Shifting trends in the epidemiology of Cervical Spine Injuries: An Analysis of 11,822 patients from the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) over two decades.

Cervical spine injuries (CSIs) are heterogeneous in nature and often lead to long-term disability and morbidity. However, there are few recent and comprehensive epidemiological studies on CSI. The objective of this study was to characterize recent trends in CSI patient demographics, incidence, etiology, and injury level. The National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) was used to extract data on CSIs from 2002-2022. Weighted national estimates of CSI incidence were computed using yearly population estimates interpolated from United States census data. Data analysis involved extracting additional information from patient narratives to categorize injury etiology (i.e. fall), and to identify CSI level. K-means clustering was performed on cervical levels to define upper vs lower cervical injuries. Appropriate summary statistics including mean with 95% confidence intervals, and frequency were reported for age, sex, race, ethnicity, etiology, and disposition. Age between groups was compared using an independent weighted Z- test. All categorical variables were compared using Pearson chi-square with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparison. Ordinary least squares linear regression was used to quantify the rate of change of various metrics with time. A total of 11,822 patient records met the study criteria. The mean age of patients was 62.4 ± 22.7 years, 52.4% of whom were male and 61.4% of whom were white, 7.4% were black, 27.8% were not specified, the remaining comprised a variety of ethnicities. The most common mechanism of CSI was a fall (67.3%). There was a significant increase in the incidence of cervical injuries between 2003-2022 (p<0.001). Unbiased K means clustering defined upper cervical injuries as C1-C3 and lower cervical injuries as C4-C7. The mean age of patients with upper CSIs was 72.3 ± 19.6, significantly greater than the age of those with lower CSIs (57.1 ± 23.1, p<0.001). Compared with lower CSI, white patients were more likely to have an upper CSI (67.4% vs. 73.7%; p<0.001). While Black/African American (7.5% vs. 3.8%) and Hispanic (2.5% vs 1.0%) patients were more likely to have a lower CSI (p<0.001). Our study identified a significant increase in the incidence of CSIs over time which was associated with increasing patient age. Our study detected a pragmatic demarcation of classifying upper injuries as C1-C3 and lower cervical injuries as C4-C7. Upper injuries were seen more often in older, white females who were treated and admitted, and lower injuries were seen more often in young, black male patients who were released without admission.

Disparities in the treatment of movement disorders using deep brain stimulation.

OBJECTIVE: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a well-established treatment for Parkinson's disease (PD) and essential tremor (ET). Although the prevalence of PD and ET can vary by sex and race, little is known about the accessibility of neurosurgical treatments for these conditions. In this nationwide study, the authors aimed to characterize trends in the use of DBS for the treatment of PD and ET and to identify disparities in the neurosurgical treatment of these diseases based on ethnic, racial, sex, insurance, income, hospital, and geographic factors. METHODS: Using the dates January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2019, the authors queried the National Inpatient Sample database for all discharges with an ICD-9 or ICD-10 diagnosis of PD or ET. Among these discharges, the DBS rates were reported for each subgroup of race, ethnicity, and sex. To develop national estimates, all analyses were weighted. RESULTS: Among 2,517,639 discharges with PD, 29,820 (1.2%) received DBS, and among 652,935 discharges with ET, 11,885 (1.8%) received DBS. Amid the PD cases, Black patients (n = 405 [0.2%], OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.12-0.20) were less likely than White patients (n = 23,975 [1.2%]) to receive DBS treatment, as were Hispanic patients (n = 1965 [1.1%], OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.65-0.88), whereas Asian/Pacific Islander patients (n = 855 [1.5%]) did not statistically differ from White patients. Amid the ET cases, Black (n = 230 [0.8%], OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.27-0.56), Hispanic (n = 215 [1.0%], OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.28-0.55), and Asian/Pacific Islander (n = 55 [1.0%], OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.28-0.93) patients were less likely than White patients (n = 10,440 [1.9%]) to receive DBS. Females were less likely than males to receive DBS for PD (OR 0.69, p < 0.0001) or ET (OR 0.70, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The authors describe significant racial and sex-based differences in the utilization of DBS for the treatment of PD and ET. Further research is required to ascertain the causes of these disparities, as well as any differences in access to specialty neurosurgical care and referral for neuromodulation approaches.

Disparities in Access to Deep Brain Stimulation and Responsive Neurostimulation Approaches to Drug-Resistant Epilepsy.

