Prevalence, Clinical Characteristics, and Management of Episodic Dyspnea in Advanced Lung Cancer Outpatients: A Multicenter Nationwide Study-The INSPIRA-DOS Study.

Background: Episodic dyspnea (ED) is a common problem in patients with advanced lung cancer (LC). However, the prevalence of ED and other related aspects in this patient population is not known. Objectives: To assess and describe the prevalence, clinical features, treatment, and risk factors for ED in outpatients with advanced LC. Design: Multicenter cross-sectional study. Subjects: Consecutive sample of adult outpatients with advanced LC. Measurements: We assessed background dyspnea (BD), the characteristics, triggers, and management of ED. Potential ED risk factors were assessed through multivariate logistic regression. Results: A total of 366 patients were surveyed. Overall, the prevalence of ED was 31.9% (90% in patients reporting BD). Patients reported a median of one episode per day (interquartile range [IQR]: 1-2), with a median intensity of 7/10 (IQR: 5-8.25). ED triggers were identified in 89.9% of patients. ED was significantly associated with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (p = 0.011), pulmonary vascular disease (p = 0.003), cachexia (p = 0.002), and palliative care (p < 0.001). Continuous oxygen use was associated with higher risk of ED (odds ratio: 9.89; p < 0.001). Opioids were used by 44% patients with ED. Conclusions: ED is highly prevalent and severe in outpatients with advanced LC experiencing BD. The association between intrathoracic comorbidities and oxygen therapy points to alveolar oxygen exchange failure having a potential etiopathogenic role in ED in this population. Further studies are needed to better characterize ED in LC to better inform treatments and trial protocols.

Prevalence of the need for sodium intake restriction and the use of laxatives in palliative patients.

BACKGROUND: palliative patients usually have diseases that require a restriction of dietary sodium, although the prevalence of this requirement is unknown. Such conditions, combined with constipation, may mean that the use of laxatives with electrolytes should be avoided. OBJECTIVES: to ascertain the prevalence of the need to restrict sodium intake in palliative patients and to analyze the prevalence of constipation and the use of laxatives, including those containing sodium. METHOD: this was a multicenter retrospective, descriptive, cross-sectional, epidemiological study of both inpatients and outpatients over 18 years of age treated at the palliative care clinic (June 2015-March 2016). Demographic and anthropometric characteristics, diseases associated with dietary sodium restriction and treatments administered were recorded. RESULTS: the study sample consisted of 400 palliative patients, with a mean age of 77.8 ± 13.0 years and 52.2% were male. Of these, 68.3% were inpatients and 31.8% were outpatients. Comorbidities requiring low sodium or a sodium-free diet were found in 87.0% (95% CI: 83.3-90.0) of cases. Only 46.5% (95% CI: 41.5-51.5) of patients had been prescribed a low salt diet. It should be noted that 50.5% (95% CI: 45.5-55.5) of patients required a low sodium diet and suffered from constipation. Laxatives (polyethylene glycol or lactulose-rich products [PEG] with electrolytes in 54% of cases) were taken by 53.8% (95% CI: 48.7-58.7) of patients, 52.1% due to constipation and 42.3% as a prevention due to opioid treatment. CONCLUSIONS: a high proportion of the study cohort (87%) had some condition that required dietary sodium restriction and at least half the patients had constipation. The use of laxatives to treat or prevent constipation is common in palliative patients. A sodium-free laxative is therefore preferred in these patients.

Valoración ética de la craneoplastia con vendaje compresivo como forma de limitación de tratamientos de soporte vital / Valoração ética da cranioplastia com curativo compressivo como forma de limitação de tratamentos de suporte vital / Ethical value of cranioplasty with oppressive binder as a way of limiting life support treatments

Este artículo analiza, desde una postura crítica, la utilización de la craneoplastia de compresión con vendaje como método de limitación de tratamiento de soporte vital (LTSV). Con esta técnica activa, algunos autores han propuesto provocar la muerte encefálica, posibilitando la donación de órganos. Al contrastar este procedimiento con las recomendaciones del documento de consenso sobre el tratamiento al final de la vida del paciente crítico, elaborado por el grupo de bioética de la SEMICYUC, se comprueba que los medios y fines de esta técnica no encajan con las actuaciones propias de la LTSV, que se basan en la retirada de medios de soporte vital o en su no inicio, al considerar dichos medios desproporcionados o extraordinarios en algunos casos, evitando así la obstinación terapéutica. La definición de LTSV permite clarificar los límites en los que, de un modo éticamente correcto y consensuado, las actuaciones al final de la vida se circunscriben a los fines de la medicina, evitando la sospecha de que dichas actuaciones puedan ser malinterpretadas como justificación para una obtención de órganos abusiva. El artículo concluye que la provocación directa de la muerte encefálica mediante la técnica de craneoplastia con vendaje no parece cumplir los criterios propios de la LTSV.

