The generally low sensitivity of CA 125 for FIGO stage I ovarian cancer diagnosis increases for endometrioid histotype.

BACKGROUND: The serum marker CA 125 is still the most widely used biomarker for ovarian cancer (OC) diagnosis in gynecological and oncological setting, but its predictive role in early-stage OC is still debated. The aim of this study was to explore the value of CA 125 in distinguishing between early-stage OC and borderline ovarian tumor (BOT) and to evaluate the accuracy of CA 125 in the detection of early stage OC. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed at the University Hospital of Bologna (Italy) on 1296 consecutive women suffering from OC or BOT (diagnosed at histology) between 1988-2017. Patients for whom CA 125 level was determined preoperatively were included. The positive cut-off level used was >35 U/mL. RESULTS: Of 910 patients, 192 (21.1%) were diagnosed with BOT and 718 (78.9%) with OC. The sensitivity of CA 125 for stage I OC was 54.4 (95% CI: 45.3-63.3) (51.5 for IA, 54.6 for IB, 58.3 for IC), but it increased to 78.0 (95% CI: 63.7-88.0) for stage II. Interestingly, in stage I OC, CA 125 presented a significantly higher sensitivity for the endometrioid histotype [72.4 (95% CI: 52.5-86.5) vs. 49.0 (95% CI: 38.6-59.4), P=0.026]. The positive likelihood ratio of CA 125 for early-stage OC compared to BOT was 1.29 (95% CI: 1.06-1.58). CONCLUSIONS: Despite its limited sensitivity for early-stage OCs, CA 125 still represents a useful serum marker to early differentiate between OCs and BOTs. Its sensitivity for stage I OC increases in endometrioid histotype.

Increasing BMI is associated with both endometrioid and serous histotypes among endometrial rather than ovarian cancers: a case-to-case study.

AIM: Although obesity has been associated with endometrioid (type I) and, to a lesser extent, with serous (type II) endometrial cancer (EC), the association with the same histotypes of ovarian cancer (OC) remains unclear. Therefore, we intended to compare the role of BMI in carcinogenesis of endometrioid and the serous malignancies, at both ovarian and endometrial level. METHODS: A retrospective case-to-case study was performed in the University Hospital of Bologna (Italy), through the review of primary EC matched with the corresponding OC cases in the same period (1988-2017). RESULTS: We included 1052 women diagnosed with EC (n = 897 endometrioid, n = 52 serous) and 955 women affected by OC (n = 132 endometrioid, n = 627 serous). EC patients had higher median BMI than women diagnosed with OC (27.3 [23.4-31.9] vs 24.9 [21.7-27.5], p < 0.01). After controlling for confounding, 1 unit increase in BMI was associated with a 5% higher odds of endometrial as opposed to ovarian cancer (OR for ovarian as opposed to endometrial cancer 0.95; 95% CI 0.91-0.98, p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Increasing BMI is associated with endometrial rather than ovarian cancer, among both serous and endometrioid histotypes.