Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Patient Saf ; 19(1): e13-e17, 2023 01 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36538340

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Serious adverse events, such as wrong-side, wrong-organ, wrong-procedure, or wrong-person errors, still occur despite the implementation of preventative measures. In France, we describe the claims related to such errors based on the database from one of the main insurance companies. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of claims declared between January 2007 and December 2017 to Relyens, a medical liability insurance company (Sham), was performed. Their database was queried using the following keywords: "wrong side," "wrong organ," and "wrong person." RESULTS: We collected 219 claims (0.4% of the total claims). The main specialties involved were orthopedics (34% of cases), neurosurgery (14%), and dentistry (14%). The claims were related to wrong organ (44%), side (39%), identity (13%), or procedure (4%). Juridical entity involved were mainly public facility (69%), followed by private facility (19%) or private physician (10%). The mean number of annual claims made has decreased of 20% since the mandatory implementation of the checklist in 2010 (22 versus 17.5 events per year). The main risk factors identified according to the ALARM protocol were factor related to the team (87%) or to the task to accomplish (78%). A direct causal factor was involved in 20% of the files, the main one being the organization (43%) closely related to the medical file (36%). The settlement was performed by conciliation in 69% of the claim and in court in 30%. The compensation was higher during a court settlement. CONCLUSIONS: Wrong-side, wrong-organ, wrong-procedure, or wrong-person surgical errors are rare but fully preventable by the implementation of a safety culture.


Assuntos
Seguro , Imperícia , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Erros Médicos/prevenção & controle , Responsabilidade Legal , Fatores de Risco
2.
Urol Int ; 106(11): 1095-1099, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36195061

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The study aimed to analyze testicular torsion (TT) claims settled with compensation to have data available as the basis for making recommendations to decrease clinical risk and prevent claims. TT is a urological emergency with a high rate of orchiectomy, representing one of the main reasons for urological claims. METHODS: Data were analyzed from personal majority policy and from the public sector of Catalonia (Spain), as well as data from the main medical civil liability insurance firm at healthcare centers in France in the period from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2018. RESULTS: Fifty Spanish and 51 French cases were analyzed. Statistical differences were logged in the two settings analyzed in performing ultrasounds, in the area where primary care was provided and with regard to settlement amounts. Diagnosis was late in 76.2% of cases. DISCUSSION: The medical action time from the onset of symptoms and Doppler testicular ultrasound in cases of questionable differential diagnoses is key to prognoses to save the testicles. Properly filling out the emergency report and the rest of medical records are essential for receiving correct medical care and defending possible claims.


Assuntos
Imperícia , Torção do Cordão Espermático , Masculino , Humanos , Espanha , Torção do Cordão Espermático/diagnóstico por imagem , Torção do Cordão Espermático/cirurgia , Orquiectomia , Diagnóstico Diferencial
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA