Significant increase in the prevalence of Panton-Valentine leukocidin-positive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, particularly the USA300 variant ΨUSA300, in the Japanese community.

IMPORTANCE: USA300 is an MRSA clone producing PVL, a toxin associated with SSTIs. ΨUSA300 is a USA300 variant recently identified in Japan by Takadama et al. (15). Here, we found that the prevalence rate of PVL-positive MRSA in S. aureus was elevated in the Japanese community, and ΨUSA300 accounted for most of them. ΨUSA300 strains have been isolated from several areas in Japan and were associated with deep-seated SSTIs. This study highlighted the emerging threat posed by ΨUSA300 in Japan.

Current status of Panton-Valentine leukocidin-positive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from patients with skin and soft tissue infections in Japan.

The USA300 clone, which produces Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL), is a major pathogenic community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) clone that causes intractable skin infections. Recently, PVL-positive CA-MRSA, including USA300 clones, have emerged in both communities and hospitals in Japan. To prevent an outbreak of PVL-positive MRSA, infected patients should be treated with effective antimicrobial agents at community clinics. Herein, we investigate molecular epidemiological characteristics of PVL-positive MRSA isolated from outpatients with skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI), which are common community-onset infectious diseases. The detection rate of MRSA was 24.9% (362 strains) out of 1455 S. aureus strains isolated between 2013 and 2017. Among the MRSA strains, 15.5% (56 strains) were PVL-positive strains and associated with deep-seated skin infections. Molecular epidemiological analyses of PVL-positive MRSA showed that USA300 was the predominant clone (53.6%, 30 strains) and was identified in Kanto (18 strains), Kagawa (nine strains), Tohoku (two strains) and Hokkaido (one strain). Notably, minocycline and fusidic acid were effective against all PVL-positive MRSA strains. Hence, our data reveals the current status of PVL-positive MRSA isolated from patients with SSTI in Japan. Continuous surveillance of CA-MRSA is necessary to monitor latest prevalence rates and identify effective antimicrobial agents for PVL-positive MRSA strains.

Comparative analysis of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from outpatients of dermatology unit in hospitals and clinics.

Community-onset methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CO-MRSA) is a causative agent of intractable skin infections. In general, clinical symptoms of hospital outpatients with skin infections are severer than those of clinic patients. Hence, molecular epidemiological features of the CO-MRSA strains from hospital outpatients are predicted to be different from those of clinic patients. Here, we conducted a comparative analysis for CO-MRSA isolates from outpatients with impetigo in hospitals and clinics located in the same district of Tokyo, Japan. Incidence of MRSA infection was higher in hospital outpatients (21.5%, 20/93 isolates) than in clinic patients (14.5%, 121/845 isolates). The resistance rate to clindamycin, which is a common topical antimicrobial agent in dermatology, in the isolates from hospital outpatients (60.0%) was higher than those from clinic patients (31.4%). Proportion of the staphylococcal cassette chromosome (SCC) mec type II, which is a representative type of hospital-acquired MRSA in Japan, in the isolates from hospital outpatients (65.0%) was significantly higher than those from clinic patients (30.6%) (P < 0.01). Multilocus sequence typing showed that the clonal complex 89-SCCmec type II (CC89-II) clone, which exhibits clindamycin resistance, was the most predominant (55.0%) in the isolates from hospital outpatients. On the other hand, all CC8-IV, CC121-V, and CC89-V clones accounted for 60% in clinic patients were susceptible to clindamycin. Our findings suggested that the clindamycin-resistant CC89-II CO-MRSA clone might be more related to skin infections in hospital outpatients than clinic patients.