This article analyzes, from a critical perspective, the use of cranioplasty with oppressive binder as a method to limit life support treatment (LLST). Some authors have proposed that this active technique provokes encephalic death, allowing organ donation. Contrasting this procedure with the recommendations of the consent document about treatment of critical patients at the end of life, elaborated by the bioethics group of SEMICYUC, it is shown that the means and ends of this technique do not match with the proper actions of LLST, based on the withdrawal of life support means or in not starting them, considering such means disproportionate or extraordinary in some cases, thus avoiding the therapeutic obstinacy. The definition of LLST allows to clarify the limits in which, in a way ethically fair and with a consensus, the acts at the end of life are included in the medical goals, avoiding the suspicion that these acts may be misinterpreted as justifying an abusive extraction of organs. This article concludes that the direct provocation of encephalic death by the technique of cranioplasty with binder does not appear to fulfill the criteria proper of LLST.

Este artigo analisa, a partir de uma postura crítica, a utilização da cranioplastia de compressão com curativo como método de limitação de tratamento de suporte vital (LTSV). Com esta técnica ativa, alguns autores têm proposto provocar a morte encefálica, possibilitando a doação de órgãos. Ao contrastar este procedimento com as recomendações do documento de consenso sobre o tratamento do final de vida do paciente crítico, elaborado pelo grupo de bioética da SEMICYUC, se comprova que os meios e fins desta técnica não encaixam com as atuações próprias da LTSV, que se baseiam na retirada de meios de suporte vital ou em seu não início, ao considerar os ditos meios desproporcionados ou extraordinários em alguns casos, evitando assim a obstinação terapêutica. A definição de LTSV permite esclarecer os limites nos quais, de um modo eticamente correto e aceito, as atuações ao final da vida se circunscrevem às finalidades da medicina, evitando a suspeita de que ditas atuações podem ser mal interpretadas como justificativa para uma obtenção de órgãos abusiva. O artigo conclui que a provocação direta da morte encefálica mediante a técnica da cranioplastia com curativo não parece cumprir os critérios próprios da LTSV.

Valoración ética de la craneoplastia con vendaje compresivo como forma de limitación de tratamientos de soporte vital / Ethical value of cranioplasty with oppressive binder as a way of limiting life support treatments

Este artículo analiza, desde una postura crítica, la utilización de la craneoplastia de compresión con vendaje como método de limitación de tratamiento de soporte vital (LTSV). Con esta técnica activa, algunos autores han propuesto provo- car la muerte encefálica, posibilitando la donación de órganos. Al contrastar este procedimiento con las recomendaciones del documento de consenso sobre el tratamiento al final de la vida del paciente crítico, elaborado por el grupo de bioética de la SEMICYUC, se comprueba que los medios y fines de esta técnica no encajan con las actuaciones propias de la LTSV, que se basan en la retirada de medios de soporte vital o en su no inicio, al considerar dichos medios desproporcionados o extraordinarios en algunos casos, evitando así la obstinación terapéutica. La definición de LTSV permite clarificar los límites en los que, de un modo éticamente correcto y consensuado, las actuaciones al final de la vida se circunscriben a los fines de la medicina, evitando la sospecha de que dichas actuaciones puedan ser malinterpretadas como justificación para una obtención de órganos abusiva. El artículo concluye que la provocación directa de la muerte encefálica mediante la técnica de craneoplastia con vendaje no parece cumplir los criterios propios de la LTSV.(AU)

This article analyzes, from a critical perspective, the use of cranioplasty with oppressive binder as a method to limit life support treatment (LLST). Some authors have proposed that this active technique provokes encephalic death, allowing organ donation. Contrasting this procedure with the recommendations of the consent document about treatment of critical patients at the end of life, elaborated by the bioethics group of SEMICYUC, it is shown that the means and ends of this technique do not match with the proper actions of LLST, based on the withdrawal of life support means or in not starting them, considering such means disproportionate or extraordinary in some cases, thus avoiding the therapeutic obstinacy. The definition of LLST allows to clarify the limits in which, in a way ethically fair and with a consensus, the acts at the end of life are included in the medical goals, avoiding the suspicion that these acts may be misinterpreted as justifying an abusive extraction of organs. This article concludes that the direct provocation of encephalic death by the technique of cranioplasty with binder does not appear to fulfill the criteria proper of LLST.(AU)

Este artigo analisa, a partir de uma postura crítica, a utilização da cranioplastia de compressão com curativo como método de limitação de tratamento de suporte vital (LTSV). Com esta técnica ativa, alguns autores têm proposto provocar a morte encefálica, possibilitando a doação de órgãos. Ao contrastar este procedimento com as recomendações do documento de consenso sobre o tratamento do final de vida do paciente crítico, elaborado pelo grupo de bioética da SEMICYUC, se comprova que os meios e fins desta técnica não encaixam com as atuações próprias da LTSV, que se baseiam na retirada de meios de suporte vital ou em seu não início, ao considerar os ditos meios desproporcionados ou extraordinários em alguns casos, evitando assim a obstinação terapêutica. A definição de LTSV permite esclarecer os limites nos quais, de um modo eticamente correto e aceito, as atuações ao final da vida se circunscrevem às finalidades da medicina, evitando a suspeita de que ditas atuações podem ser mal interpretadas como justificativa para uma obtenção de órgãos abusiva. O artigo conclui que a provocação direta da morte encefálica mediante a técnica da cranioplastia com curativo não parece cumprir os critérios próprios da LTSV.(AU)