by a 7-day ring-free period. The primary endpoint, as assessed by a daily electronic diary (e-Diary), was the change in menstrual pain score from baseline to the second in-treatment withdrawal bleeding episode (Cycle 2). The pain score was the mean of the three highest scores for menstrual cramping pain (0-4 point scale) recorded from the day before menses to the third day of bleeding. The primary hypothesis was that at least one investigational vaginal ring would demonstrate a statistically significant larger reduction from baseline in pain score compared to placebo. Secondary endpoints included total mean impact score (which assessed the negative impact on work/school, physical activities, leisure/social activities) and the amount and days of rescue medication (ibuprofen) used. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01670656. RESULTS: We randomized 439 participants. The mean pain score decreased from baseline to Cycle 2 in all groups; the decrease in all four treatment groups compared to placebo was statistically significant (p-values ≤0.002). All treatment groups had greater reductions than placebo in ibuprofen intake and greater improvement in impact scores; these differences were statistically significant for both endpoints for the ENG-E2 100/300 µg/day group, while the other groups were not statistically significant for one or both endpoints. CONCLUSION: All four investigational rings produced a statistically significantly larger reduction from baseline in mean menstrual pain score compared to placebo while pain medication use decreased. IMPLICATIONS: This placebo-controlled study provides evidence that vaginal contraceptive rings containing NOMAC-E2 or ENG-E2 improve moderate to severe dysmenorrhea, across all of doses studied. This adds to the evidence that hormonal contraceptives are effective treatments for dysmenorrhea.

Phase II dose-finding study on ovulation inhibition and cycle control associated with the use of contraceptive vaginal rings containing 17ß-estradiol and the progestagens etonogestrel or nomegestrol acetate compared to NuvaRing.

PURPOSE: To identify at least one contraceptive vaginal ring that effectively inhibits ovulation and demonstrates cycle control that is non-inferior to NuvaRing® (Merck Sharp & Dohme B.V., The Netherlands) in terms of an unscheduled bleeding incidence, with a non-inferiority margin of 10%. METHODS: This was a randomised, active controlled, parallel group, multicentre, partially blinded trial in healthy women 18-35 years of age. Subjects received one of six contraceptive vaginal rings with an average daily release rate of 300 µg 17ß-estradiol (E2) and various rates of either etonogestrel (ENG; 75, 100, or 125 µg/day) or nomegestrol acetate (NOMAC; 500, 700, or 900 µg/day), or the active control NuvaRing® (ENG/ethinylestradiol 120/15 µg), for three 28-day cycles. RESULTS: Ovulation inhibition was observed in all groups as confirmed by absence of progesterone concentrations compatible with ovulation (>16 nmol/L) and absence of ultrasound evidence of ovulation. All investigational rings provided good cycle control, with the ENG-E2 125/300 µg/day group being associated with the best cycle control based on the numerically lowest incidence of unscheduled bleeding and absence of scheduled bleeding. Non-inferiority to NuvaRing® with respect to the incidence of unscheduled bleeding could not be concluded for any of the investigational ring groups. The safety profile was consistent with the known safety profile of combined estrogen/progestin contraceptives and similar across all groups. CONCLUSIONS: Contraceptive rings releasing 300 µg E2 and 75-125 µg/day of ENG or 500-900 µg/day of NOMAC provided adequate ovulation inhibition and cycle control and are generally well-tolerated. While non-inferiority to NuvaRing® was not met, among the investigational rings, the ENG-E2 125/300 ring provided the best cycle control.

Safety and efficacy of the NuvaRing® Applicator in healthy females: a multicenter, open-label, randomized, 2-period crossover study.

INTRODUCTION: We assessed performance and safety of the NuvaRing® Applicator. METHODS: We randomized women (18-45 years) to insert a placebo ring using the applicator or fingers-only and then vice versa. We assessed outcomes post-insertion and then 24-72 h later. RESULTS: Insertion was 100% successful using both methods (applicator, n=163; fingers-only, n=162). A total of 8.6% (applicator) and 4.3% (fingers-only) of subjects reported at least 1 treatment-related adverse event (AE); all were mild. Subjects reported 5 applicator-related AEs (vulvovaginal pain, 4; abdominal cramping, 1). There was no vaginal bleeding within 15 h post-applicator use. Ring expulsions were rare (applicator, 1; fingers-only, 2). CONCLUSION: NuvaRing Applicator is effective and well-tolerated (NCT02275546).

