Document analysis of adaptive sport opportunities at Division-1 universities in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Individuals with disabilities are less likely to participate in physical activity, with the greatest decline in participation during college years. Despite known health benefits, there are significant barriers that limit sport and exercise participation for students with disabilities, including adaptive access. To our knowledge, there has been no comprehensive review conducted to examine the number of adaptive sport offerings on a collegiate level. OBJECTIVE: Assess the availability of adaptive sport opportunities for students at National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division-1 Universities to better understand university-affiliated adaptive sport opportunity for students. METHODS: Website document analysis was conducted by systematically querying the general homepage, athletics page, and campus recreation websites of each NCAA Division-1 University in the United States (US). Institutional and sport-related characteristics were recorded. RESULTS: Of the 358 NCAA Division-1 Universities, 20.4 % (73/358) marketed adaptive sport opportunities (recreational, club, and/or intercollegiate), with 3.9 % (11/358) acknowledging intercollegiate adaptive sport programs on their websites. Five percent (6/121) of private institutions, and 28.3 % (67/237) of public institutions reported adaptive sport opportunities. The Northeast region had the fewest number of institutions reporting adaptive sport offerings (4/67, 6.0 %). The most commonly offered sport was adaptive recreation (36/358, 10.2 %), followed by wheelchair basketball (26/358, 7.4 %). CONCLUSION: Over three-quarters of Division-1 Universities in the US lack an online description of adaptive sport opportunity, highlighting the need for expanded resourcing and marketing of adaptive sport at the university level. Future studies are necessary to identify appropriate strategies to effectively promote sport, maximize participation and improve social inclusion.

Longitudinal Ultrasound-Guided Injection Curriculum for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Residents.

ABSTRACT: Physiatrists are increasingly using musculoskeletal ultrasound for both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. However, a standardized longitudinal curriculum for instructing physical medicine and rehabilitation residents in performing ultrasound-guided interventional procedures has yet to be established. The purpose of this study is to develop and assess the effectiveness of a longitudinal curriculum in training residents to perform common ultrasound-guided musculoskeletal injections using fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens. The course included six weekly hands-on educational sessions, divided by anatomical region, integrated into an established anatomy and physical examination curriculum. After completion of the curriculum, residents reported improved comfort and confidence and displayed improved competence in performing these injections. Other physiatry residency programs should consider implementing longitudinal, hands-on cadaveric training courses to better prepare trainees to perform ultrasound-guided injections as part of their future clinical practice.

The Utility of Ultrasound in the Evaluation of Traumatic Hallux Valgus.

Isolated disruption of the medial collateral ligament of the great toe is rare and often misdiagnosed as turf toe. It may progress to acquired traumatic hallux valgus, often requiring operative intervention and a longer return to play. This case of a grade II medial collateral ligament injury highlights the importance of a thorough physical examination and consideration of the mechanism of injury. It demonstrates the utility of diagnostic musculoskeletal ultrasound in establishing a specific diagnosis upon initial patient presentation with great toe pain. It is an example of the use of ultrasound in guiding treatment and monitoring interval healing. In this case, differentiation of the injury from the classic "turf toe" led to proper stabilization with a toe spacer and activity modification, thus preventing progression of traumatic hallux valgus and leading to successful nonoperative treatment with full return to sport. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V.