Inpatient Pediatric Palliative Care Consult Requests and Recommendations.

INTRODUCTION: Little is known about the requests for and recommendations from inpatient pediatric palliative care (PPC) consults and whether they differ by patient location (ward vs. intensive care unit) or patient type (new vs. established with PPC). METHODS: Single-center, retrospective cohort study comparing PPC consult requests and recommendations for children who received a PPC consult between January 1, 2018 and June 30, 2019. Comparisons were made by patient location and patient type using bivariate statistics. RESULTS: Three hundred twenty-seven PPC encounters were evaluated. Symptoms were more likely to be addressed in consults for ward patients than for intensive care unit patients. Compared with established patients, consults for new patients occurred significantly later in the hospital course and were more likely to be for psychosocial support or goals of care. DISCUSSION: We found variability in PPC consult requests and recommendations that may inform future work and targeted education for primary providers.

National Resident Matching Program Performance Among US MD and DO Seniors in the Early Single Accreditation Graduate Medical Education Era.

INTRODUCTION: As of the 2020 National Resident Matching Program (NRMP), nearly all applicants are evaluated together for graduate medical education (GME) candidacy. We set out to characterize US MD and DO Senior residency match performance in the single-accreditation GME era. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted in 2021 utilizing data collected from the 2018 and 2020 NRMP Charting Outcomes in the Match publications aggregated and subdivided into three groups based on competitiveness: low (LC), moderate (MC), and high (HC). Nonparametric analysis was performed using Chi square or Fisher exact tests if counts were less than five. Significance was determined at p < 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 46,853 candidates were included, with 36,194 (77.3%) US MD and 10,659 (22.7%) DO Seniors. Match rates for US DO Seniors were lower than US MD Seniors across all competitiveness strata (p < 0.0001). Research item production, national licensing examination scores, and mean number of contiguous programs ranked were lower for matched US DO Seniors compared to matched US MD Seniors, with significant differences depending on competitiveness group. CONCLUSIONS: With recent changes to GME and its application process, understanding how various groups compare will be increasingly important. US DO Seniors have lower first-rank match rates for all specialty competitiveness levels. This may be due to lower research output or nuanced specialty selection. This study could aid GME stakeholders to more effectively allocate resources and better prepare residency candidates.