Perioperative use of etoricoxib reduces pain and opioid side-effects after total abdominal hysterectomy: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase III study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of two different doses of etoricoxib delivered perioperatively compared with placebo and standard pain management on pain at rest, pain with mobilization, and use of additional morphine/opioids postoperatively. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial, we evaluated postoperative pain following total abdominal hysterectomy over 5 days in patients receiving placebo or etoricoxib administered 90 min prior to surgery and continuing postoperatively. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either placebo (n = 144), etoricoxib 90 mg/day (n = 142), or etoricoxib 120 mg/day (n = 144). Average Pain Intensity at Rest over days 1-3 (0- to 10-point numerical rating scale [NRS]) was the primary efficacy endpoint. Secondary endpoints included Average Pain Intensity upon Sitting, Standing, and Walking over days 1-3 (0- to 10-point NRS) as well as Average Total Daily Dose of Morphine over days 1-3. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered on www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00788710). RESULTS: The least squares (LS) means (95% CI) for the primary endpoint were 3.26 (2.96, 3.55); 2.46 (2.16, 2.76); and 2.40 (2.11, 2.69) for placebo, etoricoxib 90 mg, and etoricoxib 120 mg, respectively, significantly different for both etoricoxib doses versus placebo (p < 0.001). Patients on etoricoxib 90 mg and 120 mg required ~30% less morphine per day than those on placebo (p < 0.001), which led to more rapid bowel recovery in the active treatment groups by ~10 hours vs. placebo. A greater proportion of patients on etoricoxib (10-30% greater than placebo) achieved mild levels of pain with movement, defined as pain ≤3/10. LIMITATIONS: A key limitation for this study was that movement-evoked pain measurements were not designated as primary endpoints. CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy, etoricoxib 90 mg and 120 mg dosed preoperatively and then continued postoperatively significantly reduces both resting and movement-related pain, as well as reduced opioid (morphine) consumption that led to more rapid bowel recovery.

Variability of urodynamic parameters in patients with overactive bladder.

AIMS: To report interpatient, intrapatient, and study site variability of urodynamic study (UDS) parameters in patients with overactive bladder (OAB). METHODS: Fifty-eight patients with OAB participated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, urodynamic trial of an experimental OAB drug. Patients underwent 3 serial cystometries (CMGs) at three times: screening, pre-dose, and 4-hr postdose. This post hoc analysis describes intrapatient, interpatient, and site variability for the 6 CMGs prior to administration of study drug. Sites were given standard procedures for equipment calibration and UDS technique. Instilled volumes and pressures were recorded at first sensation of filling, first desire to void (FDV), strong desire to void (SDV), and maximum cystometric capacity (MCC). RESULTS: The UDS volume endpoint with the smallest observed within-patient variability based on coefficient of variation (%CV) was MCC (%CV 24). Pressure measurements of all bladder sensations had larger within-patient variability than volume (MCC %CV 105). The between-patient variability was greater than within-patient variability for all bladder sensation volumes. Between-patient MCC variability for the 6 pre-treatment CMGs ranged from %CV of 50 to 58, whereas the within-patient %CV for MCC was 21-23. Excellent reproducibility was observed for bladder volume for MCC (intraclass correlation coefficients, range: 0.80-0.84). The between-site variability was large, as demonstrated by the mean volumes by site for MCC (132-397 ml). CONCLUSIONS: MCC was the most reproducible sensation. Pressure measurements were substantially more variable than volume. Between-patient variability was substantially greater than within-patient variability. The observed intersite variability suggests that despite detailed instructions, sensations may not have been measured in a consistent manner across sites.

A multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled trial of a neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist for overactive bladder.

PURPOSE: Neurokinin-1 receptor dependent mechanisms may regulate urinary frequency and urgency. We conducted this study to assess the efficacy and tolerability of the neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist serlopitant vs placebo or tolterodine in patients with overactive bladder. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, 69-center trial enrolled adults with overactive bladder (8 or more average daily micturitions and 1 or more daily urge incontinence episodes). After a 1-week placebo run-in the patients were randomized to 8 weeks of daily 0.25, 1 or 4 mg serlopitant, 4 mg tolterodine extended release or placebo. Patients kept 7-day voiding diaries. The primary end point was change from baseline in micturitions per day. Secondary end points included urgency, total incontinence, urge incontinence episodes and incidence of dry mouth. RESULTS: Of 557 patients randomized 476 completed the trial and had valid efficacy data for analysis. Mean change from baseline in daily micturitions was significantly greater for 0.25 (-1.1) and 4 mg (-1.1) serlopitant, and for tolterodine (-1.5) than for placebo (-0.5), but not for 1 mg serlopitant (-0.8). No serlopitant dose response was demonstrated. Tolterodine was numerically superior to all doses of serlopitant in mean micturitions per day and secondary end points. The incidence of dry mouth on serlopitant (3.3%) was comparable to placebo (4.6%) and lower than tolterodine (8.8%). Serlopitant was generally well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Serlopitant (0.25 and 4 mg) significantly decreased the primary end point of daily micturitions but not the secondary end points compared with placebo. Serlopitant was generally well tolerated. Thus, NK-1 receptor antagonists may have a role in the treatment of overactive bladder but this compound does not offer advantages in efficacy compared to tolterodine.

