CAR-T Cells in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.

The treatment outcomes of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) have considerably improved with the introduction of targeted therapies based on Bruton kinase inhibitors (BTKIs), venetoclax, and anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies. However, despite these consistent improvements, patients who become resistant to these agents have poor outcomes and need new and more efficacious therapeutic strategies. Among these new treatments, a potentially curative approach consists of the use of chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy, which achieved remarkable success in various B-cell malignancies, including B-cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas (NHLs) and B-acute lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL). However, although CAR-T cells were initially used for the treatment of CLL, their efficacy in CLL patients was lower than in other B-cell malignancies. This review analyses possible mechanisms of these failures, highlighting some recent developments that could offer the perspective of the incorporation of CAR-T cells in treatment protocols for relapsed/refractory CLL patients.

Treatment Sequencing in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia in 2024: Where We Are and Where We Are Headed.

As treatments with BTK inhibitors and BCL2 inhibitors have replaced the use of chemoimmunotherapy in CLL in both first-line and relapsed patients, it becomes critical to rationalize their use and exploit the full potential of each drug. Despite their proven, robust, and manifest efficacy, BTKis and BCL2is fail to provide long-term disease control in some categories of patients, and to date this is an unmet clinical need that is critical to recognize and address. Ongoing clinical trials are evaluating new treatment algorithms and new molecules to progressively thin this population. In this review for each category of patients we explicate the different possible patterns of treatment sequencing based on currently available evidence, starting from the frontline to currently ongoing trials, in order to optimize therapies as much as possible.

What Does Atypical Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Really Mean? A Retrospective Morphological and Immunophenotypic Study.

Atypical chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is still defined according to morphological criteria. However, deviance from the typical surface immunological profile suggests an atypical immunological-based CLL. A large cohort of patients with CLL was retrospectively evaluated aiming at assessing morphological (FAB criteria), immunophenotypical (two or more discordances from the typical profile), and clinical-biological features of atypical CLL. Compared to typical cases, morphologically atypical CLL showed a greater percentage of unmutated IgVH and CD38 positivity, and a higher expression of CD20. Immunophenotypically atypical CLL was characterized by more advanced clinical stages, higher expression of CD20, higher rate of FMC7, CD79b and CD49d positivity, and by an intermediate-high expression of membrane surface immunoglobulin, compared to typical cases. When patients were categorized based on immunophenotypic and morphologic concordance or discordance, no difference emerged. Finally, morphological features better discriminated patients' prognosis in terms of time-to-first treatment, while concordant atypical cases showed overall a worse prognosis. Discordant cases by immunophenotype and/or morphology did not identify specific prognostic groups. Whether-in the era of molecular markers used as prognostic indicators-it does make sense to focus on morphology and immunophenotype features in CLL is still matter of debate needing further research.

Unselected donor-derived hematopoietic stem cells boost for Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell associated hematotoxicity.

Hematological toxicity following Chimeric Antigen Receptor-T therapy in a patient with a prior allogeneic stem cell transplantation was resolved by the infusion of unselected donor-derived stem cell boost. Due to the donor's lymphocytes, the patient experienced a well-controlled flare-up of acute graft versus host disease.

Acute graft versus host disease 1976-2020: reduced incidence and predictive factors.

We studied the incidence of acute graft versus host disease (GvHD) and its outcome in three consecutive time frames (year <2000; 2000-2010; >2010), in 3,120 patients allografted in two transplant Centers between 1976 and 2020. The median age increased over the three periods from 32 to 42 to 54 years (p < 0.00001). The median day of onset of GvHD in the three periods was day +14, day +16, and day +30, respectively (p < 0.0001). The cumulative incidence (CI) of GvHD grades II-IV in the three periods was 47, 24, and 16%, respectively (p < 0.00001). The CI of GvHD grades III-IV was 13, 5, and 4% (p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, significant predictive factors for GvHD II-IV, on top of year of transplant, were anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) (RR 0.67, p > 0.001); post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCY) (RR 0.41, p < 0.001), a family mismatched donor (RR 1.31, p = 0.03) a matched unrelated donor (RR 2.1, p < 0.001), an unrelated mismatched donor (RR1.8, p = 0.001), donor age above 40 years (RR 1.27, p < 0.001), hematological malignancy-as compared to aplastic anemia (RR 2.3, p < 0.001). When selecting only GvHD grade II, in a multivariate analysis, there was a significant reduction of transplant-related mortality (TRM) for patients grafted in 2001-2010 (RR 0.62, p < 0.0001) and for patients grafted in 2011-2020 (RR 0.35, p < 0.0001) as compared to grafts before the year 2000. A similar reduction in time was seen for patients with GvHD grades III-IV. The overall TRM in the three periods was 30, 22, and 16% (p < 0.0001) and survival was 47, 51, and 58% (p < 0.0001). Relapse risk was unchanged. In conclusion, we showed improved prevention of acute GvHD with time, together with a significant delay in the onset of the disease. Treatment of GvHD has also improved over time, as suggested by both reduced TRM and improved survival in more recent transplant periods.