BACKGROUND: Epilepsy affects 1% to 2% of the global population, and those who are resistant to medical treatment may be candidates for neuromodulation. In select populations, brain stimulation approaches including deep brain stimulation (DBS) and responsive neurostimulation (RNS) are used. Although studies have shown that patients from Black, Hispanic, lower income, and rural communities have less access to epilepsy care and have lower rates of epilepsy surgery, disparities in the use of brain stimulation for epilepsy treatment are currently not known. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We queried the US National Inpatient Sample data base from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2019 for all patients discharged with an International Classification of Diseases (ICD) Ninth Revision or ICD Tenth Revision diagnosis of drug-resistant epilepsy. Among these patients discharged, the rates of brain stimulation treatment, including DBS and RNS, were reported in each subgroup of race, ethnicity, and insurance. To generate national estimates, all analyses were weighted. RESULTS: A total of 237,895 patients discharged with drug-resistant epilepsy were identified, of whom 4,925 (2.1%) received brain stimulation treatment for drug-resistant epilepsy. Black patients (n = 420, 0.9%, odds ratio [OR] = 0.51, 95% CI [0.40, 0.64]) were less likely to receive brain stimulation treatment than were White patients (n = 3300, 2.4%). There was no significant difference between Asian (n = 105, 2.3%, OR = 0.80, 95% CI [0.53, 1.33]) and Hispanic (n = 655, 2.6%, OR = 0.95, 95% CI [0.77, 1.17]) patients and White patients. No significant difference was observed between female (n = 2515, 2.1%, OR = 1.02, 95% CI [0.89, 1.17]) and male (n = 2410, 2.0%) patients either. Patients with Medicare (n = 1150, 1.2%, OR = 0.69, 95% CI [0.57, 0.84]) or Medicaid (n = 1150, 1.8%, OR = 0.52, 95% CI [0.44, 0.62]) were less likely to receive brain stimulation treatment than were those with private insurance as the primary payer (n = 2370, 3.9%). CONCLUSIONS: We discovered significant disparities in the use of brain stimulation treatments for drug-resistant epilepsy based on race and insurance status. More research will be required to determine the cause of these disparities.

Assessment of Health Care Costs and Total Baclofen Use Associated With Targeted Drug Delivery for Spasticity.

BACKGROUND: Chronic spasticity causes significant impairment and financial burden. Oral baclofen, the first-line therapy, can have intolerable, dose-dependent side effects. Targeted drug delivery (TDD) through intrathecal baclofen delivers smaller amounts of baclofen into the thecal sac via an implanted infusion system. However, the health care resource utilization of patients with spasticity receiving TDD has not been studied extensively. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adult patients who received TDD for spasticity between 2009 and 2017 were identified using the IBM MarketScan® data bases. Patients' use of oral baclofen and health care costs were examined at baseline (one year before implantation) and three years after implantation. A multivariable regression model using the generalized estimating equations method and a log link function was used to compare postimplantation costs with those at baseline. RESULTS: The study identified 771 patients with TDD for medication analysis and 576 for cost analysis. At baseline, the median costs were $39,326 (interquartile range [IQR]: $19,526-$80,679), which increased to $75,728 (IQR: $44,199-$122,676) in year 1, decreased to $27,160 (IQR: $11,896-$62,427) in year 2, and increased slightly to $28,008 (IQR: $11,771-$61,885) in year 3. In multivariable analysis, the cost was 47% higher than at baseline (cost ratio [CR] 1.47, 95% CI: 1.32-1.63) in year 1 but was 25% lower (CR 0.75, 95% CI: 0.66-0.86) in year 2 and 32% lower (CR 0.68, 95% CI: 0.59-0.79) in year 3. Before implant, 58% of patients took oral baclofen, which decreased to 24% by year 3. The median daily baclofen dose decreased from 61.8 mg (IQR: 40-86.4) before TDD to 32.8 mg (IQR: 30-65.7) three years later. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that patients who undergo TDD use less oral baclofen, potentially reducing the risk of side effects. Although total health care costs increased immediately after TDD, most likely owing to device and implantation costs, they decreased below baseline after one year. The costs of TDD reach cost neutrality approximately three years after implant, indicating its potential for long-term cost savings.

How dimensions can guide surgical planning and training: a systematic review of Kambin's triangle.

OBJECTIVE: The authors sought to analyze the current literature to determine dimensional trends across the lumbar levels of Kambin's triangle, clarify the role of imaging techniques for preoperative planning, and understand the effect of inclusion of the superior articular process (SAP). This compiled knowledge of the triangle is needed to perform successful procedures, reduce nerve root injuries, and help guide surgeons in training. METHODS: The authors performed a search of multiple databases using combinations of keywords: Kambin's triangle, size, measurement, safe triangle, and bony triangle. Articles were included if their main findings included measurement of Kambin's triangle. The PubMed, Scopus, Ovid, Cochrane, Embase, and Medline databases were systematically searched for English-language articles with no time frame restrictions through July 2022. RESULTS: Eight studies comprising 132 patients or cadavers were included in the study. The mean ± SD age was 66.69 ± 9.6 years, and 53% of patients were male. Overall, the size of Kambin's triangle increased in area moving down vertebral levels, with L5-S1 being the largest (133.59 ± 4.36 mm2). This trend followed a linear regression model when SAP was kept (p = 0.008) and removed (p = 0.003). There was also a considerable increase in the size of Kambin's triangle if the SAP was removed. CONCLUSIONS: Here, the authors have provided the first reported systematic review of the literature of Kambin's triangle, its measurements at each lumbar level, and key areas of debate related to the definition of the working safe zone. These findings indicate that CT is heavily utilized for imaging of the safe zone, the area of Kambin's triangle tends to increase caudally, and variation exists between patients. Future studies should focus on using advanced imaging techniques for preoperative planning and establishing guidelines for surgeons.