Bladder dysfunction in mice with experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis.

The vast majority of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) develop bladder control problems including urgency to urinate, urinary incontinence, frequency of urination, and retention of urine. Over 60% of MS patients show detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia, an abnormality characterized by obstruction of urinary outflow as a result of discoordinated contraction of the urethral sphincter muscle and the bladder detrusor muscle. In the current study we examined bladder function in female SWXJ mice with different defined levels of neurological impairment following induction of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), an animal model of central nervous system inflammation widely used in MS research. We found that EAE mice develop profound bladder dysfunction characterized by significantly increased micturition frequencies and significantly decreased urine output per micturition. Moreover, we found that the severity of bladder abnormalities in EAE mice was directly related to the severity of clinical EAE and neurologic disability. Our study is the first to show and characterize micturition abnormalities in EAE mice thereby providing a most useful model system for understanding and treating neurogenic bladder.

Management of iatrogenic foreign bodies of the bladder and urethra following pelvic floor surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Literature regarding the management of iatrogenic foreign body in the bladder and urethra following female pelvic reconstructive surgery, especially mesh erosion, are sparse. We present our recent experience with the removal of iatrogenic foreign bodies from the bladder and urethra and propose a treatment algorithm. METHODS: A retrospective review yielded 22 patients with iatrogenic foreign body in the bladder or urethra between 1/1998 and 12/2005. Presenting complaints, cystoscopic findings, operative techniques, and outcomes were reviewed. RESULTS: Source surgery of the iatrogenic foreign bodies included bladder suspension in 9 patients, synthetic sling in 11 patients, abdominal sacrocolpopexy and porcine dermis sling in 1 patient each. The majority of patients presented with multiple voiding dysfunctions including overactive bladder symptoms (11), incontinence (5), chronic pelvic or urethral pain (7), urinary tract infections (7), obstructive voiding symptoms (5), and gross hematuria (3). Eleven cases were managed endoscopically, 4 using the holmium laser. One patient required subsequent cystorrhaphy. Four patients were managed with urethroplasty, 4 with cystorrhaphy, and the remainder utilizing a combination of techniques. No patients required complex reconstruction with interposition flaps. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnosis of iatrogenic foreign bodies in the lower urinary tract requires a high index of suspicion and a low threshold for performing cystoscopy. From this series, we have found that sutures can most often be managed successfully with endoscopic techniques, whereas mesh is best managed with cystorrhaphy and/or urethroplasty. To our knowledge, our series represents the largest number of reported iatrogenic foreign body removals at a single institution.

Office based transurethral needle ablation of the prostate with analgesia and local anesthesia.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the efficacy and feasibility of performing office based transurethral needle ablation of the prostate with analgesia and local anesthesia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 56 consecutive patients underwent transurethral needle ablation of the prostate for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia. Oral rofecoxib (50 mg) and ciprofloxacin (250 mg) were administered before the procedure with 25 mg hydroxyzine and 50 to 100 mg meperidine intramuscularly. A combination of 2% lidocaine solution and jelly was used for anesthesia. Patients rated discomfort during anesthesia administration and the procedure using a 10-point scale of 0--no discomfort to 10--the worst pain/discomfort ever experienced in the patient life. Overall satisfaction with the procedure was assessed with a 4-point scale of 1--very satisfactory to 4--very unsatisfactory. Followup was 12 months for uroflow and 36 months for International Prostate Symptom Score. RESULTS: The mean age of 47 patients was 65.4 years. Mean discomfort ratings were 3.6 and 4.9 for anesthesia administration and the procedure, respectively. Average operative time was 34.4 minutes, excluding anesthesia administration. The mean overall satisfaction score was 1.5. The mean preoperative International Prostate Symptom Score was 23.1, which improved to 10.9, 11.2, 12.3, 13.8 and 11.3 at 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months, respectively. Mean maximum uroflow improved from 8.2 ml/sec at baseline to 12.8, 13.9 and 13.3 ml/sec at 3, 6 and 12 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of an intramuscular narcotic combined with oral analgesic and topical lidocaine provided adequate pain control for transurethral needle ablation of the prostate, making it a feasible office procedure.

