Successful Treatment of Metastatic Gallbladder Carcinoma with a High Tumor Mutational Burden Using Pembrolizumab.

A woman in her 70s presented with gallbladder carcinoma with liver metastases and peritoneal dissemination. After standard chemotherapy failed, a liver biopsy was performed. A FoundationOne CDx analysis showed that the tumor mutational burden (TMB) was high (34 mutations/megabase). Treatment with pembrolizumab, which is an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI), resulted in a partial response, and there were no significant immune-related adverse events. According to recently published reports, the frequency of TMB-high biliary tract cancer (BTC) is 3.4-4%, which makes it extremely rare. In conclusion, ICIs may be effective in patients with TMB-high BTC.

Increased Spleen Volume in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Treated with Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab in Comparison to Lenvatinib: A Retrospective Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: We previously reported 2 cases of esophageal varices rupture during atezolizumab and bevacizumab (Atez/Bev) treatment, in which the spleen volume gradually increased. The aim of this retrospective study is to compare the chronological change in spleen volume of patients treated with Atez/Bev and lenvatinib (LEN). METHODS: Seventy-two patients (Atez/Bev group, n = 26; LEN group, n = 46) were included in this retrospective study. The splenic parenchyma area was measured based on CT imaging. We used mixed-effect regression models with random intercepts to test the difference in the rate of change in spleen volume between the Atez/Bev and LEN groups. RESULTS: The median age of the Atez/Bev and LEN groups was 74.0 (71.0-82.0) and 72.0 (67.5-76.0), respectively. About 80% patients were male. The mALBI grade was classified as 1, 2a, 2b, and 3 in 10 (38.5%), 6 (23.1%), 10 (38.5%), and zero (0.0%) patients, respectively, in the Atez/Bev group and 21 (45.7%), 9 (19.6%), 15 (32.6%), and 1 (2.2%) patient in the LEN group (p = 0.9). The median baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was 2.61 (1.80-3.41) in the Atez/Bev group and 2.71 (1.76-3.67) in the LEN group (p = 1.0). The median baseline spleen volume was 185 (132-246) cm3 in the Atez/Bev group and 231 (150-355) cm3 in the LEN group. The spleen volume gradually increased during Atez/Bev treatment (2.41 cm3 per week), while it was mostly consistent during LEN treatment (0.32 cm3 per week). Among patients with mALBI grade 2b or 3, the spleen volume increased in the Atez/Bev group (2.99 cm3 per week) and slightly decreased in the LEN group (0.82 cm3 per week), without statistical significance (p = 0.07). Among patients with a baseline NLR of >2.68, the spleen volume increased at a rate of 2.57 cm3 per week in the Atez/Bev group and decreased at a rate of 1.18 cm3 per week in the LEN group. The difference in the slope of the two groups was statistically significant (p = 0.04). DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Atez/Bev treatment could result in an increased spleen volume. Caution is required when managing patients treated with Atez/Bev, especially those with a high NLR.

A case of conversion hepatectomy for huge hepatocellular carcinoma with adrenal metastasis and vascular invasion after atezolizumab-bevacizumab treatment.

We herein report a case of huge hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with adrenal metastasis and vascular invasion successfully treated by conversion hepatectomy after atezolizumab-bevacizumab treatment. A 77-year-old male patient with chest pain was admitted. He had a history of HCC treatment; however, the patient stopped receiving follow-up treatment based on his own decision. This time, he visited the emergency department of our hospital for the first time in 5 years. The tumor at the right lobe had grown into a lump with adrenal metastases and was 15 cm in diameter. It had invaded the inferior vena cava. Atezolizumab-bevacizumab treatment was selected for HCC treatment. Before starting treatment, his liver function was preserved (Child-Pugh A5). His alpha fetoprotein (AFP) and des-gamma-carboxyprothrombin (DCP) levels were 759.0 ng/mL and 5,681 mAU/mL, respectively. Atezolizumab-bevacizumab treatment resulted in a marked decrease in tumor marker levels and tumor staining. After nine courses of atezolizumab-bevacizumab treatment, it became difficult to continue the administration of bevacizumab because of proteinuria. Because the tumor had decreased in size and the tumor markers were in the normal range, we decided to perform conversion hepatectomy. The tumor was completely removed by combined resection of the diaphragm, and pathological analyses showed a complete response to atezolizumab-bevacizumab treatment. No viable tumor cells remained on histological analyses. The patient is doing well without any signs of recurrence at 3 months after conversion surgery.

Two cases of rapid progression of esophageal varices after atezolizumab-bevacizumab treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma.

We report two cases of rapid progression of esophageal varices after atezolizumab-bevacizumab treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Case 1: a man in his 60s with hepatitis C-related liver cirrhosis after viral eradication by direct acting antiviral. He was diagnosed with HCC 8 years previously. He had undergone surgical resection 4 times, radio-frequency ablation (RFA) several times, and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE). However, HCC progressed and could not be controlled by locoregional treatment. Systemic chemotherapy was, therefore, selected. Atezolizumab-bevacizumab was administered after lenvatinib and sorafenib failure. Before starting treatment, his liver function was preserved (Child-Pugh score 5 and class A). His alpha fetoprotein and des-gamma-carboxyprothrombin levels were 3.6 ng/mL and 443 mAU/mL, respectively. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy showed no remarkable esophageal varices before atezolizumab-bevacizumab treatment. Nine months after the initiation of atezolizumab-bevacizumab, the patient was admitted for hematemesis from esophageal varices. The disease control of HCC was classified as stable disease (SD) for the liver and lung metastases, and partial response for the lymph node metastases. Neither AST nor ALT was markedly elevated in the clinical course. Endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) for the spurting point of large esophageal varices with red wale signs was able to successfully achieve hemostasis. Atezolizumab-bevacizumab was stopped and additional EVL eradicated the esophageal varices. However, the post-banding ulcer was prolonged in comparison to usual cases. Case 2: a man in his 60s with hepatitis C-related liver cirrhosis after viral eradication by direct acting antiviral therapy. He was diagnosed with HCC 6 years previously. He had received RFA 2 times and TACE 7 times. Atezolizumab-bevacizumab was administered after lenvatinib failure. The disease control of HCC was classified as SD; however, the esophageal varices ruptured after 15 courses of atezolizumab-bevacizumab. Neither AST nor ALT were markedly elevated in the clinical course. The esophageal varices of these patients did not require treatment before atezolizumab-bevacizumab; however, they rapidly worsened and ruptured during atezolizumab-bevacizumab treatment. Although rare, similar cases with rapid progression of portal hypertension after atezolizumab-bevacizumab have been reported. We should pay attention to the worsening of esophageal varices during atezolizumab-bevacizumab treatment and poor wound healing after EVL.