Results of cystocele repair: a comparison of traditional anterior colporrhaphy, polypropylene mesh and porcine dermis.

PURPOSE: Because traditional anterior colporrhaphy can have a high recurrence rate, we assessed the recurrence rate of 3 methods of cystocele repair, including 1) traditional anterior colporrhaphy, 2) repair using porcine dermis interposition graft and 3) repair using polypropylene mesh. Additionally, we compared the rate of erosion of porcine dermal graft with that of polypropylene mesh. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The records of patients who underwent cystocele repair by the same urologist using porcine dermal graft, polypropylene mesh or traditional repair from January 1999 to August 2005 were reviewed. Data were collected on history, physical examination, outcomes and complications. Using the Baden-Walker system a cystocele of grade 2 or higher on followup examination was considered recurrence. RESULTS: A total of 119 patients underwent cystocele repair from January 1999 to August 2005. Followup was available on 99 patients and it averaged 13.5 months (range 2 to 46). Of the patients 56 (57%) underwent cystocele repair using porcine dermal graft, 25 (25%) received polypropylene mesh and 18 (18%) underwent traditional repair. Of the 99 patients 22 (22%) had cystocele recurrence. Based on the type of repair 36% of patients (20 of 56) with porcine dermal grafts had recurrence compared to 4% (1 of 25) and 6% (1 of 18) using polypropylene and traditional repair, respectively. Mean time to cystocele recurrence was 4.9 months (range 0.5 to 20). A total of 12 patients (21%) had extrusion of porcine grafts through the anterior vaginal wall incision compared to 1 (4%) with polypropylene mesh. CONCLUSIONS: In our patient population the short-term failure rate for anterior vaginal wall prolapse using porcine dermis interposition graft was higher than that for traditional anterior colporrhaphy or polypropylene mesh. In addition, the incidence of vaginal extrusion of porcine graft was unacceptably high. Porcine dermis is a less suitable material for cystocele repair than polypropylene mesh or traditional anterior colporrhaphy. Prospective, randomized trials are necessary to determine the true efficacy and complication rates of these graft materials for anterior vaginal wall prolapse repair.

Injectable neuromodulatory agents: botulinum toxin therapy.

Botulinum toxin therapy is a diverse treatment option for various dysfunctions of the lower urinary tract. The limited but growing clinical experience reveals that temporary chemodenervation with reduction or loss of neuronal activity at the target organ may be achieved with minimal risk. This highly favorable risk-benefit ratio in urology is derived from the clinical ability to treat an end-organ condition effectively with controllable site-specific delivery (eg, subcutaneous, intramuscular, or instillation) combined with high affinity for toxin uptake by the peripheral cholinergic nerves. Although many questions remain regarding the optimal use of this minimally invasive option for urologic applications, the opportunity for expanding indications will provide urologists with more options for addressing difficult challenges in voiding dysfunction.

Results of a simplified technique for buried penis repair.

PURPOSE: The buried penis can cause secondary phimosis, recurrent balanitis and social embarrassment. We report our results using a simplified technique for repair. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review of 83 consecutive patients undergoing buried penis repair between March 1995 and March 2001 was performed. Indications for surgery included recurrent balanitis, secondary phimosis, difficulty holding the penis during voiding, spraying of the urinary stream, or parental or patient concern for social embarrassment. The technique involves fixation of the subcutaneous penile skin at the base of the degloved penis to Buck's fascia of the penile shaft at the 3 and 9 o'clock positions. RESULTS: For the 79 patients included in the study average followup was 4.4 years. Group 1 consisted of 26 patients who underwent circumcision at the time of buried penis repair. Six patients had hypospadias and 13 had penoscrotal webbing that was repaired simultaneously. Three patients (11.5%) had recurrent buried penis that required a repeat procedure and 1 (3.8%) required revision of the circumcision only. Three patients (11.5%) with penoscrotal webbing had mild recurrence requiring no further treatment. Group 2 consisted of 49 patients who underwent revision of the circumcision at the time of buried penis repair. Seven patients (14.3%) had mild recurrence that did not require further treatment. Group 3 consisted of 4 patients who underwent liposuction at the time of buried penis repair. One patient experienced lymphedema of the ventral distal shaft skin, which required subsequent excision. CONCLUSIONS: The buried penis repair is a simple and effective outpatient procedure with few complications and recurrences. It can be used as a primary or secondary procedure and affords good cosmetic results.